Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort

Background: Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents. Purpose: To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 2014-10, Vol.42 (10), p.2311-2318
Hauptverfasser: Engelman, Glenn H., Carry, Patrick M., Hitt, Kirtley G., Polousky, John D., Vidal, Armando F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2318
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2311
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 42
creator Engelman, Glenn H.
Carry, Patrick M.
Hitt, Kirtley G.
Polousky, John D.
Vidal, Armando F.
description Background: Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents. Purpose: To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: After institutional review board approval was obtained, adolescent subjects (age range, 11-18 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery at a large tertiary pediatric hospital between July 2005 and July 2009 were identified through a query of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, diagnostic and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subject data were obtained by means of a retrospective chart review, phone survey, and the administration of functional knee outcome instruments. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to graft survival. Results: The average ages at surgery in the allograft (n = 38) and autograft (n = 35) groups were 15.29 ± 2.24 and 15.60 ± 1.57 years, respectively. There were 11 graft failures (28.95%) in the allograft group compared with 4 graft failures (11.43%) in the autograft group. In the multivariate model, graft type (P = .0352) and postoperative knee laxity according to the Lachman test (P = .0217) were the only variables significantly related to graft survival. The hazard of graft failure was 4.4 (95% CI, 1.23-18.89) times greater in the allograft group compared with the autograft group. The hazard of graft failure was 5.28 times (95% CI, 1.1-12.72; P = .0217) greater for a subject who demonstrated increased postoperative knee laxity relative to the contralateral knee. The risk for autograft failure tended to remain constant 24 to 48 months after initial surgery, whereas the risk for allograft failure continued to increase during postoperative months 24 to 48. There were no differences (P > .05) between the allograft and autograft groups with respect to International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and the rate of return to previous activity level. Conclusion: Graft type and postoperative knee laxity were identified as significant predictors of graft survival. On the basis of this large retrospective cohort, we recommend the use of autogenous grafts in children and adolescents undergoing primary, transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Patients who demonstrate increased translation during a postoperative Lachman test shoul
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0363546514541935
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705062564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0363546514541935</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1705062564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d6ad75750ca54fdd394bd1b28b86b15ea6c273749a90174e5829801a3c188bb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVoSbZJ7j0VQS-5uNFYGlk-GtOmhYVA2uZqZFveKtjWVpIXeutPj7a7KSVQchLM-97TDI-Qt8A-ABTFNeOSo5AIAgWUHE_IChDzjHOJr8hqL2d7_Yy8CeGBMQaFVKfkLEemgEO-Ir9rN221t8HN1A20Gke38XqI9N74sARaLfE4qOZovHWe1n7prI6Gru1GT2aO9M50bg4xzaNNOTd_-K-L39mdHqmdqZ5plbSdoVXvRhO6vat2P5yPF-T1oMdgLo_vOfn-6eO3-nO2vr35UlfrrBNSxKyXui-wQNZpFEPf81K0PbS5apVsAY2WXV7wQpS6TEcKgyovFQPNO1CqbSU_J1eH3K13PxcTYjPZtMc46tm4JTRQMGQyRyleRlFJVpYoWELfP0Mf3OLndEiT-uC8lAAqUexAdd6F4M3QbL2dtP_VAGv2RTbPi0yWd8fgpZ1M_9fw1FwCsgMQ9Mb88-v_Ah8BHhKlGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933396118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Engelman, Glenn H. ; Carry, Patrick M. ; Hitt, Kirtley G. ; Polousky, John D. ; Vidal, Armando F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Engelman, Glenn H. ; Carry, Patrick M. ; Hitt, Kirtley G. ; Polousky, John D. ; Vidal, Armando F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents. Purpose: To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: After institutional review board approval was obtained, adolescent subjects (age range, 11-18 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery at a large tertiary pediatric hospital between July 2005 and July 2009 were identified through a query of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, diagnostic and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subject data were obtained by means of a retrospective chart review, phone survey, and the administration of functional knee outcome instruments. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to graft survival. Results: The average ages at surgery in the allograft (n = 38) and autograft (n = 35) groups were 15.29 ± 2.24 and 15.60 ± 1.57 years, respectively. There were 11 graft failures (28.95%) in the allograft group compared with 4 graft failures (11.43%) in the autograft group. In the multivariate model, graft type (P = .0352) and postoperative knee laxity according to the Lachman test (P = .0217) were the only variables significantly related to graft survival. The hazard of graft failure was 4.4 (95% CI, 1.23-18.89) times greater in the allograft group compared with the autograft group. The hazard of graft failure was 5.28 times (95% CI, 1.1-12.72; P = .0217) greater for a subject who demonstrated increased postoperative knee laxity relative to the contralateral knee. The risk for autograft failure tended to remain constant 24 to 48 months after initial surgery, whereas the risk for allograft failure continued to increase during postoperative months 24 to 48. There were no differences (P &gt; .05) between the allograft and autograft groups with respect to International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and the rate of return to previous activity level. Conclusion: Graft type and postoperative knee laxity were identified as significant predictors of graft survival. On the basis of this large retrospective cohort, we recommend the use of autogenous grafts in children and adolescents undergoing primary, transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Patients who demonstrate increased translation during a postoperative Lachman test should be carefully followed because of concerns for subsequent graft failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0363546514541935</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25081312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Allografts ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ; Autografts ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Joint Instability - physiopathology ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Ligaments ; Lysholm Knee Score ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin &amp; tissue grafts ; Sports medicine ; Studies ; Surgery ; Teenagers ; Terminology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 2014-10, Vol.42 (10), p.2311-2318</ispartof><rights>2014 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2014 The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d6ad75750ca54fdd394bd1b28b86b15ea6c273749a90174e5829801a3c188bb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d6ad75750ca54fdd394bd1b28b86b15ea6c273749a90174e5829801a3c188bb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0363546514541935$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0363546514541935$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Engelman, Glenn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carry, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Kirtley G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polousky, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Armando F.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background: Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents. Purpose: To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: After institutional review board approval was obtained, adolescent subjects (age range, 11-18 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery at a large tertiary pediatric hospital between July 2005 and July 2009 were identified through a query of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, diagnostic and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subject data were obtained by means of a retrospective chart review, phone survey, and the administration of functional knee outcome instruments. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to graft survival. Results: The average ages at surgery in the allograft (n = 38) and autograft (n = 35) groups were 15.29 ± 2.24 and 15.60 ± 1.57 years, respectively. There were 11 graft failures (28.95%) in the allograft group compared with 4 graft failures (11.43%) in the autograft group. In the multivariate model, graft type (P = .0352) and postoperative knee laxity according to the Lachman test (P = .0217) were the only variables significantly related to graft survival. The hazard of graft failure was 4.4 (95% CI, 1.23-18.89) times greater in the allograft group compared with the autograft group. The hazard of graft failure was 5.28 times (95% CI, 1.1-12.72; P = .0217) greater for a subject who demonstrated increased postoperative knee laxity relative to the contralateral knee. The risk for autograft failure tended to remain constant 24 to 48 months after initial surgery, whereas the risk for allograft failure continued to increase during postoperative months 24 to 48. There were no differences (P &gt; .05) between the allograft and autograft groups with respect to International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and the rate of return to previous activity level. Conclusion: Graft type and postoperative knee laxity were identified as significant predictors of graft survival. On the basis of this large retrospective cohort, we recommend the use of autogenous grafts in children and adolescents undergoing primary, transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Patients who demonstrate increased translation during a postoperative Lachman test should be carefully followed because of concerns for subsequent graft failure.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Allografts</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Lysholm Knee Score</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFr3DAQhUVoSbZJ7j0VQS-5uNFYGlk-GtOmhYVA2uZqZFveKtjWVpIXeutPj7a7KSVQchLM-97TDI-Qt8A-ABTFNeOSo5AIAgWUHE_IChDzjHOJr8hqL2d7_Yy8CeGBMQaFVKfkLEemgEO-Ir9rN221t8HN1A20Gke38XqI9N74sARaLfE4qOZovHWe1n7prI6Gru1GT2aO9M50bg4xzaNNOTd_-K-L39mdHqmdqZ5plbSdoVXvRhO6vat2P5yPF-T1oMdgLo_vOfn-6eO3-nO2vr35UlfrrBNSxKyXui-wQNZpFEPf81K0PbS5apVsAY2WXV7wQpS6TEcKgyovFQPNO1CqbSU_J1eH3K13PxcTYjPZtMc46tm4JTRQMGQyRyleRlFJVpYoWELfP0Mf3OLndEiT-uC8lAAqUexAdd6F4M3QbL2dtP_VAGv2RTbPi0yWd8fgpZ1M_9fw1FwCsgMQ9Mb88-v_Ah8BHhKlGw</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>Engelman, Glenn H.</creator><creator>Carry, Patrick M.</creator><creator>Hitt, Kirtley G.</creator><creator>Polousky, John D.</creator><creator>Vidal, Armando F.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort</title><author>Engelman, Glenn H. ; Carry, Patrick M. ; Hitt, Kirtley G. ; Polousky, John D. ; Vidal, Armando F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d6ad75750ca54fdd394bd1b28b86b15ea6c273749a90174e5829801a3c188bb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Allografts</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Lysholm Knee Score</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Engelman, Glenn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carry, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitt, Kirtley G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polousky, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidal, Armando F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Engelman, Glenn H.</au><au>Carry, Patrick M.</au><au>Hitt, Kirtley G.</au><au>Polousky, John D.</au><au>Vidal, Armando F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2311</spage><epage>2318</epage><pages>2311-2318</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>Background: Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery is a controversial topic. Few studies have compared graft outcomes in adolescents. Purpose: To identify factors related to ACL graft failure in an adolescent cohort. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: After institutional review board approval was obtained, adolescent subjects (age range, 11-18 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery at a large tertiary pediatric hospital between July 2005 and July 2009 were identified through a query of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, diagnostic and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Subject data were obtained by means of a retrospective chart review, phone survey, and the administration of functional knee outcome instruments. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze factors related to graft survival. Results: The average ages at surgery in the allograft (n = 38) and autograft (n = 35) groups were 15.29 ± 2.24 and 15.60 ± 1.57 years, respectively. There were 11 graft failures (28.95%) in the allograft group compared with 4 graft failures (11.43%) in the autograft group. In the multivariate model, graft type (P = .0352) and postoperative knee laxity according to the Lachman test (P = .0217) were the only variables significantly related to graft survival. The hazard of graft failure was 4.4 (95% CI, 1.23-18.89) times greater in the allograft group compared with the autograft group. The hazard of graft failure was 5.28 times (95% CI, 1.1-12.72; P = .0217) greater for a subject who demonstrated increased postoperative knee laxity relative to the contralateral knee. The risk for autograft failure tended to remain constant 24 to 48 months after initial surgery, whereas the risk for allograft failure continued to increase during postoperative months 24 to 48. There were no differences (P &gt; .05) between the allograft and autograft groups with respect to International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm score, and the rate of return to previous activity level. Conclusion: Graft type and postoperative knee laxity were identified as significant predictors of graft survival. On the basis of this large retrospective cohort, we recommend the use of autogenous grafts in children and adolescents undergoing primary, transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Patients who demonstrate increased translation during a postoperative Lachman test should be carefully followed because of concerns for subsequent graft failure.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25081312</pmid><doi>10.1177/0363546514541935</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 2014-10, Vol.42 (10), p.2311-2318
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1705062564
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Allografts
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Autografts
Case-Control Studies
Child
Female
Graft Survival
Humans
Joint Instability - physiopathology
Knee
Knee Joint - physiopathology
Ligaments
Lysholm Knee Score
Male
Multivariate Analysis
Postoperative Complications - physiopathology
Retrospective Studies
Skin & tissue grafts
Sports medicine
Studies
Surgery
Teenagers
Terminology
title Comparison of Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Survival in an Active Adolescent Cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T14%3A18%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Allograft%20Versus%20Autograft%20Anterior%20Cruciate%20Ligament%20Reconstruction%20Graft%20Survival%20in%20an%20Active%20Adolescent%20Cohort&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Engelman,%20Glenn%20H.&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2311&rft.epage=2318&rft.pages=2311-2318&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0363546514541935&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1705062564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933396118&rft_id=info:pmid/25081312&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0363546514541935&rfr_iscdi=true