Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology

Many students are being left behind by an educational system that some people believe is in crisis. Improving educational outcomes will require efforts on many fronts, but a central premise of this monograph is that one part of a solution involves helping students to better regulate their learning t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological science in the public interest 2013-01, Vol.14 (1), p.4-58
Hauptverfasser: Dunlosky, John, Rawson, Katherine A., Marsh, Elizabeth J., Nathan, Mitchell J., Willingham, Daniel T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 4
container_title Psychological science in the public interest
container_volume 14
creator Dunlosky, John
Rawson, Katherine A.
Marsh, Elizabeth J.
Nathan, Mitchell J.
Willingham, Daniel T.
description Many students are being left behind by an educational system that some people believe is in crisis. Improving educational outcomes will require efforts on many fronts, but a central premise of this monograph is that one part of a solution involves helping students to better regulate their learning through the use of effective learning techniques. Fortunately, cognitive and educational psychologists have been developing and evaluating easy-to-use learning techniques that could help students achieve their learning goals. In this monograph, we discuss 10 learning techniques in detail and offer recommendations about their relative utility. We selected techniques that were expected to be relatively easy to use and hence could be adopted by many students. Also, some techniques (e.g., highlighting and rereading) were selected because students report relying heavily on them, which makes it especially important to examine how well they work. The techniques include elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, summarization, highlighting (or underlining), the keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, rereading, practice testing, distributed practice, and interleaved practice. To offer recommendations about the relative utility of these techniques, we evaluated whether their benefits generalize across four categories of variables: learning conditions, student characteristics, materials, and criterion tasks. Learning conditions include aspects of the learning environment in which the technique is implemented, such as whether a student studies alone or with a group. Student characteristics include variables such as age, ability, and level of prior knowledge. Materials vary from simple concepts to mathematical problems to complicated science texts. Criterion tasks include different outcome measures that are relevant to student achievement, such as those tapping memory, problem solving, and comprehension. We attempted to provide thorough reviews for each technique, so this monograph is rather lengthy. However, we also wrote the monograph in a modular fashion, so it is easy to use. In particular, each review is divided into the following sections: 1. General description of the technique and why it should work 2. How general are the effects of this technique? 2a. Learning conditions 2b. Student characteristics 2c. Materials 2d. Criterion tasks 3. Effects in representative educational contexts 4. Issues for implementation 5. Overall assessment The review for each tech
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1529100612453266
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697210976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23484712</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1529100612453266</sage_id><sourcerecordid>23484712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ba1fa6628e49ecd7af7f8808c694c4d91b1a26ec696812e74d5e011ff294a3eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9L5DAUx4O46Kh796IUPLiXal6SJu3eZBx3hQGFddljyaQvMx06jZu0wpz8100dfyF4Cvl-P99vXniEHAI9A1DqHDJWAKUSmMg4k3KLjBhImlLKYZuMBjsd_F2yF8KSUhCQyR2yyyQozvJ8RB6vV_fePdTtPPnT9RW2XThNpqh9O0j_6m6RTKxF09UP-K7foVm09f8ew8_k1rtVHQb1svYD6NqQXEUxGbt5Wz8HdVslk6o3enB1k9yGtVm4xs3XB-Sb1U3A7y_nPvl7Nbkb_06nN7-uxxfT1HBBu3SmwWopWY6iQFMpbZXNc5obWQgjqgJmoJnEeJU5MFSiypACWMsKoTnO-D75semNvx3m7so4tMGm0S26PpQgC8WAFkpG9OQTunS9j2NHimdMKa5kFim6oYx3IXi05b2vV9qvS6DlsJzy83Ji5PiluJ-tsHoLvG4jAukGCHqOH179uvBowy9D5_x7Hxe5UMD4E-EpoTc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1352773765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Dunlosky, John ; Rawson, Katherine A. ; Marsh, Elizabeth J. ; Nathan, Mitchell J. ; Willingham, Daniel T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunlosky, John ; Rawson, Katherine A. ; Marsh, Elizabeth J. ; Nathan, Mitchell J. ; Willingham, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><description>Many students are being left behind by an educational system that some people believe is in crisis. Improving educational outcomes will require efforts on many fronts, but a central premise of this monograph is that one part of a solution involves helping students to better regulate their learning through the use of effective learning techniques. Fortunately, cognitive and educational psychologists have been developing and evaluating easy-to-use learning techniques that could help students achieve their learning goals. In this monograph, we discuss 10 learning techniques in detail and offer recommendations about their relative utility. We selected techniques that were expected to be relatively easy to use and hence could be adopted by many students. Also, some techniques (e.g., highlighting and rereading) were selected because students report relying heavily on them, which makes it especially important to examine how well they work. The techniques include elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, summarization, highlighting (or underlining), the keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, rereading, practice testing, distributed practice, and interleaved practice. To offer recommendations about the relative utility of these techniques, we evaluated whether their benefits generalize across four categories of variables: learning conditions, student characteristics, materials, and criterion tasks. Learning conditions include aspects of the learning environment in which the technique is implemented, such as whether a student studies alone or with a group. Student characteristics include variables such as age, ability, and level of prior knowledge. Materials vary from simple concepts to mathematical problems to complicated science texts. Criterion tasks include different outcome measures that are relevant to student achievement, such as those tapping memory, problem solving, and comprehension. We attempted to provide thorough reviews for each technique, so this monograph is rather lengthy. However, we also wrote the monograph in a modular fashion, so it is easy to use. In particular, each review is divided into the following sections: 1. General description of the technique and why it should work 2. How general are the effects of this technique? 2a. Learning conditions 2b. Student characteristics 2c. Materials 2d. Criterion tasks 3. Effects in representative educational contexts 4. Issues for implementation 5. Overall assessment The review for each technique can be read independently of the others, and particular variables of interest can be easily compared across techniques. To foreshadow our final recommendations, the techniques vary widely with respect to their generalizability and promise for improving student learning. Practice testing and distributed practice received high utility assessments because they benefit learners of different ages and abilities and have been shown to boost students' performance across many criterion tasks and even in educational contexts. Elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, and interleaved practice received moderate utility assessments. The benefits of these techniques do generalize across some variables, yet despite their promise, they fell short of a high utility assessment because the evidence for their efficacy is limited. For instance, elaborative interrogation and self-explanation have not been adequately evaluated in educational contexts, and the benefits of interleaving have just begun to be systematically explored, so the ultimate effectiveness of these techniques is currently unknown. Nevertheless, the techniques that received moderate-utility ratings show enough promise for us to recommend their use in appropriate situations, which we describe in detail within the review of each technique. Five techniques received a low utility assessment: summarization, highlighting, the keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, and rereading. These techniques were rated as low utility for numerous reasons. Summarization and imagery use for text learning have been shown to help some students on some criterion tasks, yet the conditions under which these techniques produce benefits are limited, and much research is still needed to fully explore their overall effectiveness. The keyword mnemonic is difficult to implement in some contexts, and it appears to benefit students for a limited number of materials and for short retention intervals. Most students report rereading and highlighting, yet these techniques do not consistently boost students' performance, so other techniques should be used in their place (e.g., practice testing instead of rereading). Our hope is that this monograph will foster improvements in student learning, not only by showcasing which learning techniques are likely to have the most generalizable effects but also by encouraging researchers to continue investigating the most promising techniques. Accordingly, in our closing remarks, we discuss some issues for how these techniques could be implemented by teachers and students, and we highlight directions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-1006</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-0031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1529100612453266</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26173288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cognitive psychology ; College students ; Educational psychology ; High school students ; Keywords ; Learning ; Mathematical problems ; Medical practice ; Memory ; Students ; Summarization ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>Psychological science in the public interest, 2013-01, Vol.14 (1), p.4-58</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©2013 Association for Psychological Science</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2013.</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jan 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ba1fa6628e49ecd7af7f8808c694c4d91b1a26ec696812e74d5e011ff294a3eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23484712$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23484712$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26173288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunlosky, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawson, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Elizabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathan, Mitchell J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willingham, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology</title><title>Psychological science in the public interest</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci Public Interest</addtitle><description>Many students are being left behind by an educational system that some people believe is in crisis. Improving educational outcomes will require efforts on many fronts, but a central premise of this monograph is that one part of a solution involves helping students to better regulate their learning through the use of effective learning techniques. Fortunately, cognitive and educational psychologists have been developing and evaluating easy-to-use learning techniques that could help students achieve their learning goals. In this monograph, we discuss 10 learning techniques in detail and offer recommendations about their relative utility. We selected techniques that were expected to be relatively easy to use and hence could be adopted by many students. Also, some techniques (e.g., highlighting and rereading) were selected because students report relying heavily on them, which makes it especially important to examine how well they work. The techniques include elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, summarization, highlighting (or underlining), the keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, rereading, practice testing, distributed practice, and interleaved practice. To offer recommendations about the relative utility of these techniques, we evaluated whether their benefits generalize across four categories of variables: learning conditions, student characteristics, materials, and criterion tasks. Learning conditions include aspects of the learning environment in which the technique is implemented, such as whether a student studies alone or with a group. Student characteristics include variables such as age, ability, and level of prior knowledge. Materials vary from simple concepts to mathematical problems to complicated science texts. Criterion tasks include different outcome measures that are relevant to student achievement, such as those tapping memory, problem solving, and comprehension. We attempted to provide thorough reviews for each technique, so this monograph is rather lengthy. However, we also wrote the monograph in a modular fashion, so it is easy to use. In particular, each review is divided into the following sections: 1. General description of the technique and why it should work 2. How general are the effects of this technique? 2a. Learning conditions 2b. Student characteristics 2c. Materials 2d. Criterion tasks 3. Effects in representative educational contexts 4. Issues for implementation 5. Overall assessment The review for each technique can be read independently of the others, and particular variables of interest can be easily compared across techniques. To foreshadow our final recommendations, the techniques vary widely with respect to their generalizability and promise for improving student learning. Practice testing and distributed practice received high utility assessments because they benefit learners of different ages and abilities and have been shown to boost students' performance across many criterion tasks and even in educational contexts. Elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, and interleaved practice received moderate utility assessments. The benefits of these techniques do generalize across some variables, yet despite their promise, they fell short of a high utility assessment because the evidence for their efficacy is limited. For instance, elaborative interrogation and self-explanation have not been adequately evaluated in educational contexts, and the benefits of interleaving have just begun to be systematically explored, so the ultimate effectiveness of these techniques is currently unknown. Nevertheless, the techniques that received moderate-utility ratings show enough promise for us to recommend their use in appropriate situations, which we describe in detail within the review of each technique. Five techniques received a low utility assessment: summarization, highlighting, the keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, and rereading. These techniques were rated as low utility for numerous reasons. Summarization and imagery use for text learning have been shown to help some students on some criterion tasks, yet the conditions under which these techniques produce benefits are limited, and much research is still needed to fully explore their overall effectiveness. The keyword mnemonic is difficult to implement in some contexts, and it appears to benefit students for a limited number of materials and for short retention intervals. Most students report rereading and highlighting, yet these techniques do not consistently boost students' performance, so other techniques should be used in their place (e.g., practice testing instead of rereading). Our hope is that this monograph will foster improvements in student learning, not only by showcasing which learning techniques are likely to have the most generalizable effects but also by encouraging researchers to continue investigating the most promising techniques. Accordingly, in our closing remarks, we discuss some issues for how these techniques could be implemented by teachers and students, and we highlight directions for future research.</description><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mathematical problems</subject><subject>Medical practice</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Summarization</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>1529-1006</issn><issn>2160-0031</issn><issn>1539-6053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9L5DAUx4O46Kh796IUPLiXal6SJu3eZBx3hQGFddljyaQvMx06jZu0wpz8100dfyF4Cvl-P99vXniEHAI9A1DqHDJWAKUSmMg4k3KLjBhImlLKYZuMBjsd_F2yF8KSUhCQyR2yyyQozvJ8RB6vV_fePdTtPPnT9RW2XThNpqh9O0j_6m6RTKxF09UP-K7foVm09f8ew8_k1rtVHQb1svYD6NqQXEUxGbt5Wz8HdVslk6o3enB1k9yGtVm4xs3XB-Sb1U3A7y_nPvl7Nbkb_06nN7-uxxfT1HBBu3SmwWopWY6iQFMpbZXNc5obWQgjqgJmoJnEeJU5MFSiypACWMsKoTnO-D75semNvx3m7so4tMGm0S26PpQgC8WAFkpG9OQTunS9j2NHimdMKa5kFim6oYx3IXi05b2vV9qvS6DlsJzy83Ji5PiluJ-tsHoLvG4jAukGCHqOH179uvBowy9D5_x7Hxe5UMD4E-EpoTc</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Dunlosky, John</creator><creator>Rawson, Katherine A.</creator><creator>Marsh, Elizabeth J.</creator><creator>Nathan, Mitchell J.</creator><creator>Willingham, Daniel T.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology</title><author>Dunlosky, John ; Rawson, Katherine A. ; Marsh, Elizabeth J. ; Nathan, Mitchell J. ; Willingham, Daniel T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ba1fa6628e49ecd7af7f8808c694c4d91b1a26ec696812e74d5e011ff294a3eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mathematical problems</topic><topic>Medical practice</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Summarization</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunlosky, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawson, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Elizabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathan, Mitchell J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willingham, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological science in the public interest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunlosky, John</au><au>Rawson, Katherine A.</au><au>Marsh, Elizabeth J.</au><au>Nathan, Mitchell J.</au><au>Willingham, Daniel T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science in the public interest</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci Public Interest</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>4-58</pages><issn>1529-1006</issn><eissn>2160-0031</eissn><eissn>1539-6053</eissn><abstract>Many students are being left behind by an educational system that some people believe is in crisis. Improving educational outcomes will require efforts on many fronts, but a central premise of this monograph is that one part of a solution involves helping students to better regulate their learning through the use of effective learning techniques. Fortunately, cognitive and educational psychologists have been developing and evaluating easy-to-use learning techniques that could help students achieve their learning goals. In this monograph, we discuss 10 learning techniques in detail and offer recommendations about their relative utility. We selected techniques that were expected to be relatively easy to use and hence could be adopted by many students. Also, some techniques (e.g., highlighting and rereading) were selected because students report relying heavily on them, which makes it especially important to examine how well they work. The techniques include elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, summarization, highlighting (or underlining), the keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, rereading, practice testing, distributed practice, and interleaved practice. To offer recommendations about the relative utility of these techniques, we evaluated whether their benefits generalize across four categories of variables: learning conditions, student characteristics, materials, and criterion tasks. Learning conditions include aspects of the learning environment in which the technique is implemented, such as whether a student studies alone or with a group. Student characteristics include variables such as age, ability, and level of prior knowledge. Materials vary from simple concepts to mathematical problems to complicated science texts. Criterion tasks include different outcome measures that are relevant to student achievement, such as those tapping memory, problem solving, and comprehension. We attempted to provide thorough reviews for each technique, so this monograph is rather lengthy. However, we also wrote the monograph in a modular fashion, so it is easy to use. In particular, each review is divided into the following sections: 1. General description of the technique and why it should work 2. How general are the effects of this technique? 2a. Learning conditions 2b. Student characteristics 2c. Materials 2d. Criterion tasks 3. Effects in representative educational contexts 4. Issues for implementation 5. Overall assessment The review for each technique can be read independently of the others, and particular variables of interest can be easily compared across techniques. To foreshadow our final recommendations, the techniques vary widely with respect to their generalizability and promise for improving student learning. Practice testing and distributed practice received high utility assessments because they benefit learners of different ages and abilities and have been shown to boost students' performance across many criterion tasks and even in educational contexts. Elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, and interleaved practice received moderate utility assessments. The benefits of these techniques do generalize across some variables, yet despite their promise, they fell short of a high utility assessment because the evidence for their efficacy is limited. For instance, elaborative interrogation and self-explanation have not been adequately evaluated in educational contexts, and the benefits of interleaving have just begun to be systematically explored, so the ultimate effectiveness of these techniques is currently unknown. Nevertheless, the techniques that received moderate-utility ratings show enough promise for us to recommend their use in appropriate situations, which we describe in detail within the review of each technique. Five techniques received a low utility assessment: summarization, highlighting, the keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, and rereading. These techniques were rated as low utility for numerous reasons. Summarization and imagery use for text learning have been shown to help some students on some criterion tasks, yet the conditions under which these techniques produce benefits are limited, and much research is still needed to fully explore their overall effectiveness. The keyword mnemonic is difficult to implement in some contexts, and it appears to benefit students for a limited number of materials and for short retention intervals. Most students report rereading and highlighting, yet these techniques do not consistently boost students' performance, so other techniques should be used in their place (e.g., practice testing instead of rereading). Our hope is that this monograph will foster improvements in student learning, not only by showcasing which learning techniques are likely to have the most generalizable effects but also by encouraging researchers to continue investigating the most promising techniques. Accordingly, in our closing remarks, we discuss some issues for how these techniques could be implemented by teachers and students, and we highlight directions for future research.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26173288</pmid><doi>10.1177/1529100612453266</doi><tpages>55</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-1006
ispartof Psychological science in the public interest, 2013-01, Vol.14 (1), p.4-58
issn 1529-1006
2160-0031
1539-6053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1697210976
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Cognitive psychology
College students
Educational psychology
High school students
Keywords
Learning
Mathematical problems
Medical practice
Memory
Students
Summarization
Teaching methods
title Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Students'%20Learning%20With%20Effective%20Learning%20Techniques:%20Promising%20Directions%20From%20Cognitive%20and%20Educational%20Psychology&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science%20in%20the%20public%20interest&rft.au=Dunlosky,%20John&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=4-58&rft.issn=1529-1006&rft.eissn=2160-0031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1529100612453266&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23484712%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1352773765&rft_id=info:pmid/26173288&rft_jstor_id=23484712&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1529100612453266&rfr_iscdi=true