Ebola Cases and Health System Demand in Liberia: e1002056
In 2014, a major epidemic of human Ebola virus disease emerged in West Africa, where human-to-human transmission has now been sustained for greater than 12 months. In the summer of 2014, there was great uncertainty about the answers to several key policy questions concerning the path to containment....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLoS biology 2015-01, Vol.13 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | PLoS biology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Drake, John M Kaul, RajReni B Alexander, Laura W O'Regan, Suzanne M Kramer, Andrew M Pulliam, J Tomlin Ferrari, Matthew J Park, Andrew W |
description | In 2014, a major epidemic of human Ebola virus disease emerged in West Africa, where human-to-human transmission has now been sustained for greater than 12 months. In the summer of 2014, there was great uncertainty about the answers to several key policy questions concerning the path to containment. What is the relative importance of nosocomial transmission compared with community-acquired infection? How much must hospital capacity increase to provide care for the anticipated patient burden? To which interventions will Ebola transmission be most responsive? What must be done to achieve containment? In recent years, epidemic models have been used to guide public health interventions. But, model-based policy relies on high quality causal understanding of transmission, including the availability of appropriate dynamic transmission models and reliable reporting about the sequence of case incidence for model fitting, which were lacking for this epidemic. To investigate the range of potential transmission scenarios, we developed a multi-type branching process model that incorporates key heterogeneities and time-varying parameters to reflect changing human behavior and deliberate interventions in Liberia. Ensembles of this model were evaluated at a set of parameters that were both epidemiologically plausible and capable of reproducing the observed trajectory. Results of this model suggested that epidemic outcome would depend on both hospital capacity and individual behavior. Simulations suggested that if hospital capacity was not increased, then transmission might outpace the rate of isolation and the ability to provide care for the ill, infectious, and dying. Similarly, the model suggested that containment would require individuals to adopt behaviors that increase the rates of case identification and isolation and secure burial of the deceased. As of mid-October, it was unclear that this epidemic would be contained even by 99% hospitalization at the planned hospital capacity. A new version of the model, updated to reflect information collected during October and November 2014, predicts a significantly more constrained set of possible futures. This model suggests that epidemic outcome still depends very heavily on individual behavior. Particularly, if future patient hospitalization rates return to background levels (estimated to be around 70%), then transmission is predicted to remain just below the critical point around Reff = 1. At the higher hospitalization ra |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701487004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3702081531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p614-d9839673358920f7f6df6755d0b2c9882c0f6d7d5799a3990181a91e0546167d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0DtPwzAUBWALgUQp_AMGSywsSe_12yMKLUWKxED3yokdkSov4mTg3xOgE9O5Ovp0h0PIPUKKXOPm1M9j55p0KOo-RQAGUl2QFUohE22MvPy9RWJR82tyE-NpMcwysyKbbdE3jmYuhkhd5-k-uGb6oO9fcQotfQ7tT1l3NK-LMNbullxVronh7pxrcthtD9k-yd9eXrOnPBkUisRbw63SnEtjGVS6Ur5SWkoPBSutMayEpdJeamsdtxbQoLMYQAqFSnu-Jo9_b4ex_5xDnI5tHcvQNK4L_RyPqAGF0QBioQ__6HmORSkjF8eA8W-j8lKv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1685014202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ebola Cases and Health System Demand in Liberia: e1002056</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Drake, John M ; Kaul, RajReni B ; Alexander, Laura W ; O'Regan, Suzanne M ; Kramer, Andrew M ; Pulliam, J Tomlin ; Ferrari, Matthew J ; Park, Andrew W</creator><creatorcontrib>Drake, John M ; Kaul, RajReni B ; Alexander, Laura W ; O'Regan, Suzanne M ; Kramer, Andrew M ; Pulliam, J Tomlin ; Ferrari, Matthew J ; Park, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><description>In 2014, a major epidemic of human Ebola virus disease emerged in West Africa, where human-to-human transmission has now been sustained for greater than 12 months. In the summer of 2014, there was great uncertainty about the answers to several key policy questions concerning the path to containment. What is the relative importance of nosocomial transmission compared with community-acquired infection? How much must hospital capacity increase to provide care for the anticipated patient burden? To which interventions will Ebola transmission be most responsive? What must be done to achieve containment? In recent years, epidemic models have been used to guide public health interventions. But, model-based policy relies on high quality causal understanding of transmission, including the availability of appropriate dynamic transmission models and reliable reporting about the sequence of case incidence for model fitting, which were lacking for this epidemic. To investigate the range of potential transmission scenarios, we developed a multi-type branching process model that incorporates key heterogeneities and time-varying parameters to reflect changing human behavior and deliberate interventions in Liberia. Ensembles of this model were evaluated at a set of parameters that were both epidemiologically plausible and capable of reproducing the observed trajectory. Results of this model suggested that epidemic outcome would depend on both hospital capacity and individual behavior. Simulations suggested that if hospital capacity was not increased, then transmission might outpace the rate of isolation and the ability to provide care for the ill, infectious, and dying. Similarly, the model suggested that containment would require individuals to adopt behaviors that increase the rates of case identification and isolation and secure burial of the deceased. As of mid-October, it was unclear that this epidemic would be contained even by 99% hospitalization at the planned hospital capacity. A new version of the model, updated to reflect information collected during October and November 2014, predicts a significantly more constrained set of possible futures. This model suggests that epidemic outcome still depends very heavily on individual behavior. Particularly, if future patient hospitalization rates return to background levels (estimated to be around 70%), then transmission is predicted to remain just below the critical point around Reff = 1. At the higher hospitalization rate of 85%, this model predicts near complete elimination in March to June, 2015.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-9173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-7885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002056</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Ebola virus ; Fatalities ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Mortality ; Neighborhoods ; Patient admissions ; Personal protective equipment ; Public health</subject><ispartof>PLoS biology, 2015-01, Vol.13 (1)</ispartof><rights>2015 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Drake JM, Kaul RB, Alexander LW, O'Regan SM, Kramer AM, Pulliam JT, et al. (2015) Ebola Cases and Health System Demand in Liberia. PLoS Biol 13(1): e1002056. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002056</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drake, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, RajReni B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Laura W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Regan, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulliam, J Tomlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><title>Ebola Cases and Health System Demand in Liberia: e1002056</title><title>PLoS biology</title><description>In 2014, a major epidemic of human Ebola virus disease emerged in West Africa, where human-to-human transmission has now been sustained for greater than 12 months. In the summer of 2014, there was great uncertainty about the answers to several key policy questions concerning the path to containment. What is the relative importance of nosocomial transmission compared with community-acquired infection? How much must hospital capacity increase to provide care for the anticipated patient burden? To which interventions will Ebola transmission be most responsive? What must be done to achieve containment? In recent years, epidemic models have been used to guide public health interventions. But, model-based policy relies on high quality causal understanding of transmission, including the availability of appropriate dynamic transmission models and reliable reporting about the sequence of case incidence for model fitting, which were lacking for this epidemic. To investigate the range of potential transmission scenarios, we developed a multi-type branching process model that incorporates key heterogeneities and time-varying parameters to reflect changing human behavior and deliberate interventions in Liberia. Ensembles of this model were evaluated at a set of parameters that were both epidemiologically plausible and capable of reproducing the observed trajectory. Results of this model suggested that epidemic outcome would depend on both hospital capacity and individual behavior. Simulations suggested that if hospital capacity was not increased, then transmission might outpace the rate of isolation and the ability to provide care for the ill, infectious, and dying. Similarly, the model suggested that containment would require individuals to adopt behaviors that increase the rates of case identification and isolation and secure burial of the deceased. As of mid-October, it was unclear that this epidemic would be contained even by 99% hospitalization at the planned hospital capacity. A new version of the model, updated to reflect information collected during October and November 2014, predicts a significantly more constrained set of possible futures. This model suggests that epidemic outcome still depends very heavily on individual behavior. Particularly, if future patient hospitalization rates return to background levels (estimated to be around 70%), then transmission is predicted to remain just below the critical point around Reff = 1. At the higher hospitalization rate of 85%, this model predicts near complete elimination in March to June, 2015.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Ebola virus</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Personal protective equipment</subject><subject>Public health</subject><issn>1544-9173</issn><issn>1545-7885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0DtPwzAUBWALgUQp_AMGSywsSe_12yMKLUWKxED3yokdkSov4mTg3xOgE9O5Ovp0h0PIPUKKXOPm1M9j55p0KOo-RQAGUl2QFUohE22MvPy9RWJR82tyE-NpMcwysyKbbdE3jmYuhkhd5-k-uGb6oO9fcQotfQ7tT1l3NK-LMNbullxVronh7pxrcthtD9k-yd9eXrOnPBkUisRbw63SnEtjGVS6Ur5SWkoPBSutMayEpdJeamsdtxbQoLMYQAqFSnu-Jo9_b4ex_5xDnI5tHcvQNK4L_RyPqAGF0QBioQ__6HmORSkjF8eA8W-j8lKv</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Drake, John M</creator><creator>Kaul, RajReni B</creator><creator>Alexander, Laura W</creator><creator>O'Regan, Suzanne M</creator><creator>Kramer, Andrew M</creator><creator>Pulliam, J Tomlin</creator><creator>Ferrari, Matthew J</creator><creator>Park, Andrew W</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Ebola Cases and Health System Demand in Liberia</title><author>Drake, John M ; Kaul, RajReni B ; Alexander, Laura W ; O'Regan, Suzanne M ; Kramer, Andrew M ; Pulliam, J Tomlin ; Ferrari, Matthew J ; Park, Andrew W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p614-d9839673358920f7f6df6755d0b2c9882c0f6d7d5799a3990181a91e0546167d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Ebola virus</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Personal protective equipment</topic><topic>Public health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drake, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, RajReni B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Laura W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Regan, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulliam, J Tomlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><jtitle>PLoS biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drake, John M</au><au>Kaul, RajReni B</au><au>Alexander, Laura W</au><au>O'Regan, Suzanne M</au><au>Kramer, Andrew M</au><au>Pulliam, J Tomlin</au><au>Ferrari, Matthew J</au><au>Park, Andrew W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ebola Cases and Health System Demand in Liberia: e1002056</atitle><jtitle>PLoS biology</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1544-9173</issn><eissn>1545-7885</eissn><abstract>In 2014, a major epidemic of human Ebola virus disease emerged in West Africa, where human-to-human transmission has now been sustained for greater than 12 months. In the summer of 2014, there was great uncertainty about the answers to several key policy questions concerning the path to containment. What is the relative importance of nosocomial transmission compared with community-acquired infection? How much must hospital capacity increase to provide care for the anticipated patient burden? To which interventions will Ebola transmission be most responsive? What must be done to achieve containment? In recent years, epidemic models have been used to guide public health interventions. But, model-based policy relies on high quality causal understanding of transmission, including the availability of appropriate dynamic transmission models and reliable reporting about the sequence of case incidence for model fitting, which were lacking for this epidemic. To investigate the range of potential transmission scenarios, we developed a multi-type branching process model that incorporates key heterogeneities and time-varying parameters to reflect changing human behavior and deliberate interventions in Liberia. Ensembles of this model were evaluated at a set of parameters that were both epidemiologically plausible and capable of reproducing the observed trajectory. Results of this model suggested that epidemic outcome would depend on both hospital capacity and individual behavior. Simulations suggested that if hospital capacity was not increased, then transmission might outpace the rate of isolation and the ability to provide care for the ill, infectious, and dying. Similarly, the model suggested that containment would require individuals to adopt behaviors that increase the rates of case identification and isolation and secure burial of the deceased. As of mid-October, it was unclear that this epidemic would be contained even by 99% hospitalization at the planned hospital capacity. A new version of the model, updated to reflect information collected during October and November 2014, predicts a significantly more constrained set of possible futures. This model suggests that epidemic outcome still depends very heavily on individual behavior. Particularly, if future patient hospitalization rates return to background levels (estimated to be around 70%), then transmission is predicted to remain just below the critical point around Reff = 1. At the higher hospitalization rate of 85%, this model predicts near complete elimination in March to June, 2015.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pbio.1002056</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1544-9173 |
ispartof | PLoS biology, 2015-01, Vol.13 (1) |
issn | 1544-9173 1545-7885 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701487004 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Behavior Ebola virus Fatalities Hospitalization Hospitals Mortality Neighborhoods Patient admissions Personal protective equipment Public health |
title | Ebola Cases and Health System Demand in Liberia: e1002056 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ebola%20Cases%20and%20Health%20System%20Demand%20in%20Liberia:%20e1002056&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20biology&rft.au=Drake,%20John%20M&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1544-9173&rft.eissn=1545-7885&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3702081531%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1685014202&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |