The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2015-08, Vol.73 (2), p.264-271
Hauptverfasser: Atzmony, Lihi, MD, Hodak, Emmilia, MD, Leshem, Yael A., MD, Rosenbaum, Omer, MD, Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH, Anhalt, Grant J., MD, Mimouni, Daniel, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue 2
container_start_page 264
container_title Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
container_volume 73
creator Atzmony, Lihi, MD
Hodak, Emmilia, MD
Leshem, Yael A., MD
Rosenbaum, Omer, MD
Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH
Anhalt, Grant J., MD
Mimouni, Daniel, MD
description Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was remission. Secondary outcomes were disease control, time to disease control, relapse, time to relapse, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, withdrawal because of adverse events, and all-cause death. Trials were pooled irrespective of adjuvant type evaluated. Results Ten trials (559 participants) were included. Adjuvants evaluated were azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and infliximab; not all were included in every analysis. Although adjuvants were not beneficial for achieving remission, they were found to collectively decrease the risk of relapse by 29% (relative risk 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95). Limitations Different adjuvants were pooled together. Conclusion Adjuvants have a role in pemphigus treatment, at least in reducing the risk of relapse. Further randomized controlled trials of other promising modalities are warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697219222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190962215016096</els_id><sourcerecordid>1697219222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-441d644ca3a754ef3893dd3ae810df5b44642b7c666502732f7c9740b9f5b5823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2L1TAUxYMoznP0H3AhWbppvUnTpBERhsEvGFBwXIe85NaX2i-TdqT_vSlvdOHC1b1wzzlwf4eQ5wxKBky-6srOWl9yYHUJooSqeUAODLQqpGrUQ3IApqHQkvML8iSlDgC0qNRjcsElNI1s9IF8uT0hjVOPdGqp9d16Z8eFLieMdt5oGOmMw3wK39f0ml7RtKUFB7sERyPeBfxF7ejpgIst7Gj7LYX0lDxqbZ_w2f28JN_ev7u9_ljcfP7w6frqpnC1UEshBPNSCGcrq2qBbdXoyvvKYsPAt_VRCCn4UTkpZQ1cVbxVTisBR52PdcOrS_LynDvH6eeKaTFDSA773o44rckwqRVnmvNdys9SF6eUIrZmjmGwcTMMzE7SdGYnaXaSBoTJJLPpxX3-ehzQ_7X8QZcFb84CzF9mFtEkF3B06ENEtxg_hf_nv_3H7vowBmf7H7hh6qY1ZqL5D5O4AfN173KvktU5MG_Vb-fwmF0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697219222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Atzmony, Lihi, MD ; Hodak, Emmilia, MD ; Leshem, Yael A., MD ; Rosenbaum, Omer, MD ; Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH ; Anhalt, Grant J., MD ; Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Atzmony, Lihi, MD ; Hodak, Emmilia, MD ; Leshem, Yael A., MD ; Rosenbaum, Omer, MD ; Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH ; Anhalt, Grant J., MD ; Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was remission. Secondary outcomes were disease control, time to disease control, relapse, time to relapse, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, withdrawal because of adverse events, and all-cause death. Trials were pooled irrespective of adjuvant type evaluated. Results Ten trials (559 participants) were included. Adjuvants evaluated were azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and infliximab; not all were included in every analysis. Although adjuvants were not beneficial for achieving remission, they were found to collectively decrease the risk of relapse by 29% (relative risk 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95). Limitations Different adjuvants were pooled together. Conclusion Adjuvants have a role in pemphigus treatment, at least in reducing the risk of relapse. Further randomized controlled trials of other promising modalities are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26088689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>adjuvant ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Dermatology ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; glucocorticoids ; Glucocorticoids - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Male ; meta-analysis ; pemphigus ; Pemphigus - diagnosis ; Pemphigus - drug therapy ; pemphigus vulgaris ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Recurrence ; Remission Induction ; Risk Assessment ; Role ; Severity of Illness Index ; systematic review ; therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2015-08, Vol.73 (2), p.264-271</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-441d644ca3a754ef3893dd3ae810df5b44642b7c666502732f7c9740b9f5b5823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-441d644ca3a754ef3893dd3ae810df5b44642b7c666502732f7c9740b9f5b5823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962215016096$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atzmony, Lihi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodak, Emmilia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leshem, Yael A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Omer, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anhalt, Grant J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creatorcontrib><title>The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was remission. Secondary outcomes were disease control, time to disease control, relapse, time to relapse, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, withdrawal because of adverse events, and all-cause death. Trials were pooled irrespective of adjuvant type evaluated. Results Ten trials (559 participants) were included. Adjuvants evaluated were azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and infliximab; not all were included in every analysis. Although adjuvants were not beneficial for achieving remission, they were found to collectively decrease the risk of relapse by 29% (relative risk 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95). Limitations Different adjuvants were pooled together. Conclusion Adjuvants have a role in pemphigus treatment, at least in reducing the risk of relapse. Further randomized controlled trials of other promising modalities are warranted.</description><subject>adjuvant</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>glucocorticoids</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>pemphigus</subject><subject>Pemphigus - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pemphigus - drug therapy</subject><subject>pemphigus vulgaris</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2L1TAUxYMoznP0H3AhWbppvUnTpBERhsEvGFBwXIe85NaX2i-TdqT_vSlvdOHC1b1wzzlwf4eQ5wxKBky-6srOWl9yYHUJooSqeUAODLQqpGrUQ3IApqHQkvML8iSlDgC0qNRjcsElNI1s9IF8uT0hjVOPdGqp9d16Z8eFLieMdt5oGOmMw3wK39f0ml7RtKUFB7sERyPeBfxF7ejpgIst7Gj7LYX0lDxqbZ_w2f28JN_ev7u9_ljcfP7w6frqpnC1UEshBPNSCGcrq2qBbdXoyvvKYsPAt_VRCCn4UTkpZQ1cVbxVTisBR52PdcOrS_LynDvH6eeKaTFDSA773o44rckwqRVnmvNdys9SF6eUIrZmjmGwcTMMzE7SdGYnaXaSBoTJJLPpxX3-ehzQ_7X8QZcFb84CzF9mFtEkF3B06ENEtxg_hf_nv_3H7vowBmf7H7hh6qY1ZqL5D5O4AfN173KvktU5MG_Vb-fwmF0</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Atzmony, Lihi, MD</creator><creator>Hodak, Emmilia, MD</creator><creator>Leshem, Yael A., MD</creator><creator>Rosenbaum, Omer, MD</creator><creator>Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH</creator><creator>Anhalt, Grant J., MD</creator><creator>Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Atzmony, Lihi, MD ; Hodak, Emmilia, MD ; Leshem, Yael A., MD ; Rosenbaum, Omer, MD ; Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH ; Anhalt, Grant J., MD ; Mimouni, Daniel, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-441d644ca3a754ef3893dd3ae810df5b44642b7c666502732f7c9740b9f5b5823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>adjuvant</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>glucocorticoids</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>pemphigus</topic><topic>Pemphigus - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pemphigus - drug therapy</topic><topic>pemphigus vulgaris</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atzmony, Lihi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodak, Emmilia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leshem, Yael A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Omer, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anhalt, Grant J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mimouni, Daniel, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atzmony, Lihi, MD</au><au>Hodak, Emmilia, MD</au><au>Leshem, Yael A., MD</au><au>Rosenbaum, Omer, MD</au><au>Gdalevich, Michael, MD, MPH</au><au>Anhalt, Grant J., MD</au><au>Mimouni, Daniel, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>264</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>264-271</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><abstract>Background The assumption that adjuvant modalities have added value to oral glucocorticoids in the treatment of pemphigus is intuitively sound but has not been conclusively proven. Objective We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoid treatment with or without adjuvants for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was remission. Secondary outcomes were disease control, time to disease control, relapse, time to relapse, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, withdrawal because of adverse events, and all-cause death. Trials were pooled irrespective of adjuvant type evaluated. Results Ten trials (559 participants) were included. Adjuvants evaluated were azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and infliximab; not all were included in every analysis. Although adjuvants were not beneficial for achieving remission, they were found to collectively decrease the risk of relapse by 29% (relative risk 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95). Limitations Different adjuvants were pooled together. Conclusion Adjuvants have a role in pemphigus treatment, at least in reducing the risk of relapse. Further randomized controlled trials of other promising modalities are warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26088689</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.038</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-9622
ispartof Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2015-08, Vol.73 (2), p.264-271
issn 0190-9622
1097-6787
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697219222
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects adjuvant
Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Dermatology
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Follow-Up Studies
glucocorticoids
Glucocorticoids - administration & dosage
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage
Male
meta-analysis
pemphigus
Pemphigus - diagnosis
Pemphigus - drug therapy
pemphigus vulgaris
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recurrence
Remission Induction
Risk Assessment
Role
Severity of Illness Index
systematic review
therapy
Treatment Outcome
title The role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T11%3A30%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20adjuvant%20therapy%20in%20pemphigus:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Atzmony,%20Lihi,%20MD&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=264&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=264-271&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1697219222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697219222&rft_id=info:pmid/26088689&rft_els_id=S0190962215016096&rfr_iscdi=true