Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?
Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salam...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wildlife Biology 2015-07, Vol.21 (4), p.186-194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 186 |
container_title | Wildlife Biology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Raybuck, Amy L. Moorman, Christopher E. Fritts, Sarah R. Greenberg, Cathryn H. Deperno, Christopher S. Simon, Dean M. Warburton, Gordon S. |
description | Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salamanders to three silvicultural practices designed to promote oak regeneration — prescribed fire, midstory herbicide application and shelterwood harvest — and a control. We trapped salamanders using drift fences with pitfall traps in five replicates of the four treatments. Only the southern gray-cheeked salamander Plethodon metcalfi and the southern Appalachian salamander P. teyahalee were captured in sufficient numbers for robust statistical analysis. We analyzed data for these species using single-species dynamic occupancy models in statistical software program R. We allowed changes in four covariates to influence extinction probability from pre- to post-treatment implementation: 1) percent leaf litter cover; 2) percent understory cover; 3) percent CWD cover; and 4) percent canopy cover. The final combined model set describing extinction probability contained four models with ΔAIC < 2 for P. metcalfi and nine models with ΔAIC < 2, including the null model, for P. teyahalee. For both species, the 95% confidence intervals for model-averaged extinction probability parameter estimates overlapped zero, suggesting none were significant predictors of extinction probability. Absence of short-term salamander response in midstory herbicide and prescribed burn treatments was likely because of minor or transitory changes to forest structure. In shelterwood harvests, any potential effects of reduced canopy and leaf litter cover may have been mitigated by rapid post-treatment vegetation sprouting. Additionally, climatic conditions associated with high elevation sites and high amounts of rainfall in 2011 may have compensated for potential changes to microclimate. Continued monitoring of Plethodon salamanders to assess responses at longer time scales (e.g. > 3 years post-treatment) is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2981/wlb.00076 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701479525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1701479525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4246-11b5d416333566dfa9e427a464d97dcf18278e5388e3f6bb26ef8196052efe303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9rFTEUBfAgCj6rCz-BARfaxdSbP5NMVtLWVoUHClp0FzIzNzY1b_JMZiz99uY5rgRd3c3vXA6HkKcMTrjp2Kvb2J8AgFb3yIYZEA3n8PU-2YAB0yhh1EPyqJQbACnbTm_IxzeJlhB_hmGJ85JdpPvshjkMWOicaMYyp4w0ue-FOu9xmGlx0e3cNGIuNEx0vkZarlOe6Yx59_oxeeBdLPjkzz0iV5cXn8_fNdsPb9-fn26bXnKpGsb6dpRMCSFapUbvDEqunVRyNHocPOu47rAVXYfCq77nCn3HjIKWo0cB4oi8XP_uc_qx1Jp2F8qAMboJ01Is08CkNi1vK33-F71JS55qu4OSmrfM6KqOVzXkVEpGb_c57Fy-swzsYVtbt7W_t62Wr_Y2RLz7N7Rftmfi7BKgDl9Dz9aQd8m6bzkUe_WJA1OVGqO6Q4UXq-hDShP-p8AvYCeQxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1704725197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>BioOne Open Access Titles</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Raybuck, Amy L. ; Moorman, Christopher E. ; Fritts, Sarah R. ; Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Deperno, Christopher S. ; Simon, Dean M. ; Warburton, Gordon S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raybuck, Amy L. ; Moorman, Christopher E. ; Fritts, Sarah R. ; Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Deperno, Christopher S. ; Simon, Dean M. ; Warburton, Gordon S.</creatorcontrib><description>Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salamanders to three silvicultural practices designed to promote oak regeneration — prescribed fire, midstory herbicide application and shelterwood harvest — and a control. We trapped salamanders using drift fences with pitfall traps in five replicates of the four treatments. Only the southern gray-cheeked salamander Plethodon metcalfi and the southern Appalachian salamander P. teyahalee were captured in sufficient numbers for robust statistical analysis. We analyzed data for these species using single-species dynamic occupancy models in statistical software program R. We allowed changes in four covariates to influence extinction probability from pre- to post-treatment implementation: 1) percent leaf litter cover; 2) percent understory cover; 3) percent CWD cover; and 4) percent canopy cover. The final combined model set describing extinction probability contained four models with ΔAIC < 2 for P. metcalfi and nine models with ΔAIC < 2, including the null model, for P. teyahalee. For both species, the 95% confidence intervals for model-averaged extinction probability parameter estimates overlapped zero, suggesting none were significant predictors of extinction probability. Absence of short-term salamander response in midstory herbicide and prescribed burn treatments was likely because of minor or transitory changes to forest structure. In shelterwood harvests, any potential effects of reduced canopy and leaf litter cover may have been mitigated by rapid post-treatment vegetation sprouting. Additionally, climatic conditions associated with high elevation sites and high amounts of rainfall in 2011 may have compensated for potential changes to microclimate. Continued monitoring of Plethodon salamanders to assess responses at longer time scales (e.g. > 3 years post-treatment) is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0909-6396</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1903-220X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1903-220X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hornslet: Nordic Board for Wildlife Research</publisher><subject>canopy ; Caudata ; climatic factors ; computer software ; confidence interval ; extinction ; fences ; habitats ; hardwood forests ; herbicides ; microclimate ; monitoring ; pesticide application ; pitfall traps ; plant litter ; Plethodon ; Plethodon metcalfi ; prescribed burning ; rain ; salamanders and newts ; shelterwood systems ; silvicultural practices ; sprouting ; statistical analysis ; statistical models ; understory</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Biology, 2015-07, Vol.21 (4), p.186-194</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. This is an Open Access article</rights><rights>Wildlife Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>Copyright Nordic Board for Wildlife Research Jul 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4246-11b5d416333566dfa9e427a464d97dcf18278e5388e3f6bb26ef8196052efe303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4246-11b5d416333566dfa9e427a464d97dcf18278e5388e3f6bb26ef8196052efe303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2981/wlb.00076$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2981%2Fwlb.00076$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,780,784,864,1416,11560,27922,27923,45572,45573,46050,46474,52717</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raybuck, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritts, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deperno, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Gordon S.</creatorcontrib><title>Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?</title><title>Wildlife Biology</title><description>Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salamanders to three silvicultural practices designed to promote oak regeneration — prescribed fire, midstory herbicide application and shelterwood harvest — and a control. We trapped salamanders using drift fences with pitfall traps in five replicates of the four treatments. Only the southern gray-cheeked salamander Plethodon metcalfi and the southern Appalachian salamander P. teyahalee were captured in sufficient numbers for robust statistical analysis. We analyzed data for these species using single-species dynamic occupancy models in statistical software program R. We allowed changes in four covariates to influence extinction probability from pre- to post-treatment implementation: 1) percent leaf litter cover; 2) percent understory cover; 3) percent CWD cover; and 4) percent canopy cover. The final combined model set describing extinction probability contained four models with ΔAIC < 2 for P. metcalfi and nine models with ΔAIC < 2, including the null model, for P. teyahalee. For both species, the 95% confidence intervals for model-averaged extinction probability parameter estimates overlapped zero, suggesting none were significant predictors of extinction probability. Absence of short-term salamander response in midstory herbicide and prescribed burn treatments was likely because of minor or transitory changes to forest structure. In shelterwood harvests, any potential effects of reduced canopy and leaf litter cover may have been mitigated by rapid post-treatment vegetation sprouting. Additionally, climatic conditions associated with high elevation sites and high amounts of rainfall in 2011 may have compensated for potential changes to microclimate. Continued monitoring of Plethodon salamanders to assess responses at longer time scales (e.g. > 3 years post-treatment) is warranted.</description><subject>canopy</subject><subject>Caudata</subject><subject>climatic factors</subject><subject>computer software</subject><subject>confidence interval</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>fences</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>hardwood forests</subject><subject>herbicides</subject><subject>microclimate</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>pesticide application</subject><subject>pitfall traps</subject><subject>plant litter</subject><subject>Plethodon</subject><subject>Plethodon metcalfi</subject><subject>prescribed burning</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>salamanders and newts</subject><subject>shelterwood systems</subject><subject>silvicultural practices</subject><subject>sprouting</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>statistical models</subject><subject>understory</subject><issn>0909-6396</issn><issn>1903-220X</issn><issn>1903-220X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E9rFTEUBfAgCj6rCz-BARfaxdSbP5NMVtLWVoUHClp0FzIzNzY1b_JMZiz99uY5rgRd3c3vXA6HkKcMTrjp2Kvb2J8AgFb3yIYZEA3n8PU-2YAB0yhh1EPyqJQbACnbTm_IxzeJlhB_hmGJ85JdpPvshjkMWOicaMYyp4w0ue-FOu9xmGlx0e3cNGIuNEx0vkZarlOe6Yx59_oxeeBdLPjkzz0iV5cXn8_fNdsPb9-fn26bXnKpGsb6dpRMCSFapUbvDEqunVRyNHocPOu47rAVXYfCq77nCn3HjIKWo0cB4oi8XP_uc_qx1Jp2F8qAMboJ01Is08CkNi1vK33-F71JS55qu4OSmrfM6KqOVzXkVEpGb_c57Fy-swzsYVtbt7W_t62Wr_Y2RLz7N7Rftmfi7BKgDl9Dz9aQd8m6bzkUe_WJA1OVGqO6Q4UXq-hDShP-p8AvYCeQxg</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Raybuck, Amy L.</creator><creator>Moorman, Christopher E.</creator><creator>Fritts, Sarah R.</creator><creator>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</creator><creator>Deperno, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Simon, Dean M.</creator><creator>Warburton, Gordon S.</creator><general>Nordic Board for Wildlife Research</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?</title><author>Raybuck, Amy L. ; Moorman, Christopher E. ; Fritts, Sarah R. ; Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Deperno, Christopher S. ; Simon, Dean M. ; Warburton, Gordon S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4246-11b5d416333566dfa9e427a464d97dcf18278e5388e3f6bb26ef8196052efe303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>canopy</topic><topic>Caudata</topic><topic>climatic factors</topic><topic>computer software</topic><topic>confidence interval</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>fences</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>hardwood forests</topic><topic>herbicides</topic><topic>microclimate</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>pesticide application</topic><topic>pitfall traps</topic><topic>plant litter</topic><topic>Plethodon</topic><topic>Plethodon metcalfi</topic><topic>prescribed burning</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>salamanders and newts</topic><topic>shelterwood systems</topic><topic>silvicultural practices</topic><topic>sprouting</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>statistical models</topic><topic>understory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raybuck, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritts, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deperno, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Gordon S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raybuck, Amy L.</au><au>Moorman, Christopher E.</au><au>Fritts, Sarah R.</au><au>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</au><au>Deperno, Christopher S.</au><au>Simon, Dean M.</au><au>Warburton, Gordon S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Biology</jtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>186-194</pages><issn>0909-6396</issn><issn>1903-220X</issn><eissn>1903-220X</eissn><abstract>Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salamanders to three silvicultural practices designed to promote oak regeneration — prescribed fire, midstory herbicide application and shelterwood harvest — and a control. We trapped salamanders using drift fences with pitfall traps in five replicates of the four treatments. Only the southern gray-cheeked salamander Plethodon metcalfi and the southern Appalachian salamander P. teyahalee were captured in sufficient numbers for robust statistical analysis. We analyzed data for these species using single-species dynamic occupancy models in statistical software program R. We allowed changes in four covariates to influence extinction probability from pre- to post-treatment implementation: 1) percent leaf litter cover; 2) percent understory cover; 3) percent CWD cover; and 4) percent canopy cover. The final combined model set describing extinction probability contained four models with ΔAIC < 2 for P. metcalfi and nine models with ΔAIC < 2, including the null model, for P. teyahalee. For both species, the 95% confidence intervals for model-averaged extinction probability parameter estimates overlapped zero, suggesting none were significant predictors of extinction probability. Absence of short-term salamander response in midstory herbicide and prescribed burn treatments was likely because of minor or transitory changes to forest structure. In shelterwood harvests, any potential effects of reduced canopy and leaf litter cover may have been mitigated by rapid post-treatment vegetation sprouting. Additionally, climatic conditions associated with high elevation sites and high amounts of rainfall in 2011 may have compensated for potential changes to microclimate. Continued monitoring of Plethodon salamanders to assess responses at longer time scales (e.g. > 3 years post-treatment) is warranted.</abstract><cop>Hornslet</cop><pub>Nordic Board for Wildlife Research</pub><doi>10.2981/wlb.00076</doi><tpages>09</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0909-6396 |
ispartof | Wildlife Biology, 2015-07, Vol.21 (4), p.186-194 |
issn | 0909-6396 1903-220X 1903-220X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701479525 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; BioOne Open Access Titles; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | canopy Caudata climatic factors computer software confidence interval extinction fences habitats hardwood forests herbicides microclimate monitoring pesticide application pitfall traps plant litter Plethodon Plethodon metcalfi prescribed burning rain salamanders and newts shelterwood systems silvicultural practices sprouting statistical analysis statistical models understory |
title | Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A52%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20silvicultural%20practices%20to%20restore%20oaks%20affect%20salamanders%20in%20the%20short%20term?&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Biology&rft.au=Raybuck,%20Amy%20L.&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=186-194&rft.issn=0909-6396&rft.eissn=1903-220X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2981/wlb.00076&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701479525%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1704725197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |