Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study

Background Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Ant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vox sanguinis 2015-08, Vol.109 (2), p.114-121
Hauptverfasser: Schmidt, M., Jimenez, A., Mühlbacher, A., Oota, S., Blanco, L., Sakuldamrongpanich, T., Schennach, H., Seifried, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 2
container_start_page 114
container_title Vox sanguinis
container_volume 109
creator Schmidt, M.
Jimenez, A.
Mühlbacher, A.
Oota, S.
Blanco, L.
Sakuldamrongpanich, T.
Schennach, H.
Seifried, E.
description Background Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study. Study Design and Methods Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened. Results Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was >99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality. Conclusions These results suggest that the Elecsys immunoassays for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, with a comparative sensitivity of 100% and a specificity exceeding the common technical specification threshold of >99·5%, meet the stringent performance criteria stipulated for blood donor screening for these infectious agents. Significant differences in the specificity between first‐time and repeat donors were not detectable.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/vox.12259
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697219901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1697219901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3879-b755e64bade2b898febd8676639982d6e3d8f26ba69fdb9b18d55db6f88150563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQsgS2xYNK3tjP-W7QgmRSO6gaE7y44dcEniaex0mhfiOXEnbRd44Xuk-50jXR0A3mN0ivM7uwv3p5gQKl-ABV6SskBLjF6CBUJLUkiE-BF4E-MNQkgQQV-DI0KFlEsuF-Bv5bQtUih-5wnr0O304GPooXFp71wP0z7AWA9Z-v4XjFNMrouwCQOsLuL5-gTqPvmiuqif1GqbhYXV5fYhzvheJ5_zfNeNfdAx6ilC32cm_8kN81q3J7Ab2-Rr16fBQXen23E2xjTa6S141eg2uneP8xj8-PL5-6oqNlfry9X5pvCl4LIwnFLHlkZbR4yQonHGCsYZK6UUxDJXWtEQZjSTjTXSYGEptYY1QmCKKCuPwac5dzeE29HFpDofa9e2undhjAozyQmWEuGMfvwPvQljPqc9UIwjzAnK1IdHajSds2o3-E4Pk3pqIANnM7D3rZue9xiph2pVrlYdqlXbq-uDyI5idvjcxf2zQw9_FOMlp-rnt7X6yjeI8-u1wuU_6YCm1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696701720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Schmidt, M. ; Jimenez, A. ; Mühlbacher, A. ; Oota, S. ; Blanco, L. ; Sakuldamrongpanich, T. ; Schennach, H. ; Seifried, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, M. ; Jimenez, A. ; Mühlbacher, A. ; Oota, S. ; Blanco, L. ; Sakuldamrongpanich, T. ; Schennach, H. ; Seifried, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study. Study Design and Methods Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened. Results Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was &gt;99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality. Conclusions These results suggest that the Elecsys immunoassays for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, with a comparative sensitivity of 100% and a specificity exceeding the common technical specification threshold of &gt;99·5%, meet the stringent performance criteria stipulated for blood donor screening for these infectious agents. Significant differences in the specificity between first‐time and repeat donors were not detectable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0410</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vox.12259</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25899479</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VOSAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>assay validation ; Blood &amp; organ donations ; HBsAG - Anti-HBc - HCV - HIV - screening ; Hepatitis ; Hepatitis B - blood ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - immunology ; Hepatitis C - blood ; Hepatitis C Antibodies - blood ; Hepatitis C Antibodies - immunology ; HIV Antibodies - blood ; HIV Antibodies - immunology ; HIV Infections - blood ; Humans ; Immunoassay ; Immunoassay - methods ; Medical screening ; sensitivity ; Serologic Tests - methods ; specificity</subject><ispartof>Vox sanguinis, 2015-08, Vol.109 (2), p.114-121</ispartof><rights>2015 International Society of Blood Transfusion</rights><rights>2015 International Society of Blood Transfusion.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 International Society of Blood Transfusion</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvox.12259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvox.12259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25899479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mühlbacher, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oota, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakuldamrongpanich, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schennach, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifried, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study</title><title>Vox sanguinis</title><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><description>Background Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study. Study Design and Methods Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened. Results Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was &gt;99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality. Conclusions These results suggest that the Elecsys immunoassays for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, with a comparative sensitivity of 100% and a specificity exceeding the common technical specification threshold of &gt;99·5%, meet the stringent performance criteria stipulated for blood donor screening for these infectious agents. Significant differences in the specificity between first‐time and repeat donors were not detectable.</description><subject>assay validation</subject><subject>Blood &amp; organ donations</subject><subject>HBsAG - Anti-HBc - HCV - HIV - screening</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>Hepatitis C - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis C Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis C Antibodies - immunology</subject><subject>HIV Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>HIV Antibodies - immunology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - blood</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>sensitivity</subject><subject>Serologic Tests - methods</subject><subject>specificity</subject><issn>0042-9007</issn><issn>1423-0410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQsgS2xYNK3tjP-W7QgmRSO6gaE7y44dcEniaex0mhfiOXEnbRd44Xuk-50jXR0A3mN0ivM7uwv3p5gQKl-ABV6SskBLjF6CBUJLUkiE-BF4E-MNQkgQQV-DI0KFlEsuF-Bv5bQtUih-5wnr0O304GPooXFp71wP0z7AWA9Z-v4XjFNMrouwCQOsLuL5-gTqPvmiuqif1GqbhYXV5fYhzvheJ5_zfNeNfdAx6ilC32cm_8kN81q3J7Ab2-Rr16fBQXen23E2xjTa6S141eg2uneP8xj8-PL5-6oqNlfry9X5pvCl4LIwnFLHlkZbR4yQonHGCsYZK6UUxDJXWtEQZjSTjTXSYGEptYY1QmCKKCuPwac5dzeE29HFpDofa9e2undhjAozyQmWEuGMfvwPvQljPqc9UIwjzAnK1IdHajSds2o3-E4Pk3pqIANnM7D3rZue9xiph2pVrlYdqlXbq-uDyI5idvjcxf2zQw9_FOMlp-rnt7X6yjeI8-u1wuU_6YCm1g</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Schmidt, M.</creator><creator>Jimenez, A.</creator><creator>Mühlbacher, A.</creator><creator>Oota, S.</creator><creator>Blanco, L.</creator><creator>Sakuldamrongpanich, T.</creator><creator>Schennach, H.</creator><creator>Seifried, E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study</title><author>Schmidt, M. ; Jimenez, A. ; Mühlbacher, A. ; Oota, S. ; Blanco, L. ; Sakuldamrongpanich, T. ; Schennach, H. ; Seifried, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3879-b755e64bade2b898febd8676639982d6e3d8f26ba69fdb9b18d55db6f88150563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>assay validation</topic><topic>Blood &amp; organ donations</topic><topic>HBsAG - Anti-HBc - HCV - HIV - screening</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>Hepatitis C - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis C Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis C Antibodies - immunology</topic><topic>HIV Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>HIV Antibodies - immunology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - blood</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>sensitivity</topic><topic>Serologic Tests - methods</topic><topic>specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mühlbacher, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oota, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakuldamrongpanich, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schennach, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifried, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmidt, M.</au><au>Jimenez, A.</au><au>Mühlbacher, A.</au><au>Oota, S.</au><au>Blanco, L.</au><au>Sakuldamrongpanich, T.</au><au>Schennach, H.</au><au>Seifried, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study</atitle><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>114-121</pages><issn>0042-9007</issn><eissn>1423-0410</eissn><coden>VOSAAD</coden><abstract>Background Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study. Study Design and Methods Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened. Results Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was &gt;99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality. Conclusions These results suggest that the Elecsys immunoassays for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, with a comparative sensitivity of 100% and a specificity exceeding the common technical specification threshold of &gt;99·5%, meet the stringent performance criteria stipulated for blood donor screening for these infectious agents. Significant differences in the specificity between first‐time and repeat donors were not detectable.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25899479</pmid><doi>10.1111/vox.12259</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-9007
ispartof Vox sanguinis, 2015-08, Vol.109 (2), p.114-121
issn 0042-9007
1423-0410
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697219901
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects assay validation
Blood & organ donations
HBsAG - Anti-HBc - HCV - HIV - screening
Hepatitis
Hepatitis B - blood
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - immunology
Hepatitis C - blood
Hepatitis C Antibodies - blood
Hepatitis C Antibodies - immunology
HIV Antibodies - blood
HIV Antibodies - immunology
HIV Infections - blood
Humans
Immunoassay
Immunoassay - methods
Medical screening
sensitivity
Serologic Tests - methods
specificity
title Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A29%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Head-to-head%20comparison%20between%20two%20screening%20systems%20for%20HBsAG,%20anti-HBc,%20anti-HCV%20and%20HIV%20combination%20immunoassays%20in%20an%20international,%20multicentre%20evaluation%20study&rft.jtitle=Vox%20sanguinis&rft.au=Schmidt,%20M.&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=114-121&rft.issn=0042-9007&rft.eissn=1423-0410&rft.coden=VOSAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vox.12259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1697219901%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696701720&rft_id=info:pmid/25899479&rfr_iscdi=true