Early, Goal-Directed Resuscitation for Septic Shock
To the Editor: The Protocolised Management in Sepsis (ProMISe) trial (April 2 issue) 1 completes a trio of studies 1 – 3 that question the further application of early, goal-directed therapy (EGDT) as suggested by Rivers et al. 4 In particular, these trials consistently show no survival benefit with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2015-08, Vol.373 (6), p.576-578 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
The Protocolised Management in Sepsis (ProMISe) trial (April 2 issue)
1
completes a trio of studies
1
–
3
that question the further application of early, goal-directed therapy (EGDT) as suggested by Rivers et al.
4
In particular, these trials consistently show no survival benefit with regard to the mandated use of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO
2
) monitoring. However, it remains questionable whether the results of the three trials support this claim. According to the EGDT protocol, an ScvO
2
value of less than 70% is a trigger for hemodynamic intervention. Unlike in the study by Rivers et al., . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc1506514 |