Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: Multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing
Abstract Objective To determine the influence of cement thickness and ceramic/cement bonding on stresses and failure of CAD/CAM crowns, using both multi-physics finite element analysis and monotonic testing. Methods Axially symmetric FEA models were created for stress analysis of a stylized monolith...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dental materials 2012-08, Vol.28 (8), p.e99-e109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e99 |
container_title | Dental materials |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | May, Liliana G Kelly, J. Robert Bottino, Marco A Hill, Thomas |
description | Abstract Objective To determine the influence of cement thickness and ceramic/cement bonding on stresses and failure of CAD/CAM crowns, using both multi-physics finite element analysis and monotonic testing. Methods Axially symmetric FEA models were created for stress analysis of a stylized monolithic crown having resin cement thicknesses from 50 to 500 μm under occlusal loading. Ceramic–cement interface was modeled as bonded or not-bonded (cement–dentin as bonded). Cement polymerization shrinkage was simulated as a thermal contraction. Loads necessary to reach stresses for radial cracking from the intaglio surface were calculated by FEA. Experimentally, feldspathic CAD/CAM crowns based on the FEA model were machined having different occlusal cementation spaces, etched and cemented to dentin analogs. Non-bonding of etched ceramic was achieved using a thin layer of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Crowns were loaded to failure at 5 N/s, with radial cracks detected acoustically. Results Failure loads depended on the bonding condition and the cement thickness for both FEA and physical testing. Average fracture loads for bonded crowns were: 673.5 N at 50 μm cement and 300.6 N at 500 μm. FEA stresses due to polymerization shrinkage increased with the cement thickness overwhelming the protective effect of bonding, as was also seen experimentally. At 50 μm cement thickness, bonded crowns withstood at least twice the load before failure than non-bonded crowns. Significance Occlusal “fit” can have structural implications for CAD/CAM crowns; pre-cementation spaces around 50–100 μm being recommended from this study. Bonding benefits were lost at thickness approaching 450–500 μm due to polymerization shrinkage stresses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692307652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S010956411200139X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1024476501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-f18ef708fc92c0c7dd8c23a7beab1561dfd6364cf7c8f482c85f23070667a7073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAURSMEotPCHyDkJZtMnx3HTlggjYZpQWrFApDYWR77mXqa2EOcgOYP-GwcprBgM6ws2efeK793i-IFhSUFKi53S4th1N2SAWVL4EuoqkfFgjayLQFa-bhYAIW2rAWnZ8V5SjsA4KylT4szxuq2lpwuip8b59CMiURHDPbZkYx33twHTInoYMk2BuvDVxJDfkDitO-mAUkXtf0tWq_eXq5Xt1k86N4bYob4I6TX5HbqRl_u7w7Jm0SuNivSR4vdbDXb9jHEMYYsGDGN-fZZ8cTpLuHzh_Oi-Hy1-bR-V958uH6_Xt2Upm7YWDraoJPQONMyA0Za2xhWablFvaW1oNZZUQlunDSN4w0zTe1YBRKEkFqCrC6KV0ff_RC_TTlb9T4Z7DodME5JUdHOvKjZaZTmJGjbqjmNQoZA8Er8B8o4z_lAM8qPaB5qSgM6tR98r4dDhtRcArVTxxKouQQKuMolyLKXDwnTtkf7V_Rn6xl4cwQwD_q7x0El4zEYtH7IZVA2-lMJ_xqYvFlvdHePB0y7OA0hL1FRlbJGfZyLOPeQMsjfar9UvwAz4tiJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024476501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: Multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>May, Liliana G ; Kelly, J. Robert ; Bottino, Marco A ; Hill, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>May, Liliana G ; Kelly, J. Robert ; Bottino, Marco A ; Hill, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To determine the influence of cement thickness and ceramic/cement bonding on stresses and failure of CAD/CAM crowns, using both multi-physics finite element analysis and monotonic testing. Methods Axially symmetric FEA models were created for stress analysis of a stylized monolithic crown having resin cement thicknesses from 50 to 500 μm under occlusal loading. Ceramic–cement interface was modeled as bonded or not-bonded (cement–dentin as bonded). Cement polymerization shrinkage was simulated as a thermal contraction. Loads necessary to reach stresses for radial cracking from the intaglio surface were calculated by FEA. Experimentally, feldspathic CAD/CAM crowns based on the FEA model were machined having different occlusal cementation spaces, etched and cemented to dentin analogs. Non-bonding of etched ceramic was achieved using a thin layer of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Crowns were loaded to failure at 5 N/s, with radial cracks detected acoustically. Results Failure loads depended on the bonding condition and the cement thickness for both FEA and physical testing. Average fracture loads for bonded crowns were: 673.5 N at 50 μm cement and 300.6 N at 500 μm. FEA stresses due to polymerization shrinkage increased with the cement thickness overwhelming the protective effect of bonding, as was also seen experimentally. At 50 μm cement thickness, bonded crowns withstood at least twice the load before failure than non-bonded crowns. Significance Occlusal “fit” can have structural implications for CAD/CAM crowns; pre-cementation spaces around 50–100 μm being recommended from this study. Bonding benefits were lost at thickness approaching 450–500 μm due to polymerization shrinkage stresses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22595741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced Basic Science ; Bonding ; Cement shrinkage ; Cement thickness ; Cements ; Ceramics ; Compressive Strength ; Computer aided design ; Computer aided manufacturing ; Computer Simulation ; Crowns ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Porcelain ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Stress Analysis - methods ; Dentistry ; Failure ; Failure test ; Finite Element Analysis ; Finite element method ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Molar ; Polymerization ; Resin cement ; Resin Cements ; Shrinkage ; Software Validation ; Stresses ; Survival Analysis ; Tensile Strength ; Tensile stress</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2012-08, Vol.28 (8), p.e99-e109</ispartof><rights>Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>2012 Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-f18ef708fc92c0c7dd8c23a7beab1561dfd6364cf7c8f482c85f23070667a7073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-f18ef708fc92c0c7dd8c23a7beab1561dfd6364cf7c8f482c85f23070667a7073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S010956411200139X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65308</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22595741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>May, Liliana G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, J. Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: Multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To determine the influence of cement thickness and ceramic/cement bonding on stresses and failure of CAD/CAM crowns, using both multi-physics finite element analysis and monotonic testing. Methods Axially symmetric FEA models were created for stress analysis of a stylized monolithic crown having resin cement thicknesses from 50 to 500 μm under occlusal loading. Ceramic–cement interface was modeled as bonded or not-bonded (cement–dentin as bonded). Cement polymerization shrinkage was simulated as a thermal contraction. Loads necessary to reach stresses for radial cracking from the intaglio surface were calculated by FEA. Experimentally, feldspathic CAD/CAM crowns based on the FEA model were machined having different occlusal cementation spaces, etched and cemented to dentin analogs. Non-bonding of etched ceramic was achieved using a thin layer of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Crowns were loaded to failure at 5 N/s, with radial cracks detected acoustically. Results Failure loads depended on the bonding condition and the cement thickness for both FEA and physical testing. Average fracture loads for bonded crowns were: 673.5 N at 50 μm cement and 300.6 N at 500 μm. FEA stresses due to polymerization shrinkage increased with the cement thickness overwhelming the protective effect of bonding, as was also seen experimentally. At 50 μm cement thickness, bonded crowns withstood at least twice the load before failure than non-bonded crowns. Significance Occlusal “fit” can have structural implications for CAD/CAM crowns; pre-cementation spaces around 50–100 μm being recommended from this study. Bonding benefits were lost at thickness approaching 450–500 μm due to polymerization shrinkage stresses.</description><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Bonding</subject><subject>Cement shrinkage</subject><subject>Cement thickness</subject><subject>Cements</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Compressive Strength</subject><subject>Computer aided design</subject><subject>Computer aided manufacturing</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure test</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Resin cement</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Shrinkage</subject><subject>Software Validation</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAURSMEotPCHyDkJZtMnx3HTlggjYZpQWrFApDYWR77mXqa2EOcgOYP-GwcprBgM6ws2efeK793i-IFhSUFKi53S4th1N2SAWVL4EuoqkfFgjayLQFa-bhYAIW2rAWnZ8V5SjsA4KylT4szxuq2lpwuip8b59CMiURHDPbZkYx33twHTInoYMk2BuvDVxJDfkDitO-mAUkXtf0tWq_eXq5Xt1k86N4bYob4I6TX5HbqRl_u7w7Jm0SuNivSR4vdbDXb9jHEMYYsGDGN-fZZ8cTpLuHzh_Oi-Hy1-bR-V958uH6_Xt2Upm7YWDraoJPQONMyA0Za2xhWablFvaW1oNZZUQlunDSN4w0zTe1YBRKEkFqCrC6KV0ff_RC_TTlb9T4Z7DodME5JUdHOvKjZaZTmJGjbqjmNQoZA8Er8B8o4z_lAM8qPaB5qSgM6tR98r4dDhtRcArVTxxKouQQKuMolyLKXDwnTtkf7V_Rn6xl4cwQwD_q7x0El4zEYtH7IZVA2-lMJ_xqYvFlvdHePB0y7OA0hL1FRlbJGfZyLOPeQMsjfar9UvwAz4tiJ</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>May, Liliana G</creator><creator>Kelly, J. Robert</creator><creator>Bottino, Marco A</creator><creator>Hill, Thomas</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: Multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing</title><author>May, Liliana G ; Kelly, J. Robert ; Bottino, Marco A ; Hill, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c582t-f18ef708fc92c0c7dd8c23a7beab1561dfd6364cf7c8f482c85f23070667a7073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Bonding</topic><topic>Cement shrinkage</topic><topic>Cement thickness</topic><topic>Cements</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Compressive Strength</topic><topic>Computer aided design</topic><topic>Computer aided manufacturing</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure test</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Resin cement</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Shrinkage</topic><topic>Software Validation</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>May, Liliana G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, J. Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottino, Marco A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>May, Liliana G</au><au>Kelly, J. Robert</au><au>Bottino, Marco A</au><au>Hill, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: Multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e99</spage><epage>e109</epage><pages>e99-e109</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To determine the influence of cement thickness and ceramic/cement bonding on stresses and failure of CAD/CAM crowns, using both multi-physics finite element analysis and monotonic testing. Methods Axially symmetric FEA models were created for stress analysis of a stylized monolithic crown having resin cement thicknesses from 50 to 500 μm under occlusal loading. Ceramic–cement interface was modeled as bonded or not-bonded (cement–dentin as bonded). Cement polymerization shrinkage was simulated as a thermal contraction. Loads necessary to reach stresses for radial cracking from the intaglio surface were calculated by FEA. Experimentally, feldspathic CAD/CAM crowns based on the FEA model were machined having different occlusal cementation spaces, etched and cemented to dentin analogs. Non-bonding of etched ceramic was achieved using a thin layer of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Crowns were loaded to failure at 5 N/s, with radial cracks detected acoustically. Results Failure loads depended on the bonding condition and the cement thickness for both FEA and physical testing. Average fracture loads for bonded crowns were: 673.5 N at 50 μm cement and 300.6 N at 500 μm. FEA stresses due to polymerization shrinkage increased with the cement thickness overwhelming the protective effect of bonding, as was also seen experimentally. At 50 μm cement thickness, bonded crowns withstood at least twice the load before failure than non-bonded crowns. Significance Occlusal “fit” can have structural implications for CAD/CAM crowns; pre-cementation spaces around 50–100 μm being recommended from this study. Bonding benefits were lost at thickness approaching 450–500 μm due to polymerization shrinkage stresses.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22595741</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.033</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0109-5641 |
ispartof | Dental materials, 2012-08, Vol.28 (8), p.e99-e109 |
issn | 0109-5641 1879-0097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692307652 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Advanced Basic Science Bonding Cement shrinkage Cement thickness Cements Ceramics Compressive Strength Computer aided design Computer aided manufacturing Computer Simulation Crowns Dental Bonding Dental Porcelain Dental Prosthesis Design Dental Restoration Failure Dental Stress Analysis - methods Dentistry Failure Failure test Finite Element Analysis Finite element method Humans Materials Testing Molar Polymerization Resin cement Resin Cements Shrinkage Software Validation Stresses Survival Analysis Tensile Strength Tensile stress |
title | Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: Multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A56%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20cement%20thickness%20and%20bonding%20on%20the%20failure%20loads%20of%20CAD/CAM%20ceramic%20crowns:%20Multi-physics%20FEA%20modeling%20and%20monotonic%20testing&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=May,%20Liliana%20G&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e99&rft.epage=e109&rft.pages=e99-e109&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1024476501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024476501&rft_id=info:pmid/22595741&rft_els_id=S010956411200139X&rfr_iscdi=true |