Autologous endometrial coculture biopsy: is timing everything?

Objective To determine whether endometrial biopsy timing affects implantation rates and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous endometrial coculture (AECC). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic medical center. Patient(s) All patients wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2015-07, Vol.104 (1), p.104-109.e1
Hauptverfasser: Melnick, Alexis P., M.D, Murphy, Erin M., M.D, Masbou, Alexis K., M.D, Sapra, Katherine J., M.P.H, Rosenwaks, Zev, M.D, Spandorfer, Steven D., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109.e1
container_issue 1
container_start_page 104
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 104
creator Melnick, Alexis P., M.D
Murphy, Erin M., M.D
Masbou, Alexis K., M.D
Sapra, Katherine J., M.P.H
Rosenwaks, Zev, M.D
Spandorfer, Steven D., M.D
description Objective To determine whether endometrial biopsy timing affects implantation rates and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous endometrial coculture (AECC). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic medical center. Patient(s) All patients with a history of at least one failed IVF cycle who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle at our center from May 2004 to November 2013 were included. Intervention(s) Patients underwent luteal-phase endometrial biopsy in preparation for IVF. Biopsy samples were used for IVF in either the subsequent menstrual cycle or a future cycle. Embryos were cultured in AECC media and transferred on day 3. Main Outcome Measure(s) A total of 2,533 cycles of 1,719 patients who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle were identified. Cycles were stratified by endometrial biopsy timing. Clinical outcomes, including implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates, were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Result(s) A total of 1,416 coculture biopsies were performed in the menstrual cycle before IVF and 1,117 were performed more than one cycle before IVF. The two groups were similar in age, body mass index, number of mature oocytes retrieved, and best embryo grade. There were no significant differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates, with adjusted relative risks of 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–1.13), 1.02 (95% CI 0.91–1.14), and 0.99 (95% CI 0.86–1.16), respectively. Conclusion(s) Coculture biopsy in the cycle preceding IVF does not increase implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates compared with biopsies performed more than one cycle before IVF. Previously demonstrated improvements in embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing IVF with AECC are probably not attributable to biopsy-induced endometrial injury.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1693724054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0015028215003003</els_id><sourcerecordid>1693724054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-e1ae70d90aafa5b1a2ef12584712936ae7b1de000776c033e9e5989a523142fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1L7DAQhoMoun78BemlN62TpEm3Xigqeo4geKFeh2w61axtsyapsP_elFUPnCshTALzzsybZwjJKBQUqDxdFi36OISYYsGAigLKApjcIjMqhMyFFHybzCBlcmBztkf2Q1gCgKQV2yV7TNTzuq7kjJxfjtF17sWNIcOhcT1Gb3WXGWfGLo4es4V1q7A-y2zIou3t8JLhB_p1fE3Pi0Oy0-ou4NHXfUCeb2-erv_m9w9_7q4v73MjyjrmSDVW0NSgdavFgmqGLWViXlaU1Vym5II2mPxVlTTAOdY4OdSCcVqyFvkBOdn0XXn3PmKIqrfBYNfpAZN1RWXNK1aCKJN0vpEa70Lw2KqVt732a0VBTfTUUv2jpyZ6CkqV6KXS468p46LH5qfwG1cSXG0EmP76YdGrYCwOBhvr0UTVOPubKef_NTGdHazR3RuuMSzd6IfEUlEVmAL1OG1xWmKKwNPhn_L4mzI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1693724054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autologous endometrial coculture biopsy: is timing everything?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Melnick, Alexis P., M.D ; Murphy, Erin M., M.D ; Masbou, Alexis K., M.D ; Sapra, Katherine J., M.P.H ; Rosenwaks, Zev, M.D ; Spandorfer, Steven D., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Melnick, Alexis P., M.D ; Murphy, Erin M., M.D ; Masbou, Alexis K., M.D ; Sapra, Katherine J., M.P.H ; Rosenwaks, Zev, M.D ; Spandorfer, Steven D., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine whether endometrial biopsy timing affects implantation rates and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous endometrial coculture (AECC). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic medical center. Patient(s) All patients with a history of at least one failed IVF cycle who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle at our center from May 2004 to November 2013 were included. Intervention(s) Patients underwent luteal-phase endometrial biopsy in preparation for IVF. Biopsy samples were used for IVF in either the subsequent menstrual cycle or a future cycle. Embryos were cultured in AECC media and transferred on day 3. Main Outcome Measure(s) A total of 2,533 cycles of 1,719 patients who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle were identified. Cycles were stratified by endometrial biopsy timing. Clinical outcomes, including implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates, were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Result(s) A total of 1,416 coculture biopsies were performed in the menstrual cycle before IVF and 1,117 were performed more than one cycle before IVF. The two groups were similar in age, body mass index, number of mature oocytes retrieved, and best embryo grade. There were no significant differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates, with adjusted relative risks of 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–1.13), 1.02 (95% CI 0.91–1.14), and 0.99 (95% CI 0.86–1.16), respectively. Conclusion(s) Coculture biopsy in the cycle preceding IVF does not increase implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates compared with biopsies performed more than one cycle before IVF. Previously demonstrated improvements in embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing IVF with AECC are probably not attributable to biopsy-induced endometrial injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25989976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; autologous endometrial coculture ; Biopsy - methods ; Coculture Techniques - methods ; Cohort Studies ; Embryo Implantation ; endometrial biopsy timing ; Endometrium - pathology ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - methods ; Humans ; implantation ; Infant, Newborn ; Internal Medicine ; IVF ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate - trends ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2015-07, Vol.104 (1), p.104-109.e1</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-e1ae70d90aafa5b1a2ef12584712936ae7b1de000776c033e9e5989a523142fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-e1ae70d90aafa5b1a2ef12584712936ae7b1de000776c033e9e5989a523142fe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7940-665X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25989976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melnick, Alexis P., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Erin M., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masbou, Alexis K., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapra, Katherine J., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenwaks, Zev, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spandorfer, Steven D., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Autologous endometrial coculture biopsy: is timing everything?</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To determine whether endometrial biopsy timing affects implantation rates and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous endometrial coculture (AECC). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic medical center. Patient(s) All patients with a history of at least one failed IVF cycle who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle at our center from May 2004 to November 2013 were included. Intervention(s) Patients underwent luteal-phase endometrial biopsy in preparation for IVF. Biopsy samples were used for IVF in either the subsequent menstrual cycle or a future cycle. Embryos were cultured in AECC media and transferred on day 3. Main Outcome Measure(s) A total of 2,533 cycles of 1,719 patients who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle were identified. Cycles were stratified by endometrial biopsy timing. Clinical outcomes, including implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates, were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Result(s) A total of 1,416 coculture biopsies were performed in the menstrual cycle before IVF and 1,117 were performed more than one cycle before IVF. The two groups were similar in age, body mass index, number of mature oocytes retrieved, and best embryo grade. There were no significant differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates, with adjusted relative risks of 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–1.13), 1.02 (95% CI 0.91–1.14), and 0.99 (95% CI 0.86–1.16), respectively. Conclusion(s) Coculture biopsy in the cycle preceding IVF does not increase implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates compared with biopsies performed more than one cycle before IVF. Previously demonstrated improvements in embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing IVF with AECC are probably not attributable to biopsy-induced endometrial injury.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>autologous endometrial coculture</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Coculture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>endometrial biopsy timing</subject><subject>Endometrium - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implantation</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>IVF</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate - trends</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1L7DAQhoMoun78BemlN62TpEm3Xigqeo4geKFeh2w61axtsyapsP_elFUPnCshTALzzsybZwjJKBQUqDxdFi36OISYYsGAigLKApjcIjMqhMyFFHybzCBlcmBztkf2Q1gCgKQV2yV7TNTzuq7kjJxfjtF17sWNIcOhcT1Gb3WXGWfGLo4es4V1q7A-y2zIou3t8JLhB_p1fE3Pi0Oy0-ou4NHXfUCeb2-erv_m9w9_7q4v73MjyjrmSDVW0NSgdavFgmqGLWViXlaU1Vym5II2mPxVlTTAOdY4OdSCcVqyFvkBOdn0XXn3PmKIqrfBYNfpAZN1RWXNK1aCKJN0vpEa70Lw2KqVt732a0VBTfTUUv2jpyZ6CkqV6KXS468p46LH5qfwG1cSXG0EmP76YdGrYCwOBhvr0UTVOPubKef_NTGdHazR3RuuMSzd6IfEUlEVmAL1OG1xWmKKwNPhn_L4mzI</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Melnick, Alexis P., M.D</creator><creator>Murphy, Erin M., M.D</creator><creator>Masbou, Alexis K., M.D</creator><creator>Sapra, Katherine J., M.P.H</creator><creator>Rosenwaks, Zev, M.D</creator><creator>Spandorfer, Steven D., M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7940-665X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Autologous endometrial coculture biopsy: is timing everything?</title><author>Melnick, Alexis P., M.D ; Murphy, Erin M., M.D ; Masbou, Alexis K., M.D ; Sapra, Katherine J., M.P.H ; Rosenwaks, Zev, M.D ; Spandorfer, Steven D., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-e1ae70d90aafa5b1a2ef12584712936ae7b1de000776c033e9e5989a523142fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>autologous endometrial coculture</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Coculture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>endometrial biopsy timing</topic><topic>Endometrium - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implantation</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>IVF</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate - trends</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melnick, Alexis P., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Erin M., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masbou, Alexis K., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapra, Katherine J., M.P.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenwaks, Zev, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spandorfer, Steven D., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melnick, Alexis P., M.D</au><au>Murphy, Erin M., M.D</au><au>Masbou, Alexis K., M.D</au><au>Sapra, Katherine J., M.P.H</au><au>Rosenwaks, Zev, M.D</au><au>Spandorfer, Steven D., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Autologous endometrial coculture biopsy: is timing everything?</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>109.e1</epage><pages>104-109.e1</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><abstract>Objective To determine whether endometrial biopsy timing affects implantation rates and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with autologous endometrial coculture (AECC). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic medical center. Patient(s) All patients with a history of at least one failed IVF cycle who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle at our center from May 2004 to November 2013 were included. Intervention(s) Patients underwent luteal-phase endometrial biopsy in preparation for IVF. Biopsy samples were used for IVF in either the subsequent menstrual cycle or a future cycle. Embryos were cultured in AECC media and transferred on day 3. Main Outcome Measure(s) A total of 2,533 cycles of 1,719 patients who underwent an IVF-AECC cycle were identified. Cycles were stratified by endometrial biopsy timing. Clinical outcomes, including implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates, were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Result(s) A total of 1,416 coculture biopsies were performed in the menstrual cycle before IVF and 1,117 were performed more than one cycle before IVF. The two groups were similar in age, body mass index, number of mature oocytes retrieved, and best embryo grade. There were no significant differences in implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates, with adjusted relative risks of 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–1.13), 1.02 (95% CI 0.91–1.14), and 0.99 (95% CI 0.86–1.16), respectively. Conclusion(s) Coculture biopsy in the cycle preceding IVF does not increase implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates compared with biopsies performed more than one cycle before IVF. Previously demonstrated improvements in embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing IVF with AECC are probably not attributable to biopsy-induced endometrial injury.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25989976</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.026</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7940-665X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2015-07, Vol.104 (1), p.104-109.e1
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1693724054
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
autologous endometrial coculture
Biopsy - methods
Coculture Techniques - methods
Cohort Studies
Embryo Implantation
endometrial biopsy timing
Endometrium - pathology
Female
Fertilization in Vitro - methods
Humans
implantation
Infant, Newborn
Internal Medicine
IVF
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate - trends
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
title Autologous endometrial coculture biopsy: is timing everything?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A01%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autologous%20endometrial%20coculture%20biopsy:%20is%20timing%20everything?&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Melnick,%20Alexis%20P.,%20M.D&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=109.e1&rft.pages=104-109.e1&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1693724054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1693724054&rft_id=info:pmid/25989976&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0015028215003003&rfr_iscdi=true