Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion
Summary This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The structural design of tall and special buildings 2015-06, Vol.24 (8), p.607-628 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 628 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 607 |
container_title | The structural design of tall and special buildings |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Manie, Salar Moghadam, Abdoreza S. Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen |
description | Summary
This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings with uni‐directional mass eccentricities equal to 0% (symmetrical), 10%, 20% and 30% are subjected to nonlinear static (pushover) as well as incremental dynamic analyses using a set of far‐field two‐component ground motions and their performance are assessed on the basis of the safety margin against collapse and its probability of occurrence. Comparison of the collapse margin ratios as well as the fragility curves demonstrates significant reduction of the collapse‐level ground motion intensity with increasing eccentricity in plan. Results also indicate that current seismic design parameters including the response modification (R), overstrength (Ω) and ductility (μ) factors are not appropriate for buildings with high levels of plan eccentricity. Buildings with high values of plan eccentricity do not meet the design target life safety performance level on the basis of the calculated probability of collapse and safety margin against collapse. It appears that re‐evaluation of their design parameters is necessary. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/tal.1202 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692377961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3679964061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3642-b8e8e85ccaa1ba3a9b62b1b0af08c0c4bd9fd52bb02c67893bfee5888d4525c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqUg8QmW2LBJ8SNOnGUp0CJVwKLADst2nOKS1MVOCv17HJWHQEKzmLnSmdHcG0XHCA4QhPisEdUAYYh3oh6iCYozBtnu15zlyX504P0CQpRDSnrR08hWlVh5DaR-FmtjHdBrUbWiMXYJbAmE39S1bpxRQLamKsxy7oFv5UKrRhegsUCauDAuyLAhKjB3tl0WoLadPoz2SlF5ffTZ-9H91eVsNImnt-Pr0XAaK5ImOJZMh6JKCYGkICKXKZZIQlFCpqBKZJGXBcVSQqzSjOVEllpTxliRUEwVIf3odHt35exrq33Da-OVDtaW2raeozTHJNhPUUBP_qAL27rweUdlOUtSipOfg8pZ750u-cqZWrgNR5B3QfMQNO-CDmi8Rd9MpTf_cnw2nP7mjW_0-zcv3AtPM5JR_ngz5nezC3x-8TDhOfkA8syPiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1679846524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Manie, Salar ; Moghadam, Abdoreza S. ; Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creator><creatorcontrib>Manie, Salar ; Moghadam, Abdoreza S. ; Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings with uni‐directional mass eccentricities equal to 0% (symmetrical), 10%, 20% and 30% are subjected to nonlinear static (pushover) as well as incremental dynamic analyses using a set of far‐field two‐component ground motions and their performance are assessed on the basis of the safety margin against collapse and its probability of occurrence. Comparison of the collapse margin ratios as well as the fragility curves demonstrates significant reduction of the collapse‐level ground motion intensity with increasing eccentricity in plan. Results also indicate that current seismic design parameters including the response modification (R), overstrength (Ω) and ductility (μ) factors are not appropriate for buildings with high levels of plan eccentricity. Buildings with high values of plan eccentricity do not meet the design target life safety performance level on the basis of the calculated probability of collapse and safety margin against collapse. It appears that re‐evaluation of their design parameters is necessary. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-7794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-7808</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tal.1202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Buildings ; Collapse ; Eccentricity ; Ground motion ; IDA ; irregular buildings ; Mathematical models ; Nonlinearity ; performance-based design ; plan-asymmetric ; Safety margins ; Three dimensional ; torsional</subject><ispartof>The structural design of tall and special buildings, 2015-06, Vol.24 (8), p.607-628</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3642-b8e8e85ccaa1ba3a9b62b1b0af08c0c4bd9fd52bb02c67893bfee5888d4525c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3642-b8e8e85ccaa1ba3a9b62b1b0af08c0c4bd9fd52bb02c67893bfee5888d4525c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftal.1202$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftal.1202$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manie, Salar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghadam, Abdoreza S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><title>Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion</title><title>The structural design of tall and special buildings</title><addtitle>Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build</addtitle><description>Summary
This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings with uni‐directional mass eccentricities equal to 0% (symmetrical), 10%, 20% and 30% are subjected to nonlinear static (pushover) as well as incremental dynamic analyses using a set of far‐field two‐component ground motions and their performance are assessed on the basis of the safety margin against collapse and its probability of occurrence. Comparison of the collapse margin ratios as well as the fragility curves demonstrates significant reduction of the collapse‐level ground motion intensity with increasing eccentricity in plan. Results also indicate that current seismic design parameters including the response modification (R), overstrength (Ω) and ductility (μ) factors are not appropriate for buildings with high levels of plan eccentricity. Buildings with high values of plan eccentricity do not meet the design target life safety performance level on the basis of the calculated probability of collapse and safety margin against collapse. It appears that re‐evaluation of their design parameters is necessary. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Eccentricity</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>IDA</subject><subject>irregular buildings</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>performance-based design</subject><subject>plan-asymmetric</subject><subject>Safety margins</subject><subject>Three dimensional</subject><subject>torsional</subject><issn>1541-7794</issn><issn>1541-7808</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqUg8QmW2LBJ8SNOnGUp0CJVwKLADst2nOKS1MVOCv17HJWHQEKzmLnSmdHcG0XHCA4QhPisEdUAYYh3oh6iCYozBtnu15zlyX504P0CQpRDSnrR08hWlVh5DaR-FmtjHdBrUbWiMXYJbAmE39S1bpxRQLamKsxy7oFv5UKrRhegsUCauDAuyLAhKjB3tl0WoLadPoz2SlF5ffTZ-9H91eVsNImnt-Pr0XAaK5ImOJZMh6JKCYGkICKXKZZIQlFCpqBKZJGXBcVSQqzSjOVEllpTxliRUEwVIf3odHt35exrq33Da-OVDtaW2raeozTHJNhPUUBP_qAL27rweUdlOUtSipOfg8pZ750u-cqZWrgNR5B3QfMQNO-CDmi8Rd9MpTf_cnw2nP7mjW_0-zcv3AtPM5JR_ngz5nezC3x-8TDhOfkA8syPiQ</recordid><startdate>20150610</startdate><enddate>20150610</enddate><creator>Manie, Salar</creator><creator>Moghadam, Abdoreza S.</creator><creator>Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150610</creationdate><title>Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion</title><author>Manie, Salar ; Moghadam, Abdoreza S. ; Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3642-b8e8e85ccaa1ba3a9b62b1b0af08c0c4bd9fd52bb02c67893bfee5888d4525c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Eccentricity</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>IDA</topic><topic>irregular buildings</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>performance-based design</topic><topic>plan-asymmetric</topic><topic>Safety margins</topic><topic>Three dimensional</topic><topic>torsional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manie, Salar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghadam, Abdoreza S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The structural design of tall and special buildings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manie, Salar</au><au>Moghadam, Abdoreza S.</au><au>Ghafory-Ashtiany, Mohsen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion</atitle><jtitle>The structural design of tall and special buildings</jtitle><addtitle>Struct. Design Tall Spec. Build</addtitle><date>2015-06-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>628</epage><pages>607-628</pages><issn>1541-7794</issn><eissn>1541-7808</eissn><abstract>Summary
This paper discusses the collapse behavior of low‐rise plan‐asymmetric buildings under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions and utilizing strength and stiffness degrading nonlinear models. For this purpose, three‐dimensional three‐story and six‐story reinforced concrete frame buildings with uni‐directional mass eccentricities equal to 0% (symmetrical), 10%, 20% and 30% are subjected to nonlinear static (pushover) as well as incremental dynamic analyses using a set of far‐field two‐component ground motions and their performance are assessed on the basis of the safety margin against collapse and its probability of occurrence. Comparison of the collapse margin ratios as well as the fragility curves demonstrates significant reduction of the collapse‐level ground motion intensity with increasing eccentricity in plan. Results also indicate that current seismic design parameters including the response modification (R), overstrength (Ω) and ductility (μ) factors are not appropriate for buildings with high levels of plan eccentricity. Buildings with high values of plan eccentricity do not meet the design target life safety performance level on the basis of the calculated probability of collapse and safety margin against collapse. It appears that re‐evaluation of their design parameters is necessary. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/tal.1202</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-7794 |
ispartof | The structural design of tall and special buildings, 2015-06, Vol.24 (8), p.607-628 |
issn | 1541-7794 1541-7808 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692377961 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Buildings Collapse Eccentricity Ground motion IDA irregular buildings Mathematical models Nonlinearity performance-based design plan-asymmetric Safety margins Three dimensional torsional |
title | Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi-directional ground motion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A12%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collapse%20behavior%20evaluation%20of%20asymmetric%20buildings%20subjected%20to%20bi-directional%20ground%20motion&rft.jtitle=The%20structural%20design%20of%20tall%20and%20special%20buildings&rft.au=Manie,%20Salar&rft.date=2015-06-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=628&rft.pages=607-628&rft.issn=1541-7794&rft.eissn=1541-7808&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tal.1202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3679964061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1679846524&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |