Emission Analysis of Alternative Diesel Fuels Using a Compression Ignition Benchtop Engine Generator

A compact diesel-powered generator (5 kW) experimental setup was used to systematically evaluate the emissions generated by the combustion of several commercially produced alternative diesel fuels. The measured diesel engine exhaust components include oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy & fuels 2011-10, Vol.25 (10), p.4704-4712
Hauptverfasser: Bugosh, Gregory S, Muncrief, Rachel L, Harold, Michael P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4712
container_issue 10
container_start_page 4704
container_title Energy & fuels
container_volume 25
creator Bugosh, Gregory S
Muncrief, Rachel L
Harold, Michael P
description A compact diesel-powered generator (5 kW) experimental setup was used to systematically evaluate the emissions generated by the combustion of several commercially produced alternative diesel fuels. The measured diesel engine exhaust components include oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), volatile hydrocarbons (HCs), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Alternative diesel fuels, including biodiesel made from various feedstocks (soy, canola, palm, and tallow) and gas-to-liquid (GTL) diesel fuel, were compared to Texas low-emission diesel (TxLED), a petroleum-based ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD), in terms of emissions and fuel consumption. The biodiesel feedstock oil identity is an important variable affecting the level of NO x emissions, because increases were found for soy biodiesel and canola biodiesel, which are the most common feedstocks in the United States and Europe, respectively. At low engine load, NO x emissions increased for all biodiesels when compared to the ULSD, with the soy-based fuel giving the largest increase, followed by canola-based fuel and then tallow-based fuel, with palm-based biodiesel producing the smallest increase in NO x . At high engine load, NO x emissions for biodiesels followed the same relative ranking, but the increases were smaller for biodiesel made from the soy and canola feedstocks and decreases were observed for palm- and tallow-based biodiesel. NO x emissions for the GTL decreased at both low and high load. Emissions of CO and HCs decreased for all alternative diesel fuels at both load points. Quantification of several exhaust HC species was accomplished, with the highest concentrations belonging to ethene, pentane, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde. Biodiesels produced slightly more CO2 compared to ULSD, while GTL produced slightly less. The small differences in CO2 emissions were attributed to the carbon/hydrogen (C/H) ratio of the fuels and to the conversion of CO, HCs, and PM to CO2. This study provides further evidence that alternative diesel fuels can be used in compression ignition engines designed for conventional diesel without modification and that emission reductions can be achieved in some cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ef2009452
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701035139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1701035139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f0a1649640a56077a89e7dd37c84691c08976f070de966126254f8039618bc023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkLFOwzAURS0EEqUw8AdekGAIPDuJY4-ltKVSJRY6RyZ5Ka5cO9gJUv-eVEFMTO8O517pHUJuGTwy4OwJGw6gspyfkQnLOSQ5cHVOJiBlkYDg2SW5inEPACKV-YTUi4OJ0XhHZ07bYzSR-obObIfB6c58I30xGNHSZY820m00bkc1nftDG3AsrnfOdKfwjK767HxLF25nHNIVOgy68-GaXDTaRrz5vVOyXS7e56_J5m21ns82ieaKd0kDmolMiQx0LqAotFRY1HVaVDITilUgVSEaKKBGJQTjgudZIyFVgsmPCng6Jffjbhv8V4-xK4fnKrRWO_R9LFkBDNKcpWpAH0a0Cj7GgE3ZBnPQ4VgyKE8myz-TA3s3srqK5d73gxkb_-F-AAO-cDk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701035139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emission Analysis of Alternative Diesel Fuels Using a Compression Ignition Benchtop Engine Generator</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Bugosh, Gregory S ; Muncrief, Rachel L ; Harold, Michael P</creator><creatorcontrib>Bugosh, Gregory S ; Muncrief, Rachel L ; Harold, Michael P</creatorcontrib><description>A compact diesel-powered generator (5 kW) experimental setup was used to systematically evaluate the emissions generated by the combustion of several commercially produced alternative diesel fuels. The measured diesel engine exhaust components include oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), volatile hydrocarbons (HCs), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Alternative diesel fuels, including biodiesel made from various feedstocks (soy, canola, palm, and tallow) and gas-to-liquid (GTL) diesel fuel, were compared to Texas low-emission diesel (TxLED), a petroleum-based ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD), in terms of emissions and fuel consumption. The biodiesel feedstock oil identity is an important variable affecting the level of NO x emissions, because increases were found for soy biodiesel and canola biodiesel, which are the most common feedstocks in the United States and Europe, respectively. At low engine load, NO x emissions increased for all biodiesels when compared to the ULSD, with the soy-based fuel giving the largest increase, followed by canola-based fuel and then tallow-based fuel, with palm-based biodiesel producing the smallest increase in NO x . At high engine load, NO x emissions for biodiesels followed the same relative ranking, but the increases were smaller for biodiesel made from the soy and canola feedstocks and decreases were observed for palm- and tallow-based biodiesel. NO x emissions for the GTL decreased at both low and high load. Emissions of CO and HCs decreased for all alternative diesel fuels at both load points. Quantification of several exhaust HC species was accomplished, with the highest concentrations belonging to ethene, pentane, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde. Biodiesels produced slightly more CO2 compared to ULSD, while GTL produced slightly less. The small differences in CO2 emissions were attributed to the carbon/hydrogen (C/H) ratio of the fuels and to the conversion of CO, HCs, and PM to CO2. This study provides further evidence that alternative diesel fuels can be used in compression ignition engines designed for conventional diesel without modification and that emission reductions can be achieved in some cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-0624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ef2009452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Alternative fuels ; Biodiesel ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon monoxide ; Diesel ; Diesel engines ; Diesel fuels ; Feedstock ; Fuels ; Renewable Energy</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; fuels, 2011-10, Vol.25 (10), p.4704-4712</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f0a1649640a56077a89e7dd37c84691c08976f070de966126254f8039618bc023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f0a1649640a56077a89e7dd37c84691c08976f070de966126254f8039618bc023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ef2009452$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ef2009452$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2765,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bugosh, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muncrief, Rachel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harold, Michael P</creatorcontrib><title>Emission Analysis of Alternative Diesel Fuels Using a Compression Ignition Benchtop Engine Generator</title><title>Energy &amp; fuels</title><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><description>A compact diesel-powered generator (5 kW) experimental setup was used to systematically evaluate the emissions generated by the combustion of several commercially produced alternative diesel fuels. The measured diesel engine exhaust components include oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), volatile hydrocarbons (HCs), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Alternative diesel fuels, including biodiesel made from various feedstocks (soy, canola, palm, and tallow) and gas-to-liquid (GTL) diesel fuel, were compared to Texas low-emission diesel (TxLED), a petroleum-based ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD), in terms of emissions and fuel consumption. The biodiesel feedstock oil identity is an important variable affecting the level of NO x emissions, because increases were found for soy biodiesel and canola biodiesel, which are the most common feedstocks in the United States and Europe, respectively. At low engine load, NO x emissions increased for all biodiesels when compared to the ULSD, with the soy-based fuel giving the largest increase, followed by canola-based fuel and then tallow-based fuel, with palm-based biodiesel producing the smallest increase in NO x . At high engine load, NO x emissions for biodiesels followed the same relative ranking, but the increases were smaller for biodiesel made from the soy and canola feedstocks and decreases were observed for palm- and tallow-based biodiesel. NO x emissions for the GTL decreased at both low and high load. Emissions of CO and HCs decreased for all alternative diesel fuels at both load points. Quantification of several exhaust HC species was accomplished, with the highest concentrations belonging to ethene, pentane, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde. Biodiesels produced slightly more CO2 compared to ULSD, while GTL produced slightly less. The small differences in CO2 emissions were attributed to the carbon/hydrogen (C/H) ratio of the fuels and to the conversion of CO, HCs, and PM to CO2. This study provides further evidence that alternative diesel fuels can be used in compression ignition engines designed for conventional diesel without modification and that emission reductions can be achieved in some cases.</description><subject>Alternative fuels</subject><subject>Biodiesel</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon monoxide</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>Diesel engines</subject><subject>Diesel fuels</subject><subject>Feedstock</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Renewable Energy</subject><issn>0887-0624</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkLFOwzAURS0EEqUw8AdekGAIPDuJY4-ltKVSJRY6RyZ5Ka5cO9gJUv-eVEFMTO8O517pHUJuGTwy4OwJGw6gspyfkQnLOSQ5cHVOJiBlkYDg2SW5inEPACKV-YTUi4OJ0XhHZ07bYzSR-obObIfB6c58I30xGNHSZY820m00bkc1nftDG3AsrnfOdKfwjK767HxLF25nHNIVOgy68-GaXDTaRrz5vVOyXS7e56_J5m21ns82ieaKd0kDmolMiQx0LqAotFRY1HVaVDITilUgVSEaKKBGJQTjgudZIyFVgsmPCng6Jffjbhv8V4-xK4fnKrRWO_R9LFkBDNKcpWpAH0a0Cj7GgE3ZBnPQ4VgyKE8myz-TA3s3srqK5d73gxkb_-F-AAO-cDk</recordid><startdate>20111020</startdate><enddate>20111020</enddate><creator>Bugosh, Gregory S</creator><creator>Muncrief, Rachel L</creator><creator>Harold, Michael P</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111020</creationdate><title>Emission Analysis of Alternative Diesel Fuels Using a Compression Ignition Benchtop Engine Generator</title><author>Bugosh, Gregory S ; Muncrief, Rachel L ; Harold, Michael P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a292t-f0a1649640a56077a89e7dd37c84691c08976f070de966126254f8039618bc023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Alternative fuels</topic><topic>Biodiesel</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon monoxide</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>Diesel engines</topic><topic>Diesel fuels</topic><topic>Feedstock</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Renewable Energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bugosh, Gregory S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muncrief, Rachel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harold, Michael P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bugosh, Gregory S</au><au>Muncrief, Rachel L</au><au>Harold, Michael P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emission Analysis of Alternative Diesel Fuels Using a Compression Ignition Benchtop Engine Generator</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><date>2011-10-20</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>4704</spage><epage>4712</epage><pages>4704-4712</pages><issn>0887-0624</issn><eissn>1520-5029</eissn><abstract>A compact diesel-powered generator (5 kW) experimental setup was used to systematically evaluate the emissions generated by the combustion of several commercially produced alternative diesel fuels. The measured diesel engine exhaust components include oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), volatile hydrocarbons (HCs), and carbon dioxide (CO2). Alternative diesel fuels, including biodiesel made from various feedstocks (soy, canola, palm, and tallow) and gas-to-liquid (GTL) diesel fuel, were compared to Texas low-emission diesel (TxLED), a petroleum-based ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD), in terms of emissions and fuel consumption. The biodiesel feedstock oil identity is an important variable affecting the level of NO x emissions, because increases were found for soy biodiesel and canola biodiesel, which are the most common feedstocks in the United States and Europe, respectively. At low engine load, NO x emissions increased for all biodiesels when compared to the ULSD, with the soy-based fuel giving the largest increase, followed by canola-based fuel and then tallow-based fuel, with palm-based biodiesel producing the smallest increase in NO x . At high engine load, NO x emissions for biodiesels followed the same relative ranking, but the increases were smaller for biodiesel made from the soy and canola feedstocks and decreases were observed for palm- and tallow-based biodiesel. NO x emissions for the GTL decreased at both low and high load. Emissions of CO and HCs decreased for all alternative diesel fuels at both load points. Quantification of several exhaust HC species was accomplished, with the highest concentrations belonging to ethene, pentane, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde. Biodiesels produced slightly more CO2 compared to ULSD, while GTL produced slightly less. The small differences in CO2 emissions were attributed to the carbon/hydrogen (C/H) ratio of the fuels and to the conversion of CO, HCs, and PM to CO2. This study provides further evidence that alternative diesel fuels can be used in compression ignition engines designed for conventional diesel without modification and that emission reductions can be achieved in some cases.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/ef2009452</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-0624
ispartof Energy & fuels, 2011-10, Vol.25 (10), p.4704-4712
issn 0887-0624
1520-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701035139
source ACS Publications
subjects Alternative fuels
Biodiesel
Carbon dioxide
Carbon monoxide
Diesel
Diesel engines
Diesel fuels
Feedstock
Fuels
Renewable Energy
title Emission Analysis of Alternative Diesel Fuels Using a Compression Ignition Benchtop Engine Generator
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T15%3A53%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emission%20Analysis%20of%20Alternative%20Diesel%20Fuels%20Using%20a%20Compression%20Ignition%20Benchtop%20Engine%20Generator&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20fuels&rft.au=Bugosh,%20Gregory%20S&rft.date=2011-10-20&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=4704&rft.epage=4712&rft.pages=4704-4712&rft.issn=0887-0624&rft.eissn=1520-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ef2009452&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701035139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701035139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true