Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella enterica transmission associated with starling–livestock interactions
•We examine the ability of European starlings to mechanically move S. enterica.•Antimicrobial resistant S. enterica was isolated from the exterior of starlings.•Serotypes recovered from starlings were all found in cattle feed or water troughs.•European starlings are able to mechanically move AMR S....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary microbiology 2015-08, Vol.179 (1-2), p.60-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We examine the ability of European starlings to mechanically move S. enterica.•Antimicrobial resistant S. enterica was isolated from the exterior of starlings.•Serotypes recovered from starlings were all found in cattle feed or water troughs.•European starlings are able to mechanically move AMR S. enterica.•Mechanical movement of S. enterica may contaminate cattle feed and water troughs.
Bird–livestock interactions have been implicated as potential sources for bacteria within concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO). European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in particular are known to contaminate cattle feed and water with Salmonella enterica through their fecal waste. We propose that fecal waste is not the only mechanisms through which starlings introduce S. enterica to CAFO. The goal of this study was to assess if starlings can mechanically move S. enterica. We define mechanical movement as the transportation of media containing S. enterica, on the exterior of starlings within CAFO. We collected 100 starlings and obtained external wash and gastrointestinal tract (GI) samples. We also collected 100 samples from animal pens. Within each pen we collected one cattle fecal, feed, and water trough sample. Isolates from all S. enterica positive samples were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. All sample types, including 17% of external starling wash samples, contained S. enterica. All sample types had at least one antimicrobial resistant (AMR) isolate and starling GI samples harbored multidrug resistant S. enterica. The serotypes isolated from the starling external wash samples were all found in the farm environment and 11.8% (2/17) of isolates from positive starling external wash samples were resistant to at least one class of antibiotics. This study provides evidence of a potential mechanism of wildlife introduced microbial contamination in CAFO. Mechanical movement of microbiological hazards, by starlings, should be considered a potential source of bacteria that is of concern to veterinary, environmental and public health. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-1135 1873-2542 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.04.009 |