The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer
Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2015-08, Vol.62 (2), p.440-451 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 451 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 440 |
container_title | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Roayaie, Sasan Jibara, Ghalib Tabrizian, Parissa Park, Joong‐Won Yang, Jijin Yan, Lunan Schwartz, Myron Han, Guohong Izzo, Francesco Chen, Mishan Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric Johnson, Philip Kudo, Masatoshi Roberts, Lewis R. Sherman, Morris |
description | Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin >1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (Hepatology 2015;62:440–451 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hep.27745 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705075886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3751579501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-1ce5775e8cc9b92c8df40c0cea7c394938734cee4f4b516c8ea7875e71c23a543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUwPEgis7pwX9ACl700Pnyq0mOMnQTBD3Mc8mer6zStTNpEf97o1MPgnjKIR--JO8xdsJhwgHE5Yo2E2GM0jtsxLUwuZQadtkIhIHccekO2GGMzwDglLD77EDowlhRyBGbLVaUha6hrKuy1PF9jVmgSNjXXZvVbdYn0Afy_Zra_kd1SE0zND5k6FukcMT2Kt9EOv46x-zx5noxned397Pb6dVdjloInXMkbYwmi-iWTqB9qhQgIHmD0iknrZEKiVSllpoXaNOFTd5wFNJrJcfsfNvdhO5loNiX6zp-vMW31A2x5AY0GG1t8T8tnHUFgBKJnv2iz90Q2vSRTwWqUMokdbFVGLoYA1XlJtRrH95KDuXHIso0mvJzEcmefhWH5ZqefuT35BO43ILXuqG3v0vl_Pphm3wHwRGQSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1698046447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Roayaie, Sasan ; Jibara, Ghalib ; Tabrizian, Parissa ; Park, Joong‐Won ; Yang, Jijin ; Yan, Lunan ; Schwartz, Myron ; Han, Guohong ; Izzo, Francesco ; Chen, Mishan ; Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric ; Johnson, Philip ; Kudo, Masatoshi ; Roberts, Lewis R. ; Sherman, Morris</creator><creatorcontrib>Roayaie, Sasan ; Jibara, Ghalib ; Tabrizian, Parissa ; Park, Joong‐Won ; Yang, Jijin ; Yan, Lunan ; Schwartz, Myron ; Han, Guohong ; Izzo, Francesco ; Chen, Mishan ; Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric ; Johnson, Philip ; Kudo, Masatoshi ; Roberts, Lewis R. ; Sherman, Morris</creatorcontrib><description>Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin >1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (Hepatology 2015;62:440–451</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-9139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hep.27745</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25678263</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPTLD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Hepatectomy - mortality ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Liver cancer ; Liver cirrhosis ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Liver Neoplasms - mortality ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Patient Selection ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; United States</subject><ispartof>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2015-08, Vol.62 (2), p.440-451</ispartof><rights>2015 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases</rights><rights>2015 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-1ce5775e8cc9b92c8df40c0cea7c394938734cee4f4b516c8ea7875e71c23a543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-1ce5775e8cc9b92c8df40c0cea7c394938734cee4f4b516c8ea7875e71c23a543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhep.27745$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhep.27745$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roayaie, Sasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibara, Ghalib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabrizian, Parissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Joong‐Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Lunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Myron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Guohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izzo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Mishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Lewis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Morris</creatorcontrib><title>The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer</title><title>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><description>Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin >1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (Hepatology 2015;62:440–451</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0270-9139</issn><issn>1527-3350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUwPEgis7pwX9ACl700Pnyq0mOMnQTBD3Mc8mer6zStTNpEf97o1MPgnjKIR--JO8xdsJhwgHE5Yo2E2GM0jtsxLUwuZQadtkIhIHccekO2GGMzwDglLD77EDowlhRyBGbLVaUha6hrKuy1PF9jVmgSNjXXZvVbdYn0Afy_Zra_kd1SE0zND5k6FukcMT2Kt9EOv46x-zx5noxned397Pb6dVdjloInXMkbYwmi-iWTqB9qhQgIHmD0iknrZEKiVSllpoXaNOFTd5wFNJrJcfsfNvdhO5loNiX6zp-vMW31A2x5AY0GG1t8T8tnHUFgBKJnv2iz90Q2vSRTwWqUMokdbFVGLoYA1XlJtRrH95KDuXHIso0mvJzEcmefhWH5ZqefuT35BO43ILXuqG3v0vl_Pphm3wHwRGQSA</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Roayaie, Sasan</creator><creator>Jibara, Ghalib</creator><creator>Tabrizian, Parissa</creator><creator>Park, Joong‐Won</creator><creator>Yang, Jijin</creator><creator>Yan, Lunan</creator><creator>Schwartz, Myron</creator><creator>Han, Guohong</creator><creator>Izzo, Francesco</creator><creator>Chen, Mishan</creator><creator>Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric</creator><creator>Johnson, Philip</creator><creator>Kudo, Masatoshi</creator><creator>Roberts, Lewis R.</creator><creator>Sherman, Morris</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer</title><author>Roayaie, Sasan ; Jibara, Ghalib ; Tabrizian, Parissa ; Park, Joong‐Won ; Yang, Jijin ; Yan, Lunan ; Schwartz, Myron ; Han, Guohong ; Izzo, Francesco ; Chen, Mishan ; Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric ; Johnson, Philip ; Kudo, Masatoshi ; Roberts, Lewis R. ; Sherman, Morris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-1ce5775e8cc9b92c8df40c0cea7c394938734cee4f4b516c8ea7875e71c23a543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roayaie, Sasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibara, Ghalib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabrizian, Parissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Joong‐Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Lunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Myron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Guohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izzo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Mishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Lewis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Morris</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roayaie, Sasan</au><au>Jibara, Ghalib</au><au>Tabrizian, Parissa</au><au>Park, Joong‐Won</au><au>Yang, Jijin</au><au>Yan, Lunan</au><au>Schwartz, Myron</au><au>Han, Guohong</au><au>Izzo, Francesco</au><au>Chen, Mishan</au><au>Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric</au><au>Johnson, Philip</au><au>Kudo, Masatoshi</au><au>Roberts, Lewis R.</au><au>Sherman, Morris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer</atitle><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>440</spage><epage>451</epage><pages>440-451</pages><issn>0270-9139</issn><eissn>1527-3350</eissn><coden>HPTLD9</coden><abstract>Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin >1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (Hepatology 2015;62:440–451</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</pub><pmid>25678263</pmid><doi>10.1002/hep.27745</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-9139 |
ispartof | Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2015-08, Vol.62 (2), p.440-451 |
issn | 0270-9139 1527-3350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705075886 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery Cohort Studies Confidence Intervals Disease-Free Survival Female Follow-Up Studies Hepatectomy - methods Hepatectomy - mortality Humans Hypertension Liver cancer Liver cirrhosis Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis Liver Neoplasms - mortality Liver Neoplasms - surgery Male Middle Aged Mortality Multivariate Analysis Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology Neoplasm Staging Patient Selection Proportional Hazards Models Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Statistics, Nonparametric Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome United States |
title | The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20hepatic%20resection%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20hepatocellular%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Hepatology%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Roayaie,%20Sasan&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=440&rft.epage=451&rft.pages=440-451&rft.issn=0270-9139&rft.eissn=1527-3350&rft.coden=HPTLD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hep.27745&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3751579501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1698046447&rft_id=info:pmid/25678263&rfr_iscdi=true |