Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes

Purpose To determine indications for, operative findings of, and outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy. Methods A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Therapeutic clinical outcome...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2015-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1382-1390
Hauptverfasser: Cvetanovich, Gregory L., M.D, Harris, Joshua D., M.D, Erickson, Brandon J., M.D, Bach, Bernard R., M.D, Bush-Joseph, Charles A., M.D, Nho, Shane J., M.D., M.S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1390
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1382
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 31
creator Cvetanovich, Gregory L., M.D
Harris, Joshua D., M.D
Erickson, Brandon J., M.D
Bach, Bernard R., M.D
Bush-Joseph, Charles A., M.D
Nho, Shane J., M.D., M.S
description Purpose To determine indications for, operative findings of, and outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy. Methods A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Therapeutic clinical outcome studies reporting the indications for, operative findings of, and outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy were eligible for inclusion. All study-, patient-, and hip-specific data were extracted and analyzed. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess study quality. Results Five studies were included (348 revision hip arthroscopies; 333 patients; mean age, 31.4 ± 4.2 years; 60% female patients). All 5 studies were either Level III or IV evidence. The surgeon performing revision hip arthroscopy was the same as the primary hip surgeon in only 25% of cases. The mean time between primary and revision hip arthroscopy was 27.8 ± 7.0 months (range, 2 to 193 months). Residual femoroacetabular impingement was the most common indication for and operative finding of revision hip arthroscopy (81% of cases). The most commonly reported revision procedures were femoral osteochondroplasty (24%) and acetabuloplasty (18%). The modified Harris Hip Score was used in all 5 analyzed studies, with significant ( P < .05) improvements observed in all 5 studies (weighted mean, 56.8 ± 3.6 preoperatively v 72.0 ± 8.3 at final follow-up [22.4 ± 9.8 months]; P  = .01). Other patient-reported outcomes (Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool, Short Form 12) showed significant improvements but were not used in all 5 analyzed studies. After revision hip arthroscopy, subsequent reported operations were hip arthroplasty in 11 patients and re-revision hip arthroscopy in 8 patients (5% total reoperation rate). Conclusions Revision hip arthroscopy is most commonly performed for residual femoroacetabular impingement, with statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements shown in multiple patient-reported clinical outcome scores at short-term follow-up. The reoperation rate after revision hip arthroscopy is 5% within 2 years, including further arthroscopy or conversion to hip arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1694706755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806315000122</els_id><sourcerecordid>1694706755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-14542deb049f2076967baef33334cd5874fd51ed0e2d7fecaad275ae6d9156de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhDRDykgUJ_o0TFkijQilSpZEo7JAsj31TPCR2sJOieXscprBggzeW7HPO1f0OQs8pqSmhzetDbdL8LcWaESpqymrC1AO0oZI1FWecPkQbokRXtaThZ-hJzgdCCOctf4zOmFSEs7bboK-f4M5nHwO-8hPe_k7MNk7HN3iLb455htHM3uJVBj9x7PE7b25DzJBf4d0EqfzeAb70wflwW95McHi3zDaOkJ-iR70ZMjy7v8_Rl8v3ny-uquvdh48X2-vKilbNFRVSMAd7IrqeEdV0jdob6Hk5wjrZKtE7ScERYE71YI1xTEkDjeuobBzwc_TylDul-GOBPOvRZwvDYALEJWvadEKRRklZpOIktWXPnKDXU_KjSUdNiV656oM-cdUrV02ZLlyL7cX9hGU_gvtr-gOyCN6eBFD2LKiSztZDsOB8AjtrF_3_JvwbYAcfvDXDdzhCPsQlhcJQU52LQd-s3a7VUllqpYzxX7HtoGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1694706755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., M.D ; Harris, Joshua D., M.D ; Erickson, Brandon J., M.D ; Bach, Bernard R., M.D ; Bush-Joseph, Charles A., M.D ; Nho, Shane J., M.D., M.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., M.D ; Harris, Joshua D., M.D ; Erickson, Brandon J., M.D ; Bach, Bernard R., M.D ; Bush-Joseph, Charles A., M.D ; Nho, Shane J., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine indications for, operative findings of, and outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy. Methods A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Therapeutic clinical outcome studies reporting the indications for, operative findings of, and outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy were eligible for inclusion. All study-, patient-, and hip-specific data were extracted and analyzed. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess study quality. Results Five studies were included (348 revision hip arthroscopies; 333 patients; mean age, 31.4 ± 4.2 years; 60% female patients). All 5 studies were either Level III or IV evidence. The surgeon performing revision hip arthroscopy was the same as the primary hip surgeon in only 25% of cases. The mean time between primary and revision hip arthroscopy was 27.8 ± 7.0 months (range, 2 to 193 months). Residual femoroacetabular impingement was the most common indication for and operative finding of revision hip arthroscopy (81% of cases). The most commonly reported revision procedures were femoral osteochondroplasty (24%) and acetabuloplasty (18%). The modified Harris Hip Score was used in all 5 analyzed studies, with significant ( P &lt; .05) improvements observed in all 5 studies (weighted mean, 56.8 ± 3.6 preoperatively v 72.0 ± 8.3 at final follow-up [22.4 ± 9.8 months]; P  = .01). Other patient-reported outcomes (Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool, Short Form 12) showed significant improvements but were not used in all 5 analyzed studies. After revision hip arthroscopy, subsequent reported operations were hip arthroplasty in 11 patients and re-revision hip arthroscopy in 8 patients (5% total reoperation rate). Conclusions Revision hip arthroscopy is most commonly performed for residual femoroacetabular impingement, with statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements shown in multiple patient-reported clinical outcome scores at short-term follow-up. The reoperation rate after revision hip arthroscopy is 5% within 2 years, including further arthroscopy or conversion to hip arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25703289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroscopy - methods ; Arthroscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery ; Hip - surgery ; Humans ; Orthopedics ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2015-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1382-1390</ispartof><rights>Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-14542deb049f2076967baef33334cd5874fd51ed0e2d7fecaad275ae6d9156de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-14542deb049f2076967baef33334cd5874fd51ed0e2d7fecaad275ae6d9156de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25703289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Joshua D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Brandon J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bach, Bernard R., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush-Joseph, Charles A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nho, Shane J., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><title>Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine indications for, operative findings of, and outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy. Methods A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Therapeutic clinical outcome studies reporting the indications for, operative findings of, and outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy were eligible for inclusion. All study-, patient-, and hip-specific data were extracted and analyzed. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess study quality. Results Five studies were included (348 revision hip arthroscopies; 333 patients; mean age, 31.4 ± 4.2 years; 60% female patients). All 5 studies were either Level III or IV evidence. The surgeon performing revision hip arthroscopy was the same as the primary hip surgeon in only 25% of cases. The mean time between primary and revision hip arthroscopy was 27.8 ± 7.0 months (range, 2 to 193 months). Residual femoroacetabular impingement was the most common indication for and operative finding of revision hip arthroscopy (81% of cases). The most commonly reported revision procedures were femoral osteochondroplasty (24%) and acetabuloplasty (18%). The modified Harris Hip Score was used in all 5 analyzed studies, with significant ( P &lt; .05) improvements observed in all 5 studies (weighted mean, 56.8 ± 3.6 preoperatively v 72.0 ± 8.3 at final follow-up [22.4 ± 9.8 months]; P  = .01). Other patient-reported outcomes (Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool, Short Form 12) showed significant improvements but were not used in all 5 analyzed studies. After revision hip arthroscopy, subsequent reported operations were hip arthroplasty in 11 patients and re-revision hip arthroscopy in 8 patients (5% total reoperation rate). Conclusions Revision hip arthroscopy is most commonly performed for residual femoroacetabular impingement, with statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements shown in multiple patient-reported clinical outcome scores at short-term follow-up. The reoperation rate after revision hip arthroscopy is 5% within 2 years, including further arthroscopy or conversion to hip arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.</description><subject>Arthroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Arthroscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery</subject><subject>Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhDRDykgUJ_o0TFkijQilSpZEo7JAsj31TPCR2sJOieXscprBggzeW7HPO1f0OQs8pqSmhzetDbdL8LcWaESpqymrC1AO0oZI1FWecPkQbokRXtaThZ-hJzgdCCOctf4zOmFSEs7bboK-f4M5nHwO-8hPe_k7MNk7HN3iLb455htHM3uJVBj9x7PE7b25DzJBf4d0EqfzeAb70wflwW95McHi3zDaOkJ-iR70ZMjy7v8_Rl8v3ny-uquvdh48X2-vKilbNFRVSMAd7IrqeEdV0jdob6Hk5wjrZKtE7ScERYE71YI1xTEkDjeuobBzwc_TylDul-GOBPOvRZwvDYALEJWvadEKRRklZpOIktWXPnKDXU_KjSUdNiV656oM-cdUrV02ZLlyL7cX9hGU_gvtr-gOyCN6eBFD2LKiSztZDsOB8AjtrF_3_JvwbYAcfvDXDdzhCPsQlhcJQU52LQd-s3a7VUllqpYzxX7HtoGw</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., M.D</creator><creator>Harris, Joshua D., M.D</creator><creator>Erickson, Brandon J., M.D</creator><creator>Bach, Bernard R., M.D</creator><creator>Bush-Joseph, Charles A., M.D</creator><creator>Nho, Shane J., M.D., M.S</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes</title><author>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., M.D ; Harris, Joshua D., M.D ; Erickson, Brandon J., M.D ; Bach, Bernard R., M.D ; Bush-Joseph, Charles A., M.D ; Nho, Shane J., M.D., M.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-14542deb049f2076967baef33334cd5874fd51ed0e2d7fecaad275ae6d9156de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arthroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Arthroscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery</topic><topic>Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Joshua D., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, Brandon J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bach, Bernard R., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush-Joseph, Charles A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nho, Shane J., M.D., M.S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cvetanovich, Gregory L., M.D</au><au>Harris, Joshua D., M.D</au><au>Erickson, Brandon J., M.D</au><au>Bach, Bernard R., M.D</au><au>Bush-Joseph, Charles A., M.D</au><au>Nho, Shane J., M.D., M.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1382</spage><epage>1390</epage><pages>1382-1390</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>Purpose To determine indications for, operative findings of, and outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy. Methods A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Therapeutic clinical outcome studies reporting the indications for, operative findings of, and outcomes of revision hip arthroscopy were eligible for inclusion. All study-, patient-, and hip-specific data were extracted and analyzed. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess study quality. Results Five studies were included (348 revision hip arthroscopies; 333 patients; mean age, 31.4 ± 4.2 years; 60% female patients). All 5 studies were either Level III or IV evidence. The surgeon performing revision hip arthroscopy was the same as the primary hip surgeon in only 25% of cases. The mean time between primary and revision hip arthroscopy was 27.8 ± 7.0 months (range, 2 to 193 months). Residual femoroacetabular impingement was the most common indication for and operative finding of revision hip arthroscopy (81% of cases). The most commonly reported revision procedures were femoral osteochondroplasty (24%) and acetabuloplasty (18%). The modified Harris Hip Score was used in all 5 analyzed studies, with significant ( P &lt; .05) improvements observed in all 5 studies (weighted mean, 56.8 ± 3.6 preoperatively v 72.0 ± 8.3 at final follow-up [22.4 ± 9.8 months]; P  = .01). Other patient-reported outcomes (Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, 33-item International Hip Outcome Tool, Short Form 12) showed significant improvements but were not used in all 5 analyzed studies. After revision hip arthroscopy, subsequent reported operations were hip arthroplasty in 11 patients and re-revision hip arthroscopy in 8 patients (5% total reoperation rate). Conclusions Revision hip arthroscopy is most commonly performed for residual femoroacetabular impingement, with statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements shown in multiple patient-reported clinical outcome scores at short-term follow-up. The reoperation rate after revision hip arthroscopy is 5% within 2 years, including further arthroscopy or conversion to hip arthroplasty. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25703289</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.027</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2015-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1382-1390
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1694706755
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Arthroscopy - methods
Arthroscopy - statistics & numerical data
Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery
Hip - surgery
Humans
Orthopedics
Reoperation
Treatment Outcome
title Revision Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Diagnoses, Operative Findings, and Outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T14%3A22%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revision%20Hip%20Arthroscopy:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Diagnoses,%20Operative%20Findings,%20and%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Cvetanovich,%20Gregory%20L.,%20M.D&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1382&rft.epage=1390&rft.pages=1382-1390&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1694706755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1694706755&rft_id=info:pmid/25703289&rft_els_id=S0749806315000122&rfr_iscdi=true