Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study

Objectives Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2015-07, Vol.25 (7), p.2074-2079
Hauptverfasser: Buckens, Constantinus F., Dijkhuis, Gawein, de Keizer, Bart, Verhaar, Harald J., de Jong, Pim A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2079
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2074
container_title European radiology
container_volume 25
creator Buckens, Constantinus F.
Dijkhuis, Gawein
de Keizer, Bart
Verhaar, Harald J.
de Jong, Pim A.
description Objectives Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinations for diagnosing osteoporosis in a separate, external population. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent a CT examination of the chest or abdomen and had also received a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test were retrospectively included. CTs were evaluated for vertebral fractures and vertebral attenuation (density) values were measured. Diagnostic performance measures and the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) for diagnosing osteoporosis were calculated. Results Three hundred and two patients with a mean age of 57.9 years were included, of which 82 (27 %) had osteoporosis according to DXA and 65 (22 %) had vertebral fractures. The diagnostic performance for vertebral HU measurements was modest, with a maximal AUC of 0.74 (0.68 – 0.80). At that optimal threshold the sensitivity was 62 % (51 – 72 %) and the specificity was 79 % (74 – 84 %). Conclusions We confirmed that simple trabecular vertebral density measurements on routine CT contain diagnostic information related to bone mineral density as measured by DXA, albeit with substantially lower diagnostic accuracy than previously reported. Key Points • We externally validated the value of vertebral trabecular bone attenuation for osteoporosis • These diagnostic performance measures were, however, substantially lower than previously reported • This information might be useful when considering the implementation of opportunistic osteoporosis screening
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701486717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1686415692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-8c7770a5c589f0b23c49cfeffc7b6a2ca9b4af62552ce0ae5a228853879003653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6A9xIwI2b0ptXJVnJMPiCgdnoOqTTt9oMVZUySYn9701To4ggrkK43zm5OYeQ5wxeMwD9pgAIAR0w2QllZAcPyI5JwTsGRj4kO7DCdNpaeUGelHIHAJZJ_ZhccKUs0wp2BG-XJeW6zrHUGGgJGXGO85EOKdNUKqY2TiUWmmaa01rjjDSkaVkrHmhNUzpmv3w9vaVXM8UfFfPsR_rdj_Hga2yaUtfD6Sl5NPix4LP785J8ef_u8_XH7ub2w6frq5sutPVrZ4LWGrxqNzvAnosgbRhwGILe954Hb_fSD33bngcEj8pzbowSRtuWRK_EJXm1-S45fVuxVDfFEnAc_YxpLY7plpXpNdP_R3vTS6Z6yxv68i_0Lq3nf24Us73golFso0LLq2Qc3JLj5PPJMXDnutxWl2sruHNdDprmxb3zup_w8Fvxq58G8A0obTQfMf_x9D9dfwKQdqDK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1686196323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Buckens, Constantinus F. ; Dijkhuis, Gawein ; de Keizer, Bart ; Verhaar, Harald J. ; de Jong, Pim A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buckens, Constantinus F. ; Dijkhuis, Gawein ; de Keizer, Bart ; Verhaar, Harald J. ; de Jong, Pim A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinations for diagnosing osteoporosis in a separate, external population. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent a CT examination of the chest or abdomen and had also received a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test were retrospectively included. CTs were evaluated for vertebral fractures and vertebral attenuation (density) values were measured. Diagnostic performance measures and the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) for diagnosing osteoporosis were calculated. Results Three hundred and two patients with a mean age of 57.9 years were included, of which 82 (27 %) had osteoporosis according to DXA and 65 (22 %) had vertebral fractures. The diagnostic performance for vertebral HU measurements was modest, with a maximal AUC of 0.74 (0.68 – 0.80). At that optimal threshold the sensitivity was 62 % (51 – 72 %) and the specificity was 79 % (74 – 84 %). Conclusions We confirmed that simple trabecular vertebral density measurements on routine CT contain diagnostic information related to bone mineral density as measured by DXA, albeit with substantially lower diagnostic accuracy than previously reported. Key Points • We externally validated the value of vertebral trabecular bone attenuation for osteoporosis • These diagnostic performance measures were, however, substantially lower than previously reported • This information might be useful when considering the implementation of opportunistic osteoporosis screening</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25591750</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Absorptiometry, Photon - methods ; Aged ; Bone density ; Bone Density - physiology ; Computed Tomography ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Fractures ; Humans ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multimodal Imaging - methods ; Neuroradiology ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoporosis - physiopathology ; Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Spinal Fractures - physiopathology ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Ultrasound ; Validation studies ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2015-07, Vol.25 (7), p.2074-2079</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-8c7770a5c589f0b23c49cfeffc7b6a2ca9b4af62552ce0ae5a228853879003653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-8c7770a5c589f0b23c49cfeffc7b6a2ca9b4af62552ce0ae5a228853879003653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591750$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buckens, Constantinus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkhuis, Gawein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Keizer, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhaar, Harald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Pim A.</creatorcontrib><title>Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinations for diagnosing osteoporosis in a separate, external population. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent a CT examination of the chest or abdomen and had also received a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test were retrospectively included. CTs were evaluated for vertebral fractures and vertebral attenuation (density) values were measured. Diagnostic performance measures and the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) for diagnosing osteoporosis were calculated. Results Three hundred and two patients with a mean age of 57.9 years were included, of which 82 (27 %) had osteoporosis according to DXA and 65 (22 %) had vertebral fractures. The diagnostic performance for vertebral HU measurements was modest, with a maximal AUC of 0.74 (0.68 – 0.80). At that optimal threshold the sensitivity was 62 % (51 – 72 %) and the specificity was 79 % (74 – 84 %). Conclusions We confirmed that simple trabecular vertebral density measurements on routine CT contain diagnostic information related to bone mineral density as measured by DXA, albeit with substantially lower diagnostic accuracy than previously reported. Key Points • We externally validated the value of vertebral trabecular bone attenuation for osteoporosis • These diagnostic performance measures were, however, substantially lower than previously reported • This information might be useful when considering the implementation of opportunistic osteoporosis screening</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multimodal Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6A9xIwI2b0ptXJVnJMPiCgdnoOqTTt9oMVZUySYn9701To4ggrkK43zm5OYeQ5wxeMwD9pgAIAR0w2QllZAcPyI5JwTsGRj4kO7DCdNpaeUGelHIHAJZJ_ZhccKUs0wp2BG-XJeW6zrHUGGgJGXGO85EOKdNUKqY2TiUWmmaa01rjjDSkaVkrHmhNUzpmv3w9vaVXM8UfFfPsR_rdj_Hga2yaUtfD6Sl5NPix4LP785J8ef_u8_XH7ub2w6frq5sutPVrZ4LWGrxqNzvAnosgbRhwGILe954Hb_fSD33bngcEj8pzbowSRtuWRK_EJXm1-S45fVuxVDfFEnAc_YxpLY7plpXpNdP_R3vTS6Z6yxv68i_0Lq3nf24Us73golFso0LLq2Qc3JLj5PPJMXDnutxWl2sruHNdDprmxb3zup_w8Fvxq58G8A0obTQfMf_x9D9dfwKQdqDK</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Buckens, Constantinus F.</creator><creator>Dijkhuis, Gawein</creator><creator>de Keizer, Bart</creator><creator>Verhaar, Harald J.</creator><creator>de Jong, Pim A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study</title><author>Buckens, Constantinus F. ; Dijkhuis, Gawein ; de Keizer, Bart ; Verhaar, Harald J. ; de Jong, Pim A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-8c7770a5c589f0b23c49cfeffc7b6a2ca9b4af62552ce0ae5a228853879003653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multimodal Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buckens, Constantinus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkhuis, Gawein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Keizer, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhaar, Harald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Pim A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buckens, Constantinus F.</au><au>Dijkhuis, Gawein</au><au>de Keizer, Bart</au><au>Verhaar, Harald J.</au><au>de Jong, Pim A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2074</spage><epage>2079</epage><pages>2074-2079</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinations for diagnosing osteoporosis in a separate, external population. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent a CT examination of the chest or abdomen and had also received a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test were retrospectively included. CTs were evaluated for vertebral fractures and vertebral attenuation (density) values were measured. Diagnostic performance measures and the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) for diagnosing osteoporosis were calculated. Results Three hundred and two patients with a mean age of 57.9 years were included, of which 82 (27 %) had osteoporosis according to DXA and 65 (22 %) had vertebral fractures. The diagnostic performance for vertebral HU measurements was modest, with a maximal AUC of 0.74 (0.68 – 0.80). At that optimal threshold the sensitivity was 62 % (51 – 72 %) and the specificity was 79 % (74 – 84 %). Conclusions We confirmed that simple trabecular vertebral density measurements on routine CT contain diagnostic information related to bone mineral density as measured by DXA, albeit with substantially lower diagnostic accuracy than previously reported. Key Points • We externally validated the value of vertebral trabecular bone attenuation for osteoporosis • These diagnostic performance measures were, however, substantially lower than previously reported • This information might be useful when considering the implementation of opportunistic osteoporosis screening</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25591750</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2015-07, Vol.25 (7), p.2074-2079
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701486717
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Abdomen
Absorptiometry, Photon - methods
Aged
Bone density
Bone Density - physiology
Computed Tomography
Diagnostic Radiology
Early Diagnosis
Female
Fractures
Humans
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multimodal Imaging - methods
Neuroradiology
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging
Osteoporosis - physiopathology
Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology
Radiology
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Spinal Fractures - physiopathology
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Ultrasound
Validation studies
Vertebrae
title Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T16%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opportunistic%20screening%20for%20osteoporosis%20on%20routine%20computed%20tomography?%20An%20external%20validation%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Buckens,%20Constantinus%20F.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2074&rft.epage=2079&rft.pages=2074-2079&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1686415692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1686196323&rft_id=info:pmid/25591750&rfr_iscdi=true