Cold fusion: comments on the state of scientific proof
Early criticisms were made of the scientific claims made by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons in 1989 on their observation of heat effects in electrochemically driven palladium–deuterium experiments that were consistent with nuclear but not chemical or stored energy sources. These criticisms were...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current science (Bangalore) 2015-02, Vol.108 (4), p.495-498 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 498 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 495 |
| container_title | Current science (Bangalore) |
| container_volume | 108 |
| creator | McKubre, Michael C. H. |
| description | Early criticisms were made of the scientific claims made by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons in 1989 on their observation of heat effects in electrochemically driven palladium–deuterium experiments that were consistent with nuclear but not chemical or stored energy sources. These criticisms were premature and adverse. In the light of 25 years further study of the palladium–deuterium system, what is the state of proof of Fleischmann and Pons' claims? |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692317532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24216593</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24216593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j240t-e8e9772d699016f253bd11b480f8bbc6f30713b9f40bed01fd8a853cfd8a3bf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjk9LxDAUxHNQcF39CEIugpfCe0mbJt5k8R8seNFzadI8TGmbtUkPfnsrK3jZ08DMj5k5YxsAxEJqgxfsMqUeQEgBZsPULg4dpyWFON1zF8fRTznxOPH86XnKbfY8Ek8urH6g4PhhjpGu2Dm1Q_LXf7plH0-P77uXYv_2_Lp72Be9KCEXXntT16JTxgAqEpW0HaItNZC21imSUKO0hkqwvgOkTre6ku5XpaVKbtndsXdd_Vp8ys0YkvPD0E4-LqlBZYTEupJiRW-OaJ9ynJvDHMZ2_m5EKVBVRq757akcoRHri3_uB_maV7U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1692317532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cold fusion: comments on the state of scientific proof</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>McKubre, Michael C. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>McKubre, Michael C. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Early criticisms were made of the scientific claims made by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons in 1989 on their observation of heat effects in electrochemically driven palladium–deuterium experiments that were consistent with nuclear but not chemical or stored energy sources. These criticisms were premature and adverse. In the light of 25 years further study of the palladium–deuterium system, what is the state of proof of Fleischmann and Pons' claims?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Current Science Association</publisher><subject>Cathodes ; Cold fusion ; Current density ; Deuterium ; Deuterons ; Electrons ; Energy ; Heat ; Internal energy ; Legal evidence ; Nuclear reactions ; Proving ; SPECIAL SECTION: LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTIONS ; Temperature effects</subject><ispartof>Current science (Bangalore), 2015-02, Vol.108 (4), p.495-498</ispartof><rights>2015 Current Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24216593$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24216593$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKubre, Michael C. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Cold fusion: comments on the state of scientific proof</title><title>Current science (Bangalore)</title><description>Early criticisms were made of the scientific claims made by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons in 1989 on their observation of heat effects in electrochemically driven palladium–deuterium experiments that were consistent with nuclear but not chemical or stored energy sources. These criticisms were premature and adverse. In the light of 25 years further study of the palladium–deuterium system, what is the state of proof of Fleischmann and Pons' claims?</description><subject>Cathodes</subject><subject>Cold fusion</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Deuterium</subject><subject>Deuterons</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Internal energy</subject><subject>Legal evidence</subject><subject>Nuclear reactions</subject><subject>Proving</subject><subject>SPECIAL SECTION: LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTIONS</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><issn>0011-3891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptjk9LxDAUxHNQcF39CEIugpfCe0mbJt5k8R8seNFzadI8TGmbtUkPfnsrK3jZ08DMj5k5YxsAxEJqgxfsMqUeQEgBZsPULg4dpyWFON1zF8fRTznxOPH86XnKbfY8Ek8urH6g4PhhjpGu2Dm1Q_LXf7plH0-P77uXYv_2_Lp72Be9KCEXXntT16JTxgAqEpW0HaItNZC21imSUKO0hkqwvgOkTre6ku5XpaVKbtndsXdd_Vp8ys0YkvPD0E4-LqlBZYTEupJiRW-OaJ9ynJvDHMZ2_m5EKVBVRq757akcoRHri3_uB_maV7U</recordid><startdate>20150225</startdate><enddate>20150225</enddate><creator>McKubre, Michael C. H.</creator><general>Current Science Association</general><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150225</creationdate><title>Cold fusion: comments on the state of scientific proof</title><author>McKubre, Michael C. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j240t-e8e9772d699016f253bd11b480f8bbc6f30713b9f40bed01fd8a853cfd8a3bf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Cathodes</topic><topic>Cold fusion</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Deuterium</topic><topic>Deuterons</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Internal energy</topic><topic>Legal evidence</topic><topic>Nuclear reactions</topic><topic>Proving</topic><topic>SPECIAL SECTION: LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTIONS</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKubre, Michael C. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Current science (Bangalore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKubre, Michael C. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cold fusion: comments on the state of scientific proof</atitle><jtitle>Current science (Bangalore)</jtitle><date>2015-02-25</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>495</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>495-498</pages><issn>0011-3891</issn><abstract>Early criticisms were made of the scientific claims made by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons in 1989 on their observation of heat effects in electrochemically driven palladium–deuterium experiments that were consistent with nuclear but not chemical or stored energy sources. These criticisms were premature and adverse. In the light of 25 years further study of the palladium–deuterium system, what is the state of proof of Fleischmann and Pons' claims?</abstract><pub>Current Science Association</pub><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0011-3891 |
| ispartof | Current science (Bangalore), 2015-02, Vol.108 (4), p.495-498 |
| issn | 0011-3891 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692317532 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Cathodes Cold fusion Current density Deuterium Deuterons Electrons Energy Heat Internal energy Legal evidence Nuclear reactions Proving SPECIAL SECTION: LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTIONS Temperature effects |
| title | Cold fusion: comments on the state of scientific proof |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A53%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cold%20fusion:%20comments%20on%20the%20state%20of%20scientific%20proof&rft.jtitle=Current%20science%20(Bangalore)&rft.au=McKubre,%20Michael%20C.%20H.&rft.date=2015-02-25&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=495&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=495-498&rft.issn=0011-3891&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24216593%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1692317532&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24216593&rfr_iscdi=true |