Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls
•The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering structures 2014-02, Vol.59, p.663-673 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 673 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 663 |
container_title | Engineering structures |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Bilgin, Ömer Mansour, Eman |
description | •The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible to use reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height.
This paper presents the results of a parametric study conducted to investigate the effect of different reinforcement types on required minimum reinforcement length and governing design criteria of mechanically stabilized earth walls. There are several reinforcement types with varying properties used in these walls. The reinforcement should be long enough to satisfy both external and internal stability criteria. The minimum reinforcement length criteria vary throughout the world; however most specifications and guidelines require that minimum length should be equal to 70% of wall height. A natural rock formation behind the wall or manmade shoring system may cause limitations on the reinforcement length. The focus of this paper is to investigate the required minimum reinforcement length and the criteria governing the design length for four different reinforcement types; geogrids, geotextiles, metal strips, and metal bar mats. Effect of different parameters on the required minimum reinforcement length and the governing design criteria were investigated for these four reinforcement types. The parameters considered included wall height, surcharge, reinforcement vertical spacing, reinforced soil properties, backfill/retained soil properties, and foundation soil properties. The results indicate that, depending on the parameters involved, the reinforcement type can affect both the required reinforcement length and the governing design criteria. The study also shows that reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height, as low as 50%, are possible in some cases. Among the four reinforcement types considered, the metal strips usually require the longest lengths; however, it is possible to reduce the required minimum reinforcement lengths of the metal strips by increasing the coverage ratio. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701081774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141029613005671</els_id><sourcerecordid>1524415346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-25e20f39d0d2b6de58b453087575af7ca2f7602dc6b98d73dd168f8a698521673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1rGzEQxZfSQNw0f0P2UuhltzPS6mOPIaQfEOilPQtZGsUy611Xklvcv74yDjn0kpweDL83j5nXNDcIPQLKT9ue5sdc0sGVngHyHrGv8qZZoVa8U5zxt80KcMAO2Cgvm3c5bwGAaQ2rJtyHQK60S2gTxTksydGO5tKW457aZW7LhlpPOT7O_wFTjS2bk3FHbmPn6Ow0Hdtc7DpO8S_5lmyqwJ86zu-bi2CnTNdPetX8_Hz_4-5r9_D9y7e724fOiYGXjgliEPjowbO19CT0ehActBJK2KCcZUFJYN7J9ai94t6j1EFbOWrBUCp-1Xw8792n5deBcjG7mB1Nk51pOWSDChA0KjW8jEqlARWKV2wVAzA-jHp8BcqGAQUfZEXVGXVpyTlRMPsUdzYdDYI5VWu25rlac6rWIJoq1fnhKcTm-vWQ7OxifrYzjRo0nE68PXNUX_47UjLZRZod-Zhq6cYv8cWsf2xUveA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1524415346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Bilgin, Ömer ; Mansour, Eman</creator><creatorcontrib>Bilgin, Ömer ; Mansour, Eman</creatorcontrib><description>•The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible to use reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height.
This paper presents the results of a parametric study conducted to investigate the effect of different reinforcement types on required minimum reinforcement length and governing design criteria of mechanically stabilized earth walls. There are several reinforcement types with varying properties used in these walls. The reinforcement should be long enough to satisfy both external and internal stability criteria. The minimum reinforcement length criteria vary throughout the world; however most specifications and guidelines require that minimum length should be equal to 70% of wall height. A natural rock formation behind the wall or manmade shoring system may cause limitations on the reinforcement length. The focus of this paper is to investigate the required minimum reinforcement length and the criteria governing the design length for four different reinforcement types; geogrids, geotextiles, metal strips, and metal bar mats. Effect of different parameters on the required minimum reinforcement length and the governing design criteria were investigated for these four reinforcement types. The parameters considered included wall height, surcharge, reinforcement vertical spacing, reinforced soil properties, backfill/retained soil properties, and foundation soil properties. The results indicate that, depending on the parameters involved, the reinforcement type can affect both the required reinforcement length and the governing design criteria. The study also shows that reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height, as low as 50%, are possible in some cases. Among the four reinforcement types considered, the metal strips usually require the longest lengths; however, it is possible to reduce the required minimum reinforcement lengths of the metal strips by increasing the coverage ratio.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENSTDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Building structure ; Buildings. Public works ; Construction (buildings and works) ; Criteria ; Design engineering ; Durability. Pathology. Repairing. Maintenance ; Earth ; Earth structure ; Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls ; Exact sciences and technology ; Failure mode ; Geosynthetics ; Geotechnics ; Limit analysis ; Metal strips ; MSE wall ; Reinforced earth ; Reinforcement ; Repair (reinforcement, strenthening) ; Retaining structures ; Rock ; Soil (material) ; Stability ; Wall design ; Walls</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2014-02, Vol.59, p.663-673</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-25e20f39d0d2b6de58b453087575af7ca2f7602dc6b98d73dd168f8a698521673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-25e20f39d0d2b6de58b453087575af7ca2f7602dc6b98d73dd168f8a698521673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28180804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bilgin, Ömer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansour, Eman</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>•The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible to use reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height.
This paper presents the results of a parametric study conducted to investigate the effect of different reinforcement types on required minimum reinforcement length and governing design criteria of mechanically stabilized earth walls. There are several reinforcement types with varying properties used in these walls. The reinforcement should be long enough to satisfy both external and internal stability criteria. The minimum reinforcement length criteria vary throughout the world; however most specifications and guidelines require that minimum length should be equal to 70% of wall height. A natural rock formation behind the wall or manmade shoring system may cause limitations on the reinforcement length. The focus of this paper is to investigate the required minimum reinforcement length and the criteria governing the design length for four different reinforcement types; geogrids, geotextiles, metal strips, and metal bar mats. Effect of different parameters on the required minimum reinforcement length and the governing design criteria were investigated for these four reinforcement types. The parameters considered included wall height, surcharge, reinforcement vertical spacing, reinforced soil properties, backfill/retained soil properties, and foundation soil properties. The results indicate that, depending on the parameters involved, the reinforcement type can affect both the required reinforcement length and the governing design criteria. The study also shows that reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height, as low as 50%, are possible in some cases. Among the four reinforcement types considered, the metal strips usually require the longest lengths; however, it is possible to reduce the required minimum reinforcement lengths of the metal strips by increasing the coverage ratio.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building structure</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Construction (buildings and works)</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Durability. Pathology. Repairing. Maintenance</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth structure</subject><subject>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Failure mode</subject><subject>Geosynthetics</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Limit analysis</subject><subject>Metal strips</subject><subject>MSE wall</subject><subject>Reinforced earth</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Repair (reinforcement, strenthening)</subject><subject>Retaining structures</subject><subject>Rock</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Wall design</subject><subject>Walls</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1rGzEQxZfSQNw0f0P2UuhltzPS6mOPIaQfEOilPQtZGsUy611Xklvcv74yDjn0kpweDL83j5nXNDcIPQLKT9ue5sdc0sGVngHyHrGv8qZZoVa8U5zxt80KcMAO2Cgvm3c5bwGAaQ2rJtyHQK60S2gTxTksydGO5tKW457aZW7LhlpPOT7O_wFTjS2bk3FHbmPn6Ow0Hdtc7DpO8S_5lmyqwJ86zu-bi2CnTNdPetX8_Hz_4-5r9_D9y7e724fOiYGXjgliEPjowbO19CT0ehActBJK2KCcZUFJYN7J9ai94t6j1EFbOWrBUCp-1Xw8792n5deBcjG7mB1Nk51pOWSDChA0KjW8jEqlARWKV2wVAzA-jHp8BcqGAQUfZEXVGXVpyTlRMPsUdzYdDYI5VWu25rlac6rWIJoq1fnhKcTm-vWQ7OxifrYzjRo0nE68PXNUX_47UjLZRZod-Zhq6cYv8cWsf2xUveA</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Bilgin, Ömer</creator><creator>Mansour, Eman</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls</title><author>Bilgin, Ömer ; Mansour, Eman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-25e20f39d0d2b6de58b453087575af7ca2f7602dc6b98d73dd168f8a698521673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building structure</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Construction (buildings and works)</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Durability. Pathology. Repairing. Maintenance</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth structure</topic><topic>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Failure mode</topic><topic>Geosynthetics</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Limit analysis</topic><topic>Metal strips</topic><topic>MSE wall</topic><topic>Reinforced earth</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Repair (reinforcement, strenthening)</topic><topic>Retaining structures</topic><topic>Rock</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Wall design</topic><topic>Walls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bilgin, Ömer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansour, Eman</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bilgin, Ömer</au><au>Mansour, Eman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>663</spage><epage>673</epage><pages>663-673</pages><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><coden>ENSTDF</coden><abstract>•The required design minimum reinforcement lengths for MSE walls have been studied.•Four different reinforcement types were considered.•Metal strips usually require the longest reinforcement lengths.•Reinforcement type affects the stability mode determining reinforcement length.•It may be possible to use reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height.
This paper presents the results of a parametric study conducted to investigate the effect of different reinforcement types on required minimum reinforcement length and governing design criteria of mechanically stabilized earth walls. There are several reinforcement types with varying properties used in these walls. The reinforcement should be long enough to satisfy both external and internal stability criteria. The minimum reinforcement length criteria vary throughout the world; however most specifications and guidelines require that minimum length should be equal to 70% of wall height. A natural rock formation behind the wall or manmade shoring system may cause limitations on the reinforcement length. The focus of this paper is to investigate the required minimum reinforcement length and the criteria governing the design length for four different reinforcement types; geogrids, geotextiles, metal strips, and metal bar mats. Effect of different parameters on the required minimum reinforcement length and the governing design criteria were investigated for these four reinforcement types. The parameters considered included wall height, surcharge, reinforcement vertical spacing, reinforced soil properties, backfill/retained soil properties, and foundation soil properties. The results indicate that, depending on the parameters involved, the reinforcement type can affect both the required reinforcement length and the governing design criteria. The study also shows that reinforcement lengths shorter than 70% of wall height, as low as 50%, are possible in some cases. Among the four reinforcement types considered, the metal strips usually require the longest lengths; however, it is possible to reduce the required minimum reinforcement lengths of the metal strips by increasing the coverage ratio.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-0296 |
ispartof | Engineering structures, 2014-02, Vol.59, p.663-673 |
issn | 0141-0296 1873-7323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701081774 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences Building structure Buildings. Public works Construction (buildings and works) Criteria Design engineering Durability. Pathology. Repairing. Maintenance Earth Earth structure Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls Exact sciences and technology Failure mode Geosynthetics Geotechnics Limit analysis Metal strips MSE wall Reinforced earth Reinforcement Repair (reinforcement, strenthening) Retaining structures Rock Soil (material) Stability Wall design Walls |
title | Effect of reinforcement type on the design reinforcement length of mechanically stabilized earth walls |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A12%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20reinforcement%20type%20on%20the%20design%20reinforcement%20length%20of%20mechanically%20stabilized%20earth%20walls&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Bilgin,%20%C3%96mer&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=673&rft.pages=663-673&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft.coden=ENSTDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1524415346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1524415346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0141029613005671&rfr_iscdi=true |