Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial
The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Toxicology (Amsterdam) 1996-04, Vol.108 (1), p.141-152 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 152 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Toxicology (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Loveless, Scott E. Ladies, Gregory S. Gerberick, G.Frank Ryan, Cindy A. Basketter, David A. Scholes, Edward W. House, Robert V. Hilton, Jennifer Dearman, Rebecca J. Kimber, Ian |
description | The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated using seven test materials in five independent laboratories. The additional chemicals examined here included compounds which are considered less potent allergens than some of those tested in the first phase of the investigation, and includes hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a chemical recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as a positive control for skin sensitization studies. In each laboratory all skin sensitizing chemicals examined (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), HCA, oxazolone, isoeugenol and eugenol) elicited positive responses of comparable magnitude as judged by the derived lowest concentration of test chemical required to elicit a 3-fold or greater increase in the proliferative activity of draining lymph node cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. We observed that sodium lauryl sulphate, considered to be a non-sensitizing skin irritant, also induced a positive response in the assay.
Para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA), a nonsensitizing chemical, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Some laboratories incorporated minor modifications into the standard assay procedure, including the evaluation of lymph nodes pooled from individual mice rather than treatment groups and the use of statistical analyses. The use of statistics did not markedly change the determination of the lowest concentration yielding a positive response. These data confirm that the local lymph node assay is robust and yields equivalent results when performed independently. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17052793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0300483X9503279O</els_id><sourcerecordid>17052793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-600f3171f9bb88b6edb41b4eeef2661b41383758d090ad0e158f1503cbda679a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLAzEUx4MoWpdvoJCDiB5GX5pZMhdBxA2EXhS8hUzmhUanSU1mCv32pgs9esrL-y88foScM7hlwMo74ABZLvjXdV3cAB9XdTbZIyMm0sCZKPbJaGc5IscxfgPAmOflITkUZZ4zNh6Rn-ch9FMMFBeqG1RvvaPe0LSindeqo91yNp9S51ukKka1pNatVWNdUudTFXEVUC4JPQa3rkiK9l2nGh_Sf4G0D1Z1p-TAqC7i2fY9IZ_PTx-Pr9n75OXt8eE90wXUfVYCGM4qZuqmEaIpsW1y1uSIaMZlmSbGBa8K0UINqgVkhTCsAK6bVpVVrfgJudr0zoP_HTD2cmajxnSPQz9EySooEi2ejPnGqIOPMaCR82BnKiwlA7liLFcA5QqgrAu5ZiwnKXax7R-aGba70BZq0i-3uooJoQnKaRt3Ng6c1Tkk2_3GhonFwmKQUVt0GlsbUPey9fb_O_4APiiZZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17052793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Loveless, Scott E. ; Ladies, Gregory S. ; Gerberick, G.Frank ; Ryan, Cindy A. ; Basketter, David A. ; Scholes, Edward W. ; House, Robert V. ; Hilton, Jennifer ; Dearman, Rebecca J. ; Kimber, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Loveless, Scott E. ; Ladies, Gregory S. ; Gerberick, G.Frank ; Ryan, Cindy A. ; Basketter, David A. ; Scholes, Edward W. ; House, Robert V. ; Hilton, Jennifer ; Dearman, Rebecca J. ; Kimber, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated using seven test materials in five independent laboratories. The additional chemicals examined here included compounds which are considered less potent allergens than some of those tested in the first phase of the investigation, and includes hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a chemical recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as a positive control for skin sensitization studies. In each laboratory all skin sensitizing chemicals examined (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), HCA, oxazolone, isoeugenol and eugenol) elicited positive responses of comparable magnitude as judged by the derived lowest concentration of test chemical required to elicit a 3-fold or greater increase in the proliferative activity of draining lymph node cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. We observed that sodium lauryl sulphate, considered to be a non-sensitizing skin irritant, also induced a positive response in the assay.
Para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA), a nonsensitizing chemical, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Some laboratories incorporated minor modifications into the standard assay procedure, including the evaluation of lymph nodes pooled from individual mice rather than treatment groups and the use of statistical analyses. The use of statistics did not markedly change the determination of the lowest concentration yielding a positive response. These data confirm that the local lymph node assay is robust and yields equivalent results when performed independently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-483X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3185</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8644112</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TXICDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical allergens ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; General aspects. Methods ; Hypersensitivity ; International Cooperation ; Irritants - administration & dosage ; Irritants - toxicity ; Local lymph node assay ; Lymph Nodes - drug effects ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred CBA ; Predictive testing ; Skin sensitization ; Skin Tests - methods ; Toxicity Tests - methods ; Toxicology ; United Kingdom ; United States</subject><ispartof>Toxicology (Amsterdam), 1996-04, Vol.108 (1), p.141-152</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-600f3171f9bb88b6edb41b4eeef2661b41383758d090ad0e158f1503cbda679a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-600f3171f9bb88b6edb41b4eeef2661b41383758d090ad0e158f1503cbda679a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3031940$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8644112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loveless, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladies, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerberick, G.Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Cindy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basketter, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholes, Edward W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearman, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimber, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial</title><title>Toxicology (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Toxicology</addtitle><description>The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated using seven test materials in five independent laboratories. The additional chemicals examined here included compounds which are considered less potent allergens than some of those tested in the first phase of the investigation, and includes hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a chemical recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as a positive control for skin sensitization studies. In each laboratory all skin sensitizing chemicals examined (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), HCA, oxazolone, isoeugenol and eugenol) elicited positive responses of comparable magnitude as judged by the derived lowest concentration of test chemical required to elicit a 3-fold or greater increase in the proliferative activity of draining lymph node cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. We observed that sodium lauryl sulphate, considered to be a non-sensitizing skin irritant, also induced a positive response in the assay.
Para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA), a nonsensitizing chemical, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Some laboratories incorporated minor modifications into the standard assay procedure, including the evaluation of lymph nodes pooled from individual mice rather than treatment groups and the use of statistical analyses. The use of statistics did not markedly change the determination of the lowest concentration yielding a positive response. These data confirm that the local lymph node assay is robust and yields equivalent results when performed independently.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical allergens</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects. Methods</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Irritants - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Irritants - toxicity</subject><subject>Local lymph node assay</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - drug effects</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred CBA</subject><subject>Predictive testing</subject><subject>Skin sensitization</subject><subject>Skin Tests - methods</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0300-483X</issn><issn>1879-3185</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElLAzEUx4MoWpdvoJCDiB5GX5pZMhdBxA2EXhS8hUzmhUanSU1mCv32pgs9esrL-y88foScM7hlwMo74ABZLvjXdV3cAB9XdTbZIyMm0sCZKPbJaGc5IscxfgPAmOflITkUZZ4zNh6Rn-ch9FMMFBeqG1RvvaPe0LSindeqo91yNp9S51ukKka1pNatVWNdUudTFXEVUC4JPQa3rkiK9l2nGh_Sf4G0D1Z1p-TAqC7i2fY9IZ_PTx-Pr9n75OXt8eE90wXUfVYCGM4qZuqmEaIpsW1y1uSIaMZlmSbGBa8K0UINqgVkhTCsAK6bVpVVrfgJudr0zoP_HTD2cmajxnSPQz9EySooEi2ejPnGqIOPMaCR82BnKiwlA7liLFcA5QqgrAu5ZiwnKXax7R-aGba70BZq0i-3uooJoQnKaRt3Ng6c1Tkk2_3GhonFwmKQUVt0GlsbUPey9fb_O_4APiiZZw</recordid><startdate>19960415</startdate><enddate>19960415</enddate><creator>Loveless, Scott E.</creator><creator>Ladies, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Gerberick, G.Frank</creator><creator>Ryan, Cindy A.</creator><creator>Basketter, David A.</creator><creator>Scholes, Edward W.</creator><creator>House, Robert V.</creator><creator>Hilton, Jennifer</creator><creator>Dearman, Rebecca J.</creator><creator>Kimber, Ian</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960415</creationdate><title>Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial</title><author>Loveless, Scott E. ; Ladies, Gregory S. ; Gerberick, G.Frank ; Ryan, Cindy A. ; Basketter, David A. ; Scholes, Edward W. ; House, Robert V. ; Hilton, Jennifer ; Dearman, Rebecca J. ; Kimber, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-600f3171f9bb88b6edb41b4eeef2661b41383758d090ad0e158f1503cbda679a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical allergens</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects. Methods</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Irritants - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Irritants - toxicity</topic><topic>Local lymph node assay</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - drug effects</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred CBA</topic><topic>Predictive testing</topic><topic>Skin sensitization</topic><topic>Skin Tests - methods</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loveless, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladies, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerberick, G.Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Cindy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basketter, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholes, Edward W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearman, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimber, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Toxicology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loveless, Scott E.</au><au>Ladies, Gregory S.</au><au>Gerberick, G.Frank</au><au>Ryan, Cindy A.</au><au>Basketter, David A.</au><au>Scholes, Edward W.</au><au>House, Robert V.</au><au>Hilton, Jennifer</au><au>Dearman, Rebecca J.</au><au>Kimber, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicology</addtitle><date>1996-04-15</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>141-152</pages><issn>0300-483X</issn><eissn>1879-3185</eissn><coden>TXICDD</coden><abstract>The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated using seven test materials in five independent laboratories. The additional chemicals examined here included compounds which are considered less potent allergens than some of those tested in the first phase of the investigation, and includes hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a chemical recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as a positive control for skin sensitization studies. In each laboratory all skin sensitizing chemicals examined (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), HCA, oxazolone, isoeugenol and eugenol) elicited positive responses of comparable magnitude as judged by the derived lowest concentration of test chemical required to elicit a 3-fold or greater increase in the proliferative activity of draining lymph node cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. We observed that sodium lauryl sulphate, considered to be a non-sensitizing skin irritant, also induced a positive response in the assay.
Para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA), a nonsensitizing chemical, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Some laboratories incorporated minor modifications into the standard assay procedure, including the evaluation of lymph nodes pooled from individual mice rather than treatment groups and the use of statistical analyses. The use of statistics did not markedly change the determination of the lowest concentration yielding a positive response. These data confirm that the local lymph node assay is robust and yields equivalent results when performed independently.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8644112</pmid><doi>10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-483X |
ispartof | Toxicology (Amsterdam), 1996-04, Vol.108 (1), p.141-152 |
issn | 0300-483X 1879-3185 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17052793 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Chemical allergens Data Interpretation, Statistical Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Evaluation Studies as Topic Female General aspects. Methods Hypersensitivity International Cooperation Irritants - administration & dosage Irritants - toxicity Local lymph node assay Lymph Nodes - drug effects Lymph Nodes - pathology Medical sciences Mice Mice, Inbred CBA Predictive testing Skin sensitization Skin Tests - methods Toxicity Tests - methods Toxicology United Kingdom United States |
title | Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A21%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Further%20evaluation%20of%20the%20local%20lymph%20node%20assay%20in%20the%20final%20phase%20of%20an%20international%20collaborative%20trial&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Loveless,%20Scott%20E.&rft.date=1996-04-15&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=141-152&rft.issn=0300-483X&rft.eissn=1879-3185&rft.coden=TXICDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17052793%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17052793&rft_id=info:pmid/8644112&rft_els_id=0300483X9503279O&rfr_iscdi=true |