Can Changes in Social Behaviour Help to Explain House Mouse Plagues in Australia?

House mouse plagues in the grain-growing areas of eastern Australia are a graphic illustration of the failure of social mechanisms of population control that are postulated by the self-regulation hypothesis to prevent unlimited increase in numbers. Yet house mice are well known for the strength and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oikos 1995-09, Vol.73 (3), p.429-434
Hauptverfasser: Krebs, Charles J., Chitty, Dennis, Singleton, Grant, Boonstra, Rudy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 434
container_issue 3
container_start_page 429
container_title Oikos
container_volume 73
creator Krebs, Charles J.
Chitty, Dennis
Singleton, Grant
Boonstra, Rudy
description House mouse plagues in the grain-growing areas of eastern Australia are a graphic illustration of the failure of social mechanisms of population control that are postulated by the self-regulation hypothesis to prevent unlimited increase in numbers. Yet house mice are well known for the strength and variety of social interactions and are clearly capable of regulating their own numbers through social mortality. Most of the research on house mouse plagues has assumed that extrinsic agencies - predators, diseases, food supplies, and weather - determine when and where mouse plagues will occur. Some aspects of these plagues cannot, however, be explained that easily, among them the low phase, which may persist for 1-3 years. We focus here on the low phase of plagues and the trigger that flips a population from the low into the increase phase of a plague. Can social factors in house mouse populations explain the low phase, and is a change in social organization a necessary condition for generating a plague? Two possible models are presented to suggest predictions to be tested by further studies of social mechanisms of population limitation in feral house mice.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3545972
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16983994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3545972</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3545972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-4263d9f8ead7f415614bc7a689e17afdda4a8009737fa6821f0ff14f871d879d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMouK7iK-QgeqpOmrRpTrKW1RVWVNRzGdNkt0u2rUkr-vZWd9GTlxkYvvn4-Qk5ZnAec5AXPBGJkvEOGbEUIAIJ6S4ZAXCIWKzUPjkIYQUAUkoxIo851jRfYr0wgVY1fWp0hY5emSW-V03v6cy4lnYNnX60Dgdg1vTB0Luf-eBw0W_-Jn3oPLoKLw_JnkUXzNF2j8nL9fQ5n0Xz-5vbfDKPNBdJF4k45aWymcFSWsGSlIlXLTHNlGESbVmiwAxASS7tcI2ZBWuZsJlkZSZVycfkdONtffM2pOiKdRW0cQ5rM6QrWKoyrpQYwLMNqH0Tgje2aH21Rv9ZMCi-Kyu2lQ3kyVaJQaOzHmtdhV-cp0qIWPxhq9A1_l_bFwOCdEs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16983994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Changes in Social Behaviour Help to Explain House Mouse Plagues in Australia?</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Krebs, Charles J. ; Chitty, Dennis ; Singleton, Grant ; Boonstra, Rudy</creator><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Charles J. ; Chitty, Dennis ; Singleton, Grant ; Boonstra, Rudy</creatorcontrib><description>House mouse plagues in the grain-growing areas of eastern Australia are a graphic illustration of the failure of social mechanisms of population control that are postulated by the self-regulation hypothesis to prevent unlimited increase in numbers. Yet house mice are well known for the strength and variety of social interactions and are clearly capable of regulating their own numbers through social mortality. Most of the research on house mouse plagues has assumed that extrinsic agencies - predators, diseases, food supplies, and weather - determine when and where mouse plagues will occur. Some aspects of these plagues cannot, however, be explained that easily, among them the low phase, which may persist for 1-3 years. We focus here on the low phase of plagues and the trigger that flips a population from the low into the increase phase of a plague. Can social factors in house mouse populations explain the low phase, and is a change in social organization a necessary condition for generating a plague? Two possible models are presented to suggest predictions to be tested by further studies of social mechanisms of population limitation in feral house mice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3545972</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OIKSAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Demecology ; Disease outbreaks ; Epidemics ; Forum ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Infanticide ; Mammalia ; Mice ; Mus musculus ; Phenotypes ; Population dynamics ; Population growth ; Social behavior ; Social organization ; Vertebrata ; Voles</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 1995-09, Vol.73 (3), p.429-434</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1995 Munksgaard International Publishers Ltd.</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-4263d9f8ead7f415614bc7a689e17afdda4a8009737fa6821f0ff14f871d879d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3545972$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3545972$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3694424$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitty, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singleton, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boonstra, Rudy</creatorcontrib><title>Can Changes in Social Behaviour Help to Explain House Mouse Plagues in Australia?</title><title>Oikos</title><description>House mouse plagues in the grain-growing areas of eastern Australia are a graphic illustration of the failure of social mechanisms of population control that are postulated by the self-regulation hypothesis to prevent unlimited increase in numbers. Yet house mice are well known for the strength and variety of social interactions and are clearly capable of regulating their own numbers through social mortality. Most of the research on house mouse plagues has assumed that extrinsic agencies - predators, diseases, food supplies, and weather - determine when and where mouse plagues will occur. Some aspects of these plagues cannot, however, be explained that easily, among them the low phase, which may persist for 1-3 years. We focus here on the low phase of plagues and the trigger that flips a population from the low into the increase phase of a plague. Can social factors in house mouse populations explain the low phase, and is a change in social organization a necessary condition for generating a plague? Two possible models are presented to suggest predictions to be tested by further studies of social mechanisms of population limitation in feral house mice.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Disease outbreaks</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Forum</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Infanticide</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mus musculus</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Voles</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKxDAQhoMouK7iK-QgeqpOmrRpTrKW1RVWVNRzGdNkt0u2rUkr-vZWd9GTlxkYvvn4-Qk5ZnAec5AXPBGJkvEOGbEUIAIJ6S4ZAXCIWKzUPjkIYQUAUkoxIo851jRfYr0wgVY1fWp0hY5emSW-V03v6cy4lnYNnX60Dgdg1vTB0Luf-eBw0W_-Jn3oPLoKLw_JnkUXzNF2j8nL9fQ5n0Xz-5vbfDKPNBdJF4k45aWymcFSWsGSlIlXLTHNlGESbVmiwAxASS7tcI2ZBWuZsJlkZSZVycfkdONtffM2pOiKdRW0cQ5rM6QrWKoyrpQYwLMNqH0Tgje2aH21Rv9ZMCi-Kyu2lQ3kyVaJQaOzHmtdhV-cp0qIWPxhq9A1_l_bFwOCdEs</recordid><startdate>19950901</startdate><enddate>19950901</enddate><creator>Krebs, Charles J.</creator><creator>Chitty, Dennis</creator><creator>Singleton, Grant</creator><creator>Boonstra, Rudy</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950901</creationdate><title>Can Changes in Social Behaviour Help to Explain House Mouse Plagues in Australia?</title><author>Krebs, Charles J. ; Chitty, Dennis ; Singleton, Grant ; Boonstra, Rudy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-4263d9f8ead7f415614bc7a689e17afdda4a8009737fa6821f0ff14f871d879d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Disease outbreaks</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Forum</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Infanticide</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mus musculus</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Voles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krebs, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitty, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singleton, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boonstra, Rudy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krebs, Charles J.</au><au>Chitty, Dennis</au><au>Singleton, Grant</au><au>Boonstra, Rudy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Changes in Social Behaviour Help to Explain House Mouse Plagues in Australia?</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><date>1995-09-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>429-434</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><coden>OIKSAA</coden><abstract>House mouse plagues in the grain-growing areas of eastern Australia are a graphic illustration of the failure of social mechanisms of population control that are postulated by the self-regulation hypothesis to prevent unlimited increase in numbers. Yet house mice are well known for the strength and variety of social interactions and are clearly capable of regulating their own numbers through social mortality. Most of the research on house mouse plagues has assumed that extrinsic agencies - predators, diseases, food supplies, and weather - determine when and where mouse plagues will occur. Some aspects of these plagues cannot, however, be explained that easily, among them the low phase, which may persist for 1-3 years. We focus here on the low phase of plagues and the trigger that flips a population from the low into the increase phase of a plague. Can social factors in house mouse populations explain the low phase, and is a change in social organization a necessary condition for generating a plague? Two possible models are presented to suggest predictions to be tested by further studies of social mechanisms of population limitation in feral house mice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</pub><doi>10.2307/3545972</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-1299
ispartof Oikos, 1995-09, Vol.73 (3), p.429-434
issn 0030-1299
1600-0706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_16983994
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Demecology
Disease outbreaks
Epidemics
Forum
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Infanticide
Mammalia
Mice
Mus musculus
Phenotypes
Population dynamics
Population growth
Social behavior
Social organization
Vertebrata
Voles
title Can Changes in Social Behaviour Help to Explain House Mouse Plagues in Australia?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A26%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Changes%20in%20Social%20Behaviour%20Help%20to%20Explain%20House%20Mouse%20Plagues%20in%20Australia?&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Krebs,%20Charles%20J.&rft.date=1995-09-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=429-434&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft.coden=OIKSAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3545972&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3545972%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16983994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3545972&rfr_iscdi=true