Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study
Objectives Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2015-07, Vol.25 (7), p.2074-2079 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2079 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2074 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Buckens, Constantinus F. Dijkhuis, Gawein de Keizer, Bart Verhaar, Harald J. de Jong, Pim A. |
description | Objectives
Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinations for diagnosing osteoporosis in a separate, external population.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent a CT examination of the chest or abdomen and had also received a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test were retrospectively included. CTs were evaluated for vertebral fractures and vertebral attenuation (density) values were measured. Diagnostic performance measures and the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) for diagnosing osteoporosis were calculated.
Results
Three hundred and two patients with a mean age of 57.9 years were included, of which 82 (27 %) had osteoporosis according to DXA and 65 (22 %) had vertebral fractures. The diagnostic performance for vertebral HU measurements was modest, with a maximal AUC of 0.74 (0.68 – 0.80). At that optimal threshold the sensitivity was 62 % (51 – 72 %) and the specificity was 79 % (74 – 84 %).
Conclusions
We confirmed that simple trabecular vertebral density measurements on routine CT contain diagnostic information related to bone mineral density as measured by DXA, albeit with substantially lower diagnostic accuracy than previously reported.
Key Points
•
We externally validated the value of vertebral trabecular bone attenuation for osteoporosis
•
These diagnostic performance measures were, however, substantially lower than previously reported
•
This information might be useful when considering the implementation of opportunistic osteoporosis screening |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701486717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1686415692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-8c7770a5c589f0b23c49cfeffc7b6a2ca9b4af62552ce0ae5a228853879003653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6A9xIwI2b0ptXJVnJMPiCgdnoOqTTt9oMVZUySYn9701To4ggrkK43zm5OYeQ5wxeMwD9pgAIAR0w2QllZAcPyI5JwTsGRj4kO7DCdNpaeUGelHIHAJZJ_ZhccKUs0wp2BG-XJeW6zrHUGGgJGXGO85EOKdNUKqY2TiUWmmaa01rjjDSkaVkrHmhNUzpmv3w9vaVXM8UfFfPsR_rdj_Hga2yaUtfD6Sl5NPix4LP785J8ef_u8_XH7ub2w6frq5sutPVrZ4LWGrxqNzvAnosgbRhwGILe954Hb_fSD33bngcEj8pzbowSRtuWRK_EJXm1-S45fVuxVDfFEnAc_YxpLY7plpXpNdP_R3vTS6Z6yxv68i_0Lq3nf24Us73golFso0LLq2Qc3JLj5PPJMXDnutxWl2sruHNdDprmxb3zup_w8Fvxq58G8A0obTQfMf_x9D9dfwKQdqDK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1686196323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Buckens, Constantinus F. ; Dijkhuis, Gawein ; de Keizer, Bart ; Verhaar, Harald J. ; de Jong, Pim A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buckens, Constantinus F. ; Dijkhuis, Gawein ; de Keizer, Bart ; Verhaar, Harald J. ; de Jong, Pim A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinations for diagnosing osteoporosis in a separate, external population.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent a CT examination of the chest or abdomen and had also received a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test were retrospectively included. CTs were evaluated for vertebral fractures and vertebral attenuation (density) values were measured. Diagnostic performance measures and the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) for diagnosing osteoporosis were calculated.
Results
Three hundred and two patients with a mean age of 57.9 years were included, of which 82 (27 %) had osteoporosis according to DXA and 65 (22 %) had vertebral fractures. The diagnostic performance for vertebral HU measurements was modest, with a maximal AUC of 0.74 (0.68 – 0.80). At that optimal threshold the sensitivity was 62 % (51 – 72 %) and the specificity was 79 % (74 – 84 %).
Conclusions
We confirmed that simple trabecular vertebral density measurements on routine CT contain diagnostic information related to bone mineral density as measured by DXA, albeit with substantially lower diagnostic accuracy than previously reported.
Key Points
•
We externally validated the value of vertebral trabecular bone attenuation for osteoporosis
•
These diagnostic performance measures were, however, substantially lower than previously reported
•
This information might be useful when considering the implementation of opportunistic osteoporosis screening</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25591750</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Absorptiometry, Photon - methods ; Aged ; Bone density ; Bone Density - physiology ; Computed Tomography ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Fractures ; Humans ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multimodal Imaging - methods ; Neuroradiology ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoporosis - physiopathology ; Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Spinal Fractures - physiopathology ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Ultrasound ; Validation studies ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2015-07, Vol.25 (7), p.2074-2079</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-8c7770a5c589f0b23c49cfeffc7b6a2ca9b4af62552ce0ae5a228853879003653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-8c7770a5c589f0b23c49cfeffc7b6a2ca9b4af62552ce0ae5a228853879003653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591750$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buckens, Constantinus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkhuis, Gawein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Keizer, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhaar, Harald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Pim A.</creatorcontrib><title>Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives
Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinations for diagnosing osteoporosis in a separate, external population.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent a CT examination of the chest or abdomen and had also received a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test were retrospectively included. CTs were evaluated for vertebral fractures and vertebral attenuation (density) values were measured. Diagnostic performance measures and the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) for diagnosing osteoporosis were calculated.
Results
Three hundred and two patients with a mean age of 57.9 years were included, of which 82 (27 %) had osteoporosis according to DXA and 65 (22 %) had vertebral fractures. The diagnostic performance for vertebral HU measurements was modest, with a maximal AUC of 0.74 (0.68 – 0.80). At that optimal threshold the sensitivity was 62 % (51 – 72 %) and the specificity was 79 % (74 – 84 %).
Conclusions
We confirmed that simple trabecular vertebral density measurements on routine CT contain diagnostic information related to bone mineral density as measured by DXA, albeit with substantially lower diagnostic accuracy than previously reported.
Key Points
•
We externally validated the value of vertebral trabecular bone attenuation for osteoporosis
•
These diagnostic performance measures were, however, substantially lower than previously reported
•
This information might be useful when considering the implementation of opportunistic osteoporosis screening</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multimodal Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuLFDEUhYMoTjv6A9xIwI2b0ptXJVnJMPiCgdnoOqTTt9oMVZUySYn9701To4ggrkK43zm5OYeQ5wxeMwD9pgAIAR0w2QllZAcPyI5JwTsGRj4kO7DCdNpaeUGelHIHAJZJ_ZhccKUs0wp2BG-XJeW6zrHUGGgJGXGO85EOKdNUKqY2TiUWmmaa01rjjDSkaVkrHmhNUzpmv3w9vaVXM8UfFfPsR_rdj_Hga2yaUtfD6Sl5NPix4LP785J8ef_u8_XH7ub2w6frq5sutPVrZ4LWGrxqNzvAnosgbRhwGILe954Hb_fSD33bngcEj8pzbowSRtuWRK_EJXm1-S45fVuxVDfFEnAc_YxpLY7plpXpNdP_R3vTS6Z6yxv68i_0Lq3nf24Us73golFso0LLq2Qc3JLj5PPJMXDnutxWl2sruHNdDprmxb3zup_w8Fvxq58G8A0obTQfMf_x9D9dfwKQdqDK</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Buckens, Constantinus F.</creator><creator>Dijkhuis, Gawein</creator><creator>de Keizer, Bart</creator><creator>Verhaar, Harald J.</creator><creator>de Jong, Pim A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study</title><author>Buckens, Constantinus F. ; Dijkhuis, Gawein ; de Keizer, Bart ; Verhaar, Harald J. ; de Jong, Pim A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-8c7770a5c589f0b23c49cfeffc7b6a2ca9b4af62552ce0ae5a228853879003653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multimodal Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buckens, Constantinus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dijkhuis, Gawein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Keizer, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhaar, Harald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Pim A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buckens, Constantinus F.</au><au>Dijkhuis, Gawein</au><au>de Keizer, Bart</au><au>Verhaar, Harald J.</au><au>de Jong, Pim A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2074</spage><epage>2079</epage><pages>2074-2079</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using computed tomography (CT) examinations that happen to visualise the spine can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. We sought to verify the diagnostic performance of vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements on routine CT examinations for diagnosing osteoporosis in a separate, external population.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent a CT examination of the chest or abdomen and had also received a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test were retrospectively included. CTs were evaluated for vertebral fractures and vertebral attenuation (density) values were measured. Diagnostic performance measures and the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) for diagnosing osteoporosis were calculated.
Results
Three hundred and two patients with a mean age of 57.9 years were included, of which 82 (27 %) had osteoporosis according to DXA and 65 (22 %) had vertebral fractures. The diagnostic performance for vertebral HU measurements was modest, with a maximal AUC of 0.74 (0.68 – 0.80). At that optimal threshold the sensitivity was 62 % (51 – 72 %) and the specificity was 79 % (74 – 84 %).
Conclusions
We confirmed that simple trabecular vertebral density measurements on routine CT contain diagnostic information related to bone mineral density as measured by DXA, albeit with substantially lower diagnostic accuracy than previously reported.
Key Points
•
We externally validated the value of vertebral trabecular bone attenuation for osteoporosis
•
These diagnostic performance measures were, however, substantially lower than previously reported
•
This information might be useful when considering the implementation of opportunistic osteoporosis screening</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25591750</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2015-07, Vol.25 (7), p.2074-2079 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701486717 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Abdomen Absorptiometry, Photon - methods Aged Bone density Bone Density - physiology Computed Tomography Diagnostic Radiology Early Diagnosis Female Fractures Humans Imaging Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Multimodal Imaging - methods Neuroradiology Osteoporosis Osteoporosis - diagnostic imaging Osteoporosis - physiopathology Osteoporotic Fractures - diagnostic imaging Osteoporotic Fractures - physiopathology Radiology Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Spinal Fractures - diagnostic imaging Spinal Fractures - physiopathology Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Ultrasound Validation studies Vertebrae |
title | Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T16%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opportunistic%20screening%20for%20osteoporosis%20on%20routine%20computed%20tomography?%20An%20external%20validation%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Buckens,%20Constantinus%20F.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2074&rft.epage=2079&rft.pages=2074-2079&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-014-3584-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1686415692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1686196323&rft_id=info:pmid/25591750&rfr_iscdi=true |