Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools
•New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to pre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 2015-08, Vol.72 (3), p.578-585 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 585 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 578 |
container_title | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Nishida, Hayato Hirota, Morihiko Seto, Yoshiki Suzuki, Gen Kato, Masashi Kitagaki, Masato Sugiyama, Mariko Kouzuki, Hirokazu Onoue, Satomi |
description | •New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to predict phototoxic risk.
Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705068080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0273230015001452</els_id><sourcerecordid>1705068080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2751f6fec01952d18cfcef802003b18adcd0ce8a1d134ec43e9c753e985b9ad43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EotvCEyChHLlkGTubxDn0UFW0IFXlAmfLO56wXiVx6vFSlqfHJS3iVGk0Y838_4z8CfFOwlqCbD7u18eY5t1agazXkEN1L8RKQteU-Vm_FCtQbVWqCuBEnDLvAUBp3b4WJ6qBjVayWYnft2Eq7eRHOxTzLqTAtqd0LBgj0eSnH0UfYoFhnAf6lSuPlDwWeRDJeZoSF_c-7RYv7mj0mDfZyS2drf-vyUyc_VMqUggDvxGvejswvX2sZ-L71advl5_Lm6_XXy4vbkqsOpVK1dayb3pCkF2tnNTYI_UaFEC1ldo6dICkrXSy2hBuKuqwrXPW9bazblOdiQ_L3jmGuwNxMqNnpGGwE4UDG9lCDY0GDVlaLVKMgTlSb-aY0cSjkWAeoJu9-QvdPEA3kEN12fX-8cBhO5L753minAXni4DyN396ioYxs8NMMBIm44J_9sAfkJWYVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705068080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nishida, Hayato ; Hirota, Morihiko ; Seto, Yoshiki ; Suzuki, Gen ; Kato, Masashi ; Kitagaki, Masato ; Sugiyama, Mariko ; Kouzuki, Hirokazu ; Onoue, Satomi</creator><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Hayato ; Hirota, Morihiko ; Seto, Yoshiki ; Suzuki, Gen ; Kato, Masashi ; Kitagaki, Masato ; Sugiyama, Mariko ; Kouzuki, Hirokazu ; Onoue, Satomi</creatorcontrib><description>•New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to predict phototoxic risk.
Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-2300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26048216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives ; Animals ; BALB 3T3 Cells ; Complex cosmetic ingredients ; Cosmetics ; Cosmetics - radiation effects ; Cosmetics - toxicity ; Dermatitis, Phototoxic - etiology ; Humans ; Light ; Mice ; Neutral Red - metabolism ; Photosafety assessment ; Phototoxicity ; Reactive oxygen species ; Reactive Oxygen Species - chemistry ; Risk Assessment ; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet ; Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><ispartof>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2015-08, Vol.72 (3), p.578-585</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2751f6fec01952d18cfcef802003b18adcd0ce8a1d134ec43e9c753e985b9ad43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2751f6fec01952d18cfcef802003b18adcd0ce8a1d134ec43e9c753e985b9ad43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5354-2802</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirota, Morihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seto, Yoshiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Gen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagaki, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouzuki, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoue, Satomi</creatorcontrib><title>Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools</title><title>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><description>•New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to predict phototoxic risk.
Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.</description><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>BALB 3T3 Cells</subject><subject>Complex cosmetic ingredients</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Cosmetics - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cosmetics - toxicity</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Phototoxic - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Neutral Red - metabolism</subject><subject>Photosafety assessment</subject><subject>Phototoxicity</subject><subject>Reactive oxygen species</subject><subject>Reactive Oxygen Species - chemistry</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><issn>0273-2300</issn><issn>1096-0295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EotvCEyChHLlkGTubxDn0UFW0IFXlAmfLO56wXiVx6vFSlqfHJS3iVGk0Y838_4z8CfFOwlqCbD7u18eY5t1agazXkEN1L8RKQteU-Vm_FCtQbVWqCuBEnDLvAUBp3b4WJ6qBjVayWYnft2Eq7eRHOxTzLqTAtqd0LBgj0eSnH0UfYoFhnAf6lSuPlDwWeRDJeZoSF_c-7RYv7mj0mDfZyS2drf-vyUyc_VMqUggDvxGvejswvX2sZ-L71advl5_Lm6_XXy4vbkqsOpVK1dayb3pCkF2tnNTYI_UaFEC1ldo6dICkrXSy2hBuKuqwrXPW9bazblOdiQ_L3jmGuwNxMqNnpGGwE4UDG9lCDY0GDVlaLVKMgTlSb-aY0cSjkWAeoJu9-QvdPEA3kEN12fX-8cBhO5L753minAXni4DyN396ioYxs8NMMBIm44J_9sAfkJWYVw</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Nishida, Hayato</creator><creator>Hirota, Morihiko</creator><creator>Seto, Yoshiki</creator><creator>Suzuki, Gen</creator><creator>Kato, Masashi</creator><creator>Kitagaki, Masato</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Mariko</creator><creator>Kouzuki, Hirokazu</creator><creator>Onoue, Satomi</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5354-2802</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools</title><author>Nishida, Hayato ; Hirota, Morihiko ; Seto, Yoshiki ; Suzuki, Gen ; Kato, Masashi ; Kitagaki, Masato ; Sugiyama, Mariko ; Kouzuki, Hirokazu ; Onoue, Satomi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2751f6fec01952d18cfcef802003b18adcd0ce8a1d134ec43e9c753e985b9ad43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal Testing Alternatives</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>BALB 3T3 Cells</topic><topic>Complex cosmetic ingredients</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Cosmetics - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cosmetics - toxicity</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Phototoxic - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Neutral Red - metabolism</topic><topic>Photosafety assessment</topic><topic>Phototoxicity</topic><topic>Reactive oxygen species</topic><topic>Reactive Oxygen Species - chemistry</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirota, Morihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seto, Yoshiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Gen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagaki, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouzuki, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoue, Satomi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nishida, Hayato</au><au>Hirota, Morihiko</au><au>Seto, Yoshiki</au><au>Suzuki, Gen</au><au>Kato, Masashi</au><au>Kitagaki, Masato</au><au>Sugiyama, Mariko</au><au>Kouzuki, Hirokazu</au><au>Onoue, Satomi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools</atitle><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>578</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>578-585</pages><issn>0273-2300</issn><eissn>1096-0295</eissn><abstract>•New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to predict phototoxic risk.
Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26048216</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5354-2802</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-2300 |
ispartof | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2015-08, Vol.72 (3), p.578-585 |
issn | 0273-2300 1096-0295 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705068080 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animal Testing Alternatives Animals BALB 3T3 Cells Complex cosmetic ingredients Cosmetics Cosmetics - radiation effects Cosmetics - toxicity Dermatitis, Phototoxic - etiology Humans Light Mice Neutral Red - metabolism Photosafety assessment Phototoxicity Reactive oxygen species Reactive Oxygen Species - chemistry Risk Assessment Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet Toxicity Tests - methods |
title | Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A24%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-animal%20photosafety%20screening%20for%20complex%20cosmetic%20ingredients%20with%20photochemical%20and%20photobiochemical%20assessment%20tools&rft.jtitle=Regulatory%20toxicology%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Nishida,%20Hayato&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=578&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=578-585&rft.issn=0273-2300&rft.eissn=1096-0295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1705068080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705068080&rft_id=info:pmid/26048216&rft_els_id=S0273230015001452&rfr_iscdi=true |