Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center
Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of innovation and technology management 2015-02, Vol.12 (1), p.1550002-1-1550002-20 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1-1550002-20 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1550002 |
container_title | International journal of innovation and technology management |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Hutterer, Peter Gattringer, Regina Irschik, Hans Strehl, Franz |
description | Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This paper deeply analyzes the Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM) and exposes why this publicly funded research center is able to effectively manage these conflicting demands. Using the theory of ambidexterity, the study highlights that appropriate structures and strategies are preliminarily needed. In particular we found that the fundamental abilities for managing contradictory demands are located on an individual level and argue that especially the autonomous, well-educated people and their competences of self-organization enable the research center to be ambidextrous. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1142/S0219877015500029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_world</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1704340993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1704340993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3479-80ed9dbf1a60224615f0c9b1c8a9ef6e628e2a181812bf3fa20d078f8bad12683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFP3DAQha2KSqwWfgA3S730sjBjJ058rLYsIIFA3fYcOfZ4cZuNwU5U7b9vokU9gOYwh_e-p6fH2AXCJWIhrrYgUNdVBViWACD0J7bASsuV0iWcsMUsr2b9lJ3nHFpArWRZ1MWCPT6Y3uxCv-Pr2A_JuGCHmA58O5g_9Bw7R4l_p73pXebRc8OfxrYLtjvwzdg7cvwHZTLJPvM19QOlM_bZmy7T-dtfsl-b65_r29X9483d-tv9ysqimsoAOe1aj0aBEIXC0oPVLdraaPKKlKhJGKynE62X3ghwUNW-bo1DoWq5ZF-PuS8pvo6Uh2YfsqWuMz3FMTdYQSEL0FpO1i_vrL_jmPqpXSMQlVSilHMgHl02xZwT-eYlhb1JhwahmVduPqw8MXBk_sbUuWzDNEHwwf5HPyL_AKMbfVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116362538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Hutterer, Peter ; Gattringer, Regina ; Irschik, Hans ; Strehl, Franz</creator><creatorcontrib>Hutterer, Peter ; Gattringer, Regina ; Irschik, Hans ; Strehl, Franz</creatorcontrib><description>Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This paper deeply analyzes the Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM) and exposes why this publicly funded research center is able to effectively manage these conflicting demands. Using the theory of ambidexterity, the study highlights that appropriate structures and strategies are preliminarily needed. In particular we found that the fundamental abilities for managing contradictory demands are located on an individual level and argue that especially the autonomous, well-educated people and their competences of self-organization enable the research center to be ambidextrous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0219-8770</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1793-6950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1142/S0219877015500029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Austria ; Europe ; European Union ; Mechatronics ; Public expenditure ; Research centers ; Research facilities ; Stakeholder ; Technological change ; Technology</subject><ispartof>International journal of innovation and technology management, 2015-02, Vol.12 (1), p.1550002-1-1550002-20</ispartof><rights>2015, World Scientific Publishing Company</rights><rights>2015. World Scientific Publishing Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3479-80ed9dbf1a60224615f0c9b1c8a9ef6e628e2a181812bf3fa20d078f8bad12683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3479-80ed9dbf1a60224615f0c9b1c8a9ef6e628e2a181812bf3fa20d078f8bad12683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hutterer, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gattringer, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irschik, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strehl, Franz</creatorcontrib><title>Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center</title><title>International journal of innovation and technology management</title><description>Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This paper deeply analyzes the Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM) and exposes why this publicly funded research center is able to effectively manage these conflicting demands. Using the theory of ambidexterity, the study highlights that appropriate structures and strategies are preliminarily needed. In particular we found that the fundamental abilities for managing contradictory demands are located on an individual level and argue that especially the autonomous, well-educated people and their competences of self-organization enable the research center to be ambidextrous.</description><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Public expenditure</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0219-8770</issn><issn>0022-4278</issn><issn>1793-6950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEFP3DAQha2KSqwWfgA3S730sjBjJ058rLYsIIFA3fYcOfZ4cZuNwU5U7b9vokU9gOYwh_e-p6fH2AXCJWIhrrYgUNdVBViWACD0J7bASsuV0iWcsMUsr2b9lJ3nHFpArWRZ1MWCPT6Y3uxCv-Pr2A_JuGCHmA58O5g_9Bw7R4l_p73pXebRc8OfxrYLtjvwzdg7cvwHZTLJPvM19QOlM_bZmy7T-dtfsl-b65_r29X9483d-tv9ysqimsoAOe1aj0aBEIXC0oPVLdraaPKKlKhJGKynE62X3ghwUNW-bo1DoWq5ZF-PuS8pvo6Uh2YfsqWuMz3FMTdYQSEL0FpO1i_vrL_jmPqpXSMQlVSilHMgHl02xZwT-eYlhb1JhwahmVduPqw8MXBk_sbUuWzDNEHwwf5HPyL_AKMbfVQ</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Hutterer, Peter</creator><creator>Gattringer, Regina</creator><creator>Irschik, Hans</creator><creator>Strehl, Franz</creator><general>World Scientific Publishing Company</general><general>World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center</title><author>Hutterer, Peter ; Gattringer, Regina ; Irschik, Hans ; Strehl, Franz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3479-80ed9dbf1a60224615f0c9b1c8a9ef6e628e2a181812bf3fa20d078f8bad12683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Public expenditure</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hutterer, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gattringer, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irschik, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strehl, Franz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of innovation and technology management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hutterer, Peter</au><au>Gattringer, Regina</au><au>Irschik, Hans</au><au>Strehl, Franz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center</atitle><jtitle>International journal of innovation and technology management</jtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1550002</spage><epage>1-1550002-20</epage><pages>1550002-1-1550002-20</pages><issn>0219-8770</issn><issn>0022-4278</issn><eissn>1793-6950</eissn><abstract>Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This paper deeply analyzes the Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM) and exposes why this publicly funded research center is able to effectively manage these conflicting demands. Using the theory of ambidexterity, the study highlights that appropriate structures and strategies are preliminarily needed. In particular we found that the fundamental abilities for managing contradictory demands are located on an individual level and argue that especially the autonomous, well-educated people and their competences of self-organization enable the research center to be ambidextrous.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>World Scientific Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1142/S0219877015500029</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0219-8770 |
ispartof | International journal of innovation and technology management, 2015-02, Vol.12 (1), p.1550002-1-1550002-20 |
issn | 0219-8770 0022-4278 1793-6950 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1704340993 |
source | Access via SAGE; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Austria Europe European Union Mechatronics Public expenditure Research centers Research facilities Stakeholder Technological change Technology |
title | Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A35%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_world&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20Contradictory%20Stakeholder%20Demands%20of%20a%20Publicly%20Funded%20Research%20Center&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20innovation%20and%20technology%20management&rft.au=Hutterer,%20Peter&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1550002&rft.epage=1-1550002-20&rft.pages=1550002-1-1550002-20&rft.issn=0219-8770&rft.eissn=1793-6950&rft_id=info:doi/10.1142/S0219877015500029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_world%3E1704340993%3C/proquest_world%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116362538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |