DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically conside...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New York University journal of international law & politics 2014-04, Vol.46 (3), p.741-791
Hauptverfasser: Benvenisti, Eyal, Downs, George W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 791
container_issue 3
container_start_page 741
container_title New York University journal of international law & politics
container_volume 46
creator Benvenisti, Eyal
Downs, George W
description It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically consider the interests of foreign stakeholders who are increasingly affected by them. International Organizations (IOs) are poorly designed to address the resulting democratic deficits at the national level because they tend to be dominated by the internal politics of a handful of powerful states. In this Article we argue that democratic failures at both the national and the international level can be best addressed through greater interaction and coordination between national courts and international tribunals. Such cooperation promises to enhance democracy at both levels by helping to ensure that decisionmakers take account of the interests of a greater proportion of the relevant stakeholders and that the outcomes are therefore better informed and more balanced. We further argue that 'democracy' in this context must also be understood as providing a voice to foreigners, who are often excluded from domestic and global decisionmaking processes. Adapted from the source document.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1698955559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1684420380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p999-c7d23b5dd673b45cff4342d74741f7cf56b4e9a63fe1ae9410c504ad138c7ded3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEFPwyAAhTlo4pz-B45emkChBbxVxromHZiKGr0sbYFEU90U9_-H2eLZd3l5L997Z2CGUM4zxhm5AJcxvqeIS5TPwLRQayO7yjavja6hNI-dfbiFK_MMdSqNrlpY6QVstFXdX3PE4H1n1sYqePqQLwlLNFRdBc0S1q25S3Btnn6nWqorcB76Kfrrk8-BXSorV1lr6kZWbbYTQmQjczkZCudKRgZajCFQQnPHKKM4sDEU5UC96EsSPO69oBiNBaK9w4SnqXdkDm6Ot7vv7dfex5_Nx1sc_TT1n367jxtcCi6KJPEPlFOaI8IROQDEUVnh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684420380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Benvenisti, Eyal ; Downs, George W</creator><creatorcontrib>Benvenisti, Eyal ; Downs, George W</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically consider the interests of foreign stakeholders who are increasingly affected by them. International Organizations (IOs) are poorly designed to address the resulting democratic deficits at the national level because they tend to be dominated by the internal politics of a handful of powerful states. In this Article we argue that democratic failures at both the national and the international level can be best addressed through greater interaction and coordination between national courts and international tribunals. Such cooperation promises to enhance democracy at both levels by helping to ensure that decisionmakers take account of the interests of a greater proportion of the relevant stakeholders and that the outcomes are therefore better informed and more balanced. We further argue that 'democracy' in this context must also be understood as providing a voice to foreigners, who are often excluded from domestic and global decisionmaking processes. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-7873</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Cooperation ; Courts ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Governance ; Interaction ; Interdependence ; Interest Groups ; International Cooperation ; International Court ; International courts ; International Organizations ; Proportional representation ; Stakeholder</subject><ispartof>New York University journal of international law &amp; politics, 2014-04, Vol.46 (3), p.741-791</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benvenisti, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs, George W</creatorcontrib><title>DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE</title><title>New York University journal of international law &amp; politics</title><description>It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically consider the interests of foreign stakeholders who are increasingly affected by them. International Organizations (IOs) are poorly designed to address the resulting democratic deficits at the national level because they tend to be dominated by the internal politics of a handful of powerful states. In this Article we argue that democratic failures at both the national and the international level can be best addressed through greater interaction and coordination between national courts and international tribunals. Such cooperation promises to enhance democracy at both levels by helping to ensure that decisionmakers take account of the interests of a greater proportion of the relevant stakeholders and that the outcomes are therefore better informed and more balanced. We further argue that 'democracy' in this context must also be understood as providing a voice to foreigners, who are often excluded from domestic and global decisionmaking processes. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Interdependence</subject><subject>Interest Groups</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International courts</subject><subject>International Organizations</subject><subject>Proportional representation</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><issn>0028-7873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjEFPwyAAhTlo4pz-B45emkChBbxVxromHZiKGr0sbYFEU90U9_-H2eLZd3l5L997Z2CGUM4zxhm5AJcxvqeIS5TPwLRQayO7yjavja6hNI-dfbiFK_MMdSqNrlpY6QVstFXdX3PE4H1n1sYqePqQLwlLNFRdBc0S1q25S3Btnn6nWqorcB76Kfrrk8-BXSorV1lr6kZWbbYTQmQjczkZCudKRgZajCFQQnPHKKM4sDEU5UC96EsSPO69oBiNBaK9w4SnqXdkDm6Ot7vv7dfex5_Nx1sc_TT1n367jxtcCi6KJPEPlFOaI8IROQDEUVnh</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Benvenisti, Eyal</creator><creator>Downs, George W</creator><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE</title><author>Benvenisti, Eyal ; Downs, George W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p999-c7d23b5dd673b45cff4342d74741f7cf56b4e9a63fe1ae9410c504ad138c7ded3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Interdependence</topic><topic>Interest Groups</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International courts</topic><topic>International Organizations</topic><topic>Proportional representation</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benvenisti, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs, George W</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>New York University journal of international law &amp; politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benvenisti, Eyal</au><au>Downs, George W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE</atitle><jtitle>New York University journal of international law &amp; politics</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>791</epage><pages>741-791</pages><issn>0028-7873</issn><abstract>It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically consider the interests of foreign stakeholders who are increasingly affected by them. International Organizations (IOs) are poorly designed to address the resulting democratic deficits at the national level because they tend to be dominated by the internal politics of a handful of powerful states. In this Article we argue that democratic failures at both the national and the international level can be best addressed through greater interaction and coordination between national courts and international tribunals. Such cooperation promises to enhance democracy at both levels by helping to ensure that decisionmakers take account of the interests of a greater proportion of the relevant stakeholders and that the outcomes are therefore better informed and more balanced. We further argue that 'democracy' in this context must also be understood as providing a voice to foreigners, who are often excluded from domestic and global decisionmaking processes. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><tpages>51</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-7873
ispartof New York University journal of international law & politics, 2014-04, Vol.46 (3), p.741-791
issn 0028-7873
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1698955559
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cooperation
Courts
Democracy
Democratization
Governance
Interaction
Interdependence
Interest Groups
International Cooperation
International Court
International courts
International Organizations
Proportional representation
Stakeholder
title DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A03%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DEMOCRATIZING%20COURTS:%20HOW%20NATIONAL%20AND%20INTERNATIONAL%20COURTS%20PROMOTE%20DEMOCRACY%20IN%20AN%20ERA%20OF%20GLOBAL%20GOVERNANCE&rft.jtitle=New%20York%20University%20journal%20of%20international%20law%20&%20politics&rft.au=Benvenisti,%20Eyal&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=791&rft.pages=741-791&rft.issn=0028-7873&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1684420380%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684420380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true