Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicology (Amsterdam) 1996-04, Vol.108 (1), p.141-152
Hauptverfasser: Loveless, Scott E., Ladies, Gregory S., Gerberick, G.Frank, Ryan, Cindy A., Basketter, David A., Scholes, Edward W., House, Robert V., Hilton, Jennifer, Dearman, Rebecca J., Kimber, Ian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue 1
container_start_page 141
container_title Toxicology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 108
creator Loveless, Scott E.
Ladies, Gregory S.
Gerberick, G.Frank
Ryan, Cindy A.
Basketter, David A.
Scholes, Edward W.
House, Robert V.
Hilton, Jennifer
Dearman, Rebecca J.
Kimber, Ian
description The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated using seven test materials in five independent laboratories. The additional chemicals examined here included compounds which are considered less potent allergens than some of those tested in the first phase of the investigation, and includes hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a chemical recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as a positive control for skin sensitization studies. In each laboratory all skin sensitizing chemicals examined (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), HCA, oxazolone, isoeugenol and eugenol) elicited positive responses of comparable magnitude as judged by the derived lowest concentration of test chemical required to elicit a 3-fold or greater increase in the proliferative activity of draining lymph node cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. We observed that sodium lauryl sulphate, considered to be a non-sensitizing skin irritant, also induced a positive response in the assay. Para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA), a nonsensitizing chemical, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Some laboratories incorporated minor modifications into the standard assay procedure, including the evaluation of lymph nodes pooled from individual mice rather than treatment groups and the use of statistical analyses. The use of statistics did not markedly change the determination of the lowest concentration yielding a positive response. These data confirm that the local lymph node assay is robust and yields equivalent results when performed independently.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17052793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0300483X9503279O</els_id><sourcerecordid>17052793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-600f3171f9bb88b6edb41b4eeef2661b41383758d090ad0e158f1503cbda679a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLAzEUx4MoWpdvoJCDiB5GX5pZMhdBxA2EXhS8hUzmhUanSU1mCv32pgs9esrL-y88foScM7hlwMo74ABZLvjXdV3cAB9XdTbZIyMm0sCZKPbJaGc5IscxfgPAmOflITkUZZ4zNh6Rn-ch9FMMFBeqG1RvvaPe0LSindeqo91yNp9S51ukKka1pNatVWNdUudTFXEVUC4JPQa3rkiK9l2nGh_Sf4G0D1Z1p-TAqC7i2fY9IZ_PTx-Pr9n75OXt8eE90wXUfVYCGM4qZuqmEaIpsW1y1uSIaMZlmSbGBa8K0UINqgVkhTCsAK6bVpVVrfgJudr0zoP_HTD2cmajxnSPQz9EySooEi2ejPnGqIOPMaCR82BnKiwlA7liLFcA5QqgrAu5ZiwnKXax7R-aGba70BZq0i-3uooJoQnKaRt3Ng6c1Tkk2_3GhonFwmKQUVt0GlsbUPey9fb_O_4APiiZZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17052793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Loveless, Scott E. ; Ladies, Gregory S. ; Gerberick, G.Frank ; Ryan, Cindy A. ; Basketter, David A. ; Scholes, Edward W. ; House, Robert V. ; Hilton, Jennifer ; Dearman, Rebecca J. ; Kimber, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Loveless, Scott E. ; Ladies, Gregory S. ; Gerberick, G.Frank ; Ryan, Cindy A. ; Basketter, David A. ; Scholes, Edward W. ; House, Robert V. ; Hilton, Jennifer ; Dearman, Rebecca J. ; Kimber, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated using seven test materials in five independent laboratories. The additional chemicals examined here included compounds which are considered less potent allergens than some of those tested in the first phase of the investigation, and includes hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a chemical recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as a positive control for skin sensitization studies. In each laboratory all skin sensitizing chemicals examined (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), HCA, oxazolone, isoeugenol and eugenol) elicited positive responses of comparable magnitude as judged by the derived lowest concentration of test chemical required to elicit a 3-fold or greater increase in the proliferative activity of draining lymph node cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. We observed that sodium lauryl sulphate, considered to be a non-sensitizing skin irritant, also induced a positive response in the assay. Para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA), a nonsensitizing chemical, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Some laboratories incorporated minor modifications into the standard assay procedure, including the evaluation of lymph nodes pooled from individual mice rather than treatment groups and the use of statistical analyses. The use of statistics did not markedly change the determination of the lowest concentration yielding a positive response. These data confirm that the local lymph node assay is robust and yields equivalent results when performed independently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-483X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3185</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8644112</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TXICDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical allergens ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; General aspects. Methods ; Hypersensitivity ; International Cooperation ; Irritants - administration &amp; dosage ; Irritants - toxicity ; Local lymph node assay ; Lymph Nodes - drug effects ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred CBA ; Predictive testing ; Skin sensitization ; Skin Tests - methods ; Toxicity Tests - methods ; Toxicology ; United Kingdom ; United States</subject><ispartof>Toxicology (Amsterdam), 1996-04, Vol.108 (1), p.141-152</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-600f3171f9bb88b6edb41b4eeef2661b41383758d090ad0e158f1503cbda679a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-600f3171f9bb88b6edb41b4eeef2661b41383758d090ad0e158f1503cbda679a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3031940$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8644112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loveless, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladies, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerberick, G.Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Cindy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basketter, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholes, Edward W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearman, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimber, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial</title><title>Toxicology (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Toxicology</addtitle><description>The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated using seven test materials in five independent laboratories. The additional chemicals examined here included compounds which are considered less potent allergens than some of those tested in the first phase of the investigation, and includes hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a chemical recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as a positive control for skin sensitization studies. In each laboratory all skin sensitizing chemicals examined (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), HCA, oxazolone, isoeugenol and eugenol) elicited positive responses of comparable magnitude as judged by the derived lowest concentration of test chemical required to elicit a 3-fold or greater increase in the proliferative activity of draining lymph node cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. We observed that sodium lauryl sulphate, considered to be a non-sensitizing skin irritant, also induced a positive response in the assay. Para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA), a nonsensitizing chemical, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Some laboratories incorporated minor modifications into the standard assay procedure, including the evaluation of lymph nodes pooled from individual mice rather than treatment groups and the use of statistical analyses. The use of statistics did not markedly change the determination of the lowest concentration yielding a positive response. These data confirm that the local lymph node assay is robust and yields equivalent results when performed independently.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical allergens</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects. Methods</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Irritants - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Irritants - toxicity</subject><subject>Local lymph node assay</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - drug effects</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred CBA</subject><subject>Predictive testing</subject><subject>Skin sensitization</subject><subject>Skin Tests - methods</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0300-483X</issn><issn>1879-3185</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElLAzEUx4MoWpdvoJCDiB5GX5pZMhdBxA2EXhS8hUzmhUanSU1mCv32pgs9esrL-y88foScM7hlwMo74ABZLvjXdV3cAB9XdTbZIyMm0sCZKPbJaGc5IscxfgPAmOflITkUZZ4zNh6Rn-ch9FMMFBeqG1RvvaPe0LSindeqo91yNp9S51ukKka1pNatVWNdUudTFXEVUC4JPQa3rkiK9l2nGh_Sf4G0D1Z1p-TAqC7i2fY9IZ_PTx-Pr9n75OXt8eE90wXUfVYCGM4qZuqmEaIpsW1y1uSIaMZlmSbGBa8K0UINqgVkhTCsAK6bVpVVrfgJudr0zoP_HTD2cmajxnSPQz9EySooEi2ejPnGqIOPMaCR82BnKiwlA7liLFcA5QqgrAu5ZiwnKXax7R-aGba70BZq0i-3uooJoQnKaRt3Ng6c1Tkk2_3GhonFwmKQUVt0GlsbUPey9fb_O_4APiiZZw</recordid><startdate>19960415</startdate><enddate>19960415</enddate><creator>Loveless, Scott E.</creator><creator>Ladies, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Gerberick, G.Frank</creator><creator>Ryan, Cindy A.</creator><creator>Basketter, David A.</creator><creator>Scholes, Edward W.</creator><creator>House, Robert V.</creator><creator>Hilton, Jennifer</creator><creator>Dearman, Rebecca J.</creator><creator>Kimber, Ian</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960415</creationdate><title>Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial</title><author>Loveless, Scott E. ; Ladies, Gregory S. ; Gerberick, G.Frank ; Ryan, Cindy A. ; Basketter, David A. ; Scholes, Edward W. ; House, Robert V. ; Hilton, Jennifer ; Dearman, Rebecca J. ; Kimber, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-600f3171f9bb88b6edb41b4eeef2661b41383758d090ad0e158f1503cbda679a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical allergens</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects. Methods</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Irritants - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Irritants - toxicity</topic><topic>Local lymph node assay</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - drug effects</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred CBA</topic><topic>Predictive testing</topic><topic>Skin sensitization</topic><topic>Skin Tests - methods</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loveless, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladies, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerberick, G.Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Cindy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basketter, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholes, Edward W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, Robert V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilton, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dearman, Rebecca J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimber, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Toxicology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loveless, Scott E.</au><au>Ladies, Gregory S.</au><au>Gerberick, G.Frank</au><au>Ryan, Cindy A.</au><au>Basketter, David A.</au><au>Scholes, Edward W.</au><au>House, Robert V.</au><au>Hilton, Jennifer</au><au>Dearman, Rebecca J.</au><au>Kimber, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicology</addtitle><date>1996-04-15</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>141-152</pages><issn>0300-483X</issn><eissn>1879-3185</eissn><coden>TXICDD</coden><abstract>The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a method used for the prospective identification in mice of chemicals that have the potential to cause skin sensitization. We report here the results of the second and final phase of an international trial in which the performance of the assay has been evaluated using seven test materials in five independent laboratories. The additional chemicals examined here included compounds which are considered less potent allergens than some of those tested in the first phase of the investigation, and includes hexylcinnamic aldehyde (HCA), a chemical recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as a positive control for skin sensitization studies. In each laboratory all skin sensitizing chemicals examined (2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), HCA, oxazolone, isoeugenol and eugenol) elicited positive responses of comparable magnitude as judged by the derived lowest concentration of test chemical required to elicit a 3-fold or greater increase in the proliferative activity of draining lymph node cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. We observed that sodium lauryl sulphate, considered to be a non-sensitizing skin irritant, also induced a positive response in the assay. Para-aminobenzoic acid (pABA), a nonsensitizing chemical, was negative at all test concentrations in each laboratory. Some laboratories incorporated minor modifications into the standard assay procedure, including the evaluation of lymph nodes pooled from individual mice rather than treatment groups and the use of statistical analyses. The use of statistics did not markedly change the determination of the lowest concentration yielding a positive response. These data confirm that the local lymph node assay is robust and yields equivalent results when performed independently.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8644112</pmid><doi>10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-483X
ispartof Toxicology (Amsterdam), 1996-04, Vol.108 (1), p.141-152
issn 0300-483X
1879-3185
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17052793
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical allergens
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - immunology
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
General aspects. Methods
Hypersensitivity
International Cooperation
Irritants - administration & dosage
Irritants - toxicity
Local lymph node assay
Lymph Nodes - drug effects
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Medical sciences
Mice
Mice, Inbred CBA
Predictive testing
Skin sensitization
Skin Tests - methods
Toxicity Tests - methods
Toxicology
United Kingdom
United States
title Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T09%3A21%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Further%20evaluation%20of%20the%20local%20lymph%20node%20assay%20in%20the%20final%20phase%20of%20an%20international%20collaborative%20trial&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Loveless,%20Scott%20E.&rft.date=1996-04-15&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=141-152&rft.issn=0300-483X&rft.eissn=1879-3185&rft.coden=TXICDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0300-483X(95)03279-O&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17052793%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17052793&rft_id=info:pmid/8644112&rft_els_id=0300483X9503279O&rfr_iscdi=true