Experimental investigation of induced suction distribution in a grass-covered soil

► We quantify the suction induced by grass in relation to grass characteristics. ► Suction induced in grassed soil is nearly two times higher than that in bare soil. ► Grass-induced suction influence zone is up to 4 times the root depth. ► We investigate suction distribution upon wetting under diffe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological engineering 2013-03, Vol.52, p.219-223
Hauptverfasser: Ng, C.W.W., Woon, K.X., Leung, A.K., Chu, L.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 223
container_issue
container_start_page 219
container_title Ecological engineering
container_volume 52
creator Ng, C.W.W.
Woon, K.X.
Leung, A.K.
Chu, L.M.
description ► We quantify the suction induced by grass in relation to grass characteristics. ► Suction induced in grassed soil is nearly two times higher than that in bare soil. ► Grass-induced suction influence zone is up to 4 times the root depth. ► We investigate suction distribution upon wetting under different soil suctions. ► Under wetting, suction retained in grassed soil is higher than that in bare soil. Evapotranspiration from a grass-covered ground is known to induce suction by soil evaporation and grass transpiration. However, grass-induced suction in the ground when it is subjected to wetting and drying are not yet well understood. In this study, a laboratory test program was conducted to investigate the magnitude and distribution of suction induced by Bermuda grass growing in silty sand. In total, four test boxes compacted with silty sand were prepared, three of which covered with Bermuda grass while one test box was left bare as control. All the four test boxes were subjected to wetting and drying in a plant room with temperature and humidity controlled. Under identical atmospheric conditions and initial soil density and water content, peak suction induced within the root zone in grassed soil was 1.5 times higher than that in bare soil after 20 days of drying. A vertical suction influence zone was identified to be up to four times the root depth while the lateral suction influence zone was one diameter of ring collar away from the centre of the plot. Upon wetting, suction retained at depth right below the root zone in grassed soil was found to be 40% higher than that in bare soil. For three grass replicates that were germinated under identical atmospheric conditions, they produced different shoot lengths and induced different magnitudes of suction. No direct correlation between grass shoot length and grass-induced suction could be found.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692323507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925857412003540</els_id><sourcerecordid>1492627131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b3726825f50e4a0c9263abe9bf17ae45f1ce0d24bb5213ea19f653bb1fb73d2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rGzEQhkVpoa7bn1C6l0Ivu9HoY2WdQglpGwgE2uYsJO3IyGxWjrRrkn9fOTa95iQ0PPPO8Awhn4F2QKG_2HXo04jTtmMUWAfQUeBvyAo2irW91uwtWVHNZLuRSrwnH0rZUUoVk3pFfl8_7THHB5xmOzZxOmCZ49bOMU1NCrUwLB6Hpiz-pTTEMufolpdPnBrbbLMtpfXpgPnIpTh-JO-CHQt-Or9rcv_j-u_Vr_b27ufN1ffb1gst59ZxxfoNk0FSFJZ6zXpuHWoXQFkUMoBHOjDhnGTA0YIOveTOQXCKD8zyNfl2yt3n9LjUvc1DLB7H0U6YlmKg14wzLql6HRV1OlPAoaLyhPqcSskYzL7qsfnZADVH3WZnzrrNUbcBMFV37ft6HmGLt2PIdvKx_G-u4QLUhlbuy4kLNhm7zZW5_1ODJKUMtBDHpMsTgVXeIWI2xUec6hliRj-bIcVXdvkHu62iQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492627131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental investigation of induced suction distribution in a grass-covered soil</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ng, C.W.W. ; Woon, K.X. ; Leung, A.K. ; Chu, L.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ng, C.W.W. ; Woon, K.X. ; Leung, A.K. ; Chu, L.M.</creatorcontrib><description>► We quantify the suction induced by grass in relation to grass characteristics. ► Suction induced in grassed soil is nearly two times higher than that in bare soil. ► Grass-induced suction influence zone is up to 4 times the root depth. ► We investigate suction distribution upon wetting under different soil suctions. ► Under wetting, suction retained in grassed soil is higher than that in bare soil. Evapotranspiration from a grass-covered ground is known to induce suction by soil evaporation and grass transpiration. However, grass-induced suction in the ground when it is subjected to wetting and drying are not yet well understood. In this study, a laboratory test program was conducted to investigate the magnitude and distribution of suction induced by Bermuda grass growing in silty sand. In total, four test boxes compacted with silty sand were prepared, three of which covered with Bermuda grass while one test box was left bare as control. All the four test boxes were subjected to wetting and drying in a plant room with temperature and humidity controlled. Under identical atmospheric conditions and initial soil density and water content, peak suction induced within the root zone in grassed soil was 1.5 times higher than that in bare soil after 20 days of drying. A vertical suction influence zone was identified to be up to four times the root depth while the lateral suction influence zone was one diameter of ring collar away from the centre of the plot. Upon wetting, suction retained at depth right below the root zone in grassed soil was found to be 40% higher than that in bare soil. For three grass replicates that were germinated under identical atmospheric conditions, they produced different shoot lengths and induced different magnitudes of suction. No direct correlation between grass shoot length and grass-induced suction could be found.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-8574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Atmospherics ; Bermuda grass ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cynodon dactylon ; Drying ; evaporation ; Evapotranspiration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasses ; Grounds ; humidity ; laboratory techniques ; rhizosphere ; room temperature ; Root-water uptake ; Roots ; Sand ; shoots ; Soil (material) ; soil density ; Suction distribution ; Suction influence zone ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; transpiration ; water content ; Wetting</subject><ispartof>Ecological engineering, 2013-03, Vol.52, p.219-223</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b3726825f50e4a0c9263abe9bf17ae45f1ce0d24bb5213ea19f653bb1fb73d2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b3726825f50e4a0c9263abe9bf17ae45f1ce0d24bb5213ea19f653bb1fb73d2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27141780$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ng, C.W.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woon, K.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, L.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental investigation of induced suction distribution in a grass-covered soil</title><title>Ecological engineering</title><description>► We quantify the suction induced by grass in relation to grass characteristics. ► Suction induced in grassed soil is nearly two times higher than that in bare soil. ► Grass-induced suction influence zone is up to 4 times the root depth. ► We investigate suction distribution upon wetting under different soil suctions. ► Under wetting, suction retained in grassed soil is higher than that in bare soil. Evapotranspiration from a grass-covered ground is known to induce suction by soil evaporation and grass transpiration. However, grass-induced suction in the ground when it is subjected to wetting and drying are not yet well understood. In this study, a laboratory test program was conducted to investigate the magnitude and distribution of suction induced by Bermuda grass growing in silty sand. In total, four test boxes compacted with silty sand were prepared, three of which covered with Bermuda grass while one test box was left bare as control. All the four test boxes were subjected to wetting and drying in a plant room with temperature and humidity controlled. Under identical atmospheric conditions and initial soil density and water content, peak suction induced within the root zone in grassed soil was 1.5 times higher than that in bare soil after 20 days of drying. A vertical suction influence zone was identified to be up to four times the root depth while the lateral suction influence zone was one diameter of ring collar away from the centre of the plot. Upon wetting, suction retained at depth right below the root zone in grassed soil was found to be 40% higher than that in bare soil. For three grass replicates that were germinated under identical atmospheric conditions, they produced different shoot lengths and induced different magnitudes of suction. No direct correlation between grass shoot length and grass-induced suction could be found.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Bermuda grass</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cynodon dactylon</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>evaporation</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grounds</subject><subject>humidity</subject><subject>laboratory techniques</subject><subject>rhizosphere</subject><subject>room temperature</subject><subject>Root-water uptake</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>shoots</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>soil density</subject><subject>Suction distribution</subject><subject>Suction influence zone</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>transpiration</subject><subject>water content</subject><subject>Wetting</subject><issn>0925-8574</issn><issn>1872-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1rGzEQhkVpoa7bn1C6l0Ivu9HoY2WdQglpGwgE2uYsJO3IyGxWjrRrkn9fOTa95iQ0PPPO8Awhn4F2QKG_2HXo04jTtmMUWAfQUeBvyAo2irW91uwtWVHNZLuRSrwnH0rZUUoVk3pFfl8_7THHB5xmOzZxOmCZ49bOMU1NCrUwLB6Hpiz-pTTEMufolpdPnBrbbLMtpfXpgPnIpTh-JO-CHQt-Or9rcv_j-u_Vr_b27ufN1ffb1gst59ZxxfoNk0FSFJZ6zXpuHWoXQFkUMoBHOjDhnGTA0YIOveTOQXCKD8zyNfl2yt3n9LjUvc1DLB7H0U6YlmKg14wzLql6HRV1OlPAoaLyhPqcSskYzL7qsfnZADVH3WZnzrrNUbcBMFV37ft6HmGLt2PIdvKx_G-u4QLUhlbuy4kLNhm7zZW5_1ODJKUMtBDHpMsTgVXeIWI2xUec6hliRj-bIcVXdvkHu62iQw</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Ng, C.W.W.</creator><creator>Woon, K.X.</creator><creator>Leung, A.K.</creator><creator>Chu, L.M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Experimental investigation of induced suction distribution in a grass-covered soil</title><author>Ng, C.W.W. ; Woon, K.X. ; Leung, A.K. ; Chu, L.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-b3726825f50e4a0c9263abe9bf17ae45f1ce0d24bb5213ea19f653bb1fb73d2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Bermuda grass</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cynodon dactylon</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>evaporation</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grounds</topic><topic>humidity</topic><topic>laboratory techniques</topic><topic>rhizosphere</topic><topic>room temperature</topic><topic>Root-water uptake</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>shoots</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>soil density</topic><topic>Suction distribution</topic><topic>Suction influence zone</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>transpiration</topic><topic>water content</topic><topic>Wetting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ng, C.W.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woon, K.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, A.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, L.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ng, C.W.W.</au><au>Woon, K.X.</au><au>Leung, A.K.</au><au>Chu, L.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental investigation of induced suction distribution in a grass-covered soil</atitle><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>52</volume><spage>219</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>219-223</pages><issn>0925-8574</issn><eissn>1872-6992</eissn><abstract>► We quantify the suction induced by grass in relation to grass characteristics. ► Suction induced in grassed soil is nearly two times higher than that in bare soil. ► Grass-induced suction influence zone is up to 4 times the root depth. ► We investigate suction distribution upon wetting under different soil suctions. ► Under wetting, suction retained in grassed soil is higher than that in bare soil. Evapotranspiration from a grass-covered ground is known to induce suction by soil evaporation and grass transpiration. However, grass-induced suction in the ground when it is subjected to wetting and drying are not yet well understood. In this study, a laboratory test program was conducted to investigate the magnitude and distribution of suction induced by Bermuda grass growing in silty sand. In total, four test boxes compacted with silty sand were prepared, three of which covered with Bermuda grass while one test box was left bare as control. All the four test boxes were subjected to wetting and drying in a plant room with temperature and humidity controlled. Under identical atmospheric conditions and initial soil density and water content, peak suction induced within the root zone in grassed soil was 1.5 times higher than that in bare soil after 20 days of drying. A vertical suction influence zone was identified to be up to four times the root depth while the lateral suction influence zone was one diameter of ring collar away from the centre of the plot. Upon wetting, suction retained at depth right below the root zone in grassed soil was found to be 40% higher than that in bare soil. For three grass replicates that were germinated under identical atmospheric conditions, they produced different shoot lengths and induced different magnitudes of suction. No direct correlation between grass shoot length and grass-induced suction could be found.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-8574
ispartof Ecological engineering, 2013-03, Vol.52, p.219-223
issn 0925-8574
1872-6992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692323507
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Atmospherics
Bermuda grass
Biological and medical sciences
Cynodon dactylon
Drying
evaporation
Evapotranspiration
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grasses
Grounds
humidity
laboratory techniques
rhizosphere
room temperature
Root-water uptake
Roots
Sand
shoots
Soil (material)
soil density
Suction distribution
Suction influence zone
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
transpiration
water content
Wetting
title Experimental investigation of induced suction distribution in a grass-covered soil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A46%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20investigation%20of%20induced%20suction%20distribution%20in%20a%20grass-covered%20soil&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20engineering&rft.au=Ng,%20C.W.W.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=52&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=219-223&rft.issn=0925-8574&rft.eissn=1872-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492627131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492627131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925857412003540&rfr_iscdi=true