Peroneal Stimulation for Foot Drop After Stroke: A Systematic Review
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the effect of daily use of single-channel foot drop stimulation among persons with stroke. Randomized controlled trials were searched using electronic databases through May 2014. Six randomized controlled trials were included, involving...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 2015-08, Vol.94 (8), p.649-664 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 664 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 649 |
| container_title | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 94 |
| creator | Dunning, Kari O’Dell, Michael W Kluding, Patricia McBride, Keith |
| description | ABSTRACTThe purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the effect of daily use of single-channel foot drop stimulation among persons with stroke. Randomized controlled trials were searched using electronic databases through May 2014. Six randomized controlled trials were included, involving 820 participants. Gait speed was the most common outcome measured. Other common outcomes included Timed Up and Go, modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile, Berg Balance Scale, Physiologic Cost Index, Six-Minute Walk Test, quality-of-life, and lower extremity Fugl-Meyer. In summary, foot drop stimulation and ankle foot orthoses seem effective and “equivalent” for increasing gait speed. Other outcomes that consistently improved in both groups were the Timed Up and Go and Six-Minute Walk Test. Foot drop stimulation was more effective compared with ankle foot orthosis for decreasing Physiologic Cost Index and seemed to be preferred by participants. Physical therapy may facilitate improvement in both foot drop stimulation and ankle foot orthosis groups. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000308 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697221929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1697221929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-88e68dcb5a41bfba594d3e2f7f4908e768aa37ad0394e84180cb61492f8f94c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPwjAUxxujEUS_gTE7ehm2a7u23giImGAkouelG69hslFsNwnf3hrQGA--yzu83___kh9ClwT3CVbiZjZ57OPfQ7E8Ql3CqYgFlfwYdbFULFaE8A468_4tMFxRcYo6SYopFwnvotEMnF2DrqJ5U9ZtpZvSriNjXTS2tolGzm6igWnAhbuzK7iNBtF85xuoA1lEz_BRwvYcnRhdebg47B56Hd-9DCfx9On-YTiYxkVCuYylhFQuipxrRnKTa67YgkJihGEKSxCp1JoKvcBUMZCMSFzkKWEqMdIoVkjaQ9f73o2z7y34JqtLX0BV6TXY1mckVSJJiEpUQNkeLZz13oHJNq6stdtlBGdf_rLgL_vrL8SuDh_avIbFT-hbWADkHtjaKljxq6rdgsuWwWCz_L_7Ex5geuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697221929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peroneal Stimulation for Foot Drop After Stroke: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Dunning, Kari ; O’Dell, Michael W ; Kluding, Patricia ; McBride, Keith</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunning, Kari ; O’Dell, Michael W ; Kluding, Patricia ; McBride, Keith</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTThe purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the effect of daily use of single-channel foot drop stimulation among persons with stroke. Randomized controlled trials were searched using electronic databases through May 2014. Six randomized controlled trials were included, involving 820 participants. Gait speed was the most common outcome measured. Other common outcomes included Timed Up and Go, modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile, Berg Balance Scale, Physiologic Cost Index, Six-Minute Walk Test, quality-of-life, and lower extremity Fugl-Meyer. In summary, foot drop stimulation and ankle foot orthoses seem effective and “equivalent” for increasing gait speed. Other outcomes that consistently improved in both groups were the Timed Up and Go and Six-Minute Walk Test. Foot drop stimulation was more effective compared with ankle foot orthosis for decreasing Physiologic Cost Index and seemed to be preferred by participants. Physical therapy may facilitate improvement in both foot drop stimulation and ankle foot orthosis groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-9115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-7385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000308</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26035725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Disability Evaluation ; Electric Stimulation Therapy ; Exercise Test ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Patient Preference ; Peroneal Nerve ; Quality of Life ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Stroke - complications</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2015-08, Vol.94 (8), p.649-664</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-88e68dcb5a41bfba594d3e2f7f4908e768aa37ad0394e84180cb61492f8f94c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26035725$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunning, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Dell, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluding, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>Peroneal Stimulation for Foot Drop After Stroke: A Systematic Review</title><title>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Am J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTThe purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the effect of daily use of single-channel foot drop stimulation among persons with stroke. Randomized controlled trials were searched using electronic databases through May 2014. Six randomized controlled trials were included, involving 820 participants. Gait speed was the most common outcome measured. Other common outcomes included Timed Up and Go, modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile, Berg Balance Scale, Physiologic Cost Index, Six-Minute Walk Test, quality-of-life, and lower extremity Fugl-Meyer. In summary, foot drop stimulation and ankle foot orthoses seem effective and “equivalent” for increasing gait speed. Other outcomes that consistently improved in both groups were the Timed Up and Go and Six-Minute Walk Test. Foot drop stimulation was more effective compared with ankle foot orthosis for decreasing Physiologic Cost Index and seemed to be preferred by participants. Physical therapy may facilitate improvement in both foot drop stimulation and ankle foot orthosis groups.</description><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Peroneal Nerve</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Stroke - complications</subject><issn>0894-9115</issn><issn>1537-7385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFPwjAUxxujEUS_gTE7ehm2a7u23giImGAkouelG69hslFsNwnf3hrQGA--yzu83___kh9ClwT3CVbiZjZ57OPfQ7E8Ql3CqYgFlfwYdbFULFaE8A468_4tMFxRcYo6SYopFwnvotEMnF2DrqJ5U9ZtpZvSriNjXTS2tolGzm6igWnAhbuzK7iNBtF85xuoA1lEz_BRwvYcnRhdebg47B56Hd-9DCfx9On-YTiYxkVCuYylhFQuipxrRnKTa67YgkJihGEKSxCp1JoKvcBUMZCMSFzkKWEqMdIoVkjaQ9f73o2z7y34JqtLX0BV6TXY1mckVSJJiEpUQNkeLZz13oHJNq6stdtlBGdf_rLgL_vrL8SuDh_avIbFT-hbWADkHtjaKljxq6rdgsuWwWCz_L_7Ex5geuw</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Dunning, Kari</creator><creator>O’Dell, Michael W</creator><creator>Kluding, Patricia</creator><creator>McBride, Keith</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Peroneal Stimulation for Foot Drop After Stroke: A Systematic Review</title><author>Dunning, Kari ; O’Dell, Michael W ; Kluding, Patricia ; McBride, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-88e68dcb5a41bfba594d3e2f7f4908e768aa37ad0394e84180cb61492f8f94c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Peroneal Nerve</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Stroke - complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunning, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Dell, Michael W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluding, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunning, Kari</au><au>O’Dell, Michael W</au><au>Kluding, Patricia</au><au>McBride, Keith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peroneal Stimulation for Foot Drop After Stroke: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>649-664</pages><issn>0894-9115</issn><eissn>1537-7385</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTThe purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the effect of daily use of single-channel foot drop stimulation among persons with stroke. Randomized controlled trials were searched using electronic databases through May 2014. Six randomized controlled trials were included, involving 820 participants. Gait speed was the most common outcome measured. Other common outcomes included Timed Up and Go, modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile, Berg Balance Scale, Physiologic Cost Index, Six-Minute Walk Test, quality-of-life, and lower extremity Fugl-Meyer. In summary, foot drop stimulation and ankle foot orthoses seem effective and “equivalent” for increasing gait speed. Other outcomes that consistently improved in both groups were the Timed Up and Go and Six-Minute Walk Test. Foot drop stimulation was more effective compared with ankle foot orthosis for decreasing Physiologic Cost Index and seemed to be preferred by participants. Physical therapy may facilitate improvement in both foot drop stimulation and ankle foot orthosis groups.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>26035725</pmid><doi>10.1097/PHM.0000000000000308</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0894-9115 |
| ispartof | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2015-08, Vol.94 (8), p.649-664 |
| issn | 0894-9115 1537-7385 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697221929 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Disability Evaluation Electric Stimulation Therapy Exercise Test Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology Gait Disorders, Neurologic - rehabilitation Humans Patient Preference Peroneal Nerve Quality of Life Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Stroke - complications |
| title | Peroneal Stimulation for Foot Drop After Stroke: A Systematic Review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A30%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peroneal%20Stimulation%20for%20Foot%20Drop%20After%20Stroke:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20medicine%20&%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Dunning,%20Kari&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=649-664&rft.issn=0894-9115&rft.eissn=1537-7385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1697221929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697221929&rft_id=info:pmid/26035725&rfr_iscdi=true |