Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center

Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of innovation and technology management 2015-02, Vol.12 (1), p.1550002-1-1550002-20
Hauptverfasser: Hutterer, Peter, Gattringer, Regina, Irschik, Hans, Strehl, Franz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1-1550002-20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1550002
container_title International journal of innovation and technology management
container_volume 12
creator Hutterer, Peter
Gattringer, Regina
Irschik, Hans
Strehl, Franz
description Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This paper deeply analyzes the Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM) and exposes why this publicly funded research center is able to effectively manage these conflicting demands. Using the theory of ambidexterity, the study highlights that appropriate structures and strategies are preliminarily needed. In particular we found that the fundamental abilities for managing contradictory demands are located on an individual level and argue that especially the autonomous, well-educated people and their competences of self-organization enable the research center to be ambidextrous.
doi_str_mv 10.1142/S0219877015500029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_world</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1704340993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1704340993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3479-80ed9dbf1a60224615f0c9b1c8a9ef6e628e2a181812bf3fa20d078f8bad12683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFP3DAQha2KSqwWfgA3S730sjBjJ058rLYsIIFA3fYcOfZ4cZuNwU5U7b9vokU9gOYwh_e-p6fH2AXCJWIhrrYgUNdVBViWACD0J7bASsuV0iWcsMUsr2b9lJ3nHFpArWRZ1MWCPT6Y3uxCv-Pr2A_JuGCHmA58O5g_9Bw7R4l_p73pXebRc8OfxrYLtjvwzdg7cvwHZTLJPvM19QOlM_bZmy7T-dtfsl-b65_r29X9483d-tv9ysqimsoAOe1aj0aBEIXC0oPVLdraaPKKlKhJGKynE62X3ghwUNW-bo1DoWq5ZF-PuS8pvo6Uh2YfsqWuMz3FMTdYQSEL0FpO1i_vrL_jmPqpXSMQlVSilHMgHl02xZwT-eYlhb1JhwahmVduPqw8MXBk_sbUuWzDNEHwwf5HPyL_AKMbfVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116362538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Hutterer, Peter ; Gattringer, Regina ; Irschik, Hans ; Strehl, Franz</creator><creatorcontrib>Hutterer, Peter ; Gattringer, Regina ; Irschik, Hans ; Strehl, Franz</creatorcontrib><description>Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This paper deeply analyzes the Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM) and exposes why this publicly funded research center is able to effectively manage these conflicting demands. Using the theory of ambidexterity, the study highlights that appropriate structures and strategies are preliminarily needed. In particular we found that the fundamental abilities for managing contradictory demands are located on an individual level and argue that especially the autonomous, well-educated people and their competences of self-organization enable the research center to be ambidextrous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0219-8770</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1793-6950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1142/S0219877015500029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Austria ; Europe ; European Union ; Mechatronics ; Public expenditure ; Research centers ; Research facilities ; Stakeholder ; Technological change ; Technology</subject><ispartof>International journal of innovation and technology management, 2015-02, Vol.12 (1), p.1550002-1-1550002-20</ispartof><rights>2015, World Scientific Publishing Company</rights><rights>2015. World Scientific Publishing Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3479-80ed9dbf1a60224615f0c9b1c8a9ef6e628e2a181812bf3fa20d078f8bad12683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3479-80ed9dbf1a60224615f0c9b1c8a9ef6e628e2a181812bf3fa20d078f8bad12683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hutterer, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gattringer, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irschik, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strehl, Franz</creatorcontrib><title>Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center</title><title>International journal of innovation and technology management</title><description>Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This paper deeply analyzes the Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM) and exposes why this publicly funded research center is able to effectively manage these conflicting demands. Using the theory of ambidexterity, the study highlights that appropriate structures and strategies are preliminarily needed. In particular we found that the fundamental abilities for managing contradictory demands are located on an individual level and argue that especially the autonomous, well-educated people and their competences of self-organization enable the research center to be ambidextrous.</description><subject>Austria</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Public expenditure</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0219-8770</issn><issn>0022-4278</issn><issn>1793-6950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEFP3DAQha2KSqwWfgA3S730sjBjJ058rLYsIIFA3fYcOfZ4cZuNwU5U7b9vokU9gOYwh_e-p6fH2AXCJWIhrrYgUNdVBViWACD0J7bASsuV0iWcsMUsr2b9lJ3nHFpArWRZ1MWCPT6Y3uxCv-Pr2A_JuGCHmA58O5g_9Bw7R4l_p73pXebRc8OfxrYLtjvwzdg7cvwHZTLJPvM19QOlM_bZmy7T-dtfsl-b65_r29X9483d-tv9ysqimsoAOe1aj0aBEIXC0oPVLdraaPKKlKhJGKynE62X3ghwUNW-bo1DoWq5ZF-PuS8pvo6Uh2YfsqWuMz3FMTdYQSEL0FpO1i_vrL_jmPqpXSMQlVSilHMgHl02xZwT-eYlhb1JhwahmVduPqw8MXBk_sbUuWzDNEHwwf5HPyL_AKMbfVQ</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Hutterer, Peter</creator><creator>Gattringer, Regina</creator><creator>Irschik, Hans</creator><creator>Strehl, Franz</creator><general>World Scientific Publishing Company</general><general>World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center</title><author>Hutterer, Peter ; Gattringer, Regina ; Irschik, Hans ; Strehl, Franz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3479-80ed9dbf1a60224615f0c9b1c8a9ef6e628e2a181812bf3fa20d078f8bad12683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Austria</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Public expenditure</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hutterer, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gattringer, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irschik, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strehl, Franz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of innovation and technology management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hutterer, Peter</au><au>Gattringer, Regina</au><au>Irschik, Hans</au><au>Strehl, Franz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center</atitle><jtitle>International journal of innovation and technology management</jtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1550002</spage><epage>1-1550002-20</epage><pages>1550002-1-1550002-20</pages><issn>0219-8770</issn><issn>0022-4278</issn><eissn>1793-6950</eissn><abstract>Following the guidelines of the European Union (EU), Austria supports scientific research and technological development by publicly funding of research centers. Such centers are positioned between scientific and industrial stakeholders and have to simultaneously fulfill contradictory demands. This paper deeply analyzes the Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM) and exposes why this publicly funded research center is able to effectively manage these conflicting demands. Using the theory of ambidexterity, the study highlights that appropriate structures and strategies are preliminarily needed. In particular we found that the fundamental abilities for managing contradictory demands are located on an individual level and argue that especially the autonomous, well-educated people and their competences of self-organization enable the research center to be ambidextrous.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>World Scientific Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1142/S0219877015500029</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0219-8770
ispartof International journal of innovation and technology management, 2015-02, Vol.12 (1), p.1550002-1-1550002-20
issn 0219-8770
0022-4278
1793-6950
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1704340993
source Access via SAGE; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Austria
Europe
European Union
Mechatronics
Public expenditure
Research centers
Research facilities
Stakeholder
Technological change
Technology
title Managing Contradictory Stakeholder Demands of a Publicly Funded Research Center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A35%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_world&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20Contradictory%20Stakeholder%20Demands%20of%20a%20Publicly%20Funded%20Research%20Center&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20innovation%20and%20technology%20management&rft.au=Hutterer,%20Peter&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1550002&rft.epage=1-1550002-20&rft.pages=1550002-1-1550002-20&rft.issn=0219-8770&rft.eissn=1793-6950&rft_id=info:doi/10.1142/S0219877015500029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_world%3E1704340993%3C/proquest_world%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116362538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true