Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools

•New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to pre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 2015-08, Vol.72 (3), p.578-585
Hauptverfasser: Nishida, Hayato, Hirota, Morihiko, Seto, Yoshiki, Suzuki, Gen, Kato, Masashi, Kitagaki, Masato, Sugiyama, Mariko, Kouzuki, Hirokazu, Onoue, Satomi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 585
container_issue 3
container_start_page 578
container_title Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology
container_volume 72
creator Nishida, Hayato
Hirota, Morihiko
Seto, Yoshiki
Suzuki, Gen
Kato, Masashi
Kitagaki, Masato
Sugiyama, Mariko
Kouzuki, Hirokazu
Onoue, Satomi
description •New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to predict phototoxic risk. Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705068080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0273230015001452</els_id><sourcerecordid>1705068080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2751f6fec01952d18cfcef802003b18adcd0ce8a1d134ec43e9c753e985b9ad43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EotvCEyChHLlkGTubxDn0UFW0IFXlAmfLO56wXiVx6vFSlqfHJS3iVGk0Y838_4z8CfFOwlqCbD7u18eY5t1agazXkEN1L8RKQteU-Vm_FCtQbVWqCuBEnDLvAUBp3b4WJ6qBjVayWYnft2Eq7eRHOxTzLqTAtqd0LBgj0eSnH0UfYoFhnAf6lSuPlDwWeRDJeZoSF_c-7RYv7mj0mDfZyS2drf-vyUyc_VMqUggDvxGvejswvX2sZ-L71advl5_Lm6_XXy4vbkqsOpVK1dayb3pCkF2tnNTYI_UaFEC1ldo6dICkrXSy2hBuKuqwrXPW9bazblOdiQ_L3jmGuwNxMqNnpGGwE4UDG9lCDY0GDVlaLVKMgTlSb-aY0cSjkWAeoJu9-QvdPEA3kEN12fX-8cBhO5L753minAXni4DyN396ioYxs8NMMBIm44J_9sAfkJWYVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705068080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nishida, Hayato ; Hirota, Morihiko ; Seto, Yoshiki ; Suzuki, Gen ; Kato, Masashi ; Kitagaki, Masato ; Sugiyama, Mariko ; Kouzuki, Hirokazu ; Onoue, Satomi</creator><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Hayato ; Hirota, Morihiko ; Seto, Yoshiki ; Suzuki, Gen ; Kato, Masashi ; Kitagaki, Masato ; Sugiyama, Mariko ; Kouzuki, Hirokazu ; Onoue, Satomi</creatorcontrib><description>•New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to predict phototoxic risk. Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-2300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26048216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives ; Animals ; BALB 3T3 Cells ; Complex cosmetic ingredients ; Cosmetics ; Cosmetics - radiation effects ; Cosmetics - toxicity ; Dermatitis, Phototoxic - etiology ; Humans ; Light ; Mice ; Neutral Red - metabolism ; Photosafety assessment ; Phototoxicity ; Reactive oxygen species ; Reactive Oxygen Species - chemistry ; Risk Assessment ; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet ; Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><ispartof>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2015-08, Vol.72 (3), p.578-585</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2751f6fec01952d18cfcef802003b18adcd0ce8a1d134ec43e9c753e985b9ad43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2751f6fec01952d18cfcef802003b18adcd0ce8a1d134ec43e9c753e985b9ad43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5354-2802</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirota, Morihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seto, Yoshiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Gen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagaki, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouzuki, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoue, Satomi</creatorcontrib><title>Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools</title><title>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><description>•New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to predict phototoxic risk. Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.</description><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>BALB 3T3 Cells</subject><subject>Complex cosmetic ingredients</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Cosmetics - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cosmetics - toxicity</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Phototoxic - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Neutral Red - metabolism</subject><subject>Photosafety assessment</subject><subject>Phototoxicity</subject><subject>Reactive oxygen species</subject><subject>Reactive Oxygen Species - chemistry</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><issn>0273-2300</issn><issn>1096-0295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EotvCEyChHLlkGTubxDn0UFW0IFXlAmfLO56wXiVx6vFSlqfHJS3iVGk0Y838_4z8CfFOwlqCbD7u18eY5t1agazXkEN1L8RKQteU-Vm_FCtQbVWqCuBEnDLvAUBp3b4WJ6qBjVayWYnft2Eq7eRHOxTzLqTAtqd0LBgj0eSnH0UfYoFhnAf6lSuPlDwWeRDJeZoSF_c-7RYv7mj0mDfZyS2drf-vyUyc_VMqUggDvxGvejswvX2sZ-L71advl5_Lm6_XXy4vbkqsOpVK1dayb3pCkF2tnNTYI_UaFEC1ldo6dICkrXSy2hBuKuqwrXPW9bazblOdiQ_L3jmGuwNxMqNnpGGwE4UDG9lCDY0GDVlaLVKMgTlSb-aY0cSjkWAeoJu9-QvdPEA3kEN12fX-8cBhO5L753minAXni4DyN396ioYxs8NMMBIm44J_9sAfkJWYVw</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Nishida, Hayato</creator><creator>Hirota, Morihiko</creator><creator>Seto, Yoshiki</creator><creator>Suzuki, Gen</creator><creator>Kato, Masashi</creator><creator>Kitagaki, Masato</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Mariko</creator><creator>Kouzuki, Hirokazu</creator><creator>Onoue, Satomi</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5354-2802</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools</title><author>Nishida, Hayato ; Hirota, Morihiko ; Seto, Yoshiki ; Suzuki, Gen ; Kato, Masashi ; Kitagaki, Masato ; Sugiyama, Mariko ; Kouzuki, Hirokazu ; Onoue, Satomi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2751f6fec01952d18cfcef802003b18adcd0ce8a1d134ec43e9c753e985b9ad43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal Testing Alternatives</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>BALB 3T3 Cells</topic><topic>Complex cosmetic ingredients</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Cosmetics - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cosmetics - toxicity</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Phototoxic - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Neutral Red - metabolism</topic><topic>Photosafety assessment</topic><topic>Phototoxicity</topic><topic>Reactive oxygen species</topic><topic>Reactive Oxygen Species - chemistry</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nishida, Hayato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirota, Morihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seto, Yoshiki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Gen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagaki, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Mariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouzuki, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoue, Satomi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nishida, Hayato</au><au>Hirota, Morihiko</au><au>Seto, Yoshiki</au><au>Suzuki, Gen</au><au>Kato, Masashi</au><au>Kitagaki, Masato</au><au>Sugiyama, Mariko</au><au>Kouzuki, Hirokazu</au><au>Onoue, Satomi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools</atitle><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>578</spage><epage>585</epage><pages>578-585</pages><issn>0273-2300</issn><eissn>1096-0295</eissn><abstract>•New assay strategy was proposed for photosafety of complex cosmetic ingredients.•The maximum UV/VIS absorption value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion.•The ROS assay at 50μg/mL showed a high sensitivity to predict photoreactivity.•The 3T3 NRU PT would be useful as a follow-up assay to predict phototoxic risk. Previously, a non-animal screening approach was proposed for evaluating photosafety of cosmetic ingredients by means of in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical assays; however, complex cosmetic ingredients, such as plant extracts and polymers, could not be evaluated because their molecular weight is often poorly defined and so their molar concentration cannot be calculated. The aim of the present investigation was to establish a photosafety screen for complex cosmetic ingredients by using appropriately modified in vitro photosafety assays. Twenty plant extracts were selected as model materials on the basis of photosafety information, and their phototoxic potentials were assessed by means of ultraviolet (UV)/visible light (VIS) spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS)/micellar ROS (mROS) assays, and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). The maximum UV/VIS absorption value was employed as a judgment factor for evaluating photoexcitability of samples, and the value of 1.0 was adopted as a tentative criterion for photosafety identification. The ROS/mROS assays were conducted at 50μg/mL, and no false negative prediction was obtained. Furthermore, the ROS/mROS assays at 50μg/mL had a similar predictive capacity to the ROS/mROS assays in the previous study. A systematic tiered approach for simple and rapid non-animal photosafety evaluation of complex cosmetic ingredients can be constructed using these modified in vitro photochemical assays.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26048216</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5354-2802</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-2300
ispartof Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2015-08, Vol.72 (3), p.578-585
issn 0273-2300
1096-0295
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705068080
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animal Testing Alternatives
Animals
BALB 3T3 Cells
Complex cosmetic ingredients
Cosmetics
Cosmetics - radiation effects
Cosmetics - toxicity
Dermatitis, Phototoxic - etiology
Humans
Light
Mice
Neutral Red - metabolism
Photosafety assessment
Phototoxicity
Reactive oxygen species
Reactive Oxygen Species - chemistry
Risk Assessment
Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet
Toxicity Tests - methods
title Non-animal photosafety screening for complex cosmetic ingredients with photochemical and photobiochemical assessment tools
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A24%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-animal%20photosafety%20screening%20for%20complex%20cosmetic%20ingredients%20with%20photochemical%20and%20photobiochemical%20assessment%20tools&rft.jtitle=Regulatory%20toxicology%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Nishida,%20Hayato&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=578&rft.epage=585&rft.pages=578-585&rft.issn=0273-2300&rft.eissn=1096-0295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1705068080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705068080&rft_id=info:pmid/26048216&rft_els_id=S0273230015001452&rfr_iscdi=true