On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates
The European Union has made extensive biodiversity conservation efforts with the Habitats and Birds Directives and with the establishment of the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, one of the largest networks of conservation areas worldwide. We performed a gap analysis of the entire Natura 2000...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2015-08, Vol.29 (4), p.986-995 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 995 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 986 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Maiorano, L Amori, G Montemaggiori, A Rondinini, C Santini, L Saura, S Boitani, L |
description | The European Union has made extensive biodiversity conservation efforts with the Habitats and Birds Directives and with the establishment of the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, one of the largest networks of conservation areas worldwide. We performed a gap analysis of the entire Natura 2000 system plus national protected areas and all terrestrial vertebrates (freshwater fish excluded). We also evaluated the level of connectivity of both systems, providing therefore a first estimate of the functionality of the Natura 2000 system as an effective network of protected areas. Together national protected areas and the Natura 2000 network covered more than one‐third of the European Union. National protected areas did not offer protection to 13 total gap species (i.e., species not covered by any protected area) or to almost 300 partial gap species (i.e., species whose representation target is not met). Together the Natura 2000 network and national protected areas left 1 total gap species and 121 partial gap species unprotected. The terrestrial vertebrates listed in the Habitats and Birds Directives were relatively well covered (especially birds), and overall connectivity was improved considerably by Natura 2000 sites that act as stepping stones between national protected areas. Overall, we found that the Natura 2000 network represents at continental level an important network of protected areas that acts as a good complement to existing national protected areas. However, a number of problems remain that are mainly linked to the criteria used to list the species in the Habitats and Birds Directives. The European Commission initiated in 2014 a process aimed at assessing the importance of the Birds and Habitats Directives for biodiversity conservation. Our results contribute to this assessment and suggest the system is largely effective for terrestrial vertebrates but would benefit from further updating of the species lists and field management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cobi.12535 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697214519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24483172</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24483172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-b38e4ba883214e5763e61d6443917d1bef9ff5774caa0a7b370d20176230f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgCMEokvhwgOAJYSEkFL8G8fcYNWWomq3oiCOlpNMut5u4sV2WPYpeGWcpq0QB3yxrPnmG89Mlj0n-Iik8652lT0iVDDxIJsRQVlOJFMPsxkuyzIvS0UPsichrDHGShD-ODugQikpKJ1lv5c9Wrkd6oZ6hSrrGvsTfLBxj2xAtUsPaJDt0fHg3RZQtUe9idb1ZoO23kWoY4obDyYg0zdjPK4ALUwcvEE0VUQ9xJ3z1--TJdirVQyo9a5DEbyHEL1NplQlQuVNhPA0e9SaTYBnt_dhdnly_HX-KT9fnp7NP5znNS-pyCtWAq9MWTJKOAhZMChIU3DOFJENqaBVbSuk5LUx2MiKSdxQTGRBGW45O8zeTNbUw48hfUN3NtSw2Zge3BA0KZRMYkFUQl_9g67d4FP_N9Q4R6lIot5OVO1dCB5avfW2M36vCdbjkvS4JH2zpAS_uFUOVQfNPXq3lQSQCdjZDez_o9Lz5cezO-nrKWcdovN_56SWpaacl4zI0Z1PnA0Rft1zxl_rQjIp9PfFqT6Z44vPePFFXyT-5cS3xmlz5W3Q3y7TKAXGlBCVJvQHU7vAgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1695997791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Maiorano, L ; Amori, G ; Montemaggiori, A ; Rondinini, C ; Santini, L ; Saura, S ; Boitani, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Maiorano, L ; Amori, G ; Montemaggiori, A ; Rondinini, C ; Santini, L ; Saura, S ; Boitani, L</creatorcontrib><description>The European Union has made extensive biodiversity conservation efforts with the Habitats and Birds Directives and with the establishment of the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, one of the largest networks of conservation areas worldwide. We performed a gap analysis of the entire Natura 2000 system plus national protected areas and all terrestrial vertebrates (freshwater fish excluded). We also evaluated the level of connectivity of both systems, providing therefore a first estimate of the functionality of the Natura 2000 system as an effective network of protected areas. Together national protected areas and the Natura 2000 network covered more than one‐third of the European Union. National protected areas did not offer protection to 13 total gap species (i.e., species not covered by any protected area) or to almost 300 partial gap species (i.e., species whose representation target is not met). Together the Natura 2000 network and national protected areas left 1 total gap species and 121 partial gap species unprotected. The terrestrial vertebrates listed in the Habitats and Birds Directives were relatively well covered (especially birds), and overall connectivity was improved considerably by Natura 2000 sites that act as stepping stones between national protected areas. Overall, we found that the Natura 2000 network represents at continental level an important network of protected areas that acts as a good complement to existing national protected areas. However, a number of problems remain that are mainly linked to the criteria used to list the species in the Habitats and Birds Directives. The European Commission initiated in 2014 a process aimed at assessing the importance of the Birds and Habitats Directives for biodiversity conservation. Our results contribute to this assessment and suggest the system is largely effective for terrestrial vertebrates but would benefit from further updating of the species lists and field management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12535</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25997522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Scientific Publications</publisher><subject>Animals ; análisis de falta de datos ; Biodiversity ; birds ; Birds Directive ; conectividad ; connectivity ; conservation areas ; Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence ; Directiva de Aves ; Directiva de Hábitat ; Environmental Policy - legislation & jurisprudence ; Europe ; European Union ; freshwater fish ; gap analysis ; Habitats ; Habitats Directive ; Special Section: Conservation in Europe as a Model for Emerging Conservation Issues Globally ; Unión Europea ; Vertebrates ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2015-08, Vol.29 (4), p.986-995</ispartof><rights>2015 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2015 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2015, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-b38e4ba883214e5763e61d6443917d1bef9ff5774caa0a7b370d20176230f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-b38e4ba883214e5763e61d6443917d1bef9ff5774caa0a7b370d20176230f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24483172$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24483172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25997522$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maiorano, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amori, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montemaggiori, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rondinini, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santini, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saura, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boitani, L</creatorcontrib><title>On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><description>The European Union has made extensive biodiversity conservation efforts with the Habitats and Birds Directives and with the establishment of the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, one of the largest networks of conservation areas worldwide. We performed a gap analysis of the entire Natura 2000 system plus national protected areas and all terrestrial vertebrates (freshwater fish excluded). We also evaluated the level of connectivity of both systems, providing therefore a first estimate of the functionality of the Natura 2000 system as an effective network of protected areas. Together national protected areas and the Natura 2000 network covered more than one‐third of the European Union. National protected areas did not offer protection to 13 total gap species (i.e., species not covered by any protected area) or to almost 300 partial gap species (i.e., species whose representation target is not met). Together the Natura 2000 network and national protected areas left 1 total gap species and 121 partial gap species unprotected. The terrestrial vertebrates listed in the Habitats and Birds Directives were relatively well covered (especially birds), and overall connectivity was improved considerably by Natura 2000 sites that act as stepping stones between national protected areas. Overall, we found that the Natura 2000 network represents at continental level an important network of protected areas that acts as a good complement to existing national protected areas. However, a number of problems remain that are mainly linked to the criteria used to list the species in the Habitats and Birds Directives. The European Commission initiated in 2014 a process aimed at assessing the importance of the Birds and Habitats Directives for biodiversity conservation. Our results contribute to this assessment and suggest the system is largely effective for terrestrial vertebrates but would benefit from further updating of the species lists and field management.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>análisis de falta de datos</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>birds</subject><subject>Birds Directive</subject><subject>conectividad</subject><subject>connectivity</subject><subject>conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Directiva de Aves</subject><subject>Directiva de Hábitat</subject><subject>Environmental Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>freshwater fish</subject><subject>gap analysis</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Habitats Directive</subject><subject>Special Section: Conservation in Europe as a Model for Emerging Conservation Issues Globally</subject><subject>Unión Europea</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQgCMEokvhwgOAJYSEkFL8G8fcYNWWomq3oiCOlpNMut5u4sV2WPYpeGWcpq0QB3yxrPnmG89Mlj0n-Iik8652lT0iVDDxIJsRQVlOJFMPsxkuyzIvS0UPsichrDHGShD-ODugQikpKJ1lv5c9Wrkd6oZ6hSrrGvsTfLBxj2xAtUsPaJDt0fHg3RZQtUe9idb1ZoO23kWoY4obDyYg0zdjPK4ALUwcvEE0VUQ9xJ3z1--TJdirVQyo9a5DEbyHEL1NplQlQuVNhPA0e9SaTYBnt_dhdnly_HX-KT9fnp7NP5znNS-pyCtWAq9MWTJKOAhZMChIU3DOFJENqaBVbSuk5LUx2MiKSdxQTGRBGW45O8zeTNbUw48hfUN3NtSw2Zge3BA0KZRMYkFUQl_9g67d4FP_N9Q4R6lIot5OVO1dCB5avfW2M36vCdbjkvS4JH2zpAS_uFUOVQfNPXq3lQSQCdjZDez_o9Lz5cezO-nrKWcdovN_56SWpaacl4zI0Z1PnA0Rft1zxl_rQjIp9PfFqT6Z44vPePFFXyT-5cS3xmlz5W3Q3y7TKAXGlBCVJvQHU7vAgQ</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Maiorano, L</creator><creator>Amori, G</creator><creator>Montemaggiori, A</creator><creator>Rondinini, C</creator><creator>Santini, L</creator><creator>Saura, S</creator><creator>Boitani, L</creator><general>Blackwell Scientific Publications</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates</title><author>Maiorano, L ; Amori, G ; Montemaggiori, A ; Rondinini, C ; Santini, L ; Saura, S ; Boitani, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4825-b38e4ba883214e5763e61d6443917d1bef9ff5774caa0a7b370d20176230f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>análisis de falta de datos</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>birds</topic><topic>Birds Directive</topic><topic>conectividad</topic><topic>connectivity</topic><topic>conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Directiva de Aves</topic><topic>Directiva de Hábitat</topic><topic>Environmental Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>freshwater fish</topic><topic>gap analysis</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Habitats Directive</topic><topic>Special Section: Conservation in Europe as a Model for Emerging Conservation Issues Globally</topic><topic>Unión Europea</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maiorano, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amori, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montemaggiori, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rondinini, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santini, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saura, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boitani, L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maiorano, L</au><au>Amori, G</au><au>Montemaggiori, A</au><au>Rondinini, C</au><au>Santini, L</au><au>Saura, S</au><au>Boitani, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>986</spage><epage>995</epage><pages>986-995</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>The European Union has made extensive biodiversity conservation efforts with the Habitats and Birds Directives and with the establishment of the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, one of the largest networks of conservation areas worldwide. We performed a gap analysis of the entire Natura 2000 system plus national protected areas and all terrestrial vertebrates (freshwater fish excluded). We also evaluated the level of connectivity of both systems, providing therefore a first estimate of the functionality of the Natura 2000 system as an effective network of protected areas. Together national protected areas and the Natura 2000 network covered more than one‐third of the European Union. National protected areas did not offer protection to 13 total gap species (i.e., species not covered by any protected area) or to almost 300 partial gap species (i.e., species whose representation target is not met). Together the Natura 2000 network and national protected areas left 1 total gap species and 121 partial gap species unprotected. The terrestrial vertebrates listed in the Habitats and Birds Directives were relatively well covered (especially birds), and overall connectivity was improved considerably by Natura 2000 sites that act as stepping stones between national protected areas. Overall, we found that the Natura 2000 network represents at continental level an important network of protected areas that acts as a good complement to existing national protected areas. However, a number of problems remain that are mainly linked to the criteria used to list the species in the Habitats and Birds Directives. The European Commission initiated in 2014 a process aimed at assessing the importance of the Birds and Habitats Directives for biodiversity conservation. Our results contribute to this assessment and suggest the system is largely effective for terrestrial vertebrates but would benefit from further updating of the species lists and field management.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Scientific Publications</pub><pmid>25997522</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.12535</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2015-08, Vol.29 (4), p.986-995 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697214519 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals análisis de falta de datos Biodiversity birds Birds Directive conectividad connectivity conservation areas Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence Directiva de Aves Directiva de Hábitat Environmental Policy - legislation & jurisprudence Europe European Union freshwater fish gap analysis Habitats Habitats Directive Special Section: Conservation in Europe as a Model for Emerging Conservation Issues Globally Unión Europea Vertebrates Wildlife conservation Wildlife management |
title | On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A21%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20how%20much%20biodiversity%20is%20covered%20in%20Europe%20by%20national%20protected%20areas%20and%20by%20the%20Natura%202000%20network:%20insights%20from%20terrestrial%20vertebrates&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Maiorano,%20L&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=986&rft.epage=995&rft.pages=986-995&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.12535&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24483172%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1695997791&rft_id=info:pmid/25997522&rft_jstor_id=24483172&rfr_iscdi=true |