Conditioning of Multiple-Point Statistics Facies Simulations to Tomographic Images
Geophysical tomography captures the spatial distribution of the underlying geophysical property at a relatively high resolution, but the tomographic images tend to be blurred representations of reality and generally fail to reproduce sharp interfaces. Such models may cause significant bias when take...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mathematical geosciences 2014-07, Vol.46 (5), p.625-645 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 645 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 625 |
container_title | Mathematical geosciences |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Lochbühler, Tobias Pirot, Guillaume Straubhaar, Julien Linde, Niklas |
description | Geophysical tomography captures the spatial distribution of the underlying geophysical property at a relatively high resolution, but the tomographic images tend to be blurred representations of reality and generally fail to reproduce sharp interfaces. Such models may cause significant bias when taken as a basis for predictive flow and transport modeling and are unsuitable for uncertainty assessment. We present a methodology in which tomograms are used to condition multiple-point statistics (MPS) simulations. A large set of geologically reasonable facies realizations and their corresponding synthetically calculated cross-hole radar tomograms are used as a training image. The training image is scanned with a direct sampling algorithm for patterns in the conditioning tomogram, while accounting for the spatially varying resolution of the tomograms. In a post-processing step, only those conditional simulations that predicted the radar traveltimes within the expected data error levels are accepted. The methodology is demonstrated on a two-facies example featuring channels and an aquifer analog of alluvial sedimentary structures with five facies. For both cases, MPS simulations exhibit the sharp interfaces and the geological patterns found in the training image. Compared to unconditioned MPS simulations, the uncertainty in transport predictions is markedly decreased for simulations conditioned to tomograms. As an improvement to other approaches relying on classical smoothness-constrained geophysical tomography, the proposed method allows for: (1) reproduction of sharp interfaces, (2) incorporation of realistic geological constraints and (3) generation of multiple realizations that enables uncertainty assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11004-013-9484-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692359757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3358433041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a481t-a07189e4f90b76d3c28bd7f46650a3203917c809883b041f5a016263e8d575653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuAGzfRuZn3UoqPQkWxdT1Mk0mdkmRiZrKwv96UiIggrs5dfN-By0HoHPAVYCyuAwxBUwwkVVTSdHeAJiAFTaVi5PD75nCMTkLYYsyBMJigl5lvChedb1yzSXyZPPZVdG1l02fvmpgso4kuRJeH5M7kzoZk6eq-MnsjJNEnK1_7TWfaN5cn89psbDhFR6Wpgj37yil6vbtdzR7SxdP9fHazSA2VEFODBUhlaanwWvCC5JlcF6KknDNsSIaJApFLrKQka0yhZAYDzzixsmCCcUam6HLsbTv_3tsQde1CbqvKNNb3QQNXGWFKMPE_yhhVlBFKB_TiF7r1fdcMjwwUBcUZz2CgYKTyzofQ2VK3natN96EB6_0gehxED4Po_SB6NzjZ6ISBbTa2-9H8p_QJVhSMQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1541965621</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conditioning of Multiple-Point Statistics Facies Simulations to Tomographic Images</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lochbühler, Tobias ; Pirot, Guillaume ; Straubhaar, Julien ; Linde, Niklas</creator><creatorcontrib>Lochbühler, Tobias ; Pirot, Guillaume ; Straubhaar, Julien ; Linde, Niklas</creatorcontrib><description>Geophysical tomography captures the spatial distribution of the underlying geophysical property at a relatively high resolution, but the tomographic images tend to be blurred representations of reality and generally fail to reproduce sharp interfaces. Such models may cause significant bias when taken as a basis for predictive flow and transport modeling and are unsuitable for uncertainty assessment. We present a methodology in which tomograms are used to condition multiple-point statistics (MPS) simulations. A large set of geologically reasonable facies realizations and their corresponding synthetically calculated cross-hole radar tomograms are used as a training image. The training image is scanned with a direct sampling algorithm for patterns in the conditioning tomogram, while accounting for the spatially varying resolution of the tomograms. In a post-processing step, only those conditional simulations that predicted the radar traveltimes within the expected data error levels are accepted. The methodology is demonstrated on a two-facies example featuring channels and an aquifer analog of alluvial sedimentary structures with five facies. For both cases, MPS simulations exhibit the sharp interfaces and the geological patterns found in the training image. Compared to unconditioned MPS simulations, the uncertainty in transport predictions is markedly decreased for simulations conditioned to tomograms. As an improvement to other approaches relying on classical smoothness-constrained geophysical tomography, the proposed method allows for: (1) reproduction of sharp interfaces, (2) incorporation of realistic geological constraints and (3) generation of multiple realizations that enables uncertainty assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1874-8961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-8953</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11004-013-9484-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Alluvial aquifers ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Computer Science ; Computer simulation ; Conditioning ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geology ; Geophysics ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Mathematical models ; Physics ; Radar ; Sedimentary structures ; Spatial distribution ; Special Issue ; Statistics ; Statistics for Engineering ; Tomography ; Training ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Mathematical geosciences, 2014-07, Vol.46 (5), p.625-645</ispartof><rights>International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2013</rights><rights>International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a481t-a07189e4f90b76d3c28bd7f46650a3203917c809883b041f5a016263e8d575653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a481t-a07189e4f90b76d3c28bd7f46650a3203917c809883b041f5a016263e8d575653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11004-013-9484-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11004-013-9484-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lochbühler, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirot, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straubhaar, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linde, Niklas</creatorcontrib><title>Conditioning of Multiple-Point Statistics Facies Simulations to Tomographic Images</title><title>Mathematical geosciences</title><addtitle>Math Geosci</addtitle><description>Geophysical tomography captures the spatial distribution of the underlying geophysical property at a relatively high resolution, but the tomographic images tend to be blurred representations of reality and generally fail to reproduce sharp interfaces. Such models may cause significant bias when taken as a basis for predictive flow and transport modeling and are unsuitable for uncertainty assessment. We present a methodology in which tomograms are used to condition multiple-point statistics (MPS) simulations. A large set of geologically reasonable facies realizations and their corresponding synthetically calculated cross-hole radar tomograms are used as a training image. The training image is scanned with a direct sampling algorithm for patterns in the conditioning tomogram, while accounting for the spatially varying resolution of the tomograms. In a post-processing step, only those conditional simulations that predicted the radar traveltimes within the expected data error levels are accepted. The methodology is demonstrated on a two-facies example featuring channels and an aquifer analog of alluvial sedimentary structures with five facies. For both cases, MPS simulations exhibit the sharp interfaces and the geological patterns found in the training image. Compared to unconditioned MPS simulations, the uncertainty in transport predictions is markedly decreased for simulations conditioned to tomograms. As an improvement to other approaches relying on classical smoothness-constrained geophysical tomography, the proposed method allows for: (1) reproduction of sharp interfaces, (2) incorporation of realistic geological constraints and (3) generation of multiple realizations that enables uncertainty assessment.</description><subject>Alluvial aquifers</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Sedimentary structures</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1874-8961</issn><issn>1874-8953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhQdRsFZ_gLuAGzfRuZn3UoqPQkWxdT1Mk0mdkmRiZrKwv96UiIggrs5dfN-By0HoHPAVYCyuAwxBUwwkVVTSdHeAJiAFTaVi5PD75nCMTkLYYsyBMJigl5lvChedb1yzSXyZPPZVdG1l02fvmpgso4kuRJeH5M7kzoZk6eq-MnsjJNEnK1_7TWfaN5cn89psbDhFR6Wpgj37yil6vbtdzR7SxdP9fHazSA2VEFODBUhlaanwWvCC5JlcF6KknDNsSIaJApFLrKQka0yhZAYDzzixsmCCcUam6HLsbTv_3tsQde1CbqvKNNb3QQNXGWFKMPE_yhhVlBFKB_TiF7r1fdcMjwwUBcUZz2CgYKTyzofQ2VK3natN96EB6_0gehxED4Po_SB6NzjZ6ISBbTa2-9H8p_QJVhSMQw</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Lochbühler, Tobias</creator><creator>Pirot, Guillaume</creator><creator>Straubhaar, Julien</creator><creator>Linde, Niklas</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Conditioning of Multiple-Point Statistics Facies Simulations to Tomographic Images</title><author>Lochbühler, Tobias ; Pirot, Guillaume ; Straubhaar, Julien ; Linde, Niklas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a481t-a07189e4f90b76d3c28bd7f46650a3203917c809883b041f5a016263e8d575653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alluvial aquifers</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Sedimentary structures</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lochbühler, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirot, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straubhaar, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linde, Niklas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><jtitle>Mathematical geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lochbühler, Tobias</au><au>Pirot, Guillaume</au><au>Straubhaar, Julien</au><au>Linde, Niklas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conditioning of Multiple-Point Statistics Facies Simulations to Tomographic Images</atitle><jtitle>Mathematical geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Math Geosci</stitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>645</epage><pages>625-645</pages><issn>1874-8961</issn><eissn>1874-8953</eissn><abstract>Geophysical tomography captures the spatial distribution of the underlying geophysical property at a relatively high resolution, but the tomographic images tend to be blurred representations of reality and generally fail to reproduce sharp interfaces. Such models may cause significant bias when taken as a basis for predictive flow and transport modeling and are unsuitable for uncertainty assessment. We present a methodology in which tomograms are used to condition multiple-point statistics (MPS) simulations. A large set of geologically reasonable facies realizations and their corresponding synthetically calculated cross-hole radar tomograms are used as a training image. The training image is scanned with a direct sampling algorithm for patterns in the conditioning tomogram, while accounting for the spatially varying resolution of the tomograms. In a post-processing step, only those conditional simulations that predicted the radar traveltimes within the expected data error levels are accepted. The methodology is demonstrated on a two-facies example featuring channels and an aquifer analog of alluvial sedimentary structures with five facies. For both cases, MPS simulations exhibit the sharp interfaces and the geological patterns found in the training image. Compared to unconditioned MPS simulations, the uncertainty in transport predictions is markedly decreased for simulations conditioned to tomograms. As an improvement to other approaches relying on classical smoothness-constrained geophysical tomography, the proposed method allows for: (1) reproduction of sharp interfaces, (2) incorporation of realistic geological constraints and (3) generation of multiple realizations that enables uncertainty assessment.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11004-013-9484-z</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1874-8961 |
ispartof | Mathematical geosciences, 2014-07, Vol.46 (5), p.625-645 |
issn | 1874-8961 1874-8953 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692359757 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Alluvial aquifers Chemistry and Earth Sciences Computer Science Computer simulation Conditioning Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Geology Geophysics Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Mathematical models Physics Radar Sedimentary structures Spatial distribution Special Issue Statistics Statistics for Engineering Tomography Training Uncertainty |
title | Conditioning of Multiple-Point Statistics Facies Simulations to Tomographic Images |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A53%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conditioning%20of%20Multiple-Point%20Statistics%20Facies%20Simulations%20to%20Tomographic%20Images&rft.jtitle=Mathematical%20geosciences&rft.au=Lochb%C3%BChler,%20Tobias&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=645&rft.pages=625-645&rft.issn=1874-8961&rft.eissn=1874-8953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11004-013-9484-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3358433041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1541965621&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |