The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer

Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2015-08, Vol.62 (2), p.440-451
Hauptverfasser: Roayaie, Sasan, Jibara, Ghalib, Tabrizian, Parissa, Park, Joong‐Won, Yang, Jijin, Yan, Lunan, Schwartz, Myron, Han, Guohong, Izzo, Francesco, Chen, Mishan, Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric, Johnson, Philip, Kudo, Masatoshi, Roberts, Lewis R., Sherman, Morris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 451
container_issue 2
container_start_page 440
container_title Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
container_volume 62
creator Roayaie, Sasan
Jibara, Ghalib
Tabrizian, Parissa
Park, Joong‐Won
Yang, Jijin
Yan, Lunan
Schwartz, Myron
Han, Guohong
Izzo, Francesco
Chen, Mishan
Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric
Johnson, Philip
Kudo, Masatoshi
Roberts, Lewis R.
Sherman, Morris
description Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin >1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (Hepatology 2015;62:440–451
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hep.27745
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705075886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3751579501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-1ce5775e8cc9b92c8df40c0cea7c394938734cee4f4b516c8ea7875e71c23a543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUwPEgis7pwX9ACl700Pnyq0mOMnQTBD3Mc8mer6zStTNpEf97o1MPgnjKIR--JO8xdsJhwgHE5Yo2E2GM0jtsxLUwuZQadtkIhIHccekO2GGMzwDglLD77EDowlhRyBGbLVaUha6hrKuy1PF9jVmgSNjXXZvVbdYn0Afy_Zra_kd1SE0zND5k6FukcMT2Kt9EOv46x-zx5noxned397Pb6dVdjloInXMkbYwmi-iWTqB9qhQgIHmD0iknrZEKiVSllpoXaNOFTd5wFNJrJcfsfNvdhO5loNiX6zp-vMW31A2x5AY0GG1t8T8tnHUFgBKJnv2iz90Q2vSRTwWqUMokdbFVGLoYA1XlJtRrH95KDuXHIso0mvJzEcmefhWH5ZqefuT35BO43ILXuqG3v0vl_Pphm3wHwRGQSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1698046447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Roayaie, Sasan ; Jibara, Ghalib ; Tabrizian, Parissa ; Park, Joong‐Won ; Yang, Jijin ; Yan, Lunan ; Schwartz, Myron ; Han, Guohong ; Izzo, Francesco ; Chen, Mishan ; Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric ; Johnson, Philip ; Kudo, Masatoshi ; Roberts, Lewis R. ; Sherman, Morris</creator><creatorcontrib>Roayaie, Sasan ; Jibara, Ghalib ; Tabrizian, Parissa ; Park, Joong‐Won ; Yang, Jijin ; Yan, Lunan ; Schwartz, Myron ; Han, Guohong ; Izzo, Francesco ; Chen, Mishan ; Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric ; Johnson, Philip ; Kudo, Masatoshi ; Roberts, Lewis R. ; Sherman, Morris</creatorcontrib><description>Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin &gt;1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (Hepatology 2015;62:440–451</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-9139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hep.27745</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25678263</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPTLD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Confidence Intervals ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Hepatectomy - mortality ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Liver cancer ; Liver cirrhosis ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Liver Neoplasms - mortality ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Patient Selection ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; United States</subject><ispartof>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2015-08, Vol.62 (2), p.440-451</ispartof><rights>2015 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases</rights><rights>2015 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-1ce5775e8cc9b92c8df40c0cea7c394938734cee4f4b516c8ea7875e71c23a543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-1ce5775e8cc9b92c8df40c0cea7c394938734cee4f4b516c8ea7875e71c23a543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhep.27745$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhep.27745$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roayaie, Sasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibara, Ghalib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabrizian, Parissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Joong‐Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Lunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Myron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Guohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izzo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Mishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Lewis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Morris</creatorcontrib><title>The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer</title><title>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><description>Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin &gt;1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (Hepatology 2015;62:440–451</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0270-9139</issn><issn>1527-3350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9LwzAUwPEgis7pwX9ACl700Pnyq0mOMnQTBD3Mc8mer6zStTNpEf97o1MPgnjKIR--JO8xdsJhwgHE5Yo2E2GM0jtsxLUwuZQadtkIhIHccekO2GGMzwDglLD77EDowlhRyBGbLVaUha6hrKuy1PF9jVmgSNjXXZvVbdYn0Afy_Zra_kd1SE0zND5k6FukcMT2Kt9EOv46x-zx5noxned397Pb6dVdjloInXMkbYwmi-iWTqB9qhQgIHmD0iknrZEKiVSllpoXaNOFTd5wFNJrJcfsfNvdhO5loNiX6zp-vMW31A2x5AY0GG1t8T8tnHUFgBKJnv2iz90Q2vSRTwWqUMokdbFVGLoYA1XlJtRrH95KDuXHIso0mvJzEcmefhWH5ZqefuT35BO43ILXuqG3v0vl_Pphm3wHwRGQSA</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Roayaie, Sasan</creator><creator>Jibara, Ghalib</creator><creator>Tabrizian, Parissa</creator><creator>Park, Joong‐Won</creator><creator>Yang, Jijin</creator><creator>Yan, Lunan</creator><creator>Schwartz, Myron</creator><creator>Han, Guohong</creator><creator>Izzo, Francesco</creator><creator>Chen, Mishan</creator><creator>Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric</creator><creator>Johnson, Philip</creator><creator>Kudo, Masatoshi</creator><creator>Roberts, Lewis R.</creator><creator>Sherman, Morris</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer</title><author>Roayaie, Sasan ; Jibara, Ghalib ; Tabrizian, Parissa ; Park, Joong‐Won ; Yang, Jijin ; Yan, Lunan ; Schwartz, Myron ; Han, Guohong ; Izzo, Francesco ; Chen, Mishan ; Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric ; Johnson, Philip ; Kudo, Masatoshi ; Roberts, Lewis R. ; Sherman, Morris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-1ce5775e8cc9b92c8df40c0cea7c394938734cee4f4b516c8ea7875e71c23a543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roayaie, Sasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jibara, Ghalib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabrizian, Parissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Joong‐Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Lunan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Myron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Guohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izzo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Mishan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudo, Masatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Lewis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Morris</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roayaie, Sasan</au><au>Jibara, Ghalib</au><au>Tabrizian, Parissa</au><au>Park, Joong‐Won</au><au>Yang, Jijin</au><au>Yan, Lunan</au><au>Schwartz, Myron</au><au>Han, Guohong</au><au>Izzo, Francesco</au><au>Chen, Mishan</au><au>Blanc, Jean‐Frédéric</au><au>Johnson, Philip</au><au>Kudo, Masatoshi</au><au>Roberts, Lewis R.</au><au>Sherman, Morris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer</atitle><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>440</spage><epage>451</epage><pages>440-451</pages><issn>0270-9139</issn><eissn>1527-3350</eissn><coden>HPTLD9</coden><abstract>Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as the primary treatment for a single hepatocellular cancer (HCC) with Child's A cirrhosis, normal serum bilirubin, and no clinically significant portal hypertension. We determined how frequently guidelines were followed and whether straying from them impacted survival. BRIDGE is a multiregional cohort study including HCC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2011. A total of 8,656 patients from 20 sites were classified into four groups: (A) 718 ideal resection candidates who were resected; (B) 144 ideal resection candidates who were not resected; (C) 1,624 nonideal resection candidates who were resected; and (D) 6,170 nonideal resection candidates who were not resected. Median follow‐up was 27 months. Log‐rank and Cox's regression analyses were conducted to determine differences between groups and variables associated with survival. Multivariate analysis of all ideal candidates for resection (A+B) revealed a higher risk of mortality with treatments other than resection. For all resected patients (A+C), portal hypertension and bilirubin &gt;1 mg/dL were not associated with mortality. For all patients who were not ideal candidates for resection (C+D), resection was associated with better survival, compared to embolization and “other” treatments, but was inferior to ablation and transplantation. Conclusions: The majority of patients undergoing resection would not be considered ideal candidates based on current guidelines. Not resecting ideal candidates was associated with higher mortality. The study suggests that selection criteria for resection may be modestly expanded without compromising outcomes, and that some nonideal candidates may still potentially benefit from resection over other treatment modalities. (Hepatology 2015;62:440–451</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</pub><pmid>25678263</pmid><doi>10.1002/hep.27745</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-9139
ispartof Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2015-08, Vol.62 (2), p.440-451
issn 0270-9139
1527-3350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705075886
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - mortality
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery
Cohort Studies
Confidence Intervals
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy - methods
Hepatectomy - mortality
Humans
Hypertension
Liver cancer
Liver cirrhosis
Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis
Liver Neoplasms - mortality
Liver Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Patient Selection
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Statistics, Nonparametric
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
United States
title The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20hepatic%20resection%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20hepatocellular%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Hepatology%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Roayaie,%20Sasan&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=440&rft.epage=451&rft.pages=440-451&rft.issn=0270-9139&rft.eissn=1527-3350&rft.coden=HPTLD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hep.27745&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3751579501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1698046447&rft_id=info:pmid/25678263&rfr_iscdi=true