Implementation of the Every Newborn Action Plan: Progress and lessons learned

Abstract Progress in reducing newborn mortality has lagged behind progress in reducing maternal and child deaths. The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) was launched in 2014, with the aim of achieving equitable and high-quality coverage of care for all women and newborns through links with other globa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in perinatology 2015-08, Vol.39 (5), p.326-337
Hauptverfasser: Kinney, Mary V., MSc, Cocoman, Olive, MSc, Dickson, Kim E., MBChB, MSc, Daelmans, Bernadette, MD, Zaka, Nabila, MBBS/MD, PhD, Rhoda, Natasha R., MBChB, FC Paed, Certificate in Neonatology, Moxon, Sarah G., RN, MPH, Kak, Lily, PhD, Lawn, Joy E., MBBS, MRCP, MPH, PhD, Khadka, Neena, MBBS, DCH, MSc, MPH, Darmstadt, Gary L., MD, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 337
container_issue 5
container_start_page 326
container_title Seminars in perinatology
container_volume 39
creator Kinney, Mary V., MSc
Cocoman, Olive, MSc
Dickson, Kim E., MBChB, MSc
Daelmans, Bernadette, MD
Zaka, Nabila, MBBS/MD, PhD
Rhoda, Natasha R., MBChB, FC Paed, Certificate in Neonatology
Moxon, Sarah G., RN, MPH
Kak, Lily, PhD
Lawn, Joy E., MBBS, MRCP, MPH, PhD
Khadka, Neena, MBBS, DCH, MSc, MPH
Darmstadt, Gary L., MD, MS
description Abstract Progress in reducing newborn mortality has lagged behind progress in reducing maternal and child deaths. The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) was launched in 2014, with the aim of achieving equitable and high-quality coverage of care for all women and newborns through links with other global and national plans and measurement and accountability frameworks. This article aims to assess country progress and the mechanisms in place to support country implementation of the ENAP. A country tracking tool was developed and piloted in October–December 2014 to collect data on the ENAP-related national milestones and implementation barriers in 18 high-burden countries. Simultaneously, a mapping exercise involving 47 semi-structured interviews with partner organizations was carried out to frame the categories of technical support available in countries to support care at and around the time of birth by health system building blocks. Existing literature and reports were assessed to further supplement analysis of country progress. A total of 15 out of 18 high-burden countries have taken concrete actions to advance newborn health; four have developed specific action plans with an additional six in process and a further three strengthening newborn components within existing plans. Eight high-burden countries have a newborn mortality target, but only three have a stillbirth target. The ENAP implementation in countries is well-supported by UN agencies, particularly UNICEF and WHO, as well as multilateral and bilateral agencies, especially in health workforce training. New financial commitments from development partners and the private sector are substantial but tracking of national funding remains a challenge. For interventions with strong evidence, low levels of coverage persists and health information systems require investment and support to improve quality and quantity of data to guide and track progress. Some of the highest burden countries have established newborn health action plans and are scaling up evidence based interventions. Further progress will only be made with attention to context-specific implementation challenges, especially in areas that have been neglected to date such as quality improvement, sustained investment in training and monitoring health worker skills, support to budgeting and health financing, and strengthening of health information systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.06.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1704350618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0146000515000518</els_id><sourcerecordid>1704350618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-f03732cd40b741690481f5b476ed4d18071e35985545717ea022a5ced926f4603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQx60K1G5bPgJVjlwSxvEr2wOoqvqSSlsJkLhZXmdCvU3sxc4W7bfH6S4cuPQyM9L85_UbQt5TqCgI9nFZJRxWGF1VAxUVyAqA75EZFaIpQYkfb8gMKJclAIgDcpjSEoDxOYV9clDLeor4jHy5GVY9DuhHM7rgi9AV4yMWF88YN8Ud_l6E6Isz-5J76I0_LR5i-BkxpcL4tuhzEHzK3kSP7TF525k-4budPyLfLy--nV-Xt_dXN-dnt6UVTI1lB0yx2rYcFopTOQfe0E4suJLY8pY2oCgyMW-E4EJRhQbq2giL7byWHZfAjsiHbd9VDL_WmEY9uGSxzwtiWCdNFXAmQNImS8VWamNIKWKnV9ENJm40BT2R1Eu9I6knkhqkziRz3cluxHoxYPuv6i-6LPi8FWA-9Nlh1Mk69HlLF9GOug3u1RGf_utge-edNf0TbjAtwzr6TFFTnWoN-uv0zumbVLzYhv0BqjKaeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1704350618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of the Every Newborn Action Plan: Progress and lessons learned</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kinney, Mary V., MSc ; Cocoman, Olive, MSc ; Dickson, Kim E., MBChB, MSc ; Daelmans, Bernadette, MD ; Zaka, Nabila, MBBS/MD, PhD ; Rhoda, Natasha R., MBChB, FC Paed, Certificate in Neonatology ; Moxon, Sarah G., RN, MPH ; Kak, Lily, PhD ; Lawn, Joy E., MBBS, MRCP, MPH, PhD ; Khadka, Neena, MBBS, DCH, MSc, MPH ; Darmstadt, Gary L., MD, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Mary V., MSc ; Cocoman, Olive, MSc ; Dickson, Kim E., MBChB, MSc ; Daelmans, Bernadette, MD ; Zaka, Nabila, MBBS/MD, PhD ; Rhoda, Natasha R., MBChB, FC Paed, Certificate in Neonatology ; Moxon, Sarah G., RN, MPH ; Kak, Lily, PhD ; Lawn, Joy E., MBBS, MRCP, MPH, PhD ; Khadka, Neena, MBBS, DCH, MSc, MPH ; Darmstadt, Gary L., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Progress in reducing newborn mortality has lagged behind progress in reducing maternal and child deaths. The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) was launched in 2014, with the aim of achieving equitable and high-quality coverage of care for all women and newborns through links with other global and national plans and measurement and accountability frameworks. This article aims to assess country progress and the mechanisms in place to support country implementation of the ENAP. A country tracking tool was developed and piloted in October–December 2014 to collect data on the ENAP-related national milestones and implementation barriers in 18 high-burden countries. Simultaneously, a mapping exercise involving 47 semi-structured interviews with partner organizations was carried out to frame the categories of technical support available in countries to support care at and around the time of birth by health system building blocks. Existing literature and reports were assessed to further supplement analysis of country progress. A total of 15 out of 18 high-burden countries have taken concrete actions to advance newborn health; four have developed specific action plans with an additional six in process and a further three strengthening newborn components within existing plans. Eight high-burden countries have a newborn mortality target, but only three have a stillbirth target. The ENAP implementation in countries is well-supported by UN agencies, particularly UNICEF and WHO, as well as multilateral and bilateral agencies, especially in health workforce training. New financial commitments from development partners and the private sector are substantial but tracking of national funding remains a challenge. For interventions with strong evidence, low levels of coverage persists and health information systems require investment and support to improve quality and quantity of data to guide and track progress. Some of the highest burden countries have established newborn health action plans and are scaling up evidence based interventions. Further progress will only be made with attention to context-specific implementation challenges, especially in areas that have been neglected to date such as quality improvement, sustained investment in training and monitoring health worker skills, support to budgeting and health financing, and strengthening of health information systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-0005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-075X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.06.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26249104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Bottlenecks ; Developing Countries ; Female ; Global Health ; Health Planning - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Implementation ; Indicators ; Infant ; Infant Mortality ; Infant, Newborn ; Maternal ; Maternal-Child Health Services - organization &amp; administration ; Maternal-Child Health Services - standards ; Mortality ; Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine ; Newborn ; Pilot Projects ; Pregnancy ; Program Development ; Program Evaluation ; Quality of Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Social Responsibility ; Stillbirth ; Survival ; Targets</subject><ispartof>Seminars in perinatology, 2015-08, Vol.39 (5), p.326-337</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-f03732cd40b741690481f5b476ed4d18071e35985545717ea022a5ced926f4603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-f03732cd40b741690481f5b476ed4d18071e35985545717ea022a5ced926f4603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146000515000518$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26249104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Mary V., MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocoman, Olive, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Kim E., MBChB, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daelmans, Bernadette, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaka, Nabila, MBBS/MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhoda, Natasha R., MBChB, FC Paed, Certificate in Neonatology</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moxon, Sarah G., RN, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kak, Lily, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawn, Joy E., MBBS, MRCP, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khadka, Neena, MBBS, DCH, MSc, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmstadt, Gary L., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of the Every Newborn Action Plan: Progress and lessons learned</title><title>Seminars in perinatology</title><addtitle>Semin Perinatol</addtitle><description>Abstract Progress in reducing newborn mortality has lagged behind progress in reducing maternal and child deaths. The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) was launched in 2014, with the aim of achieving equitable and high-quality coverage of care for all women and newborns through links with other global and national plans and measurement and accountability frameworks. This article aims to assess country progress and the mechanisms in place to support country implementation of the ENAP. A country tracking tool was developed and piloted in October–December 2014 to collect data on the ENAP-related national milestones and implementation barriers in 18 high-burden countries. Simultaneously, a mapping exercise involving 47 semi-structured interviews with partner organizations was carried out to frame the categories of technical support available in countries to support care at and around the time of birth by health system building blocks. Existing literature and reports were assessed to further supplement analysis of country progress. A total of 15 out of 18 high-burden countries have taken concrete actions to advance newborn health; four have developed specific action plans with an additional six in process and a further three strengthening newborn components within existing plans. Eight high-burden countries have a newborn mortality target, but only three have a stillbirth target. The ENAP implementation in countries is well-supported by UN agencies, particularly UNICEF and WHO, as well as multilateral and bilateral agencies, especially in health workforce training. New financial commitments from development partners and the private sector are substantial but tracking of national funding remains a challenge. For interventions with strong evidence, low levels of coverage persists and health information systems require investment and support to improve quality and quantity of data to guide and track progress. Some of the highest burden countries have established newborn health action plans and are scaling up evidence based interventions. Further progress will only be made with attention to context-specific implementation challenges, especially in areas that have been neglected to date such as quality improvement, sustained investment in training and monitoring health worker skills, support to budgeting and health financing, and strengthening of health information systems.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Bottlenecks</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Health Planning - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Mortality</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Maternal</subject><subject>Maternal-Child Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Maternal-Child Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine</subject><subject>Newborn</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Social Responsibility</subject><subject>Stillbirth</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Targets</subject><issn>0146-0005</issn><issn>1558-075X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQx60K1G5bPgJVjlwSxvEr2wOoqvqSSlsJkLhZXmdCvU3sxc4W7bfH6S4cuPQyM9L85_UbQt5TqCgI9nFZJRxWGF1VAxUVyAqA75EZFaIpQYkfb8gMKJclAIgDcpjSEoDxOYV9clDLeor4jHy5GVY9DuhHM7rgi9AV4yMWF88YN8Ud_l6E6Isz-5J76I0_LR5i-BkxpcL4tuhzEHzK3kSP7TF525k-4budPyLfLy--nV-Xt_dXN-dnt6UVTI1lB0yx2rYcFopTOQfe0E4suJLY8pY2oCgyMW-E4EJRhQbq2giL7byWHZfAjsiHbd9VDL_WmEY9uGSxzwtiWCdNFXAmQNImS8VWamNIKWKnV9ENJm40BT2R1Eu9I6knkhqkziRz3cluxHoxYPuv6i-6LPi8FWA-9Nlh1Mk69HlLF9GOug3u1RGf_utge-edNf0TbjAtwzr6TFFTnWoN-uv0zumbVLzYhv0BqjKaeA</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Kinney, Mary V., MSc</creator><creator>Cocoman, Olive, MSc</creator><creator>Dickson, Kim E., MBChB, MSc</creator><creator>Daelmans, Bernadette, MD</creator><creator>Zaka, Nabila, MBBS/MD, PhD</creator><creator>Rhoda, Natasha R., MBChB, FC Paed, Certificate in Neonatology</creator><creator>Moxon, Sarah G., RN, MPH</creator><creator>Kak, Lily, PhD</creator><creator>Lawn, Joy E., MBBS, MRCP, MPH, PhD</creator><creator>Khadka, Neena, MBBS, DCH, MSc, MPH</creator><creator>Darmstadt, Gary L., MD, MS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Implementation of the Every Newborn Action Plan: Progress and lessons learned</title><author>Kinney, Mary V., MSc ; Cocoman, Olive, MSc ; Dickson, Kim E., MBChB, MSc ; Daelmans, Bernadette, MD ; Zaka, Nabila, MBBS/MD, PhD ; Rhoda, Natasha R., MBChB, FC Paed, Certificate in Neonatology ; Moxon, Sarah G., RN, MPH ; Kak, Lily, PhD ; Lawn, Joy E., MBBS, MRCP, MPH, PhD ; Khadka, Neena, MBBS, DCH, MSc, MPH ; Darmstadt, Gary L., MD, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-f03732cd40b741690481f5b476ed4d18071e35985545717ea022a5ced926f4603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Bottlenecks</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Health Planning - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Mortality</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Maternal</topic><topic>Maternal-Child Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Maternal-Child Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine</topic><topic>Newborn</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Social Responsibility</topic><topic>Stillbirth</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Targets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Mary V., MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocoman, Olive, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Kim E., MBChB, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daelmans, Bernadette, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaka, Nabila, MBBS/MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhoda, Natasha R., MBChB, FC Paed, Certificate in Neonatology</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moxon, Sarah G., RN, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kak, Lily, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawn, Joy E., MBBS, MRCP, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khadka, Neena, MBBS, DCH, MSc, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmstadt, Gary L., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in perinatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kinney, Mary V., MSc</au><au>Cocoman, Olive, MSc</au><au>Dickson, Kim E., MBChB, MSc</au><au>Daelmans, Bernadette, MD</au><au>Zaka, Nabila, MBBS/MD, PhD</au><au>Rhoda, Natasha R., MBChB, FC Paed, Certificate in Neonatology</au><au>Moxon, Sarah G., RN, MPH</au><au>Kak, Lily, PhD</au><au>Lawn, Joy E., MBBS, MRCP, MPH, PhD</au><au>Khadka, Neena, MBBS, DCH, MSc, MPH</au><au>Darmstadt, Gary L., MD, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of the Every Newborn Action Plan: Progress and lessons learned</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in perinatology</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Perinatol</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>337</epage><pages>326-337</pages><issn>0146-0005</issn><eissn>1558-075X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Progress in reducing newborn mortality has lagged behind progress in reducing maternal and child deaths. The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) was launched in 2014, with the aim of achieving equitable and high-quality coverage of care for all women and newborns through links with other global and national plans and measurement and accountability frameworks. This article aims to assess country progress and the mechanisms in place to support country implementation of the ENAP. A country tracking tool was developed and piloted in October–December 2014 to collect data on the ENAP-related national milestones and implementation barriers in 18 high-burden countries. Simultaneously, a mapping exercise involving 47 semi-structured interviews with partner organizations was carried out to frame the categories of technical support available in countries to support care at and around the time of birth by health system building blocks. Existing literature and reports were assessed to further supplement analysis of country progress. A total of 15 out of 18 high-burden countries have taken concrete actions to advance newborn health; four have developed specific action plans with an additional six in process and a further three strengthening newborn components within existing plans. Eight high-burden countries have a newborn mortality target, but only three have a stillbirth target. The ENAP implementation in countries is well-supported by UN agencies, particularly UNICEF and WHO, as well as multilateral and bilateral agencies, especially in health workforce training. New financial commitments from development partners and the private sector are substantial but tracking of national funding remains a challenge. For interventions with strong evidence, low levels of coverage persists and health information systems require investment and support to improve quality and quantity of data to guide and track progress. Some of the highest burden countries have established newborn health action plans and are scaling up evidence based interventions. Further progress will only be made with attention to context-specific implementation challenges, especially in areas that have been neglected to date such as quality improvement, sustained investment in training and monitoring health worker skills, support to budgeting and health financing, and strengthening of health information systems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26249104</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.semperi.2015.06.004</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-0005
ispartof Seminars in perinatology, 2015-08, Vol.39 (5), p.326-337
issn 0146-0005
1558-075X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1704350618
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Benchmarking
Bottlenecks
Developing Countries
Female
Global Health
Health Planning - organization & administration
Humans
Implementation
Indicators
Infant
Infant Mortality
Infant, Newborn
Maternal
Maternal-Child Health Services - organization & administration
Maternal-Child Health Services - standards
Mortality
Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine
Newborn
Pilot Projects
Pregnancy
Program Development
Program Evaluation
Quality of Health Care - organization & administration
Quality of Health Care - standards
Social Responsibility
Stillbirth
Survival
Targets
title Implementation of the Every Newborn Action Plan: Progress and lessons learned
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A02%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20the%20Every%20Newborn%20Action%20Plan:%20Progress%20and%20lessons%20learned&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20perinatology&rft.au=Kinney,%20Mary%20V.,%20MSc&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=337&rft.pages=326-337&rft.issn=0146-0005&rft.eissn=1558-075X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.semperi.2015.06.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1704350618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1704350618&rft_id=info:pmid/26249104&rft_els_id=S0146000515000518&rfr_iscdi=true