Muzzled newshounds can still bite

Muzzled newshounds can still bite

Last year, the Chinese public were further alarmed after a Caixin exposé on contaminated rice. Since the early 2000s, examples such as these have led many to believe that the Chinese media could one day play the same role as its counterparts in America and Britain and hold govern ment to account. Ac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World today 2015-08, Vol.71 (4), p.14
1. Verfasser: Ni, Vincent
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Censorship
Funding
Investments
Journalism
Journalists
Media coverage
Presidents
Propaganda
Web sites
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 14
container_title World today
container_volume 71
creator Ni, Vincent
description Last year, the Chinese public were further alarmed after a Caixin exposé on contaminated rice. Since the early 2000s, examples such as these have led many to believe that the Chinese media could one day play the same role as its counterparts in America and Britain and hold govern ment to account. According to the People's Daily, investors in The Paper include the private equity firm Hony Capital, the Fortune Global 500 property developer Shanghai Greenland Group and the official Shanghai United Media Group (SUMG), which alone has reportedly spent at least $16 million. According to Qiu Xin, the party secretary of SUMG, The Paper and its sister financial website, Jiemian, are expected this year to earn more than $16 million in advertising revenue.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1702635806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3772709931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17026358063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAx1rU0NDbhYOAqLs4yMDAwNzQ35mRQ9C2tqspJTVHISy0vzsgvzUspVkhOzFMoLsnMyVFIyixJ5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDBpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfG5mcXJqTk5iXmp-aXF8YbmBkZmxqYWBmbGJCgFAOsoMSE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1702635806</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Muzzled newshounds can still bite</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Ni, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Ni, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Last year, the Chinese public were further alarmed after a Caixin exposé on contaminated rice. Since the early 2000s, examples such as these have led many to believe that the Chinese media could one day play the same role as its counterparts in America and Britain and hold govern ment to account. According to the People's Daily, investors in The Paper include the private equity firm Hony Capital, the Fortune Global 500 property developer Shanghai Greenland Group and the official Shanghai United Media Group (SUMG), which alone has reportedly spent at least $16 million. According to Qiu Xin, the party secretary of SUMG, The Paper and its sister financial website, Jiemian, are expected this year to earn more than $16 million in advertising revenue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-9134</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WRTDAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Royal Institute of International Affairs</publisher><subject>Censorship ; Funding ; Investments ; Journalism ; Journalists ; Media coverage ; Presidents ; Propaganda ; Web sites</subject><ispartof>World today, 2015-08, Vol.71 (4), p.14</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Institute of International Affairs Aug/Sep 2015</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>778,782,14645</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ni, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Muzzled newshounds can still bite</title><title>World today</title><description>Last year, the Chinese public were further alarmed after a Caixin exposé on contaminated rice. Since the early 2000s, examples such as these have led many to believe that the Chinese media could one day play the same role as its counterparts in America and Britain and hold govern ment to account. According to the People's Daily, investors in The Paper include the private equity firm Hony Capital, the Fortune Global 500 property developer Shanghai Greenland Group and the official Shanghai United Media Group (SUMG), which alone has reportedly spent at least $16 million. According to Qiu Xin, the party secretary of SUMG, The Paper and its sister financial website, Jiemian, are expected this year to earn more than $16 million in advertising revenue.</description><subject>Censorship</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Journalists</subject><subject>Media coverage</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Propaganda</subject><subject>Web sites</subject><issn>0043-9134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAx1rU0NDbhYOAqLs4yMDAwNzQ35mRQ9C2tqspJTVHISy0vzsgvzUspVkhOzFMoLsnMyVFIyixJ5WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDBpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfG5mcXJqTk5iXmp-aXF8YbmBkZmxqYWBmbGJCgFAOsoMSE</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Ni, Vincent</creator><general>Royal Institute of International Affairs</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Muzzled newshounds can still bite</title><author>Ni, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17026358063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Censorship</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Journalists</topic><topic>Media coverage</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Propaganda</topic><topic>Web sites</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ni, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>World today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ni, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muzzled newshounds can still bite</atitle><jtitle>World today</jtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>14</spage><pages>14-</pages><issn>0043-9134</issn><coden>WRTDAP</coden><abstract>Last year, the Chinese public were further alarmed after a Caixin exposé on contaminated rice. Since the early 2000s, examples such as these have led many to believe that the Chinese media could one day play the same role as its counterparts in America and Britain and hold govern ment to account. According to the People's Daily, investors in The Paper include the private equity firm Hony Capital, the Fortune Global 500 property developer Shanghai Greenland Group and the official Shanghai United Media Group (SUMG), which alone has reportedly spent at least $16 million. According to Qiu Xin, the party secretary of SUMG, The Paper and its sister financial website, Jiemian, are expected this year to earn more than $16 million in advertising revenue.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Royal Institute of International Affairs</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-9134
ispartof World today, 2015-08, Vol.71 (4), p.14
issn 0043-9134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1702635806
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete
subjects Censorship
Funding
Investments
Journalism
Journalists
Media coverage
Presidents
Propaganda
Web sites
title Muzzled newshounds can still bite
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A10%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muzzled%20newshounds%20can%20still%20bite&rft.jtitle=World%20today&rft.au=Ni,%20Vincent&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=14&rft.pages=14-&rft.issn=0043-9134&rft.coden=WRTDAP&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3772709931%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1702635806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true