Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls

•The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering structures 2014-02, Vol.59, p.663-673
Hauptverfasser: Bilgin, Ömer, Mansour, Eman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 673
container_issue
container_start_page 663
container_title Engineering structures
container_volume 59
creator Bilgin, Ömer
Mansour, Eman
description •The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible to use reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height. This paper presents the results of a parametric study conducted to investigate the effect of different reinforcement types on required minimum reinforcement length and governing design criteria of mechanically stabilized earth walls. There are several reinforcement types with varying properties used in these walls. The reinforcement should be long enough to satisfy both external and internal stability criteria. The minimum reinforcement length criteria vary throughout the world; however most specifications and guidelines require that minimum length should be equal to 70% of wall height. A natural rock formation behind the wall or manmade shoring system may cause limitations on the reinforcement length. The focus of this paper is to investigate the required minimum reinforcement length and the criteria governing the design length for four different reinforcement types; geogrids, geotextiles, metal strips, and metal bar mats. Effect of different parameters on the required minimum reinforcement length and the governing design criteria were investigated for these four reinforcement types. The parameters considered included wall height, surcharge, reinforcement vertical spacing, reinforced soil properties, backfill/retained soil properties, and foundation soil properties. The results indicate that, depending on the parameters involved, the reinforcement type can affect both the required reinforcement length and the governing design criteria. The study also shows that reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height, as low as 50%, are possible in some cases. Among the four reinforcement types considered, the metal strips usually require the longest lengths; however, it is possible to reduce the required minimum reinforcement lengths of the metal strips by increasing the coverage ratio.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701081774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029613005671</els_id><sourcerecordid>1524415346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-25e20f39d0d2b6de58b453087575af7ca2f7602dc6b98d73dd168f8a698521673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1rGzEQxZfSQNw0f0P2UuhltzPS6mOPIaQfEOilPQtZGsUy611Xklvcv74yDjn0kpweDL83j5nXNDcIPQLKT9ue5sdc0sGVngHyHrGv8qZZoVa8U5zxt80KcMAO2Cgvm3c5bwGAaQ2rJtyHQK60S2gTxTksydGO5tKW457aZW7LhlpPOT7O_wFTjS2bk3FHbmPn6Ow0Hdtc7DpO8S_5lmyqwJ86zu-bi2CnTNdPetX8_Hz_4-5r9_D9y7e724fOiYGXjgliEPjowbO19CT0ehActBJK2KCcZUFJYN7J9ai94t6j1EFbOWrBUCp-1Xw8792n5deBcjG7mB1Nk51pOWSDChA0KjW8jEqlARWKV2wVAzA-jHp8BcqGAQUfZEXVGXVpyTlRMPsUdzYdDYI5VWu25rlac6rWIJoq1fnhKcTm-vWQ7OxifrYzjRo0nE68PXNUX_47UjLZRZod-Zhq6cYv8cWsf2xUveA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524415346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Bilgin, Ömer ; Mansour, Eman</creator><creatorcontrib>Bilgin, Ömer ; Mansour, Eman</creatorcontrib><description>•The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible to use reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height. This paper presents the results of a parametric study conducted to investigate the effect of different reinforcement types on required minimum reinforcement length and governing design criteria of mechanically stabilized earth walls. There are several reinforcement types with varying properties used in these walls. The reinforcement should be long enough to satisfy both external and internal stability criteria. The minimum reinforcement length criteria vary throughout the world; however most specifications and guidelines require that minimum length should be equal to 70% of wall height. A natural rock formation behind the wall or manmade shoring system may cause limitations on the reinforcement length. The focus of this paper is to investigate the required minimum reinforcement length and the criteria governing the design length for four different reinforcement types; geogrids, geotextiles, metal strips, and metal bar mats. Effect of different parameters on the required minimum reinforcement length and the governing design criteria were investigated for these four reinforcement types. The parameters considered included wall height, surcharge, reinforcement vertical spacing, reinforced soil properties, backfill/retained soil properties, and foundation soil properties. The results indicate that, depending on the parameters involved, the reinforcement type can affect both the required reinforcement length and the governing design criteria. The study also shows that reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height, as low as 50%, are possible in some cases. Among the four reinforcement types considered, the metal strips usually require the longest lengths; however, it is possible to reduce the required minimum reinforcement lengths of the metal strips by increasing the coverage ratio.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENSTDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building structure ; Buildings. Public works ; Construction (buildings and works) ; Criteria ; Design engineering ; Durability. Pathology. Repairing. Maintenance ; Earth ; Earth structure ; Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls ; Exact sciences and technology ; Failure mode ; Geosynthetics ; Geotechnics ; Limit analysis ; Metal strips ; MSE wall ; Reinforced earth ; Reinforcement ; Repair (reinforcement, strenthening) ; Retaining structures ; Rock ; Soil (material) ; Stability ; Wall design ; Walls</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2014-02, Vol.59, p.663-673</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-25e20f39d0d2b6de58b453087575af7ca2f7602dc6b98d73dd168f8a698521673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-25e20f39d0d2b6de58b453087575af7ca2f7602dc6b98d73dd168f8a698521673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28180804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bilgin, Ömer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansour, Eman</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible to use reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height. This paper presents the results of a parametric study conducted to investigate the effect of different reinforcement types on required minimum reinforcement length and governing design criteria of mechanically stabilized earth walls. There are several reinforcement types with varying properties used in these walls. The reinforcement should be long enough to satisfy both external and internal stability criteria. The minimum reinforcement length criteria vary throughout the world; however most specifications and guidelines require that minimum length should be equal to 70% of wall height. A natural rock formation behind the wall or manmade shoring system may cause limitations on the reinforcement length. The focus of this paper is to investigate the required minimum reinforcement length and the criteria governing the design length for four different reinforcement types; geogrids, geotextiles, metal strips, and metal bar mats. Effect of different parameters on the required minimum reinforcement length and the governing design criteria were investigated for these four reinforcement types. The parameters considered included wall height, surcharge, reinforcement vertical spacing, reinforced soil properties, backfill/retained soil properties, and foundation soil properties. The results indicate that, depending on the parameters involved, the reinforcement type can affect both the required reinforcement length and the governing design criteria. The study also shows that reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height, as low as 50%, are possible in some cases. Among the four reinforcement types considered, the metal strips usually require the longest lengths; however, it is possible to reduce the required minimum reinforcement lengths of the metal strips by increasing the coverage ratio.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building structure</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Construction (buildings and works)</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Durability. Pathology. Repairing. Maintenance</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth structure</subject><subject>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Failure mode</subject><subject>Geosynthetics</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Limit analysis</subject><subject>Metal strips</subject><subject>MSE wall</subject><subject>Reinforced earth</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Repair (reinforcement, strenthening)</subject><subject>Retaining structures</subject><subject>Rock</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Wall design</subject><subject>Walls</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1rGzEQxZfSQNw0f0P2UuhltzPS6mOPIaQfEOilPQtZGsUy611Xklvcv74yDjn0kpweDL83j5nXNDcIPQLKT9ue5sdc0sGVngHyHrGv8qZZoVa8U5zxt80KcMAO2Cgvm3c5bwGAaQ2rJtyHQK60S2gTxTksydGO5tKW457aZW7LhlpPOT7O_wFTjS2bk3FHbmPn6Ow0Hdtc7DpO8S_5lmyqwJ86zu-bi2CnTNdPetX8_Hz_4-5r9_D9y7e724fOiYGXjgliEPjowbO19CT0ehActBJK2KCcZUFJYN7J9ai94t6j1EFbOWrBUCp-1Xw8792n5deBcjG7mB1Nk51pOWSDChA0KjW8jEqlARWKV2wVAzA-jHp8BcqGAQUfZEXVGXVpyTlRMPsUdzYdDYI5VWu25rlac6rWIJoq1fnhKcTm-vWQ7OxifrYzjRo0nE68PXNUX_47UjLZRZod-Zhq6cYv8cWsf2xUveA</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Bilgin, Ömer</creator><creator>Mansour, Eman</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls</title><author>Bilgin, Ömer ; Mansour, Eman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-25e20f39d0d2b6de58b453087575af7ca2f7602dc6b98d73dd168f8a698521673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building structure</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Construction (buildings and works)</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Durability. Pathology. Repairing. Maintenance</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth structure</topic><topic>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Failure mode</topic><topic>Geosynthetics</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Limit analysis</topic><topic>Metal strips</topic><topic>MSE wall</topic><topic>Reinforced earth</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Repair (reinforcement, strenthening)</topic><topic>Retaining structures</topic><topic>Rock</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Wall design</topic><topic>Walls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bilgin, Ömer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansour, Eman</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bilgin, Ömer</au><au>Mansour, Eman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>663</spage><epage>673</epage><pages>663-673</pages><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><coden>ENSTDF</coden><abstract>•The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible to use reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height. This paper presents the results of a parametric study conducted to investigate the effect of different reinforcement types on required minimum reinforcement length and governing design criteria of mechanically stabilized earth walls. There are several reinforcement types with varying properties used in these walls. The reinforcement should be long enough to satisfy both external and internal stability criteria. The minimum reinforcement length criteria vary throughout the world; however most specifications and guidelines require that minimum length should be equal to 70% of wall height. A natural rock formation behind the wall or manmade shoring system may cause limitations on the reinforcement length. The focus of this paper is to investigate the required minimum reinforcement length and the criteria governing the design length for four different reinforcement types; geogrids, geotextiles, metal strips, and metal bar mats. Effect of different parameters on the required minimum reinforcement length and the governing design criteria were investigated for these four reinforcement types. The parameters considered included wall height, surcharge, reinforcement vertical spacing, reinforced soil properties, backfill/retained soil properties, and foundation soil properties. The results indicate that, depending on the parameters involved, the reinforcement type can affect both the required reinforcement length and the governing design criteria. The study also shows that reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height, as low as 50%, are possible in some cases. Among the four reinforcement types considered, the metal strips usually require the longest lengths; however, it is possible to reduce the required minimum reinforcement lengths of the metal strips by increasing the coverage ratio.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0296
ispartof Engineering structures, 2014-02, Vol.59, p.663-673
issn 0141-0296
1873-7323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701081774
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Applied sciences
Building structure
Buildings. Public works
Construction (buildings and works)
Criteria
Design engineering
Durability. Pathology. Repairing. Maintenance
Earth
Earth structure
Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls
Exact sciences and technology
Failure mode
Geosynthetics
Geotechnics
Limit analysis
Metal strips
MSE wall
Reinforced earth
Reinforcement
Repair (reinforcement, strenthening)
Retaining structures
Rock
Soil (material)
Stability
Wall design
Walls
title Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A12%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20reinforcement%20type%20on%20the%20design%20reinforcement%20length%20of%20mechanically%20stabilized%20earth%20walls&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Bilgin,%20%C3%96mer&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=673&rft.pages=663-673&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft.coden=ENSTDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1524415346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524415346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029613005671&rfr_iscdi=true