The concept of complementary and alternative medicine from the perspective of the philosophy of science and bioethics
Decisions about therapeutic interventions to be made by physicians, patients, and healthcare purchasers essentially depend on their classification in a credible context of justification, especially in a world dominated by contradicting experts. To some extent, this framing is done by sorting terms a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2015, Vol.109 (3), p.236-244 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | ger |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 244 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 236 |
| container_title | Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen |
| container_volume | 109 |
| creator | Schöne-Seifert, Bettina Reichardt, Jan-Ole Friedrich, Daniel R Hucklenbroich, Peter |
| description | Decisions about therapeutic interventions to be made by physicians, patients, and healthcare purchasers essentially depend on their classification in a credible context of justification, especially in a world dominated by contradicting experts. To some extent, this framing is done by sorting terms and their undertones, including the case of so-called CAM measures. In this paper, the authors reflect on ways to deal with the term CAM and the underlying supply-side approaches to healthcare from a primarily science-oriented perspective. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.015 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697749513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1697749513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-c1eeea229ce08a38fd3db177d4da7fd57c8dc0d2945ee9ee6c9593ea216460cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UE1LxDAUDIK46-of8CA9emlN0iZtjrL4BQte1nNJk1eapW2yTSqsv95YV3jwHvNmBmYQuiM4I5jwx0P2De0xo5iwDJM47AKtKSU0xbQSK3Tt_QFjTnPOrtCKclIJUrI1mvcdJMqOClxIbBvPwfUwwBjkdErkqBPZB5hGGcwXJANoo8wISTvZIQlR6mDyDtTyjfIF6kxvvXXd6RfxykB0X6waYyF0RvkbdNnK3sPteW_Q58vzfvuW7j5e37dPu9RRQkKqCABISoUCXMm8anWuG1KWutCybDUrVaUV1lQUDEAAcCWYyKOC8IJj1eQb9PDn6yZ7nMGHejBeQd_LEezsa8JFWRaCkTxS78_UuYkxazeZIVZQ_1eV_wAI4G2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697749513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The concept of complementary and alternative medicine from the perspective of the philosophy of science and bioethics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Schöne-Seifert, Bettina ; Reichardt, Jan-Ole ; Friedrich, Daniel R ; Hucklenbroich, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Schöne-Seifert, Bettina ; Reichardt, Jan-Ole ; Friedrich, Daniel R ; Hucklenbroich, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Decisions about therapeutic interventions to be made by physicians, patients, and healthcare purchasers essentially depend on their classification in a credible context of justification, especially in a world dominated by contradicting experts. To some extent, this framing is done by sorting terms and their undertones, including the case of so-called CAM measures. In this paper, the authors reflect on ways to deal with the term CAM and the underlying supply-side approaches to healthcare from a primarily science-oriented perspective.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2212-0289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26189175</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Complementary Therapies - ethics ; Complementary Therapies - trends ; Ethics, Medical ; Evidence-Based Medicine - ethics ; Germany ; Health Services Accessibility - ethics ; Humans ; Philosophy, Medical ; Placebo Effect ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2015, Vol.109 (3), p.236-244</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26189175$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schöne-Seifert, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichardt, Jan-Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Daniel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hucklenbroich, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>The concept of complementary and alternative medicine from the perspective of the philosophy of science and bioethics</title><title>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen</title><addtitle>Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes</addtitle><description>Decisions about therapeutic interventions to be made by physicians, patients, and healthcare purchasers essentially depend on their classification in a credible context of justification, especially in a world dominated by contradicting experts. To some extent, this framing is done by sorting terms and their undertones, including the case of so-called CAM measures. In this paper, the authors reflect on ways to deal with the term CAM and the underlying supply-side approaches to healthcare from a primarily science-oriented perspective.</description><subject>Complementary Therapies - ethics</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - trends</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - ethics</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Philosophy, Medical</subject><subject>Placebo Effect</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2212-0289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UE1LxDAUDIK46-of8CA9emlN0iZtjrL4BQte1nNJk1eapW2yTSqsv95YV3jwHvNmBmYQuiM4I5jwx0P2De0xo5iwDJM47AKtKSU0xbQSK3Tt_QFjTnPOrtCKclIJUrI1mvcdJMqOClxIbBvPwfUwwBjkdErkqBPZB5hGGcwXJANoo8wISTvZIQlR6mDyDtTyjfIF6kxvvXXd6RfxykB0X6waYyF0RvkbdNnK3sPteW_Q58vzfvuW7j5e37dPu9RRQkKqCABISoUCXMm8anWuG1KWutCybDUrVaUV1lQUDEAAcCWYyKOC8IJj1eQb9PDn6yZ7nMGHejBeQd_LEezsa8JFWRaCkTxS78_UuYkxazeZIVZQ_1eV_wAI4G2Y</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Schöne-Seifert, Bettina</creator><creator>Reichardt, Jan-Ole</creator><creator>Friedrich, Daniel R</creator><creator>Hucklenbroich, Peter</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>The concept of complementary and alternative medicine from the perspective of the philosophy of science and bioethics</title><author>Schöne-Seifert, Bettina ; Reichardt, Jan-Ole ; Friedrich, Daniel R ; Hucklenbroich, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-c1eeea229ce08a38fd3db177d4da7fd57c8dc0d2945ee9ee6c9593ea216460cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Complementary Therapies - ethics</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - trends</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - ethics</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Philosophy, Medical</topic><topic>Placebo Effect</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schöne-Seifert, Bettina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichardt, Jan-Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Daniel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hucklenbroich, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schöne-Seifert, Bettina</au><au>Reichardt, Jan-Ole</au><au>Friedrich, Daniel R</au><au>Hucklenbroich, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The concept of complementary and alternative medicine from the perspective of the philosophy of science and bioethics</atitle><jtitle>Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen</jtitle><addtitle>Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>236</spage><epage>244</epage><pages>236-244</pages><eissn>2212-0289</eissn><abstract>Decisions about therapeutic interventions to be made by physicians, patients, and healthcare purchasers essentially depend on their classification in a credible context of justification, especially in a world dominated by contradicting experts. To some extent, this framing is done by sorting terms and their undertones, including the case of so-called CAM measures. In this paper, the authors reflect on ways to deal with the term CAM and the underlying supply-side approaches to healthcare from a primarily science-oriented perspective.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>26189175</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.015</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | EISSN: 2212-0289 |
| ispartof | Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, 2015, Vol.109 (3), p.236-244 |
| issn | 2212-0289 |
| language | ger |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697749513 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Complementary Therapies - ethics Complementary Therapies - trends Ethics, Medical Evidence-Based Medicine - ethics Germany Health Services Accessibility - ethics Humans Philosophy, Medical Placebo Effect Treatment Outcome |
| title | The concept of complementary and alternative medicine from the perspective of the philosophy of science and bioethics |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A45%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20concept%20of%20complementary%20and%20alternative%20medicine%20from%20the%20perspective%20of%20the%20philosophy%20of%20science%20and%20bioethics&rft.jtitle=Zeitschrift%20fu%CC%88r%20Evidenz,%20Fortbildung%20und%20Qualita%CC%88t%20im%20Gesundheitswesen&rft.au=Sch%C3%B6ne-Seifert,%20Bettina&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=244&rft.pages=236-244&rft.eissn=2212-0289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1697749513%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697749513&rft_id=info:pmid/26189175&rfr_iscdi=true |