Effect of Nd:YAG (1064-nm) and Diode Laser (980-nm) EDTA Agitation on Root Dentin Ultrastructure Properties

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of agitation of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) with 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 980 nm diode laser on root dentin microhardness and superficial roughness (with confocal laser scanning microscopy [CLSM]). Background data: Root canal i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Photomedicine and laser surgery 2015-07, Vol.33 (7), p.349-356
Hauptverfasser: de Macedo, Helena Suleiman, Colucci, Vivian, Messias, Danielle Cristine Furtado, Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi, Fernandes, Fernanda Silva, Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa, Raucci-Neto, Walter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue 7
container_start_page 349
container_title Photomedicine and laser surgery
container_volume 33
creator de Macedo, Helena Suleiman
Colucci, Vivian
Messias, Danielle Cristine Furtado
Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi
Fernandes, Fernanda Silva
Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa
Raucci-Neto, Walter
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of agitation of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) with 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 980 nm diode laser on root dentin microhardness and superficial roughness (with confocal laser scanning microscopy [CLSM]). Background data: Root canal irrigants are used in an attempt to minimize the negative effects of smear layer. Materials and methods: Twenty-five bovine roots were sectioned longitudinally and divided into five groups ( n =10 each): (1) deionized water, (2) 17% EDTA, (3) 17% EDTA with 60 sec manual agitation, (4) 17% EDTA with 50 sec diode laser (2 W) agitation, and (5) 17% EDTA with 50 sec Nd:YAG (1.5 W) laser agitation. Microhardness and superficial roughness values were calculated before and after the procedures at the cervical, middle, and apical root thirds. Microhardness was statistically analyzed using two way ANOVA, paired t test, and Tukey's tests ( α =0.05). Roughness was statistically analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis, paired t test, and Student–Newman–Keuls tests ( α =0.05%). Results: Statistically significant differences in microhardness and roughness were observed between the deionized water group and others. EDTA with 1064 nm Nd:YAG or 980 nm diode laser presented the lowest microhardness and the highest roughness values and was significantly different from EDTA with manual agitation and EDTA only ( p 0.05). CLSM analysis showed that the control samples exhibited smoother surfaces than that of the EDTA groups. Conclusions: Nd:YAG 1064 nm and 980-nm diode laser EDTA agitation caused greater reduction in microhardness and increased roughness of root dentin than EDTA only or EDTA with manual agitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/pho.2014.3857
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1695186486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1695186486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-43da435214f1c296d347da99294e7cf78a566d5eb4da0291627cc66dcc17680c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PIzEQhi0EAg4oaU8uQ7HB3x90UZIDpAgQgoJq5dhebo_NOtjegn9_3gtHizTSjGYevdI8AJxjNMVI6cvt7zAlCLMpVVzugWPMuawU52h_nJmuOMPqCPxI6Q9CREtND8EREeUkCTkGb8um8TbD0MA7d_Uyu4YTjASr-s0FNL2DizY4D1cm-QgnWqF_h-XiaQZnr202uQ09LPUYQoYL3-e2h89djiblONg8RA8fYtj6mFufTsFBY7rkzz77CXj-tXya31Sr--vb-WxVWUplrhh1hlFOMGuwJVo4yqQzWhPNvLSNVIYL4bhfM2fKR1gQaW3ZWIulUMjSEzDZ5W5jeB98yvWmTdZ3nel9GFKNheZYCaZEQasdamNIKfqm3sZ2Y-JHjVE9-q2L33r0W49-C__zM3pYb7z7ov8LLQDdAePa9H3X-nX5_pvYv_TEhCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1695186486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Nd:YAG (1064-nm) and Diode Laser (980-nm) EDTA Agitation on Root Dentin Ultrastructure Properties</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>de Macedo, Helena Suleiman ; Colucci, Vivian ; Messias, Danielle Cristine Furtado ; Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi ; Fernandes, Fernanda Silva ; Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa ; Raucci-Neto, Walter</creator><creatorcontrib>de Macedo, Helena Suleiman ; Colucci, Vivian ; Messias, Danielle Cristine Furtado ; Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi ; Fernandes, Fernanda Silva ; Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa ; Raucci-Neto, Walter</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of agitation of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) with 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 980 nm diode laser on root dentin microhardness and superficial roughness (with confocal laser scanning microscopy [CLSM]). Background data: Root canal irrigants are used in an attempt to minimize the negative effects of smear layer. Materials and methods: Twenty-five bovine roots were sectioned longitudinally and divided into five groups ( n =10 each): (1) deionized water, (2) 17% EDTA, (3) 17% EDTA with 60 sec manual agitation, (4) 17% EDTA with 50 sec diode laser (2 W) agitation, and (5) 17% EDTA with 50 sec Nd:YAG (1.5 W) laser agitation. Microhardness and superficial roughness values were calculated before and after the procedures at the cervical, middle, and apical root thirds. Microhardness was statistically analyzed using two way ANOVA, paired t test, and Tukey's tests ( α =0.05). Roughness was statistically analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis, paired t test, and Student–Newman–Keuls tests ( α =0.05%). Results: Statistically significant differences in microhardness and roughness were observed between the deionized water group and others. EDTA with 1064 nm Nd:YAG or 980 nm diode laser presented the lowest microhardness and the highest roughness values and was significantly different from EDTA with manual agitation and EDTA only ( p &lt;0.05). However, there were no differences in microhardness or dentin roughness between the root thirds ( p &gt;0.05). CLSM analysis showed that the control samples exhibited smoother surfaces than that of the EDTA groups. Conclusions: Nd:YAG 1064 nm and 980-nm diode laser EDTA agitation caused greater reduction in microhardness and increased roughness of root dentin than EDTA only or EDTA with manual agitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-5418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/pho.2014.3857</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26154722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cattle ; Edetic Acid ; Hardness - radiation effects ; Lasers, Semiconductor ; Lasers, Solid-State ; Low-Level Light Therapy ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Original Research ; Root Canal Irrigants ; Tissue Culture Techniques ; Tooth Root - radiation effects ; Tooth Root - ultrastructure</subject><ispartof>Photomedicine and laser surgery, 2015-07, Vol.33 (7), p.349-356</ispartof><rights>2015, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-43da435214f1c296d347da99294e7cf78a566d5eb4da0291627cc66dcc17680c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-43da435214f1c296d347da99294e7cf78a566d5eb4da0291627cc66dcc17680c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26154722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Macedo, Helena Suleiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colucci, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messias, Danielle Cristine Furtado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Fernanda Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raucci-Neto, Walter</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Nd:YAG (1064-nm) and Diode Laser (980-nm) EDTA Agitation on Root Dentin Ultrastructure Properties</title><title>Photomedicine and laser surgery</title><addtitle>Photomed Laser Surg</addtitle><description>Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of agitation of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) with 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 980 nm diode laser on root dentin microhardness and superficial roughness (with confocal laser scanning microscopy [CLSM]). Background data: Root canal irrigants are used in an attempt to minimize the negative effects of smear layer. Materials and methods: Twenty-five bovine roots were sectioned longitudinally and divided into five groups ( n =10 each): (1) deionized water, (2) 17% EDTA, (3) 17% EDTA with 60 sec manual agitation, (4) 17% EDTA with 50 sec diode laser (2 W) agitation, and (5) 17% EDTA with 50 sec Nd:YAG (1.5 W) laser agitation. Microhardness and superficial roughness values were calculated before and after the procedures at the cervical, middle, and apical root thirds. Microhardness was statistically analyzed using two way ANOVA, paired t test, and Tukey's tests ( α =0.05). Roughness was statistically analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis, paired t test, and Student–Newman–Keuls tests ( α =0.05%). Results: Statistically significant differences in microhardness and roughness were observed between the deionized water group and others. EDTA with 1064 nm Nd:YAG or 980 nm diode laser presented the lowest microhardness and the highest roughness values and was significantly different from EDTA with manual agitation and EDTA only ( p &lt;0.05). However, there were no differences in microhardness or dentin roughness between the root thirds ( p &gt;0.05). CLSM analysis showed that the control samples exhibited smoother surfaces than that of the EDTA groups. Conclusions: Nd:YAG 1064 nm and 980-nm diode laser EDTA agitation caused greater reduction in microhardness and increased roughness of root dentin than EDTA only or EDTA with manual agitation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Edetic Acid</subject><subject>Hardness - radiation effects</subject><subject>Lasers, Semiconductor</subject><subject>Lasers, Solid-State</subject><subject>Low-Level Light Therapy</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants</subject><subject>Tissue Culture Techniques</subject><subject>Tooth Root - radiation effects</subject><subject>Tooth Root - ultrastructure</subject><issn>1549-5418</issn><issn>1557-8550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PIzEQhi0EAg4oaU8uQ7HB3x90UZIDpAgQgoJq5dhebo_NOtjegn9_3gtHizTSjGYevdI8AJxjNMVI6cvt7zAlCLMpVVzugWPMuawU52h_nJmuOMPqCPxI6Q9CREtND8EREeUkCTkGb8um8TbD0MA7d_Uyu4YTjASr-s0FNL2DizY4D1cm-QgnWqF_h-XiaQZnr202uQ09LPUYQoYL3-e2h89djiblONg8RA8fYtj6mFufTsFBY7rkzz77CXj-tXya31Sr--vb-WxVWUplrhh1hlFOMGuwJVo4yqQzWhPNvLSNVIYL4bhfM2fKR1gQaW3ZWIulUMjSEzDZ5W5jeB98yvWmTdZ3nel9GFKNheZYCaZEQasdamNIKfqm3sZ2Y-JHjVE9-q2L33r0W49-C__zM3pYb7z7ov8LLQDdAePa9H3X-nX5_pvYv_TEhCM</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>de Macedo, Helena Suleiman</creator><creator>Colucci, Vivian</creator><creator>Messias, Danielle Cristine Furtado</creator><creator>Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi</creator><creator>Fernandes, Fernanda Silva</creator><creator>Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa</creator><creator>Raucci-Neto, Walter</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Effect of Nd:YAG (1064-nm) and Diode Laser (980-nm) EDTA Agitation on Root Dentin Ultrastructure Properties</title><author>de Macedo, Helena Suleiman ; Colucci, Vivian ; Messias, Danielle Cristine Furtado ; Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi ; Fernandes, Fernanda Silva ; Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa ; Raucci-Neto, Walter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-43da435214f1c296d347da99294e7cf78a566d5eb4da0291627cc66dcc17680c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Edetic Acid</topic><topic>Hardness - radiation effects</topic><topic>Lasers, Semiconductor</topic><topic>Lasers, Solid-State</topic><topic>Low-Level Light Therapy</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants</topic><topic>Tissue Culture Techniques</topic><topic>Tooth Root - radiation effects</topic><topic>Tooth Root - ultrastructure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Macedo, Helena Suleiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colucci, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messias, Danielle Cristine Furtado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Fernanda Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raucci-Neto, Walter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Photomedicine and laser surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Macedo, Helena Suleiman</au><au>Colucci, Vivian</au><au>Messias, Danielle Cristine Furtado</au><au>Rached-Júnior, Fuad Jacob Abi</au><au>Fernandes, Fernanda Silva</au><au>Silva-Sousa, Yara Teresinha Correa</au><au>Raucci-Neto, Walter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Nd:YAG (1064-nm) and Diode Laser (980-nm) EDTA Agitation on Root Dentin Ultrastructure Properties</atitle><jtitle>Photomedicine and laser surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Photomed Laser Surg</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>349-356</pages><issn>1549-5418</issn><eissn>1557-8550</eissn><abstract>Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of agitation of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) with 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 980 nm diode laser on root dentin microhardness and superficial roughness (with confocal laser scanning microscopy [CLSM]). Background data: Root canal irrigants are used in an attempt to minimize the negative effects of smear layer. Materials and methods: Twenty-five bovine roots were sectioned longitudinally and divided into five groups ( n =10 each): (1) deionized water, (2) 17% EDTA, (3) 17% EDTA with 60 sec manual agitation, (4) 17% EDTA with 50 sec diode laser (2 W) agitation, and (5) 17% EDTA with 50 sec Nd:YAG (1.5 W) laser agitation. Microhardness and superficial roughness values were calculated before and after the procedures at the cervical, middle, and apical root thirds. Microhardness was statistically analyzed using two way ANOVA, paired t test, and Tukey's tests ( α =0.05). Roughness was statistically analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis, paired t test, and Student–Newman–Keuls tests ( α =0.05%). Results: Statistically significant differences in microhardness and roughness were observed between the deionized water group and others. EDTA with 1064 nm Nd:YAG or 980 nm diode laser presented the lowest microhardness and the highest roughness values and was significantly different from EDTA with manual agitation and EDTA only ( p &lt;0.05). However, there were no differences in microhardness or dentin roughness between the root thirds ( p &gt;0.05). CLSM analysis showed that the control samples exhibited smoother surfaces than that of the EDTA groups. Conclusions: Nd:YAG 1064 nm and 980-nm diode laser EDTA agitation caused greater reduction in microhardness and increased roughness of root dentin than EDTA only or EDTA with manual agitation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>26154722</pmid><doi>10.1089/pho.2014.3857</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-5418
ispartof Photomedicine and laser surgery, 2015-07, Vol.33 (7), p.349-356
issn 1549-5418
1557-8550
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1695186486
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Cattle
Edetic Acid
Hardness - radiation effects
Lasers, Semiconductor
Lasers, Solid-State
Low-Level Light Therapy
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Original Research
Root Canal Irrigants
Tissue Culture Techniques
Tooth Root - radiation effects
Tooth Root - ultrastructure
title Effect of Nd:YAG (1064-nm) and Diode Laser (980-nm) EDTA Agitation on Root Dentin Ultrastructure Properties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A59%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Nd:YAG%20(1064-nm)%20and%20Diode%20Laser%20(980-nm)%20EDTA%20Agitation%20on%20Root%20Dentin%20Ultrastructure%20Properties&rft.jtitle=Photomedicine%20and%20laser%20surgery&rft.au=de%20Macedo,%20Helena%20Suleiman&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=349-356&rft.issn=1549-5418&rft.eissn=1557-8550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/pho.2014.3857&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1695186486%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1695186486&rft_id=info:pmid/26154722&rfr_iscdi=true