Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort
Background: Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents. Purpose: To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sports medicine 2014-10, Vol.42 (10), p.2311-2318 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2318 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2311 |
container_title | The American journal of sports medicine |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Engelman, Glenn H. Carry, Patrick M. Hitt, Kirtley G. Polousky, John D. Vidal, Armando F. |
description | Background:
Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents.
Purpose:
To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort.
Study Design:
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
After institutional review board approval was obtained, adolescent subjects (age range, 11-18 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery at a large tertiary pediatric hospital between July 2005 and July 2009 were identified through a query of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, diagnostic and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subject data were obtained by means of a retrospective chart review, phone survey, and the administration of functional knee outcome instruments. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to graft survival.
Results:
The average ages at surgery in the allograft (n = 38) and autograft (n = 35) groups were 15.29 ± 2.24 and 15.60 ± 1.57 years, respectively. There were 11 graft failures (28.95%) in the allograft group compared with 4 graft failures (11.43%) in the autograft group. In the multivariate model, graft type (P = .0352) and postoperative knee laxity according to the Lachman test (P = .0217) were the only variables significantly related to graft survival. The hazard of graft failure was 4.4 (95% CI, 1.23-18.89) times greater in the allograft group compared with the autograft group. The hazard of graft failure was 5.28 times (95% CI, 1.1-12.72; P = .0217) greater for a subject who demonstrated increased postoperative knee laxity relative to the contralateral knee. The risk for autograft failure tended to remain constant 24 to 48 months after initial surgery, whereas the risk for allograft failure continued to increase during postoperative months 24 to 48. There were no differences (P > .05) between the allograft and autograft groups with respect to International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and the rate of return to previous activity level.
Conclusion:
Graft type and postoperative knee laxity were identified as significant predictors of graft survival. On the basis of this large retrospective cohort, we recommend the use of autogenous grafts in children and adolescents undergoing primary, transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Patients who demonstrate increased translation during a postoperative Lachman test shoul |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0363546514541935 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705062564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0363546514541935</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1705062564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d6ad75750ca54fdd394bd1b28b86b15ea6c273749a90174e5829801a3c188bb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVoSbZJ7j0VQS-5uNFYGlk-GtOmhYVA2uZqZFveKtjWVpIXeutPj7a7KSVQchLM-97TDI-Qt8A-ABTFNeOSo5AIAgWUHE_IChDzjHOJr8hqL2d7_Yy8CeGBMQaFVKfkLEemgEO-Ir9rN221t8HN1A20Gke38XqI9N74sARaLfE4qOZovHWe1n7prI6Gru1GT2aO9M50bg4xzaNNOTd_-K-L39mdHqmdqZ5plbSdoVXvRhO6vat2P5yPF-T1oMdgLo_vOfn-6eO3-nO2vr35UlfrrBNSxKyXui-wQNZpFEPf81K0PbS5apVsAY2WXV7wQpS6TEcKgyovFQPNO1CqbSU_J1eH3K13PxcTYjPZtMc46tm4JTRQMGQyRyleRlFJVpYoWELfP0Mf3OLndEiT-uC8lAAqUexAdd6F4M3QbL2dtP_VAGv2RTbPi0yWd8fgpZ1M_9fw1FwCsgMQ9Mb88-v_Ah8BHhKlGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933396118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Engelman, Glenn H. ; Carry, Patrick M. ; Hitt, Kirtley G. ; Polousky, John D. ; Vidal, Armando F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Engelman, Glenn H. ; Carry, Patrick M. ; Hitt, Kirtley G. ; Polousky, John D. ; Vidal, Armando F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents.
Purpose:
To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort.
Study Design:
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
After institutional review board approval was obtained, adolescent subjects (age range, 11-18 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery at a large tertiary pediatric hospital between July 2005 and July 2009 were identified through a query of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, diagnostic and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subject data were obtained by means of a retrospective chart review, phone survey, and the administration of functional knee outcome instruments. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to graft survival.
Results:
The average ages at surgery in the allograft (n = 38) and autograft (n = 35) groups were 15.29 ± 2.24 and 15.60 ± 1.57 years, respectively. There were 11 graft failures (28.95%) in the allograft group compared with 4 graft failures (11.43%) in the autograft group. In the multivariate model, graft type (P = .0352) and postoperative knee laxity according to the Lachman test (P = .0217) were the only variables significantly related to graft survival. The hazard of graft failure was 4.4 (95% CI, 1.23-18.89) times greater in the allograft group compared with the autograft group. The hazard of graft failure was 5.28 times (95% CI, 1.1-12.72; P = .0217) greater for a subject who demonstrated increased postoperative knee laxity relative to the contralateral knee. The risk for autograft failure tended to remain constant 24 to 48 months after initial surgery, whereas the risk for allograft failure continued to increase during postoperative months 24 to 48. There were no differences (P > .05) between the allograft and autograft groups with respect to International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and the rate of return to previous activity level.
Conclusion:
Graft type and postoperative knee laxity were identified as significant predictors of graft survival. On the basis of this large retrospective cohort, we recommend the use of autogenous grafts in children and adolescents undergoing primary, transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Patients who demonstrate increased translation during a postoperative Lachman test should be carefully followed because of concerns for subsequent graft failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0363546514541935</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25081312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Allografts ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ; Autografts ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Joint Instability - physiopathology ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Ligaments ; Lysholm Knee Score ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin & tissue grafts ; Sports medicine ; Studies ; Surgery ; Teenagers ; Terminology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 2014-10, Vol.42 (10), p.2311-2318</ispartof><rights>2014 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2014 The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d6ad75750ca54fdd394bd1b28b86b15ea6c273749a90174e5829801a3c188bb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d6ad75750ca54fdd394bd1b28b86b15ea6c273749a90174e5829801a3c188bb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0363546514541935$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0363546514541935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Engelman, Glenn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carry, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Kirtley G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polousky, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Armando F.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background:
Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents.
Purpose:
To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort.
Study Design:
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
After institutional review board approval was obtained, adolescent subjects (age range, 11-18 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery at a large tertiary pediatric hospital between July 2005 and July 2009 were identified through a query of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, diagnostic and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subject data were obtained by means of a retrospective chart review, phone survey, and the administration of functional knee outcome instruments. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to graft survival.
Results:
The average ages at surgery in the allograft (n = 38) and autograft (n = 35) groups were 15.29 ± 2.24 and 15.60 ± 1.57 years, respectively. There were 11 graft failures (28.95%) in the allograft group compared with 4 graft failures (11.43%) in the autograft group. In the multivariate model, graft type (P = .0352) and postoperative knee laxity according to the Lachman test (P = .0217) were the only variables significantly related to graft survival. The hazard of graft failure was 4.4 (95% CI, 1.23-18.89) times greater in the allograft group compared with the autograft group. The hazard of graft failure was 5.28 times (95% CI, 1.1-12.72; P = .0217) greater for a subject who demonstrated increased postoperative knee laxity relative to the contralateral knee. The risk for autograft failure tended to remain constant 24 to 48 months after initial surgery, whereas the risk for allograft failure continued to increase during postoperative months 24 to 48. There were no differences (P > .05) between the allograft and autograft groups with respect to International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and the rate of return to previous activity level.
Conclusion:
Graft type and postoperative knee laxity were identified as significant predictors of graft survival. On the basis of this large retrospective cohort, we recommend the use of autogenous grafts in children and adolescents undergoing primary, transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Patients who demonstrate increased translation during a postoperative Lachman test should be carefully followed because of concerns for subsequent graft failure.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Allografts</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Lysholm Knee Score</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin & tissue grafts</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVoSbZJ7j0VQS-5uNFYGlk-GtOmhYVA2uZqZFveKtjWVpIXeutPj7a7KSVQchLM-97TDI-Qt8A-ABTFNeOSo5AIAgWUHE_IChDzjHOJr8hqL2d7_Yy8CeGBMQaFVKfkLEemgEO-Ir9rN221t8HN1A20Gke38XqI9N74sARaLfE4qOZovHWe1n7prI6Gru1GT2aO9M50bg4xzaNNOTd_-K-L39mdHqmdqZ5plbSdoVXvRhO6vat2P5yPF-T1oMdgLo_vOfn-6eO3-nO2vr35UlfrrBNSxKyXui-wQNZpFEPf81K0PbS5apVsAY2WXV7wQpS6TEcKgyovFQPNO1CqbSU_J1eH3K13PxcTYjPZtMc46tm4JTRQMGQyRyleRlFJVpYoWELfP0Mf3OLndEiT-uC8lAAqUexAdd6F4M3QbL2dtP_VAGv2RTbPi0yWd8fgpZ1M_9fw1FwCsgMQ9Mb88-v_Ah8BHhKlGw</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Engelman, Glenn H.</creator><creator>Carry, Patrick M.</creator><creator>Hitt, Kirtley G.</creator><creator>Polousky, John D.</creator><creator>Vidal, Armando F.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort</title><author>Engelman, Glenn H. ; Carry, Patrick M. ; Hitt, Kirtley G. ; Polousky, John D. ; Vidal, Armando F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d6ad75750ca54fdd394bd1b28b86b15ea6c273749a90174e5829801a3c188bb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Allografts</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Lysholm Knee Score</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin & tissue grafts</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Engelman, Glenn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carry, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Kirtley G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polousky, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Armando F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Engelman, Glenn H.</au><au>Carry, Patrick M.</au><au>Hitt, Kirtley G.</au><au>Polousky, John D.</au><au>Vidal, Armando F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2311</spage><epage>2318</epage><pages>2311-2318</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>Background:
Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents.
Purpose:
To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort.
Study Design:
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
After institutional review board approval was obtained, adolescent subjects (age range, 11-18 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery at a large tertiary pediatric hospital between July 2005 and July 2009 were identified through a query of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, diagnostic and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subject data were obtained by means of a retrospective chart review, phone survey, and the administration of functional knee outcome instruments. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to graft survival.
Results:
The average ages at surgery in the allograft (n = 38) and autograft (n = 35) groups were 15.29 ± 2.24 and 15.60 ± 1.57 years, respectively. There were 11 graft failures (28.95%) in the allograft group compared with 4 graft failures (11.43%) in the autograft group. In the multivariate model, graft type (P = .0352) and postoperative knee laxity according to the Lachman test (P = .0217) were the only variables significantly related to graft survival. The hazard of graft failure was 4.4 (95% CI, 1.23-18.89) times greater in the allograft group compared with the autograft group. The hazard of graft failure was 5.28 times (95% CI, 1.1-12.72; P = .0217) greater for a subject who demonstrated increased postoperative knee laxity relative to the contralateral knee. The risk for autograft failure tended to remain constant 24 to 48 months after initial surgery, whereas the risk for allograft failure continued to increase during postoperative months 24 to 48. There were no differences (P > .05) between the allograft and autograft groups with respect to International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and the rate of return to previous activity level.
Conclusion:
Graft type and postoperative knee laxity were identified as significant predictors of graft survival. On the basis of this large retrospective cohort, we recommend the use of autogenous grafts in children and adolescents undergoing primary, transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Patients who demonstrate increased translation during a postoperative Lachman test should be carefully followed because of concerns for subsequent graft failure.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25081312</pmid><doi>10.1177/0363546514541935</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-5465 |
ispartof | The American journal of sports medicine, 2014-10, Vol.42 (10), p.2311-2318 |
issn | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705062564 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Allografts Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Autografts Case-Control Studies Child Female Graft Survival Humans Joint Instability - physiopathology Knee Knee Joint - physiopathology Ligaments Lysholm Knee Score Male Multivariate Analysis Postoperative Complications - physiopathology Retrospective Studies Skin & tissue grafts Sports medicine Studies Surgery Teenagers Terminology |
title | Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T14%3A18%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Allograft%20Versus%20Autograft%20Anterior%20Cruciate%20Ligament%20Reconstruction%20Graft%20Survival%20in%20an%20Active%20Adolescent%20Cohort&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Engelman,%20Glenn%20H.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2311&rft.epage=2318&rft.pages=2311-2318&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0363546514541935&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1705062564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933396118&rft_id=info:pmid/25081312&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0363546514541935&rfr_iscdi=true |