Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing car...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of infection control 2015-07, Vol.43 (7), p.e33-e38
Hauptverfasser: Kohler, Philipp, MD, Sommerstein, Rami, MD, Schönrath, Felix, MD, Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD, Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD, Tschirky, Sandra, Falk, Volkmar, MD, Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc, Sax, Hugo, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e38
container_issue 7
container_start_page e33
container_title American journal of infection control
container_volume 43
creator Kohler, Philipp, MD
Sommerstein, Rami, MD
Schönrath, Felix, MD
Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD
Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD
Tschirky, Sandra
Falk, Volkmar, MD
Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc
Sax, Hugo, MD
description Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing cardiac surgery before and after implementation of mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine/octenidine body wash. Results Overall SSI rate was 8.6% (81 out of 945) for the control and 6.9% (58 out of 842) for the intervention cohort ( P  = .19). In multivariable analysis, the study protocol was associated with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.91; P  = .015) with regard to any SSI. This effect was exclusively due to a reduction in superficial SSIs and was observed both in patients with preoperative and postoperative treatment initiation. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), the most commonly isolated pathogen, were found in 37% and 48% ( P  = .19) of patients in the control and the intervention cohort, respectively. CoNS were methicillin resistant in 69% of cases. Conclusions Mupirocin and antiseptic body wash reduced the rate of superficial but not deep or organ/space SSIs. Postoperative patient treatment may be critical in reducing the risk for superficial SSI, presumably due to a reduction of bacterial skin load. A high proportion of SSI was due to methicillin-resistant CoNS and thus not covered by routine perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1702645480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196655315004319</els_id><sourcerecordid>1693706536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-84c41de613fecacac1fd18c33230e3e6eddf3bcff5ff193496e622f15a827d693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksuKFDEUhoMoTjv6Ai4k4MZNlblXFYggw3iBARfqOqSTk56U3UmZVI30M_jSpuxRYRZKyA2-_w_n_EHoKSUtJVS9HFszBtsyQmVLREv7_h7aUMm6hrNB3UcbQgfVKCn5GXpUykgIGbiSD9EZU5T3SpEN-nHpPdgZJ48nyCHVxczhBvBhmUJONkRsoqtzDgWmOVi8Te6Iv5tyjVPEIa7qUE9VBr9Qa5ZyspjMfJ12EEvF1kuAOBe8RAd5l0LcVTS7YCwuS95BPj5GD7zZF3hyu5-jL28vP1-8b64-vvtw8eaqsaJjc9MLK6iDWkJ929RBvaO95ZxxAhwUOOf51novvacDF4MCxZin0vSsc2rg5-jFyXfK6dsCZdaHUCzs9yZCWoqmHWFKSNGT_6PVriNKclXR53fQMS051kJWSkguJZWVYifK5lRKBq-nHA4mHzUlek1Vj3pNVa-paiJ0TbWKnt1aL9sDuD-S3zFW4NUJgNq2mwBZF1u7bcGFXPPRLoV_-7--I7f7EIM1-69whPK3Dl2YJvrT-q_Wb0UlIYLXHv8EEyHKvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1694535515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kohler, Philipp, MD ; Sommerstein, Rami, MD ; Schönrath, Felix, MD ; Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD ; Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD ; Tschirky, Sandra ; Falk, Volkmar, MD ; Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc ; Sax, Hugo, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Philipp, MD ; Sommerstein, Rami, MD ; Schönrath, Felix, MD ; Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD ; Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD ; Tschirky, Sandra ; Falk, Volkmar, MD ; Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc ; Sax, Hugo, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing cardiac surgery before and after implementation of mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine/octenidine body wash. Results Overall SSI rate was 8.6% (81 out of 945) for the control and 6.9% (58 out of 842) for the intervention cohort ( P  = .19). In multivariable analysis, the study protocol was associated with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.91; P  = .015) with regard to any SSI. This effect was exclusively due to a reduction in superficial SSIs and was observed both in patients with preoperative and postoperative treatment initiation. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), the most commonly isolated pathogen, were found in 37% and 48% ( P  = .19) of patients in the control and the intervention cohort, respectively. CoNS were methicillin resistant in 69% of cases. Conclusions Mupirocin and antiseptic body wash reduced the rate of superficial but not deep or organ/space SSIs. Postoperative patient treatment may be critical in reducing the risk for superficial SSI, presumably due to a reduction of bacterial skin load. A high proportion of SSI was due to methicillin-resistant CoNS and thus not covered by routine perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26138660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration & dosage ; Antisepsis - methods ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; Chlorhexidine ; Chlorhexidine - administration & dosage ; Coagulase-negative staphylococci ; Drug resistance ; Female ; Humans ; Infection Control ; Infections ; Infectious Disease ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Mupirocin - administration & dosage ; Perioperative decontamination ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Pyridines - administration & dosage ; Risk assessment ; Surgery ; Surgical site infection ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Thoracic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2015-07, Vol.43 (7), p.e33-e38</ispartof><rights>Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Mosby-Year Book, Inc. Jul 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-84c41de613fecacac1fd18c33230e3e6eddf3bcff5ff193496e622f15a827d693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-84c41de613fecacac1fd18c33230e3e6eddf3bcff5ff193496e622f15a827d693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26138660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Philipp, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerstein, Rami, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönrath, Felix, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschirky, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falk, Volkmar, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sax, Hugo, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing cardiac surgery before and after implementation of mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine/octenidine body wash. Results Overall SSI rate was 8.6% (81 out of 945) for the control and 6.9% (58 out of 842) for the intervention cohort ( P  = .19). In multivariable analysis, the study protocol was associated with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.91; P  = .015) with regard to any SSI. This effect was exclusively due to a reduction in superficial SSIs and was observed both in patients with preoperative and postoperative treatment initiation. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), the most commonly isolated pathogen, were found in 37% and 48% ( P  = .19) of patients in the control and the intervention cohort, respectively. CoNS were methicillin resistant in 69% of cases. Conclusions Mupirocin and antiseptic body wash reduced the rate of superficial but not deep or organ/space SSIs. Postoperative patient treatment may be critical in reducing the risk for superficial SSI, presumably due to a reduction of bacterial skin load. A high proportion of SSI was due to methicillin-resistant CoNS and thus not covered by routine perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antisepsis - methods</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Coagulase-negative staphylococci</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mupirocin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Perioperative decontamination</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pyridines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical site infection</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksuKFDEUhoMoTjv6Ai4k4MZNlblXFYggw3iBARfqOqSTk56U3UmZVI30M_jSpuxRYRZKyA2-_w_n_EHoKSUtJVS9HFszBtsyQmVLREv7_h7aUMm6hrNB3UcbQgfVKCn5GXpUykgIGbiSD9EZU5T3SpEN-nHpPdgZJ48nyCHVxczhBvBhmUJONkRsoqtzDgWmOVi8Te6Iv5tyjVPEIa7qUE9VBr9Qa5ZyspjMfJ12EEvF1kuAOBe8RAd5l0LcVTS7YCwuS95BPj5GD7zZF3hyu5-jL28vP1-8b64-vvtw8eaqsaJjc9MLK6iDWkJ929RBvaO95ZxxAhwUOOf51novvacDF4MCxZin0vSsc2rg5-jFyXfK6dsCZdaHUCzs9yZCWoqmHWFKSNGT_6PVriNKclXR53fQMS051kJWSkguJZWVYifK5lRKBq-nHA4mHzUlek1Vj3pNVa-paiJ0TbWKnt1aL9sDuD-S3zFW4NUJgNq2mwBZF1u7bcGFXPPRLoV_-7--I7f7EIM1-69whPK3Dl2YJvrT-q_Wb0UlIYLXHv8EEyHKvA</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Kohler, Philipp, MD</creator><creator>Sommerstein, Rami, MD</creator><creator>Schönrath, Felix, MD</creator><creator>Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD</creator><creator>Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD</creator><creator>Tschirky, Sandra</creator><creator>Falk, Volkmar, MD</creator><creator>Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Sax, Hugo, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Mosby-Year Book, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery</title><author>Kohler, Philipp, MD ; Sommerstein, Rami, MD ; Schönrath, Felix, MD ; Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD ; Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD ; Tschirky, Sandra ; Falk, Volkmar, MD ; Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc ; Sax, Hugo, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-84c41de613fecacac1fd18c33230e3e6eddf3bcff5ff193496e622f15a827d693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antisepsis - methods</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Coagulase-negative staphylococci</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mupirocin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Perioperative decontamination</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pyridines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical site infection</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Philipp, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerstein, Rami, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönrath, Felix, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschirky, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falk, Volkmar, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sax, Hugo, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kohler, Philipp, MD</au><au>Sommerstein, Rami, MD</au><au>Schönrath, Felix, MD</au><au>Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD</au><au>Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD</au><au>Tschirky, Sandra</au><au>Falk, Volkmar, MD</au><au>Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc</au><au>Sax, Hugo, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e33</spage><epage>e38</epage><pages>e33-e38</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing cardiac surgery before and after implementation of mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine/octenidine body wash. Results Overall SSI rate was 8.6% (81 out of 945) for the control and 6.9% (58 out of 842) for the intervention cohort ( P  = .19). In multivariable analysis, the study protocol was associated with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.91; P  = .015) with regard to any SSI. This effect was exclusively due to a reduction in superficial SSIs and was observed both in patients with preoperative and postoperative treatment initiation. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), the most commonly isolated pathogen, were found in 37% and 48% ( P  = .19) of patients in the control and the intervention cohort, respectively. CoNS were methicillin resistant in 69% of cases. Conclusions Mupirocin and antiseptic body wash reduced the rate of superficial but not deep or organ/space SSIs. Postoperative patient treatment may be critical in reducing the risk for superficial SSI, presumably due to a reduction of bacterial skin load. A high proportion of SSI was due to methicillin-resistant CoNS and thus not covered by routine perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26138660</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-6553
ispartof American journal of infection control, 2015-07, Vol.43 (7), p.e33-e38
issn 0196-6553
1527-3296
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1702645480
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration & dosage
Antisepsis - methods
Bacteria - classification
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Bacterial Infections - epidemiology
Bacterial Infections - microbiology
Bacterial Infections - prevention & control
Chlorhexidine
Chlorhexidine - administration & dosage
Coagulase-negative staphylococci
Drug resistance
Female
Humans
Infection Control
Infections
Infectious Disease
Male
Medical treatment
Middle Aged
Mupirocin - administration & dosage
Perioperative decontamination
Preoperative Care - methods
Prospective Studies
Pyridines - administration & dosage
Risk assessment
Surgery
Surgical site infection
Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology
Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology
Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control
Thoracic Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20perioperative%20mupirocin%20and%20antiseptic%20body%20wash%20on%20infection%20rate%20and%20causative%20pathogens%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20cardiac%20surgery&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Kohler,%20Philipp,%20MD&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e33&rft.epage=e38&rft.pages=e33-e38&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1693706536%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1694535515&rft_id=info:pmid/26138660&rft_els_id=S0196655315004319&rfr_iscdi=true