Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost
Background The frequency of nonneoplastic polypectomy (NNP) and its impact on the polyp detection rate (PDR) is unknown. The correlation between NNP and adenoma detection rate (ADR) and its impact on the cost of colonoscopy has not been investigated. Objective To determine the rate of NNP in screeni...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2015-08, Vol.82 (2), p.370-375.e1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 375.e1 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 370 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Atia, Mary A., MD Patel, Neal C., MD Ratuapli, Shiva K., MBBS Boroff, Erika S., MD Crowell, Michael D., PhD Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD Faigel, Douglas O., MD Leighton, Jonathan A., MD Ramirez, Francisco C., MD |
description | Background The frequency of nonneoplastic polypectomy (NNP) and its impact on the polyp detection rate (PDR) is unknown. The correlation between NNP and adenoma detection rate (ADR) and its impact on the cost of colonoscopy has not been investigated. Objective To determine the rate of NNP in screening colonoscopy, the impact of NNP on the PDR, and the correlation of NNP with ADR. The increased cost of NNP during screening colonoscopy also was calculated. Design We reviewed all screening colonoscopies. PDR and ADR were calculated. We then calculated a nonneoplastic polyp detection rate (patients with ≥1 nonneoplastic polyp). Setting Tertiary-care referral center. Patients Patients who underwent screening colonoscopies from 2010 to 2011. Interventions Colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements ADR, PDR, NNP rate. Results A total of 1797 colonoscopies were reviewed. Mean (± standard deviation) PDR was 47.7% ± 12.0%, and mean ADR was 27.3% ± 6.9%. The overall NNP rate was 10.4% ± 7.1%, with a range of 2.4% to 28.4%. Among all polypectomies (n = 2061), 276 were for nonneoplastic polyps (13.4%). Endoscopists with a higher rate of nonneoplastic polyp detection were more likely to detect an adenoma (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.2). With one outlier excluded, there was a strong correlation between ADR and NNP ( r = 0.825; P < .001). The increased cost of removal of nonneoplastic polyps was $32,963. Limitations Retrospective study. Conclusion There is a strong correlation between adenoma detection and nonneoplastic polyp detection. The etiology is unclear, but nonneoplastic polyp detection rate may inflate the PDR for some endoscopists. NNP also adds an increased cost. Increasing the awareness of endoscopic appearances through advanced imaging techniques of normal versus neoplastic tissue may be an area to improve cost containment in screening colonoscopy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697218815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510715000188</els_id><sourcerecordid>1697218815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-2cd73430d2848f8f7f5fc3f68033cae719155fdfcaa3ad89245ccf782a0b517b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcGL1TAQxoMo7nP1D_AiPXqwz0zTNqmCIIu7Cose1HPISyZrnmlSk3ahd_9wU97qQUEYSGb4vg_mN4Q8BboHCv3L4_7G4b6h0O0plOrvkR3Qgdc958N9sqNlVHdA-Rl5lPORUioaBg_JWdOJlvXQ7sjPjzEEjJNXeXa6mqJfJ9RzHNfKLMmFmyrrhBi2n44-hph1nNZX1fwNKzdOSs9VDCdfZXAuXlf6pGZ8USmDIY7q33kwVbzFpLwvoXl-TB5Y5TM-uXvPydfLd18u3tfXn64-XLy9rnXLxVw32nDWMmoa0QorLLed1cz2gjKmFXIYoOussVoppowYmrbT2nLRKHrogB_YOXl-yp1S_LFgnuXoskbvVUGwZAn9wBsQAroihZNUp5hzQiun5EaVVglUbvDlURb4coMvKZTqi-fZXfxyGNH8cfymXQSvTwIsS946TDJrh0GjcakAkia6_8a_-cutvQtOK_8dV8zHuKRQ6EmQuZFUft6uvx0funL4shX7BSigrJo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697218815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Atia, Mary A., MD ; Patel, Neal C., MD ; Ratuapli, Shiva K., MBBS ; Boroff, Erika S., MD ; Crowell, Michael D., PhD ; Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD ; Faigel, Douglas O., MD ; Leighton, Jonathan A., MD ; Ramirez, Francisco C., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Atia, Mary A., MD ; Patel, Neal C., MD ; Ratuapli, Shiva K., MBBS ; Boroff, Erika S., MD ; Crowell, Michael D., PhD ; Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD ; Faigel, Douglas O., MD ; Leighton, Jonathan A., MD ; Ramirez, Francisco C., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background The frequency of nonneoplastic polypectomy (NNP) and its impact on the polyp detection rate (PDR) is unknown. The correlation between NNP and adenoma detection rate (ADR) and its impact on the cost of colonoscopy has not been investigated. Objective To determine the rate of NNP in screening colonoscopy, the impact of NNP on the PDR, and the correlation of NNP with ADR. The increased cost of NNP during screening colonoscopy also was calculated. Design We reviewed all screening colonoscopies. PDR and ADR were calculated. We then calculated a nonneoplastic polyp detection rate (patients with ≥1 nonneoplastic polyp). Setting Tertiary-care referral center. Patients Patients who underwent screening colonoscopies from 2010 to 2011. Interventions Colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements ADR, PDR, NNP rate. Results A total of 1797 colonoscopies were reviewed. Mean (± standard deviation) PDR was 47.7% ± 12.0%, and mean ADR was 27.3% ± 6.9%. The overall NNP rate was 10.4% ± 7.1%, with a range of 2.4% to 28.4%. Among all polypectomies (n = 2061), 276 were for nonneoplastic polyps (13.4%). Endoscopists with a higher rate of nonneoplastic polyp detection were more likely to detect an adenoma (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.2). With one outlier excluded, there was a strong correlation between ADR and NNP ( r = 0.825; P < .001). The increased cost of removal of nonneoplastic polyps was $32,963. Limitations Retrospective study. Conclusion There is a strong correlation between adenoma detection and nonneoplastic polyp detection. The etiology is unclear, but nonneoplastic polyp detection rate may inflate the PDR for some endoscopists. NNP also adds an increased cost. Increasing the awareness of endoscopic appearances through advanced imaging techniques of normal versus neoplastic tissue may be an area to improve cost containment in screening colonoscopy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25843614</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis ; Aged ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Colonic Polyps - pathology ; Colonic Polyps - surgery ; Colonoscopy - economics ; Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Early Detection of Cancer - economics ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015-08, Vol.82 (2), p.370-375.e1</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-2cd73430d2848f8f7f5fc3f68033cae719155fdfcaa3ad89245ccf782a0b517b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-2cd73430d2848f8f7f5fc3f68033cae719155fdfcaa3ad89245ccf782a0b517b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25843614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atia, Mary A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Neal C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratuapli, Shiva K., MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boroff, Erika S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowell, Michael D., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faigel, Douglas O., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Francisco C., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background The frequency of nonneoplastic polypectomy (NNP) and its impact on the polyp detection rate (PDR) is unknown. The correlation between NNP and adenoma detection rate (ADR) and its impact on the cost of colonoscopy has not been investigated. Objective To determine the rate of NNP in screening colonoscopy, the impact of NNP on the PDR, and the correlation of NNP with ADR. The increased cost of NNP during screening colonoscopy also was calculated. Design We reviewed all screening colonoscopies. PDR and ADR were calculated. We then calculated a nonneoplastic polyp detection rate (patients with ≥1 nonneoplastic polyp). Setting Tertiary-care referral center. Patients Patients who underwent screening colonoscopies from 2010 to 2011. Interventions Colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements ADR, PDR, NNP rate. Results A total of 1797 colonoscopies were reviewed. Mean (± standard deviation) PDR was 47.7% ± 12.0%, and mean ADR was 27.3% ± 6.9%. The overall NNP rate was 10.4% ± 7.1%, with a range of 2.4% to 28.4%. Among all polypectomies (n = 2061), 276 were for nonneoplastic polyps (13.4%). Endoscopists with a higher rate of nonneoplastic polyp detection were more likely to detect an adenoma (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.2). With one outlier excluded, there was a strong correlation between ADR and NNP ( r = 0.825; P < .001). The increased cost of removal of nonneoplastic polyps was $32,963. Limitations Retrospective study. Conclusion There is a strong correlation between adenoma detection and nonneoplastic polyp detection. The etiology is unclear, but nonneoplastic polyp detection rate may inflate the PDR for some endoscopists. NNP also adds an increased cost. Increasing the awareness of endoscopic appearances through advanced imaging techniques of normal versus neoplastic tissue may be an area to improve cost containment in screening colonoscopy.</description><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - economics</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - economics</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcGL1TAQxoMo7nP1D_AiPXqwz0zTNqmCIIu7Cose1HPISyZrnmlSk3ahd_9wU97qQUEYSGb4vg_mN4Q8BboHCv3L4_7G4b6h0O0plOrvkR3Qgdc958N9sqNlVHdA-Rl5lPORUioaBg_JWdOJlvXQ7sjPjzEEjJNXeXa6mqJfJ9RzHNfKLMmFmyrrhBi2n44-hph1nNZX1fwNKzdOSs9VDCdfZXAuXlf6pGZ8USmDIY7q33kwVbzFpLwvoXl-TB5Y5TM-uXvPydfLd18u3tfXn64-XLy9rnXLxVw32nDWMmoa0QorLLed1cz2gjKmFXIYoOussVoppowYmrbT2nLRKHrogB_YOXl-yp1S_LFgnuXoskbvVUGwZAn9wBsQAroihZNUp5hzQiun5EaVVglUbvDlURb4coMvKZTqi-fZXfxyGNH8cfymXQSvTwIsS946TDJrh0GjcakAkia6_8a_-cutvQtOK_8dV8zHuKRQ6EmQuZFUft6uvx0funL4shX7BSigrJo</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Atia, Mary A., MD</creator><creator>Patel, Neal C., MD</creator><creator>Ratuapli, Shiva K., MBBS</creator><creator>Boroff, Erika S., MD</creator><creator>Crowell, Michael D., PhD</creator><creator>Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD</creator><creator>Faigel, Douglas O., MD</creator><creator>Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</creator><creator>Ramirez, Francisco C., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost</title><author>Atia, Mary A., MD ; Patel, Neal C., MD ; Ratuapli, Shiva K., MBBS ; Boroff, Erika S., MD ; Crowell, Michael D., PhD ; Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD ; Faigel, Douglas O., MD ; Leighton, Jonathan A., MD ; Ramirez, Francisco C., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-2cd73430d2848f8f7f5fc3f68033cae719155fdfcaa3ad89245ccf782a0b517b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - economics</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - economics</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atia, Mary A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Neal C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratuapli, Shiva K., MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boroff, Erika S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowell, Michael D., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faigel, Douglas O., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Francisco C., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atia, Mary A., MD</au><au>Patel, Neal C., MD</au><au>Ratuapli, Shiva K., MBBS</au><au>Boroff, Erika S., MD</au><au>Crowell, Michael D., PhD</au><au>Gurudu, Suryakanth R., MD</au><au>Faigel, Douglas O., MD</au><au>Leighton, Jonathan A., MD</au><au>Ramirez, Francisco C., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>375.e1</epage><pages>370-375.e1</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>Background The frequency of nonneoplastic polypectomy (NNP) and its impact on the polyp detection rate (PDR) is unknown. The correlation between NNP and adenoma detection rate (ADR) and its impact on the cost of colonoscopy has not been investigated. Objective To determine the rate of NNP in screening colonoscopy, the impact of NNP on the PDR, and the correlation of NNP with ADR. The increased cost of NNP during screening colonoscopy also was calculated. Design We reviewed all screening colonoscopies. PDR and ADR were calculated. We then calculated a nonneoplastic polyp detection rate (patients with ≥1 nonneoplastic polyp). Setting Tertiary-care referral center. Patients Patients who underwent screening colonoscopies from 2010 to 2011. Interventions Colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements ADR, PDR, NNP rate. Results A total of 1797 colonoscopies were reviewed. Mean (± standard deviation) PDR was 47.7% ± 12.0%, and mean ADR was 27.3% ± 6.9%. The overall NNP rate was 10.4% ± 7.1%, with a range of 2.4% to 28.4%. Among all polypectomies (n = 2061), 276 were for nonneoplastic polyps (13.4%). Endoscopists with a higher rate of nonneoplastic polyp detection were more likely to detect an adenoma (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.2). With one outlier excluded, there was a strong correlation between ADR and NNP ( r = 0.825; P < .001). The increased cost of removal of nonneoplastic polyps was $32,963. Limitations Retrospective study. Conclusion There is a strong correlation between adenoma detection and nonneoplastic polyp detection. The etiology is unclear, but nonneoplastic polyp detection rate may inflate the PDR for some endoscopists. NNP also adds an increased cost. Increasing the awareness of endoscopic appearances through advanced imaging techniques of normal versus neoplastic tissue may be an area to improve cost containment in screening colonoscopy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25843614</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015-08, Vol.82 (2), p.370-375.e1 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697218815 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adenoma - diagnosis Aged Colonic Polyps - diagnosis Colonic Polyps - pathology Colonic Polyps - surgery Colonoscopy - economics Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Early Detection of Cancer - economics Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data Female Gastroenterology and Hepatology Humans Male Middle Aged Retrospective Studies |
title | Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T17%3A26%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonneoplastic%20polypectomy%20during%20screening%20colonoscopy:%20the%20impact%20on%20polyp%20detection%20rate,%20adenoma%20detection%20rate,%20and%20overall%20cost&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Atia,%20Mary%20A.,%20MD&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=375.e1&rft.pages=370-375.e1&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1697218815%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697218815&rft_id=info:pmid/25843614&rft_els_id=S0016510715000188&rfr_iscdi=true |