DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically conside...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New York University journal of international law & politics 2014-04, Vol.46 (3), p.741-791 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 791 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 741 |
container_title | New York University journal of international law & politics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Benvenisti, Eyal Downs, George W |
description | It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically consider the interests of foreign stakeholders who are increasingly affected by them. International Organizations (IOs) are poorly designed to address the resulting democratic deficits at the national level because they tend to be dominated by the internal politics of a handful of powerful states. In this Article we argue that democratic failures at both the national and the international level can be best addressed through greater interaction and coordination between national courts and international tribunals. Such cooperation promises to enhance democracy at both levels by helping to ensure that decisionmakers take account of the interests of a greater proportion of the relevant stakeholders and that the outcomes are therefore better informed and more balanced. We further argue that 'democracy' in this context must also be understood as providing a voice to foreigners, who are often excluded from domestic and global decisionmaking processes. Adapted from the source document. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1698955559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1684420380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p999-c7d23b5dd673b45cff4342d74741f7cf56b4e9a63fe1ae9410c504ad138c7ded3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEFPwyAAhTlo4pz-B45emkChBbxVxromHZiKGr0sbYFEU90U9_-H2eLZd3l5L997Z2CGUM4zxhm5AJcxvqeIS5TPwLRQayO7yjavja6hNI-dfbiFK_MMdSqNrlpY6QVstFXdX3PE4H1n1sYqePqQLwlLNFRdBc0S1q25S3Btnn6nWqorcB76Kfrrk8-BXSorV1lr6kZWbbYTQmQjczkZCudKRgZajCFQQnPHKKM4sDEU5UC96EsSPO69oBiNBaK9w4SnqXdkDm6Ot7vv7dfex5_Nx1sc_TT1n367jxtcCi6KJPEPlFOaI8IROQDEUVnh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1684420380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Benvenisti, Eyal ; Downs, George W</creator><creatorcontrib>Benvenisti, Eyal ; Downs, George W</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically consider the interests of foreign stakeholders who are increasingly affected by them. International Organizations (IOs) are poorly designed to address the resulting democratic deficits at the national level because they tend to be dominated by the internal politics of a handful of powerful states. In this Article we argue that democratic failures at both the national and the international level can be best addressed through greater interaction and coordination between national courts and international tribunals. Such cooperation promises to enhance democracy at both levels by helping to ensure that decisionmakers take account of the interests of a greater proportion of the relevant stakeholders and that the outcomes are therefore better informed and more balanced. We further argue that 'democracy' in this context must also be understood as providing a voice to foreigners, who are often excluded from domestic and global decisionmaking processes. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-7873</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Cooperation ; Courts ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Governance ; Interaction ; Interdependence ; Interest Groups ; International Cooperation ; International Court ; International courts ; International Organizations ; Proportional representation ; Stakeholder</subject><ispartof>New York University journal of international law & politics, 2014-04, Vol.46 (3), p.741-791</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benvenisti, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs, George W</creatorcontrib><title>DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE</title><title>New York University journal of international law & politics</title><description>It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically consider the interests of foreign stakeholders who are increasingly affected by them. International Organizations (IOs) are poorly designed to address the resulting democratic deficits at the national level because they tend to be dominated by the internal politics of a handful of powerful states. In this Article we argue that democratic failures at both the national and the international level can be best addressed through greater interaction and coordination between national courts and international tribunals. Such cooperation promises to enhance democracy at both levels by helping to ensure that decisionmakers take account of the interests of a greater proportion of the relevant stakeholders and that the outcomes are therefore better informed and more balanced. We further argue that 'democracy' in this context must also be understood as providing a voice to foreigners, who are often excluded from domestic and global decisionmaking processes. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Interdependence</subject><subject>Interest Groups</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International courts</subject><subject>International Organizations</subject><subject>Proportional representation</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><issn>0028-7873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjEFPwyAAhTlo4pz-B45emkChBbxVxromHZiKGr0sbYFEU90U9_-H2eLZd3l5L997Z2CGUM4zxhm5AJcxvqeIS5TPwLRQayO7yjavja6hNI-dfbiFK_MMdSqNrlpY6QVstFXdX3PE4H1n1sYqePqQLwlLNFRdBc0S1q25S3Btnn6nWqorcB76Kfrrk8-BXSorV1lr6kZWbbYTQmQjczkZCudKRgZajCFQQnPHKKM4sDEU5UC96EsSPO69oBiNBaK9w4SnqXdkDm6Ot7vv7dfex5_Nx1sc_TT1n367jxtcCi6KJPEPlFOaI8IROQDEUVnh</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Benvenisti, Eyal</creator><creator>Downs, George W</creator><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE</title><author>Benvenisti, Eyal ; Downs, George W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p999-c7d23b5dd673b45cff4342d74741f7cf56b4e9a63fe1ae9410c504ad138c7ded3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Interdependence</topic><topic>Interest Groups</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International courts</topic><topic>International Organizations</topic><topic>Proportional representation</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benvenisti, Eyal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downs, George W</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>New York University journal of international law & politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benvenisti, Eyal</au><au>Downs, George W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE</atitle><jtitle>New York University journal of international law & politics</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>791</epage><pages>741-791</pages><issn>0028-7873</issn><abstract>It is widely acknowledged that under contemporary conditions of global interdependence, domestic democratic institutions have grown increasingly unresponsive to the preferences of many of their traditional domestic stake-holders. Additionally, these institutions are failing to systematically consider the interests of foreign stakeholders who are increasingly affected by them. International Organizations (IOs) are poorly designed to address the resulting democratic deficits at the national level because they tend to be dominated by the internal politics of a handful of powerful states. In this Article we argue that democratic failures at both the national and the international level can be best addressed through greater interaction and coordination between national courts and international tribunals. Such cooperation promises to enhance democracy at both levels by helping to ensure that decisionmakers take account of the interests of a greater proportion of the relevant stakeholders and that the outcomes are therefore better informed and more balanced. We further argue that 'democracy' in this context must also be understood as providing a voice to foreigners, who are often excluded from domestic and global decisionmaking processes. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><tpages>51</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-7873 |
ispartof | New York University journal of international law & politics, 2014-04, Vol.46 (3), p.741-791 |
issn | 0028-7873 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1698955559 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cooperation Courts Democracy Democratization Governance Interaction Interdependence Interest Groups International Cooperation International Court International courts International Organizations Proportional representation Stakeholder |
title | DEMOCRATIZING COURTS: HOW NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS PROMOTE DEMOCRACY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A03%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DEMOCRATIZING%20COURTS:%20HOW%20NATIONAL%20AND%20INTERNATIONAL%20COURTS%20PROMOTE%20DEMOCRACY%20IN%20AN%20ERA%20OF%20GLOBAL%20GOVERNANCE&rft.jtitle=New%20York%20University%20journal%20of%20international%20law%20&%20politics&rft.au=Benvenisti,%20Eyal&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=791&rft.pages=741-791&rft.issn=0028-7873&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1684420380%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1684420380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |