Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?

Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wildlife Biology 2015-07, Vol.21 (4), p.186-194
Hauptverfasser: Raybuck, Amy L., Moorman, Christopher E., Fritts, Sarah R., Greenberg, Cathryn H., Deperno, Christopher S., Simon, Dean M., Warburton, Gordon S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue 4
container_start_page 186
container_title Wildlife Biology
container_volume 21
creator Raybuck, Amy L.
Moorman, Christopher E.
Fritts, Sarah R.
Greenberg, Cathryn H.
Deperno, Christopher S.
Simon, Dean M.
Warburton, Gordon S.
description Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salamanders to three silvicultural practices designed to promote oak regeneration — prescribed fire, midstory herbicide application and shelterwood harvest — and a control. We trapped salamanders using drift fences with pitfall traps in five replicates of the four treatments. Only the southern gray-cheeked salamander Plethodon metcalfi and the southern Appalachian salamander P. teyahalee were captured in sufficient numbers for robust statistical analysis. We analyzed data for these species using single-species dynamic occupancy models in statistical software program R. We allowed changes in four covariates to influence extinction probability from pre- to post-treatment implementation: 1) percent leaf litter cover; 2) percent understory cover; 3) percent CWD cover; and 4) percent canopy cover. The final combined model set describing extinction probability contained four models with ΔAIC < 2 for P. metcalfi and nine models with ΔAIC < 2, including the null model, for P. teyahalee. For both species, the 95% confidence intervals for model-averaged extinction probability parameter estimates overlapped zero, suggesting none were significant predictors of extinction probability. Absence of short-term salamander response in midstory herbicide and prescribed burn treatments was likely because of minor or transitory changes to forest structure. In shelterwood harvests, any potential effects of reduced canopy and leaf litter cover may have been mitigated by rapid post-treatment vegetation sprouting. Additionally, climatic conditions associated with high elevation sites and high amounts of rainfall in 2011 may have compensated for potential changes to microclimate. Continued monitoring of Plethodon salamanders to assess responses at longer time scales (e.g. > 3 years post-treatment) is warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.2981/wlb.00076
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701479525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1701479525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4246-11b5d416333566dfa9e427a464d97dcf18278e5388e3f6bb26ef8196052efe303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9rFTEUBfAgCj6rCz-BARfaxdSbP5NMVtLWVoUHClp0FzIzNzY1b_JMZiz99uY5rgRd3c3vXA6HkKcMTrjp2Kvb2J8AgFb3yIYZEA3n8PU-2YAB0yhh1EPyqJQbACnbTm_IxzeJlhB_hmGJ85JdpPvshjkMWOicaMYyp4w0ue-FOu9xmGlx0e3cNGIuNEx0vkZarlOe6Yx59_oxeeBdLPjkzz0iV5cXn8_fNdsPb9-fn26bXnKpGsb6dpRMCSFapUbvDEqunVRyNHocPOu47rAVXYfCq77nCn3HjIKWo0cB4oi8XP_uc_qx1Jp2F8qAMboJ01Is08CkNi1vK33-F71JS55qu4OSmrfM6KqOVzXkVEpGb_c57Fy-swzsYVtbt7W_t62Wr_Y2RLz7N7Rftmfi7BKgDl9Dz9aQd8m6bzkUe_WJA1OVGqO6Q4UXq-hDShP-p8AvYCeQxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1704725197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>BioOne Open Access Titles</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Raybuck, Amy L. ; Moorman, Christopher E. ; Fritts, Sarah R. ; Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Deperno, Christopher S. ; Simon, Dean M. ; Warburton, Gordon S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raybuck, Amy L. ; Moorman, Christopher E. ; Fritts, Sarah R. ; Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Deperno, Christopher S. ; Simon, Dean M. ; Warburton, Gordon S.</creatorcontrib><description>Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salamanders to three silvicultural practices designed to promote oak regeneration — prescribed fire, midstory herbicide application and shelterwood harvest — and a control. We trapped salamanders using drift fences with pitfall traps in five replicates of the four treatments. Only the southern gray-cheeked salamander Plethodon metcalfi and the southern Appalachian salamander P. teyahalee were captured in sufficient numbers for robust statistical analysis. We analyzed data for these species using single-species dynamic occupancy models in statistical software program R. We allowed changes in four covariates to influence extinction probability from pre- to post-treatment implementation: 1) percent leaf litter cover; 2) percent understory cover; 3) percent CWD cover; and 4) percent canopy cover. The final combined model set describing extinction probability contained four models with ΔAIC &lt; 2 for P. metcalfi and nine models with ΔAIC &lt; 2, including the null model, for P. teyahalee. For both species, the 95% confidence intervals for model-averaged extinction probability parameter estimates overlapped zero, suggesting none were significant predictors of extinction probability. Absence of short-term salamander response in midstory herbicide and prescribed burn treatments was likely because of minor or transitory changes to forest structure. In shelterwood harvests, any potential effects of reduced canopy and leaf litter cover may have been mitigated by rapid post-treatment vegetation sprouting. Additionally, climatic conditions associated with high elevation sites and high amounts of rainfall in 2011 may have compensated for potential changes to microclimate. Continued monitoring of Plethodon salamanders to assess responses at longer time scales (e.g. &gt; 3 years post-treatment) is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0909-6396</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1903-220X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1903-220X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hornslet: Nordic Board for Wildlife Research</publisher><subject>canopy ; Caudata ; climatic factors ; computer software ; confidence interval ; extinction ; fences ; habitats ; hardwood forests ; herbicides ; microclimate ; monitoring ; pesticide application ; pitfall traps ; plant litter ; Plethodon ; Plethodon metcalfi ; prescribed burning ; rain ; salamanders and newts ; shelterwood systems ; silvicultural practices ; sprouting ; statistical analysis ; statistical models ; understory</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Biology, 2015-07, Vol.21 (4), p.186-194</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. This is an Open Access article</rights><rights>Wildlife Biology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>Copyright Nordic Board for Wildlife Research Jul 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4246-11b5d416333566dfa9e427a464d97dcf18278e5388e3f6bb26ef8196052efe303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4246-11b5d416333566dfa9e427a464d97dcf18278e5388e3f6bb26ef8196052efe303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2981/wlb.00076$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2981%2Fwlb.00076$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,780,784,864,1416,11560,27922,27923,45572,45573,46050,46474,52717</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raybuck, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritts, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deperno, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Gordon S.</creatorcontrib><title>Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?</title><title>Wildlife Biology</title><description>Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salamanders to three silvicultural practices designed to promote oak regeneration — prescribed fire, midstory herbicide application and shelterwood harvest — and a control. We trapped salamanders using drift fences with pitfall traps in five replicates of the four treatments. Only the southern gray-cheeked salamander Plethodon metcalfi and the southern Appalachian salamander P. teyahalee were captured in sufficient numbers for robust statistical analysis. We analyzed data for these species using single-species dynamic occupancy models in statistical software program R. We allowed changes in four covariates to influence extinction probability from pre- to post-treatment implementation: 1) percent leaf litter cover; 2) percent understory cover; 3) percent CWD cover; and 4) percent canopy cover. The final combined model set describing extinction probability contained four models with ΔAIC &lt; 2 for P. metcalfi and nine models with ΔAIC &lt; 2, including the null model, for P. teyahalee. For both species, the 95% confidence intervals for model-averaged extinction probability parameter estimates overlapped zero, suggesting none were significant predictors of extinction probability. Absence of short-term salamander response in midstory herbicide and prescribed burn treatments was likely because of minor or transitory changes to forest structure. In shelterwood harvests, any potential effects of reduced canopy and leaf litter cover may have been mitigated by rapid post-treatment vegetation sprouting. Additionally, climatic conditions associated with high elevation sites and high amounts of rainfall in 2011 may have compensated for potential changes to microclimate. Continued monitoring of Plethodon salamanders to assess responses at longer time scales (e.g. &gt; 3 years post-treatment) is warranted.</description><subject>canopy</subject><subject>Caudata</subject><subject>climatic factors</subject><subject>computer software</subject><subject>confidence interval</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>fences</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>hardwood forests</subject><subject>herbicides</subject><subject>microclimate</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>pesticide application</subject><subject>pitfall traps</subject><subject>plant litter</subject><subject>Plethodon</subject><subject>Plethodon metcalfi</subject><subject>prescribed burning</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>salamanders and newts</subject><subject>shelterwood systems</subject><subject>silvicultural practices</subject><subject>sprouting</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>statistical models</subject><subject>understory</subject><issn>0909-6396</issn><issn>1903-220X</issn><issn>1903-220X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E9rFTEUBfAgCj6rCz-BARfaxdSbP5NMVtLWVoUHClp0FzIzNzY1b_JMZiz99uY5rgRd3c3vXA6HkKcMTrjp2Kvb2J8AgFb3yIYZEA3n8PU-2YAB0yhh1EPyqJQbACnbTm_IxzeJlhB_hmGJ85JdpPvshjkMWOicaMYyp4w0ue-FOu9xmGlx0e3cNGIuNEx0vkZarlOe6Yx59_oxeeBdLPjkzz0iV5cXn8_fNdsPb9-fn26bXnKpGsb6dpRMCSFapUbvDEqunVRyNHocPOu47rAVXYfCq77nCn3HjIKWo0cB4oi8XP_uc_qx1Jp2F8qAMboJ01Is08CkNi1vK33-F71JS55qu4OSmrfM6KqOVzXkVEpGb_c57Fy-swzsYVtbt7W_t62Wr_Y2RLz7N7Rftmfi7BKgDl9Dz9aQd8m6bzkUe_WJA1OVGqO6Q4UXq-hDShP-p8AvYCeQxg</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Raybuck, Amy L.</creator><creator>Moorman, Christopher E.</creator><creator>Fritts, Sarah R.</creator><creator>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</creator><creator>Deperno, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Simon, Dean M.</creator><creator>Warburton, Gordon S.</creator><general>Nordic Board for Wildlife Research</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?</title><author>Raybuck, Amy L. ; Moorman, Christopher E. ; Fritts, Sarah R. ; Greenberg, Cathryn H. ; Deperno, Christopher S. ; Simon, Dean M. ; Warburton, Gordon S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4246-11b5d416333566dfa9e427a464d97dcf18278e5388e3f6bb26ef8196052efe303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>canopy</topic><topic>Caudata</topic><topic>climatic factors</topic><topic>computer software</topic><topic>confidence interval</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>fences</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>hardwood forests</topic><topic>herbicides</topic><topic>microclimate</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>pesticide application</topic><topic>pitfall traps</topic><topic>plant litter</topic><topic>Plethodon</topic><topic>Plethodon metcalfi</topic><topic>prescribed burning</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>salamanders and newts</topic><topic>shelterwood systems</topic><topic>silvicultural practices</topic><topic>sprouting</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>statistical models</topic><topic>understory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raybuck, Amy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritts, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deperno, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warburton, Gordon S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raybuck, Amy L.</au><au>Moorman, Christopher E.</au><au>Fritts, Sarah R.</au><au>Greenberg, Cathryn H.</au><au>Deperno, Christopher S.</au><au>Simon, Dean M.</au><au>Warburton, Gordon S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Biology</jtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>186-194</pages><issn>0909-6396</issn><issn>1903-220X</issn><eissn>1903-220X</eissn><abstract>Salamanders are an important ecological component of eastern hardwood forests and may be affected by natural or silvicultural disturbances that alter habitat structure and associated microclimate. From May to August in 2008 (pretreatment) and 2011 (post-treatment), we evaluated the response of salamanders to three silvicultural practices designed to promote oak regeneration — prescribed fire, midstory herbicide application and shelterwood harvest — and a control. We trapped salamanders using drift fences with pitfall traps in five replicates of the four treatments. Only the southern gray-cheeked salamander Plethodon metcalfi and the southern Appalachian salamander P. teyahalee were captured in sufficient numbers for robust statistical analysis. We analyzed data for these species using single-species dynamic occupancy models in statistical software program R. We allowed changes in four covariates to influence extinction probability from pre- to post-treatment implementation: 1) percent leaf litter cover; 2) percent understory cover; 3) percent CWD cover; and 4) percent canopy cover. The final combined model set describing extinction probability contained four models with ΔAIC &lt; 2 for P. metcalfi and nine models with ΔAIC &lt; 2, including the null model, for P. teyahalee. For both species, the 95% confidence intervals for model-averaged extinction probability parameter estimates overlapped zero, suggesting none were significant predictors of extinction probability. Absence of short-term salamander response in midstory herbicide and prescribed burn treatments was likely because of minor or transitory changes to forest structure. In shelterwood harvests, any potential effects of reduced canopy and leaf litter cover may have been mitigated by rapid post-treatment vegetation sprouting. Additionally, climatic conditions associated with high elevation sites and high amounts of rainfall in 2011 may have compensated for potential changes to microclimate. Continued monitoring of Plethodon salamanders to assess responses at longer time scales (e.g. &gt; 3 years post-treatment) is warranted.</abstract><cop>Hornslet</cop><pub>Nordic Board for Wildlife Research</pub><doi>10.2981/wlb.00076</doi><tpages>09</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0909-6396
ispartof Wildlife Biology, 2015-07, Vol.21 (4), p.186-194
issn 0909-6396
1903-220X
1903-220X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701479525
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; BioOne Open Access Titles; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects canopy
Caudata
climatic factors
computer software
confidence interval
extinction
fences
habitats
hardwood forests
herbicides
microclimate
monitoring
pesticide application
pitfall traps
plant litter
Plethodon
Plethodon metcalfi
prescribed burning
rain
salamanders and newts
shelterwood systems
silvicultural practices
sprouting
statistical analysis
statistical models
understory
title Do silvicultural practices to restore oaks affect salamanders in the short term?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A52%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20silvicultural%20practices%20to%20restore%20oaks%20affect%20salamanders%20in%20the%20short%20term?&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Biology&rft.au=Raybuck,%20Amy%20L.&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=186-194&rft.issn=0909-6396&rft.eissn=1903-220X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2981/wlb.00076&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701479525%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1704725197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true