Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery
Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing car...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of infection control 2015-07, Vol.43 (7), p.e33-e38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e33 |
container_title | American journal of infection control |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Kohler, Philipp, MD Sommerstein, Rami, MD Schönrath, Felix, MD Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD Tschirky, Sandra Falk, Volkmar, MD Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc Sax, Hugo, MD |
description | Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing cardiac surgery before and after implementation of mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine/octenidine body wash. Results Overall SSI rate was 8.6% (81 out of 945) for the control and 6.9% (58 out of 842) for the intervention cohort ( P = .19). In multivariable analysis, the study protocol was associated with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.91; P = .015) with regard to any SSI. This effect was exclusively due to a reduction in superficial SSIs and was observed both in patients with preoperative and postoperative treatment initiation. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), the most commonly isolated pathogen, were found in 37% and 48% ( P = .19) of patients in the control and the intervention cohort, respectively. CoNS were methicillin resistant in 69% of cases. Conclusions Mupirocin and antiseptic body wash reduced the rate of superficial but not deep or organ/space SSIs. Postoperative patient treatment may be critical in reducing the risk for superficial SSI, presumably due to a reduction of bacterial skin load. A high proportion of SSI was due to methicillin-resistant CoNS and thus not covered by routine perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1702645480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196655315004319</els_id><sourcerecordid>1693706536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-84c41de613fecacac1fd18c33230e3e6eddf3bcff5ff193496e622f15a827d693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksuKFDEUhoMoTjv6Ai4k4MZNlblXFYggw3iBARfqOqSTk56U3UmZVI30M_jSpuxRYRZKyA2-_w_n_EHoKSUtJVS9HFszBtsyQmVLREv7_h7aUMm6hrNB3UcbQgfVKCn5GXpUykgIGbiSD9EZU5T3SpEN-nHpPdgZJ48nyCHVxczhBvBhmUJONkRsoqtzDgWmOVi8Te6Iv5tyjVPEIa7qUE9VBr9Qa5ZyspjMfJ12EEvF1kuAOBe8RAd5l0LcVTS7YCwuS95BPj5GD7zZF3hyu5-jL28vP1-8b64-vvtw8eaqsaJjc9MLK6iDWkJ929RBvaO95ZxxAhwUOOf51novvacDF4MCxZin0vSsc2rg5-jFyXfK6dsCZdaHUCzs9yZCWoqmHWFKSNGT_6PVriNKclXR53fQMS051kJWSkguJZWVYifK5lRKBq-nHA4mHzUlek1Vj3pNVa-paiJ0TbWKnt1aL9sDuD-S3zFW4NUJgNq2mwBZF1u7bcGFXPPRLoV_-7--I7f7EIM1-69whPK3Dl2YJvrT-q_Wb0UlIYLXHv8EEyHKvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1694535515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kohler, Philipp, MD ; Sommerstein, Rami, MD ; Schönrath, Felix, MD ; Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD ; Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD ; Tschirky, Sandra ; Falk, Volkmar, MD ; Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc ; Sax, Hugo, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Philipp, MD ; Sommerstein, Rami, MD ; Schönrath, Felix, MD ; Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD ; Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD ; Tschirky, Sandra ; Falk, Volkmar, MD ; Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc ; Sax, Hugo, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing cardiac surgery before and after implementation of mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine/octenidine body wash. Results Overall SSI rate was 8.6% (81 out of 945) for the control and 6.9% (58 out of 842) for the intervention cohort ( P = .19). In multivariable analysis, the study protocol was associated with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.91; P = .015) with regard to any SSI. This effect was exclusively due to a reduction in superficial SSIs and was observed both in patients with preoperative and postoperative treatment initiation. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), the most commonly isolated pathogen, were found in 37% and 48% ( P = .19) of patients in the control and the intervention cohort, respectively. CoNS were methicillin resistant in 69% of cases. Conclusions Mupirocin and antiseptic body wash reduced the rate of superficial but not deep or organ/space SSIs. Postoperative patient treatment may be critical in reducing the risk for superficial SSI, presumably due to a reduction of bacterial skin load. A high proportion of SSI was due to methicillin-resistant CoNS and thus not covered by routine perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26138660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Aged ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration & dosage ; Antisepsis - methods ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; Chlorhexidine ; Chlorhexidine - administration & dosage ; Coagulase-negative staphylococci ; Drug resistance ; Female ; Humans ; Infection Control ; Infections ; Infectious Disease ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Mupirocin - administration & dosage ; Perioperative decontamination ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Pyridines - administration & dosage ; Risk assessment ; Surgery ; Surgical site infection ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Thoracic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2015-07, Vol.43 (7), p.e33-e38</ispartof><rights>Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Mosby-Year Book, Inc. Jul 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-84c41de613fecacac1fd18c33230e3e6eddf3bcff5ff193496e622f15a827d693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-84c41de613fecacac1fd18c33230e3e6eddf3bcff5ff193496e622f15a827d693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26138660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Philipp, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerstein, Rami, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönrath, Felix, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschirky, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falk, Volkmar, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sax, Hugo, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing cardiac surgery before and after implementation of mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine/octenidine body wash. Results Overall SSI rate was 8.6% (81 out of 945) for the control and 6.9% (58 out of 842) for the intervention cohort ( P = .19). In multivariable analysis, the study protocol was associated with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.91; P = .015) with regard to any SSI. This effect was exclusively due to a reduction in superficial SSIs and was observed both in patients with preoperative and postoperative treatment initiation. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), the most commonly isolated pathogen, were found in 37% and 48% ( P = .19) of patients in the control and the intervention cohort, respectively. CoNS were methicillin resistant in 69% of cases. Conclusions Mupirocin and antiseptic body wash reduced the rate of superficial but not deep or organ/space SSIs. Postoperative patient treatment may be critical in reducing the risk for superficial SSI, presumably due to a reduction of bacterial skin load. A high proportion of SSI was due to methicillin-resistant CoNS and thus not covered by routine perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antisepsis - methods</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine</subject><subject>Chlorhexidine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Coagulase-negative staphylococci</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mupirocin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Perioperative decontamination</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pyridines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical site infection</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksuKFDEUhoMoTjv6Ai4k4MZNlblXFYggw3iBARfqOqSTk56U3UmZVI30M_jSpuxRYRZKyA2-_w_n_EHoKSUtJVS9HFszBtsyQmVLREv7_h7aUMm6hrNB3UcbQgfVKCn5GXpUykgIGbiSD9EZU5T3SpEN-nHpPdgZJ48nyCHVxczhBvBhmUJONkRsoqtzDgWmOVi8Te6Iv5tyjVPEIa7qUE9VBr9Qa5ZyspjMfJ12EEvF1kuAOBe8RAd5l0LcVTS7YCwuS95BPj5GD7zZF3hyu5-jL28vP1-8b64-vvtw8eaqsaJjc9MLK6iDWkJ929RBvaO95ZxxAhwUOOf51novvacDF4MCxZin0vSsc2rg5-jFyXfK6dsCZdaHUCzs9yZCWoqmHWFKSNGT_6PVriNKclXR53fQMS051kJWSkguJZWVYifK5lRKBq-nHA4mHzUlek1Vj3pNVa-paiJ0TbWKnt1aL9sDuD-S3zFW4NUJgNq2mwBZF1u7bcGFXPPRLoV_-7--I7f7EIM1-69whPK3Dl2YJvrT-q_Wb0UlIYLXHv8EEyHKvA</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Kohler, Philipp, MD</creator><creator>Sommerstein, Rami, MD</creator><creator>Schönrath, Felix, MD</creator><creator>Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD</creator><creator>Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD</creator><creator>Tschirky, Sandra</creator><creator>Falk, Volkmar, MD</creator><creator>Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Sax, Hugo, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Mosby-Year Book, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery</title><author>Kohler, Philipp, MD ; Sommerstein, Rami, MD ; Schönrath, Felix, MD ; Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD ; Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD ; Tschirky, Sandra ; Falk, Volkmar, MD ; Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc ; Sax, Hugo, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-84c41de613fecacac1fd18c33230e3e6eddf3bcff5ff193496e622f15a827d693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antisepsis - methods</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine</topic><topic>Chlorhexidine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Coagulase-negative staphylococci</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mupirocin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Perioperative decontamination</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pyridines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical site infection</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Philipp, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerstein, Rami, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönrath, Felix, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschirky, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falk, Volkmar, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sax, Hugo, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kohler, Philipp, MD</au><au>Sommerstein, Rami, MD</au><au>Schönrath, Felix, MD</au><au>Ajdler-Schäffler, Evelyne, MD</au><au>Anagnostopoulos, Alexia, MD</au><au>Tschirky, Sandra</au><au>Falk, Volkmar, MD</au><au>Kuster, Stefan P., MD, MSc</au><au>Sax, Hugo, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e33</spage><epage>e38</epage><pages>e33-e38</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>Introduction Preoperative nasal mupirocin has been shown to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed the effect of mupirocin plus antiseptic body wash on SSI rate and etiology. Methods Prospective SSI surveillance was done for patients undergoing cardiac surgery before and after implementation of mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine/octenidine body wash. Results Overall SSI rate was 8.6% (81 out of 945) for the control and 6.9% (58 out of 842) for the intervention cohort ( P = .19). In multivariable analysis, the study protocol was associated with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.91; P = .015) with regard to any SSI. This effect was exclusively due to a reduction in superficial SSIs and was observed both in patients with preoperative and postoperative treatment initiation. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), the most commonly isolated pathogen, were found in 37% and 48% ( P = .19) of patients in the control and the intervention cohort, respectively. CoNS were methicillin resistant in 69% of cases. Conclusions Mupirocin and antiseptic body wash reduced the rate of superficial but not deep or organ/space SSIs. Postoperative patient treatment may be critical in reducing the risk for superficial SSI, presumably due to a reduction of bacterial skin load. A high proportion of SSI was due to methicillin-resistant CoNS and thus not covered by routine perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26138660</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-6553 |
ispartof | American journal of infection control, 2015-07, Vol.43 (7), p.e33-e38 |
issn | 0196-6553 1527-3296 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1702645480 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aged Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Anti-Infective Agents, Local - administration & dosage Antisepsis - methods Bacteria - classification Bacteria - isolation & purification Bacterial Infections - epidemiology Bacterial Infections - microbiology Bacterial Infections - prevention & control Chlorhexidine Chlorhexidine - administration & dosage Coagulase-negative staphylococci Drug resistance Female Humans Infection Control Infections Infectious Disease Male Medical treatment Middle Aged Mupirocin - administration & dosage Perioperative decontamination Preoperative Care - methods Prospective Studies Pyridines - administration & dosage Risk assessment Surgery Surgical site infection Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control Thoracic Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Effect of perioperative mupirocin and antiseptic body wash on infection rate and causative pathogens in patients undergoing cardiac surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A51%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20perioperative%20mupirocin%20and%20antiseptic%20body%20wash%20on%20infection%20rate%20and%20causative%20pathogens%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20cardiac%20surgery&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Kohler,%20Philipp,%20MD&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e33&rft.epage=e38&rft.pages=e33-e38&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.188&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1693706536%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1694535515&rft_id=info:pmid/26138660&rft_els_id=S0196655315004319&rfr_iscdi=true |