Difference in the Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon between Sitting and Standing

Purpose: We investigated differences in the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) between sitting and standing using electromyography. Subjects and Methods: We measured the activities of the lumbothoracic spine muscles, and the multifidus, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris of 10 healthy males. The a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rigaku ryoho kagaku 2015-03, Vol.29 (4), p.621-626
Hauptverfasser: Kumamoto, Tsuneo, Seko, Toshiaki, Tanaka, Masashi, Shida, Masahiro, Ito, Toshikazu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 626
container_issue 4
container_start_page 621
container_title Rigaku ryoho kagaku
container_volume 29
creator Kumamoto, Tsuneo
Seko, Toshiaki
Tanaka, Masashi
Shida, Masahiro
Ito, Toshikazu
description Purpose: We investigated differences in the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) between sitting and standing using electromyography. Subjects and Methods: We measured the activities of the lumbothoracic spine muscles, and the multifidus, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris of 10 healthy males. The activities of trunk flexion, at the initiation of extension to restore posture from maximal trunk flexion were measured in the standing, sitting, upright sitting and slump sitting positions. The appearance of FRP, the ratio of muscle activities (FRR), the ratio of the upright/slump muscle activities (Rest FRR), and the ratio of muscle activities excluding the activity at maximal flexion (Movement FRR) were calculated. Results: The appearance of FRP was high in the standing position, and low in the sitting position. Rest FRR was high in the sitting position, and Movement FRR was high in the standing position. Conclusion: The appearance of FRP in the sitting position is too infrequent for examination purposes; thus, Rest FRR in the sitting position, and Movement FRR in the standing position are the representative quantitative indices of FRP.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1694981398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1694981398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16949813983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVirsOgkAQRbfQRHz8w5Q2JKwQHrVKLCyM2JMVB1mzzCo7RD5fTPwBi3vPPcmdCE-GkfRlHCczMXfuEQSbJEilJ447XdfYIVUImoAbhNzgoC3BGY0aFH_nqUGy7RiCK_IbkaDQzJruoOgGBY89ylJMa2Ucrn5ciHW-v2wP_rOzrx4dl612FRqjCG3vShlnUZbKMEvDP64feytBHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1694981398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difference in the Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon between Sitting and Standing</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kumamoto, Tsuneo ; Seko, Toshiaki ; Tanaka, Masashi ; Shida, Masahiro ; Ito, Toshikazu</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumamoto, Tsuneo ; Seko, Toshiaki ; Tanaka, Masashi ; Shida, Masahiro ; Ito, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: We investigated differences in the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) between sitting and standing using electromyography. Subjects and Methods: We measured the activities of the lumbothoracic spine muscles, and the multifidus, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris of 10 healthy males. The activities of trunk flexion, at the initiation of extension to restore posture from maximal trunk flexion were measured in the standing, sitting, upright sitting and slump sitting positions. The appearance of FRP, the ratio of muscle activities (FRR), the ratio of the upright/slump muscle activities (Rest FRR), and the ratio of muscle activities excluding the activity at maximal flexion (Movement FRR) were calculated. Results: The appearance of FRP was high in the standing position, and low in the sitting position. Rest FRR was high in the sitting position, and Movement FRR was high in the standing position. Conclusion: The appearance of FRP in the sitting position is too infrequent for examination purposes; thus, Rest FRR in the sitting position, and Movement FRR in the standing position are the representative quantitative indices of FRP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-1667</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Rigaku ryoho kagaku, 2015-03, Vol.29 (4), p.621-626</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumamoto, Tsuneo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seko, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shida, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><title>Difference in the Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon between Sitting and Standing</title><title>Rigaku ryoho kagaku</title><description>Purpose: We investigated differences in the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) between sitting and standing using electromyography. Subjects and Methods: We measured the activities of the lumbothoracic spine muscles, and the multifidus, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris of 10 healthy males. The activities of trunk flexion, at the initiation of extension to restore posture from maximal trunk flexion were measured in the standing, sitting, upright sitting and slump sitting positions. The appearance of FRP, the ratio of muscle activities (FRR), the ratio of the upright/slump muscle activities (Rest FRR), and the ratio of muscle activities excluding the activity at maximal flexion (Movement FRR) were calculated. Results: The appearance of FRP was high in the standing position, and low in the sitting position. Rest FRR was high in the sitting position, and Movement FRR was high in the standing position. Conclusion: The appearance of FRP in the sitting position is too infrequent for examination purposes; thus, Rest FRR in the sitting position, and Movement FRR in the standing position are the representative quantitative indices of FRP.</description><issn>1341-1667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVirsOgkAQRbfQRHz8w5Q2JKwQHrVKLCyM2JMVB1mzzCo7RD5fTPwBi3vPPcmdCE-GkfRlHCczMXfuEQSbJEilJ447XdfYIVUImoAbhNzgoC3BGY0aFH_nqUGy7RiCK_IbkaDQzJruoOgGBY89ylJMa2Ucrn5ciHW-v2wP_rOzrx4dl612FRqjCG3vShlnUZbKMEvDP64feytBHw</recordid><startdate>20150314</startdate><enddate>20150314</enddate><creator>Kumamoto, Tsuneo</creator><creator>Seko, Toshiaki</creator><creator>Tanaka, Masashi</creator><creator>Shida, Masahiro</creator><creator>Ito, Toshikazu</creator><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150314</creationdate><title>Difference in the Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon between Sitting and Standing</title><author>Kumamoto, Tsuneo ; Seko, Toshiaki ; Tanaka, Masashi ; Shida, Masahiro ; Ito, Toshikazu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_16949813983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumamoto, Tsuneo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seko, Toshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shida, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Rigaku ryoho kagaku</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumamoto, Tsuneo</au><au>Seko, Toshiaki</au><au>Tanaka, Masashi</au><au>Shida, Masahiro</au><au>Ito, Toshikazu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difference in the Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon between Sitting and Standing</atitle><jtitle>Rigaku ryoho kagaku</jtitle><date>2015-03-14</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>626</epage><pages>621-626</pages><issn>1341-1667</issn><abstract>Purpose: We investigated differences in the flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) between sitting and standing using electromyography. Subjects and Methods: We measured the activities of the lumbothoracic spine muscles, and the multifidus, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris of 10 healthy males. The activities of trunk flexion, at the initiation of extension to restore posture from maximal trunk flexion were measured in the standing, sitting, upright sitting and slump sitting positions. The appearance of FRP, the ratio of muscle activities (FRR), the ratio of the upright/slump muscle activities (Rest FRR), and the ratio of muscle activities excluding the activity at maximal flexion (Movement FRR) were calculated. Results: The appearance of FRP was high in the standing position, and low in the sitting position. Rest FRR was high in the sitting position, and Movement FRR was high in the standing position. Conclusion: The appearance of FRP in the sitting position is too infrequent for examination purposes; thus, Rest FRR in the sitting position, and Movement FRR in the standing position are the representative quantitative indices of FRP.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-1667
ispartof Rigaku ryoho kagaku, 2015-03, Vol.29 (4), p.621-626
issn 1341-1667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1694981398
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Difference in the Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon between Sitting and Standing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A34%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difference%20in%20the%20Flexion%20Relaxation%20Phenomenon%20between%20Sitting%20and%20Standing&rft.jtitle=Rigaku%20ryoho%20kagaku&rft.au=Kumamoto,%20Tsuneo&rft.date=2015-03-14&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=626&rft.pages=621-626&rft.issn=1341-1667&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1694981398%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1694981398&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true