Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion

Summary This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The structural design of tall and special buildings 2015-06, Vol.24 (8), p.607-628
Hauptverfasser: Manie, Salar, Moghadam, Abdoreza S., Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 628
container_issue 8
container_start_page 607
container_title The structural design of tall and special buildings
container_volume 24
creator Manie, Salar
Moghadam, Abdoreza S.
Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen
description Summary This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings with uni‐directional mass eccentricities equal to 0% (symmetrical), 10%, 20% and 30% are subjected to nonlinear static (pushover) as well as incremental dynamic analyses using a set of far‐field two‐component ground motions and their performance are assessed on the basis of the safety margin against collapse and its probability of occurrence. Comparison of the collapse margin ratios as well as the fragility curves demonstrates significant reduction of the collapse‐level ground motion intensity with increasing eccentricity in plan. Results also indicate that current seismic design parameters including the response modification (R), overstrength (Ω) and ductility (μ) factors are not appropriate for buildings with high levels of plan eccentricity. Buildings with high values of plan eccentricity do not meet the design target life safety performance level on the basis of the calculated probability of collapse and safety margin against collapse. It appears that re‐evaluation of their design parameters is necessary. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/tal.1202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692377961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3679964061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3642-b8e8e85ccaa1ba3a9b62b1b0af08c0c4bd9fd52bb02c67893bfee5888d4525c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqUg8QmW2LBJ8SNOnGUp0CJVwKLADst2nOKS1MVOCv17HJWHQEKzmLnSmdHcG0XHCA4QhPisEdUAYYh3oh6iCYozBtnu15zlyX504P0CQpRDSnrR08hWlVh5DaR-FmtjHdBrUbWiMXYJbAmE39S1bpxRQLamKsxy7oFv5UKrRhegsUCauDAuyLAhKjB3tl0WoLadPoz2SlF5ffTZ-9H91eVsNImnt-Pr0XAaK5ImOJZMh6JKCYGkICKXKZZIQlFCpqBKZJGXBcVSQqzSjOVEllpTxliRUEwVIf3odHt35exrq33Da-OVDtaW2raeozTHJNhPUUBP_qAL27rweUdlOUtSipOfg8pZ750u-cqZWrgNR5B3QfMQNO-CDmi8Rd9MpTf_cnw2nP7mjW_0-zcv3AtPM5JR_ngz5nezC3x-8TDhOfkA8syPiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1679846524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Manie, Salar ; Moghadam, Abdoreza S. ; Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creator><creatorcontrib>Manie, Salar ; Moghadam, Abdoreza S. ; Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><description>Summary This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings with uni‐directional mass eccentricities equal to 0% (symmetrical), 10%, 20% and 30% are subjected to nonlinear static (pushover) as well as incremental dynamic analyses using a set of far‐field two‐component ground motions and their performance are assessed on the basis of the safety margin against collapse and its probability of occurrence. Comparison of the collapse margin ratios as well as the fragility curves demonstrates significant reduction of the collapse‐level ground motion intensity with increasing eccentricity in plan. Results also indicate that current seismic design parameters including the response modification (R), overstrength (Ω) and ductility (μ) factors are not appropriate for buildings with high levels of plan eccentricity. Buildings with high values of plan eccentricity do not meet the design target life safety performance level on the basis of the calculated probability of collapse and safety margin against collapse. It appears that re‐evaluation of their design parameters is necessary. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-7794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-7808</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tal.1202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Buildings ; Collapse ; Eccentricity ; Ground motion ; IDA ; irregular buildings ; Mathematical models ; Nonlinearity ; performance-based design ; plan-asymmetric ; Safety margins ; Three dimensional ; torsional</subject><ispartof>The structural design of tall and special buildings, 2015-06, Vol.24 (8), p.607-628</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3642-b8e8e85ccaa1ba3a9b62b1b0af08c0c4bd9fd52bb02c67893bfee5888d4525c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3642-b8e8e85ccaa1ba3a9b62b1b0af08c0c4bd9fd52bb02c67893bfee5888d4525c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftal.1202$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftal.1202$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manie, Salar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghadam, Abdoreza S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><title>Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion</title><title>The structural design of tall and special buildings</title><addtitle>Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build</addtitle><description>Summary This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings with uni‐directional mass eccentricities equal to 0% (symmetrical), 10%, 20% and 30% are subjected to nonlinear static (pushover) as well as incremental dynamic analyses using a set of far‐field two‐component ground motions and their performance are assessed on the basis of the safety margin against collapse and its probability of occurrence. Comparison of the collapse margin ratios as well as the fragility curves demonstrates significant reduction of the collapse‐level ground motion intensity with increasing eccentricity in plan. Results also indicate that current seismic design parameters including the response modification (R), overstrength (Ω) and ductility (μ) factors are not appropriate for buildings with high levels of plan eccentricity. Buildings with high values of plan eccentricity do not meet the design target life safety performance level on the basis of the calculated probability of collapse and safety margin against collapse. It appears that re‐evaluation of their design parameters is necessary. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Eccentricity</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>IDA</subject><subject>irregular buildings</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>performance-based design</subject><subject>plan-asymmetric</subject><subject>Safety margins</subject><subject>Three dimensional</subject><subject>torsional</subject><issn>1541-7794</issn><issn>1541-7808</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqUg8QmW2LBJ8SNOnGUp0CJVwKLADst2nOKS1MVOCv17HJWHQEKzmLnSmdHcG0XHCA4QhPisEdUAYYh3oh6iCYozBtnu15zlyX504P0CQpRDSnrR08hWlVh5DaR-FmtjHdBrUbWiMXYJbAmE39S1bpxRQLamKsxy7oFv5UKrRhegsUCauDAuyLAhKjB3tl0WoLadPoz2SlF5ffTZ-9H91eVsNImnt-Pr0XAaK5ImOJZMh6JKCYGkICKXKZZIQlFCpqBKZJGXBcVSQqzSjOVEllpTxliRUEwVIf3odHt35exrq33Da-OVDtaW2raeozTHJNhPUUBP_qAL27rweUdlOUtSipOfg8pZ750u-cqZWrgNR5B3QfMQNO-CDmi8Rd9MpTf_cnw2nP7mjW_0-zcv3AtPM5JR_ngz5nezC3x-8TDhOfkA8syPiQ</recordid><startdate>20150610</startdate><enddate>20150610</enddate><creator>Manie, Salar</creator><creator>Moghadam, Abdoreza S.</creator><creator>Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150610</creationdate><title>Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion</title><author>Manie, Salar ; Moghadam, Abdoreza S. ; Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3642-b8e8e85ccaa1ba3a9b62b1b0af08c0c4bd9fd52bb02c67893bfee5888d4525c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Eccentricity</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>IDA</topic><topic>irregular buildings</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>performance-based design</topic><topic>plan-asymmetric</topic><topic>Safety margins</topic><topic>Three dimensional</topic><topic>torsional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manie, Salar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghadam, Abdoreza S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The structural design of tall and special buildings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manie, Salar</au><au>Moghadam, Abdoreza S.</au><au>Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion</atitle><jtitle>The structural design of tall and special buildings</jtitle><addtitle>Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build</addtitle><date>2015-06-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>628</epage><pages>607-628</pages><issn>1541-7794</issn><eissn>1541-7808</eissn><abstract>Summary This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings with uni‐directional mass eccentricities equal to 0% (symmetrical), 10%, 20% and 30% are subjected to nonlinear static (pushover) as well as incremental dynamic analyses using a set of far‐field two‐component ground motions and their performance are assessed on the basis of the safety margin against collapse and its probability of occurrence. Comparison of the collapse margin ratios as well as the fragility curves demonstrates significant reduction of the collapse‐level ground motion intensity with increasing eccentricity in plan. Results also indicate that current seismic design parameters including the response modification (R), overstrength (Ω) and ductility (μ) factors are not appropriate for buildings with high levels of plan eccentricity. Buildings with high values of plan eccentricity do not meet the design target life safety performance level on the basis of the calculated probability of collapse and safety margin against collapse. It appears that re‐evaluation of their design parameters is necessary. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/tal.1202</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-7794
ispartof The structural design of tall and special buildings, 2015-06, Vol.24 (8), p.607-628
issn 1541-7794
1541-7808
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692377961
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Buildings
Collapse
Eccentricity
Ground motion
IDA
irregular buildings
Mathematical models
Nonlinearity
performance-based design
plan-asymmetric
Safety margins
Three dimensional
torsional
title Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A12%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collapse%20behavior%20evaluation%20of%20asymmetric%20buildings%20subjected%20to%20bi-directional%20ground%20motion&rft.jtitle=The%20structural%20design%20of%20tall%20and%20special%20buildings&rft.au=Manie,%20Salar&rft.date=2015-06-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=628&rft.pages=607-628&rft.issn=1541-7794&rft.eissn=1541-7808&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tal.1202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3679964061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1679846524&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true