Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study
Background Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Ant...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vox sanguinis 2015-08, Vol.109 (2), p.114-121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 121 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 114 |
container_title | Vox sanguinis |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Schmidt, M. Jimenez, A. Mühlbacher, A. Oota, S. Blanco, L. Sakuldamrongpanich, T. Schennach, H. Seifried, E. |
description | Background
Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study.
Study Design and Methods
Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened.
Results
Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was >99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality.
Conclusions
These results suggest that the Elecsys immunoassays for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, with a comparative sensitivity of 100% and a specificity exceeding the common technical specification threshold of >99·5%, meet the stringent performance criteria stipulated for blood donor screening for these infectious agents. Significant differences in the specificity between first‐time and repeat donors were not detectable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/vox.12259 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697219901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1697219901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3879-b755e64bade2b898febd8676639982d6e3d8f26ba69fdb9b18d55db6f88150563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQsgS2xYNK3tjP-W7QgmRSO6gaE7y44dcEniaex0mhfiOXEnbRd44Xuk-50jXR0A3mN0ivM7uwv3p5gQKl-ABV6SskBLjF6CBUJLUkiE-BF4E-MNQkgQQV-DI0KFlEsuF-Bv5bQtUih-5wnr0O304GPooXFp71wP0z7AWA9Z-v4XjFNMrouwCQOsLuL5-gTqPvmiuqif1GqbhYXV5fYhzvheJ5_zfNeNfdAx6ilC32cm_8kN81q3J7Ab2-Rr16fBQXen23E2xjTa6S141eg2uneP8xj8-PL5-6oqNlfry9X5pvCl4LIwnFLHlkZbR4yQonHGCsYZK6UUxDJXWtEQZjSTjTXSYGEptYY1QmCKKCuPwac5dzeE29HFpDofa9e2undhjAozyQmWEuGMfvwPvQljPqc9UIwjzAnK1IdHajSds2o3-E4Pk3pqIANnM7D3rZue9xiph2pVrlYdqlXbq-uDyI5idvjcxf2zQw9_FOMlp-rnt7X6yjeI8-u1wuU_6YCm1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696701720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Schmidt, M. ; Jimenez, A. ; Mühlbacher, A. ; Oota, S. ; Blanco, L. ; Sakuldamrongpanich, T. ; Schennach, H. ; Seifried, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, M. ; Jimenez, A. ; Mühlbacher, A. ; Oota, S. ; Blanco, L. ; Sakuldamrongpanich, T. ; Schennach, H. ; Seifried, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study.
Study Design and Methods
Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened.
Results
Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was >99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality.
Conclusions
These results suggest that the Elecsys immunoassays for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, with a comparative sensitivity of 100% and a specificity exceeding the common technical specification threshold of >99·5%, meet the stringent performance criteria stipulated for blood donor screening for these infectious agents. Significant differences in the specificity between first‐time and repeat donors were not detectable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0410</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vox.12259</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25899479</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VOSAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>assay validation ; Blood & organ donations ; HBsAG - Anti-HBc - HCV - HIV - screening ; Hepatitis ; Hepatitis B - blood ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - immunology ; Hepatitis C - blood ; Hepatitis C Antibodies - blood ; Hepatitis C Antibodies - immunology ; HIV Antibodies - blood ; HIV Antibodies - immunology ; HIV Infections - blood ; Humans ; Immunoassay ; Immunoassay - methods ; Medical screening ; sensitivity ; Serologic Tests - methods ; specificity</subject><ispartof>Vox sanguinis, 2015-08, Vol.109 (2), p.114-121</ispartof><rights>2015 International Society of Blood Transfusion</rights><rights>2015 International Society of Blood Transfusion.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 International Society of Blood Transfusion</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvox.12259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvox.12259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25899479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mühlbacher, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oota, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakuldamrongpanich, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schennach, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifried, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study</title><title>Vox sanguinis</title><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><description>Background
Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study.
Study Design and Methods
Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened.
Results
Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was >99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality.
Conclusions
These results suggest that the Elecsys immunoassays for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, with a comparative sensitivity of 100% and a specificity exceeding the common technical specification threshold of >99·5%, meet the stringent performance criteria stipulated for blood donor screening for these infectious agents. Significant differences in the specificity between first‐time and repeat donors were not detectable.</description><subject>assay validation</subject><subject>Blood & organ donations</subject><subject>HBsAG - Anti-HBc - HCV - HIV - screening</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>Hepatitis C - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis C Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>Hepatitis C Antibodies - immunology</subject><subject>HIV Antibodies - blood</subject><subject>HIV Antibodies - immunology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - blood</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Immunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>sensitivity</subject><subject>Serologic Tests - methods</subject><subject>specificity</subject><issn>0042-9007</issn><issn>1423-0410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQsgS2xYNK3tjP-W7QgmRSO6gaE7y44dcEniaex0mhfiOXEnbRd44Xuk-50jXR0A3mN0ivM7uwv3p5gQKl-ABV6SskBLjF6CBUJLUkiE-BF4E-MNQkgQQV-DI0KFlEsuF-Bv5bQtUih-5wnr0O304GPooXFp71wP0z7AWA9Z-v4XjFNMrouwCQOsLuL5-gTqPvmiuqif1GqbhYXV5fYhzvheJ5_zfNeNfdAx6ilC32cm_8kN81q3J7Ab2-Rr16fBQXen23E2xjTa6S141eg2uneP8xj8-PL5-6oqNlfry9X5pvCl4LIwnFLHlkZbR4yQonHGCsYZK6UUxDJXWtEQZjSTjTXSYGEptYY1QmCKKCuPwac5dzeE29HFpDofa9e2undhjAozyQmWEuGMfvwPvQljPqc9UIwjzAnK1IdHajSds2o3-E4Pk3pqIANnM7D3rZue9xiph2pVrlYdqlXbq-uDyI5idvjcxf2zQw9_FOMlp-rnt7X6yjeI8-u1wuU_6YCm1g</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Schmidt, M.</creator><creator>Jimenez, A.</creator><creator>Mühlbacher, A.</creator><creator>Oota, S.</creator><creator>Blanco, L.</creator><creator>Sakuldamrongpanich, T.</creator><creator>Schennach, H.</creator><creator>Seifried, E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study</title><author>Schmidt, M. ; Jimenez, A. ; Mühlbacher, A. ; Oota, S. ; Blanco, L. ; Sakuldamrongpanich, T. ; Schennach, H. ; Seifried, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3879-b755e64bade2b898febd8676639982d6e3d8f26ba69fdb9b18d55db6f88150563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>assay validation</topic><topic>Blood & organ donations</topic><topic>HBsAG - Anti-HBc - HCV - HIV - screening</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>Hepatitis C - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis C Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>Hepatitis C Antibodies - immunology</topic><topic>HIV Antibodies - blood</topic><topic>HIV Antibodies - immunology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - blood</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Immunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>sensitivity</topic><topic>Serologic Tests - methods</topic><topic>specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mühlbacher, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oota, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanco, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakuldamrongpanich, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schennach, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifried, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmidt, M.</au><au>Jimenez, A.</au><au>Mühlbacher, A.</au><au>Oota, S.</au><au>Blanco, L.</au><au>Sakuldamrongpanich, T.</au><au>Schennach, H.</au><au>Seifried, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study</atitle><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>114-121</pages><issn>0042-9007</issn><eissn>1423-0410</eissn><coden>VOSAAD</coden><abstract>Background
Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study.
Study Design and Methods
Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened.
Results
Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was >99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality.
Conclusions
These results suggest that the Elecsys immunoassays for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, with a comparative sensitivity of 100% and a specificity exceeding the common technical specification threshold of >99·5%, meet the stringent performance criteria stipulated for blood donor screening for these infectious agents. Significant differences in the specificity between first‐time and repeat donors were not detectable.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25899479</pmid><doi>10.1111/vox.12259</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-9007 |
ispartof | Vox sanguinis, 2015-08, Vol.109 (2), p.114-121 |
issn | 0042-9007 1423-0410 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697219901 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | assay validation Blood & organ donations HBsAG - Anti-HBc - HCV - HIV - screening Hepatitis Hepatitis B - blood Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - immunology Hepatitis C - blood Hepatitis C Antibodies - blood Hepatitis C Antibodies - immunology HIV Antibodies - blood HIV Antibodies - immunology HIV Infections - blood Humans Immunoassay Immunoassay - methods Medical screening sensitivity Serologic Tests - methods specificity |
title | Head-to-head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti-HBc, anti-HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A29%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Head-to-head%20comparison%20between%20two%20screening%20systems%20for%20HBsAG,%20anti-HBc,%20anti-HCV%20and%20HIV%20combination%20immunoassays%20in%20an%20international,%20multicentre%20evaluation%20study&rft.jtitle=Vox%20sanguinis&rft.au=Schmidt,%20M.&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=114-121&rft.issn=0042-9007&rft.eissn=1423-0410&rft.coden=VOSAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vox.12259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1697219901%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696701720&rft_id=info:pmid/25899479&rfr_iscdi=true |