The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2015-08, Vol.73 (2), p.264-271 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 271 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 264 |
container_title | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Atzmony, Lihi, MD Hodak, Emmilia, MD Leshem, Yael A., MD Rosenbaum, Omer, MD Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH Anhalt, Grant J., MD Mimouni, Daniel, MD |
description | Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was remission. Secondary outcomes were disease control, time to disease control, relapse, time to relapse, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, withdrawal because of adverse events, and all-cause death. Trials were pooled irrespective of adjuvant type evaluated. Results Ten trials (559 participants) were included. Adjuvants evaluated were azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and infliximab; not all were included in every analysis. Although adjuvants were not beneficial for achieving remission, they were found to collectively decrease the risk of relapse by 29% (relative risk 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95). Limitations Different adjuvants were pooled together. Conclusion Adjuvants have a role in pemphigus treatment, at least in reducing the risk of relapse. Further randomized controlled trials of other promising modalities are warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697219222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190962215016096</els_id><sourcerecordid>1697219222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-441d644ca3a754ef3893dd3ae810df5b44642b7c666502732f7c9740b9f5b5823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2L1TAUxYMoznP0H3AhWbppvUnTpBERhsEvGFBwXIe85NaX2i-TdqT_vSlvdOHC1b1wzzlwf4eQ5wxKBky-6srOWl9yYHUJooSqeUAODLQqpGrUQ3IApqHQkvML8iSlDgC0qNRjcsElNI1s9IF8uT0hjVOPdGqp9d16Z8eFLieMdt5oGOmMw3wK39f0ml7RtKUFB7sERyPeBfxF7ejpgIst7Gj7LYX0lDxqbZ_w2f28JN_ev7u9_ljcfP7w6frqpnC1UEshBPNSCGcrq2qBbdXoyvvKYsPAt_VRCCn4UTkpZQ1cVbxVTisBR52PdcOrS_LynDvH6eeKaTFDSA773o44rckwqRVnmvNdys9SF6eUIrZmjmGwcTMMzE7SdGYnaXaSBoTJJLPpxX3-ehzQ_7X8QZcFb84CzF9mFtEkF3B06ENEtxg_hf_nv_3H7vowBmf7H7hh6qY1ZqL5D5O4AfN173KvktU5MG_Vb-fwmF0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697219222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Atzmony, Lihi, MD ; Hodak, Emmilia, MD ; Leshem, Yael A., MD ; Rosenbaum, Omer, MD ; Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH ; Anhalt, Grant J., MD ; Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Atzmony, Lihi, MD ; Hodak, Emmilia, MD ; Leshem, Yael A., MD ; Rosenbaum, Omer, MD ; Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH ; Anhalt, Grant J., MD ; Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was remission. Secondary outcomes were disease control, time to disease control, relapse, time to relapse, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, withdrawal because of adverse events, and all-cause death. Trials were pooled irrespective of adjuvant type evaluated. Results Ten trials (559 participants) were included. Adjuvants evaluated were azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and infliximab; not all were included in every analysis. Although adjuvants were not beneficial for achieving remission, they were found to collectively decrease the risk of relapse by 29% (relative risk 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95). Limitations Different adjuvants were pooled together. Conclusion Adjuvants have a role in pemphigus treatment, at least in reducing the risk of relapse. Further randomized controlled trials of other promising modalities are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26088689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>adjuvant ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage ; Dermatology ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; glucocorticoids ; Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage ; Male ; meta-analysis ; pemphigus ; Pemphigus - diagnosis ; Pemphigus - drug therapy ; pemphigus vulgaris ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Recurrence ; Remission Induction ; Risk Assessment ; Role ; Severity of Illness Index ; systematic review ; therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2015-08, Vol.73 (2), p.264-271</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-441d644ca3a754ef3893dd3ae810df5b44642b7c666502732f7c9740b9f5b5823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-441d644ca3a754ef3893dd3ae810df5b44642b7c666502732f7c9740b9f5b5823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962215016096$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atzmony, Lihi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodak, Emmilia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leshem, Yael A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Omer, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anhalt, Grant J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creatorcontrib><title>The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was remission. Secondary outcomes were disease control, time to disease control, relapse, time to relapse, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, withdrawal because of adverse events, and all-cause death. Trials were pooled irrespective of adjuvant type evaluated. Results Ten trials (559 participants) were included. Adjuvants evaluated were azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and infliximab; not all were included in every analysis. Although adjuvants were not beneficial for achieving remission, they were found to collectively decrease the risk of relapse by 29% (relative risk 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95). Limitations Different adjuvants were pooled together. Conclusion Adjuvants have a role in pemphigus treatment, at least in reducing the risk of relapse. Further randomized controlled trials of other promising modalities are warranted.</description><subject>adjuvant</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>glucocorticoids</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>pemphigus</subject><subject>Pemphigus - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pemphigus - drug therapy</subject><subject>pemphigus vulgaris</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2L1TAUxYMoznP0H3AhWbppvUnTpBERhsEvGFBwXIe85NaX2i-TdqT_vSlvdOHC1b1wzzlwf4eQ5wxKBky-6srOWl9yYHUJooSqeUAODLQqpGrUQ3IApqHQkvML8iSlDgC0qNRjcsElNI1s9IF8uT0hjVOPdGqp9d16Z8eFLieMdt5oGOmMw3wK39f0ml7RtKUFB7sERyPeBfxF7ejpgIst7Gj7LYX0lDxqbZ_w2f28JN_ev7u9_ljcfP7w6frqpnC1UEshBPNSCGcrq2qBbdXoyvvKYsPAt_VRCCn4UTkpZQ1cVbxVTisBR52PdcOrS_LynDvH6eeKaTFDSA773o44rckwqRVnmvNdys9SF6eUIrZmjmGwcTMMzE7SdGYnaXaSBoTJJLPpxX3-ehzQ_7X8QZcFb84CzF9mFtEkF3B06ENEtxg_hf_nv_3H7vowBmf7H7hh6qY1ZqL5D5O4AfN173KvktU5MG_Vb-fwmF0</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Atzmony, Lihi, MD</creator><creator>Hodak, Emmilia, MD</creator><creator>Leshem, Yael A., MD</creator><creator>Rosenbaum, Omer, MD</creator><creator>Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH</creator><creator>Anhalt, Grant J., MD</creator><creator>Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Atzmony, Lihi, MD ; Hodak, Emmilia, MD ; Leshem, Yael A., MD ; Rosenbaum, Omer, MD ; Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH ; Anhalt, Grant J., MD ; Mimouni, Daniel, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-441d644ca3a754ef3893dd3ae810df5b44642b7c666502732f7c9740b9f5b5823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>adjuvant</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>glucocorticoids</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>pemphigus</topic><topic>Pemphigus - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pemphigus - drug therapy</topic><topic>pemphigus vulgaris</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atzmony, Lihi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodak, Emmilia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leshem, Yael A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Omer, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anhalt, Grant J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atzmony, Lihi, MD</au><au>Hodak, Emmilia, MD</au><au>Leshem, Yael A., MD</au><au>Rosenbaum, Omer, MD</au><au>Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH</au><au>Anhalt, Grant J., MD</au><au>Mimouni, Daniel, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>264</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>264-271</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><abstract>Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was remission. Secondary outcomes were disease control, time to disease control, relapse, time to relapse, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, withdrawal because of adverse events, and all-cause death. Trials were pooled irrespective of adjuvant type evaluated. Results Ten trials (559 participants) were included. Adjuvants evaluated were azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and infliximab; not all were included in every analysis. Although adjuvants were not beneficial for achieving remission, they were found to collectively decrease the risk of relapse by 29% (relative risk 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95). Limitations Different adjuvants were pooled together. Conclusion Adjuvants have a role in pemphigus treatment, at least in reducing the risk of relapse. Further randomized controlled trials of other promising modalities are warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26088689</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.038</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-9622 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2015-08, Vol.73 (2), p.264-271 |
issn | 0190-9622 1097-6787 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697219222 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | adjuvant Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage Dermatology Drug Therapy, Combination Female Follow-Up Studies glucocorticoids Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage Male meta-analysis pemphigus Pemphigus - diagnosis Pemphigus - drug therapy pemphigus vulgaris Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Recurrence Remission Induction Risk Assessment Role Severity of Illness Index systematic review therapy Treatment Outcome |
title | The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T11%3A30%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20adjuvant%20therapy%20in%20pemphigus:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Atzmony,%20Lihi,%20MD&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=264&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=264-271&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1697219222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697219222&rft_id=info:pmid/26088689&rft_els_id=S0190962215016096&rfr_iscdi=true |