Lattice-matched versus lattice-mismatched models to describe epitaxial monolayer graphene on Ru(0001)

Monolayer graphene grown on Ru(0001) surfaces forms a superstructure with periodic modulations in its geometry and electronic structure. The large dimension and inhomogeneous features of this superstructure make its description and subsequent analysis a challenge for theoretical modeling based on de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics Condensed matter and materials physics, 2013-12, Vol.88 (24), Article 245401
Hauptverfasser: Stradi, D., Barja, S., Díaz, C., Garnica, M., Borca, B., Hinarejos, J. J., Sánchez-Portal, D., Alcamí, M., Arnau, A., Vázquez de Parga, A. L., Miranda, R., Martín, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 24
container_start_page
container_title Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics
container_volume 88
creator Stradi, D.
Barja, S.
Díaz, C.
Garnica, M.
Borca, B.
Hinarejos, J. J.
Sánchez-Portal, D.
Alcamí, M.
Arnau, A.
Vázquez de Parga, A. L.
Miranda, R.
Martín, F.
description Monolayer graphene grown on Ru(0001) surfaces forms a superstructure with periodic modulations in its geometry and electronic structure. The large dimension and inhomogeneous features of this superstructure make its description and subsequent analysis a challenge for theoretical modeling based on density functional theory. In this work, we compare two different approaches to describe the same physical properties of this surface, focusing on the geometry and the electronic states confined at the surface. In the more complex approach, the actual moire structure is taken into account by means of large unit cells, whereas in the simplest one, the graphene moire is completely neglected by representing the system as a stretched graphene layer that adapts pseudomorphically to Ru(0001). As shown in previous work, the more complex model provides an accurate description of the existing experimental observations. More interestingly, we show that the simplified stretched models, which are computationally inexpensive, reproduce qualitatively the main features of the surface electronic structure. They also provide a simple and comprehensive picture of the observed electronic structure, thus making them particularly useful for the analysis of these and maybe other complex interfaces.
doi_str_mv 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.245401
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701003955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1701003955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4c25061d9d802f53239ae4a8f93da1fd144dbc03af05ae50a31947aa4da15c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwBzjlOA4dzhdrjjDxJU0CTTtwi7zEZUVdW5IWsX9Pp7GTLT-vbOth7FrAVAhQt--bXVrSz8M0z6dSGw3ihI2EMZBJZT5Ohx5snoGQ4pxdpPQFILTVcsRogV1Xesq22PkNBf5DMfWJV8dxmY5k2wSqEu8aHij5WK6JU1t2-FtiNcC6qXBHkX9GbDdUE29qvuwnMJy6uWRnBVaJrv7rmK2eHlfzl2zx9vw6v19kXlnoMu2lgTsRbMhBFkZJZZE05oVVAUURhNZh7UFhAQbJACph9QxRD9R4o8Zscljbxua7p9S54X1PVYU1NX1yYgYCQFmzj8pD1McmpUiFa2O5xbhzAtxeqTsqdXnuDkrVHwThbIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701003955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lattice-matched versus lattice-mismatched models to describe epitaxial monolayer graphene on Ru(0001)</title><source>PROLA</source><creator>Stradi, D. ; Barja, S. ; Díaz, C. ; Garnica, M. ; Borca, B. ; Hinarejos, J. J. ; Sánchez-Portal, D. ; Alcamí, M. ; Arnau, A. ; Vázquez de Parga, A. L. ; Miranda, R. ; Martín, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stradi, D. ; Barja, S. ; Díaz, C. ; Garnica, M. ; Borca, B. ; Hinarejos, J. J. ; Sánchez-Portal, D. ; Alcamí, M. ; Arnau, A. ; Vázquez de Parga, A. L. ; Miranda, R. ; Martín, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Monolayer graphene grown on Ru(0001) surfaces forms a superstructure with periodic modulations in its geometry and electronic structure. The large dimension and inhomogeneous features of this superstructure make its description and subsequent analysis a challenge for theoretical modeling based on density functional theory. In this work, we compare two different approaches to describe the same physical properties of this surface, focusing on the geometry and the electronic states confined at the surface. In the more complex approach, the actual moire structure is taken into account by means of large unit cells, whereas in the simplest one, the graphene moire is completely neglected by representing the system as a stretched graphene layer that adapts pseudomorphically to Ru(0001). As shown in previous work, the more complex model provides an accurate description of the existing experimental observations. More interestingly, we show that the simplified stretched models, which are computationally inexpensive, reproduce qualitatively the main features of the surface electronic structure. They also provide a simple and comprehensive picture of the observed electronic structure, thus making them particularly useful for the analysis of these and maybe other complex interfaces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-0121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-235X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.245401</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Condensed matter ; Electronic structure ; Graphene ; Mathematical models ; Modulation ; Monolayers ; Physical properties ; Superstructures</subject><ispartof>Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics, 2013-12, Vol.88 (24), Article 245401</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4c25061d9d802f53239ae4a8f93da1fd144dbc03af05ae50a31947aa4da15c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4c25061d9d802f53239ae4a8f93da1fd144dbc03af05ae50a31947aa4da15c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2876,2877,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stradi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barja, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnica, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borca, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinarejos, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Portal, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcamí, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez de Parga, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Lattice-matched versus lattice-mismatched models to describe epitaxial monolayer graphene on Ru(0001)</title><title>Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics</title><description>Monolayer graphene grown on Ru(0001) surfaces forms a superstructure with periodic modulations in its geometry and electronic structure. The large dimension and inhomogeneous features of this superstructure make its description and subsequent analysis a challenge for theoretical modeling based on density functional theory. In this work, we compare two different approaches to describe the same physical properties of this surface, focusing on the geometry and the electronic states confined at the surface. In the more complex approach, the actual moire structure is taken into account by means of large unit cells, whereas in the simplest one, the graphene moire is completely neglected by representing the system as a stretched graphene layer that adapts pseudomorphically to Ru(0001). As shown in previous work, the more complex model provides an accurate description of the existing experimental observations. More interestingly, we show that the simplified stretched models, which are computationally inexpensive, reproduce qualitatively the main features of the surface electronic structure. They also provide a simple and comprehensive picture of the observed electronic structure, thus making them particularly useful for the analysis of these and maybe other complex interfaces.</description><subject>Condensed matter</subject><subject>Electronic structure</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modulation</subject><subject>Monolayers</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Superstructures</subject><issn>1098-0121</issn><issn>1550-235X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmPwBzjlOA4dzhdrjjDxJU0CTTtwi7zEZUVdW5IWsX9Pp7GTLT-vbOth7FrAVAhQt--bXVrSz8M0z6dSGw3ihI2EMZBJZT5Ohx5snoGQ4pxdpPQFILTVcsRogV1Xesq22PkNBf5DMfWJV8dxmY5k2wSqEu8aHij5WK6JU1t2-FtiNcC6qXBHkX9GbDdUE29qvuwnMJy6uWRnBVaJrv7rmK2eHlfzl2zx9vw6v19kXlnoMu2lgTsRbMhBFkZJZZE05oVVAUURhNZh7UFhAQbJACph9QxRD9R4o8Zscljbxua7p9S54X1PVYU1NX1yYgYCQFmzj8pD1McmpUiFa2O5xbhzAtxeqTsqdXnuDkrVHwThbIc</recordid><startdate>20131202</startdate><enddate>20131202</enddate><creator>Stradi, D.</creator><creator>Barja, S.</creator><creator>Díaz, C.</creator><creator>Garnica, M.</creator><creator>Borca, B.</creator><creator>Hinarejos, J. J.</creator><creator>Sánchez-Portal, D.</creator><creator>Alcamí, M.</creator><creator>Arnau, A.</creator><creator>Vázquez de Parga, A. L.</creator><creator>Miranda, R.</creator><creator>Martín, F.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131202</creationdate><title>Lattice-matched versus lattice-mismatched models to describe epitaxial monolayer graphene on Ru(0001)</title><author>Stradi, D. ; Barja, S. ; Díaz, C. ; Garnica, M. ; Borca, B. ; Hinarejos, J. J. ; Sánchez-Portal, D. ; Alcamí, M. ; Arnau, A. ; Vázquez de Parga, A. L. ; Miranda, R. ; Martín, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-4c25061d9d802f53239ae4a8f93da1fd144dbc03af05ae50a31947aa4da15c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Condensed matter</topic><topic>Electronic structure</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modulation</topic><topic>Monolayers</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Superstructures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stradi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barja, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garnica, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borca, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinarejos, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Portal, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcamí, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez de Parga, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miranda, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stradi, D.</au><au>Barja, S.</au><au>Díaz, C.</au><au>Garnica, M.</au><au>Borca, B.</au><au>Hinarejos, J. J.</au><au>Sánchez-Portal, D.</au><au>Alcamí, M.</au><au>Arnau, A.</au><au>Vázquez de Parga, A. L.</au><au>Miranda, R.</au><au>Martín, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lattice-matched versus lattice-mismatched models to describe epitaxial monolayer graphene on Ru(0001)</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics</jtitle><date>2013-12-02</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>24</issue><artnum>245401</artnum><issn>1098-0121</issn><eissn>1550-235X</eissn><abstract>Monolayer graphene grown on Ru(0001) surfaces forms a superstructure with periodic modulations in its geometry and electronic structure. The large dimension and inhomogeneous features of this superstructure make its description and subsequent analysis a challenge for theoretical modeling based on density functional theory. In this work, we compare two different approaches to describe the same physical properties of this surface, focusing on the geometry and the electronic states confined at the surface. In the more complex approach, the actual moire structure is taken into account by means of large unit cells, whereas in the simplest one, the graphene moire is completely neglected by representing the system as a stretched graphene layer that adapts pseudomorphically to Ru(0001). As shown in previous work, the more complex model provides an accurate description of the existing experimental observations. More interestingly, we show that the simplified stretched models, which are computationally inexpensive, reproduce qualitatively the main features of the surface electronic structure. They also provide a simple and comprehensive picture of the observed electronic structure, thus making them particularly useful for the analysis of these and maybe other complex interfaces.</abstract><doi>10.1103/PhysRevB.88.245401</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-0121
ispartof Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics, 2013-12, Vol.88 (24), Article 245401
issn 1098-0121
1550-235X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1701003955
source PROLA
subjects Condensed matter
Electronic structure
Graphene
Mathematical models
Modulation
Monolayers
Physical properties
Superstructures
title Lattice-matched versus lattice-mismatched models to describe epitaxial monolayer graphene on Ru(0001)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lattice-matched%20versus%20lattice-mismatched%20models%20to%20describe%20epitaxial%20monolayer%20graphene%20on%20Ru(0001)&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20B,%20Condensed%20matter%20and%20materials%20physics&rft.au=Stradi,%20D.&rft.date=2013-12-02&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=24&rft.artnum=245401&rft.issn=1098-0121&rft.eissn=1550-235X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.245401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701003955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701003955&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true