Triplet excitations in carbon nanostructures

We show that the energy differences between the lowest optical singlet exciton and the lowest triplet exciton in semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes with diameter ~1 nm and graphene nanoribbons with widths ~2 nm are an order of magnitude smaller than in the [pi]-conjugated polymer poly(par...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics Condensed matter and materials physics, 2012-02, Vol.85 (8), Article 085438
Hauptverfasser: Aryanpour, K., Mazumdar, S., Zhao, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics
container_volume 85
creator Aryanpour, K.
Mazumdar, S.
Zhao, H.
description We show that the energy differences between the lowest optical singlet exciton and the lowest triplet exciton in semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes with diameter ~1 nm and graphene nanoribbons with widths ~2 nm are an order of magnitude smaller than in the [pi]-conjugated polymer poly(para-phenylenevinylene). Our calculated energy gaps between the singlet and triplet excitons are in excellent agreement with the measured values in three different nanotubes with diameters close to 1 nm. The spatial extent of the triplet exciton is nearly the same as that of the singlet exciton in wide nanotubes and nanoribbons, in contrast to that in [pi]-conjugated polymers in which the triplet exciton exhibits strong spatial confinement. Weakly confined behavior of the triplet state begins in nanoribbons with widths as narrow as 2.5 times the graphene unit lattice vector. We discuss possible consequences of the small singlet-triplet energy difference in the carbon nanostructures on device applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085438
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701026895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1701026895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-b114067fc914e94a80551e6f7429b39b4545cd3fdc8a8087a967d4c5a79707d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LxDAURYMoOI7-AVddurD1vXw0yVIHR4UBRWbhLqRpipVOOyapOP_eSnV1L9zDXRxCLhEKRGA3L--H-Oq_7golClCCM3VEFigE5JSJt-Opg1Y5IMVTchbjBwByzemCXG9Du-98yvy3a5NN7dDHrO0zZ0M19Flv-yGmMLo0Bh_PyUlju-gv_nJJtuv77eox3zw_PK1uN7ljlKe8QuRQysZp5F5zq0AI9GUjOdUV0xUXXLiaNbVT06ak1aWsuRNWagmyZktyNd_uw_A5-pjMro3Od53t_TBGgxIQaKm0mFA6oy4MMQbfmH1odzYcDIL5NWP-zRglzGyG_QD6MVf7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701026895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Triplet excitations in carbon nanostructures</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Aryanpour, K. ; Mazumdar, S. ; Zhao, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aryanpour, K. ; Mazumdar, S. ; Zhao, H.</creatorcontrib><description>We show that the energy differences between the lowest optical singlet exciton and the lowest triplet exciton in semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes with diameter ~1 nm and graphene nanoribbons with widths ~2 nm are an order of magnitude smaller than in the [pi]-conjugated polymer poly(para-phenylenevinylene). Our calculated energy gaps between the singlet and triplet excitons are in excellent agreement with the measured values in three different nanotubes with diameters close to 1 nm. The spatial extent of the triplet exciton is nearly the same as that of the singlet exciton in wide nanotubes and nanoribbons, in contrast to that in [pi]-conjugated polymers in which the triplet exciton exhibits strong spatial confinement. Weakly confined behavior of the triplet state begins in nanoribbons with widths as narrow as 2.5 times the graphene unit lattice vector. We discuss possible consequences of the small singlet-triplet energy difference in the carbon nanostructures on device applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-0121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-235X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085438</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Carbon ; Condensed matter ; Energy gap ; Excitation ; Graphene ; Mathematical analysis ; Nanostructure ; Nanotubes</subject><ispartof>Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics, 2012-02, Vol.85 (8), Article 085438</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-b114067fc914e94a80551e6f7429b39b4545cd3fdc8a8087a967d4c5a79707d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-b114067fc914e94a80551e6f7429b39b4545cd3fdc8a8087a967d4c5a79707d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2876,2877,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aryanpour, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazumdar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Triplet excitations in carbon nanostructures</title><title>Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics</title><description>We show that the energy differences between the lowest optical singlet exciton and the lowest triplet exciton in semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes with diameter ~1 nm and graphene nanoribbons with widths ~2 nm are an order of magnitude smaller than in the [pi]-conjugated polymer poly(para-phenylenevinylene). Our calculated energy gaps between the singlet and triplet excitons are in excellent agreement with the measured values in three different nanotubes with diameters close to 1 nm. The spatial extent of the triplet exciton is nearly the same as that of the singlet exciton in wide nanotubes and nanoribbons, in contrast to that in [pi]-conjugated polymers in which the triplet exciton exhibits strong spatial confinement. Weakly confined behavior of the triplet state begins in nanoribbons with widths as narrow as 2.5 times the graphene unit lattice vector. We discuss possible consequences of the small singlet-triplet energy difference in the carbon nanostructures on device applications.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Condensed matter</subject><subject>Energy gap</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>Nanotubes</subject><issn>1098-0121</issn><issn>1550-235X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE1LxDAURYMoOI7-AVddurD1vXw0yVIHR4UBRWbhLqRpipVOOyapOP_eSnV1L9zDXRxCLhEKRGA3L--H-Oq_7golClCCM3VEFigE5JSJt-Opg1Y5IMVTchbjBwByzemCXG9Du-98yvy3a5NN7dDHrO0zZ0M19Flv-yGmMLo0Bh_PyUlju-gv_nJJtuv77eox3zw_PK1uN7ljlKe8QuRQysZp5F5zq0AI9GUjOdUV0xUXXLiaNbVT06ak1aWsuRNWagmyZktyNd_uw_A5-pjMro3Od53t_TBGgxIQaKm0mFA6oy4MMQbfmH1odzYcDIL5NWP-zRglzGyG_QD6MVf7</recordid><startdate>20120227</startdate><enddate>20120227</enddate><creator>Aryanpour, K.</creator><creator>Mazumdar, S.</creator><creator>Zhao, H.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120227</creationdate><title>Triplet excitations in carbon nanostructures</title><author>Aryanpour, K. ; Mazumdar, S. ; Zhao, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-b114067fc914e94a80551e6f7429b39b4545cd3fdc8a8087a967d4c5a79707d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Condensed matter</topic><topic>Energy gap</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>Nanotubes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aryanpour, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazumdar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aryanpour, K.</au><au>Mazumdar, S.</au><au>Zhao, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Triplet excitations in carbon nanostructures</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics</jtitle><date>2012-02-27</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>8</issue><artnum>085438</artnum><issn>1098-0121</issn><eissn>1550-235X</eissn><abstract>We show that the energy differences between the lowest optical singlet exciton and the lowest triplet exciton in semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes with diameter ~1 nm and graphene nanoribbons with widths ~2 nm are an order of magnitude smaller than in the [pi]-conjugated polymer poly(para-phenylenevinylene). Our calculated energy gaps between the singlet and triplet excitons are in excellent agreement with the measured values in three different nanotubes with diameters close to 1 nm. The spatial extent of the triplet exciton is nearly the same as that of the singlet exciton in wide nanotubes and nanoribbons, in contrast to that in [pi]-conjugated polymers in which the triplet exciton exhibits strong spatial confinement. Weakly confined behavior of the triplet state begins in nanoribbons with widths as narrow as 2.5 times the graphene unit lattice vector. We discuss possible consequences of the small singlet-triplet energy difference in the carbon nanostructures on device applications.</abstract><doi>10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085438</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-0121
ispartof Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics, 2012-02, Vol.85 (8), Article 085438
issn 1098-0121
1550-235X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701026895
source American Physical Society Journals
subjects Carbon
Condensed matter
Energy gap
Excitation
Graphene
Mathematical analysis
Nanostructure
Nanotubes
title Triplet excitations in carbon nanostructures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A43%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Triplet%20excitations%20in%20carbon%20nanostructures&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20B,%20Condensed%20matter%20and%20materials%20physics&rft.au=Aryanpour,%20K.&rft.date=2012-02-27&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=8&rft.artnum=085438&rft.issn=1098-0121&rft.eissn=1550-235X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085438&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701026895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701026895&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true