Surfactant effects on soil aggregate tensile strength

Little is known regarding a soil aggregate's tensile strength response to surfactants that may be applied to alleviate soil water repellency. Two laboratory investigations were performed to determine surfactant effects on the tensile strength of 1) Ap horizons of nine wettable, agricultural soi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geoderma 2012-11, Vol.189-190, p.199-206
Hauptverfasser: Lehrsch, G.A., Sojka, R.E., Koehn, A.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 206
container_issue
container_start_page 199
container_title Geoderma
container_volume 189-190
creator Lehrsch, G.A.
Sojka, R.E.
Koehn, A.C.
description Little is known regarding a soil aggregate's tensile strength response to surfactants that may be applied to alleviate soil water repellency. Two laboratory investigations were performed to determine surfactant effects on the tensile strength of 1) Ap horizons of nine wettable, agricultural soils collected from across the continental U.S., and 2) two of the nine soils (Latahco and Rad silt loams from the Pacific Northwest) that were sampled at two depths (5 and 15mm) after being sprinkler irrigated. Along with an untreated control, three surfactants (an alkyl polyglycoside, an ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymer, and a blend of the two) were spray applied by hand at rates of 0, 1, 1.63, 3.35, 4.79, or 8.14kg active ingredient ha−1 to 1) air-dry, loose soil in Study 1 and 2) field-moist, tamped soil in Study 2 before being irrigated with surfactant-free water at 88mmh−1 twice, once for 0.33h, then about 8d later for 0.25h. Tensile strength was measured on oven-dry, 4- to 6.35-mm-diameter aggregates (18≤n≤37) of known mass for each treatment using a load cell with an attached flat-tip probe moving at a constant 0.27-mms−1 rate that applied continuous strain to each aggregate until it failed. In Study 1, tensile strength ranged widely, from 27kPa for Adkins loamy sand to 486kPa for Bolfar loam, averaged across surfactant treatments. Tensile strength for all nine surfactant-treated soils averaged 164kPa, 7% greater (P=0.099) than the control. In Study 2, surfactants significantly affected the tensile strength of Latahco but not Rad aggregates, when averaged across irrigations and sampling depths. After irrigation, aggregate tensile strength averaged 26% less (P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.06.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692390805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016706112002509</els_id><sourcerecordid>1221884106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a482t-8139787183083e1dcac7129c421af21d52d3894b30b1c3296e1efa8e12d8788c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwF1BGloT37MSxN1DFl1SJAZgt13kJrtKk2C4S_55UhbnT1ZXOvcNh7BqhQEB5uy46GhsKG1twQF6ALACrEzZDVfNc8kqfshlMZF6DxHN2EeN6qjVwmLHqbRda65IdUkZtSy7FbByyOPo-s10XqLOJskRD9D1lMQUauvR5yc5a20e6-ss5-3h8eF8858vXp5fF_TK3peIpVyh0rWpUApQgbJx1NXLtSo625dhUvBFKlysBK3SCa0lIrVWEvFG1Uk7M2c3hdxvGrx3FZDY-Oup7O9C4iwal5kKDguo4WpZaS9ASj6Oco1IlgpxQeUBdGGMM1Jpt8BsbfgyC2ds3a_Nv3-ztG5Bmsj8N7w5DmvR8ewomOk-Do8aHSbJpRn_s4hcuQI7u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1221884106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surfactant effects on soil aggregate tensile strength</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lehrsch, G.A. ; Sojka, R.E. ; Koehn, A.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lehrsch, G.A. ; Sojka, R.E. ; Koehn, A.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Little is known regarding a soil aggregate's tensile strength response to surfactants that may be applied to alleviate soil water repellency. Two laboratory investigations were performed to determine surfactant effects on the tensile strength of 1) Ap horizons of nine wettable, agricultural soils collected from across the continental U.S., and 2) two of the nine soils (Latahco and Rad silt loams from the Pacific Northwest) that were sampled at two depths (5 and 15mm) after being sprinkler irrigated. Along with an untreated control, three surfactants (an alkyl polyglycoside, an ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymer, and a blend of the two) were spray applied by hand at rates of 0, 1, 1.63, 3.35, 4.79, or 8.14kg active ingredient ha−1 to 1) air-dry, loose soil in Study 1 and 2) field-moist, tamped soil in Study 2 before being irrigated with surfactant-free water at 88mmh−1 twice, once for 0.33h, then about 8d later for 0.25h. Tensile strength was measured on oven-dry, 4- to 6.35-mm-diameter aggregates (18≤n≤37) of known mass for each treatment using a load cell with an attached flat-tip probe moving at a constant 0.27-mms−1 rate that applied continuous strain to each aggregate until it failed. In Study 1, tensile strength ranged widely, from 27kPa for Adkins loamy sand to 486kPa for Bolfar loam, averaged across surfactant treatments. Tensile strength for all nine surfactant-treated soils averaged 164kPa, 7% greater (P=0.099) than the control. In Study 2, surfactants significantly affected the tensile strength of Latahco but not Rad aggregates, when averaged across irrigations and sampling depths. After irrigation, aggregate tensile strength averaged 26% less (P&lt;0.001) at the 5- than 15-mm depth, likely due to droplet kinetic energy fracturing near-surface, intra-aggregate bonds or surfactant leaching. All told, tensile strength varied more by soil series and depth than by surfactants. ► Tensile strength varied 18-fold among nine continental U.S. soils. ► As a group, nine soils were 7% stronger when surfactant-treated than untreated. ► After irrigation, tensile strength averaged 26% less at the 5- than 15-mm depth. ► Tensile strength varied more by soil series and depth than by surfactants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.06.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aggregate strength ; Aggregates ; agricultural soils ; Calcium ; Droplets ; ethylene oxide ; ingredients ; Irrigation ; Kinetic energy ; loam soils ; Loams ; loamy sand soils ; Loamy sands ; Pacific States ; Particle bonding ; propylene oxide ; silt loam soils ; Soil (material) ; soil aggregates ; soil water ; Sprinkler irrigation ; Surfactants ; Tensile strength ; water repellent soils ; Wetting agent</subject><ispartof>Geoderma, 2012-11, Vol.189-190, p.199-206</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a482t-8139787183083e1dcac7129c421af21d52d3894b30b1c3296e1efa8e12d8788c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a482t-8139787183083e1dcac7129c421af21d52d3894b30b1c3296e1efa8e12d8788c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706112002509$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lehrsch, G.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sojka, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehn, A.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Surfactant effects on soil aggregate tensile strength</title><title>Geoderma</title><description>Little is known regarding a soil aggregate's tensile strength response to surfactants that may be applied to alleviate soil water repellency. Two laboratory investigations were performed to determine surfactant effects on the tensile strength of 1) Ap horizons of nine wettable, agricultural soils collected from across the continental U.S., and 2) two of the nine soils (Latahco and Rad silt loams from the Pacific Northwest) that were sampled at two depths (5 and 15mm) after being sprinkler irrigated. Along with an untreated control, three surfactants (an alkyl polyglycoside, an ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymer, and a blend of the two) were spray applied by hand at rates of 0, 1, 1.63, 3.35, 4.79, or 8.14kg active ingredient ha−1 to 1) air-dry, loose soil in Study 1 and 2) field-moist, tamped soil in Study 2 before being irrigated with surfactant-free water at 88mmh−1 twice, once for 0.33h, then about 8d later for 0.25h. Tensile strength was measured on oven-dry, 4- to 6.35-mm-diameter aggregates (18≤n≤37) of known mass for each treatment using a load cell with an attached flat-tip probe moving at a constant 0.27-mms−1 rate that applied continuous strain to each aggregate until it failed. In Study 1, tensile strength ranged widely, from 27kPa for Adkins loamy sand to 486kPa for Bolfar loam, averaged across surfactant treatments. Tensile strength for all nine surfactant-treated soils averaged 164kPa, 7% greater (P=0.099) than the control. In Study 2, surfactants significantly affected the tensile strength of Latahco but not Rad aggregates, when averaged across irrigations and sampling depths. After irrigation, aggregate tensile strength averaged 26% less (P&lt;0.001) at the 5- than 15-mm depth, likely due to droplet kinetic energy fracturing near-surface, intra-aggregate bonds or surfactant leaching. All told, tensile strength varied more by soil series and depth than by surfactants. ► Tensile strength varied 18-fold among nine continental U.S. soils. ► As a group, nine soils were 7% stronger when surfactant-treated than untreated. ► After irrigation, tensile strength averaged 26% less at the 5- than 15-mm depth. ► Tensile strength varied more by soil series and depth than by surfactants.</description><subject>Aggregate strength</subject><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>agricultural soils</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>ethylene oxide</subject><subject>ingredients</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>loam soils</subject><subject>Loams</subject><subject>loamy sand soils</subject><subject>Loamy sands</subject><subject>Pacific States</subject><subject>Particle bonding</subject><subject>propylene oxide</subject><subject>silt loam soils</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>soil aggregates</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>Sprinkler irrigation</subject><subject>Surfactants</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>water repellent soils</subject><subject>Wetting agent</subject><issn>0016-7061</issn><issn>1872-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwF1BGloT37MSxN1DFl1SJAZgt13kJrtKk2C4S_55UhbnT1ZXOvcNh7BqhQEB5uy46GhsKG1twQF6ALACrEzZDVfNc8kqfshlMZF6DxHN2EeN6qjVwmLHqbRda65IdUkZtSy7FbByyOPo-s10XqLOJskRD9D1lMQUauvR5yc5a20e6-ss5-3h8eF8858vXp5fF_TK3peIpVyh0rWpUApQgbJx1NXLtSo625dhUvBFKlysBK3SCa0lIrVWEvFG1Uk7M2c3hdxvGrx3FZDY-Oup7O9C4iwal5kKDguo4WpZaS9ASj6Oco1IlgpxQeUBdGGMM1Jpt8BsbfgyC2ds3a_Nv3-ztG5Bmsj8N7w5DmvR8ewomOk-Do8aHSbJpRn_s4hcuQI7u</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Lehrsch, G.A.</creator><creator>Sojka, R.E.</creator><creator>Koehn, A.C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Surfactant effects on soil aggregate tensile strength</title><author>Lehrsch, G.A. ; Sojka, R.E. ; Koehn, A.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a482t-8139787183083e1dcac7129c421af21d52d3894b30b1c3296e1efa8e12d8788c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aggregate strength</topic><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>agricultural soils</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>ethylene oxide</topic><topic>ingredients</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>loam soils</topic><topic>Loams</topic><topic>loamy sand soils</topic><topic>Loamy sands</topic><topic>Pacific States</topic><topic>Particle bonding</topic><topic>propylene oxide</topic><topic>silt loam soils</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>soil aggregates</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>Sprinkler irrigation</topic><topic>Surfactants</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>water repellent soils</topic><topic>Wetting agent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lehrsch, G.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sojka, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehn, A.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geoderma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lehrsch, G.A.</au><au>Sojka, R.E.</au><au>Koehn, A.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surfactant effects on soil aggregate tensile strength</atitle><jtitle>Geoderma</jtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>189-190</volume><spage>199</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>199-206</pages><issn>0016-7061</issn><eissn>1872-6259</eissn><abstract>Little is known regarding a soil aggregate's tensile strength response to surfactants that may be applied to alleviate soil water repellency. Two laboratory investigations were performed to determine surfactant effects on the tensile strength of 1) Ap horizons of nine wettable, agricultural soils collected from across the continental U.S., and 2) two of the nine soils (Latahco and Rad silt loams from the Pacific Northwest) that were sampled at two depths (5 and 15mm) after being sprinkler irrigated. Along with an untreated control, three surfactants (an alkyl polyglycoside, an ethylene oxide/propylene oxide block copolymer, and a blend of the two) were spray applied by hand at rates of 0, 1, 1.63, 3.35, 4.79, or 8.14kg active ingredient ha−1 to 1) air-dry, loose soil in Study 1 and 2) field-moist, tamped soil in Study 2 before being irrigated with surfactant-free water at 88mmh−1 twice, once for 0.33h, then about 8d later for 0.25h. Tensile strength was measured on oven-dry, 4- to 6.35-mm-diameter aggregates (18≤n≤37) of known mass for each treatment using a load cell with an attached flat-tip probe moving at a constant 0.27-mms−1 rate that applied continuous strain to each aggregate until it failed. In Study 1, tensile strength ranged widely, from 27kPa for Adkins loamy sand to 486kPa for Bolfar loam, averaged across surfactant treatments. Tensile strength for all nine surfactant-treated soils averaged 164kPa, 7% greater (P=0.099) than the control. In Study 2, surfactants significantly affected the tensile strength of Latahco but not Rad aggregates, when averaged across irrigations and sampling depths. After irrigation, aggregate tensile strength averaged 26% less (P&lt;0.001) at the 5- than 15-mm depth, likely due to droplet kinetic energy fracturing near-surface, intra-aggregate bonds or surfactant leaching. All told, tensile strength varied more by soil series and depth than by surfactants. ► Tensile strength varied 18-fold among nine continental U.S. soils. ► As a group, nine soils were 7% stronger when surfactant-treated than untreated. ► After irrigation, tensile strength averaged 26% less at the 5- than 15-mm depth. ► Tensile strength varied more by soil series and depth than by surfactants.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.06.015</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7061
ispartof Geoderma, 2012-11, Vol.189-190, p.199-206
issn 0016-7061
1872-6259
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692390805
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aggregate strength
Aggregates
agricultural soils
Calcium
Droplets
ethylene oxide
ingredients
Irrigation
Kinetic energy
loam soils
Loams
loamy sand soils
Loamy sands
Pacific States
Particle bonding
propylene oxide
silt loam soils
Soil (material)
soil aggregates
soil water
Sprinkler irrigation
Surfactants
Tensile strength
water repellent soils
Wetting agent
title Surfactant effects on soil aggregate tensile strength
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A14%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surfactant%20effects%20on%20soil%20aggregate%20tensile%20strength&rft.jtitle=Geoderma&rft.au=Lehrsch,%20G.A.&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=189-190&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=199-206&rft.issn=0016-7061&rft.eissn=1872-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.06.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1221884106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1221884106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016706112002509&rfr_iscdi=true