A Review of “Wandering” Instruments for People With Dementia Who Get Lost
Objectives: This study is the first review to be conducted to evaluate measures of wandering behavior for identifying people with dementia at risk of getting lost. Method: Drawing upon systematic review search strategies, the relevant literature was reviewed for wandering instruments using MEDLINE,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research on social work practice 2014-07, Vol.24 (4), p.400-413 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 413 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 400 |
| container_title | Research on social work practice |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | White, Eleanor Bantry Montgomery, Paul |
| description | Objectives:
This study is the first review to be conducted to evaluate measures of wandering behavior for identifying people with dementia at risk of getting lost.
Method:
Drawing upon systematic review search strategies, the relevant literature was reviewed for wandering instruments using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The psychometric properties of these were evaluated with reference to establishing the risk of getting lost.
Results:
The search yielded 34 instruments. Of these, one wandering-specific measure and four measures of behavioral change in dementia met inclusion criteria. The ability of these to confidently evaluate the risk of getting lost remains uncertain.
Conclusion:
Further research is required to more fully evaluate the psychometric properties of the retrieved instruments. This process is made complex by difficulties in defining wandering and getting lost and methodologically, by the absence of a criterion reference. Methodological developments are required to enhance assessment-focused reviews in the psychosocial intervention field. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1049731513514116 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692285520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1031997</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1049731513514116</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3357687651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ca16c4dfd1ca4879500ebf68e2666566eb1b444bf2f3585053172ebdbb32eb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFb3boQBN26iczKXJMtSa61UFCl0GXI5aVPSTJ1JFXd9EH25PolTIiIFV-dw_u_cfkLOgV0DBMENMBEFHCRwCQJAHZAOSOl7gQzh0OVO9nb6MTmxdsEYcF9FHfLYoy_4VuI71QXdbj6nSZ2jKevZdvNFR7VtzHqJdWNpoQ19Rr2qkE7LZk5vcVcvEzqdazrEho61bU7JUZFUFs9-YpdM7gaT_r03fhqO-r2xl3ElGi9LQGUiL3LIEhEGkWQM00KF6CulpFKYQiqESAu_4DKUTHIIfEzzNOUuhLxLrtqxK6Nf12ibeFnaDKsqqVGvbQwq8v3Qfc8cermHLvTa1O64GKSAIFIMpKNYS2VGW2uwiFemXCbmIwYW7-yN9-11LRdti3Mr-8UHD8A4RA7tEq_VbTLDP0v_m_cNod2C3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1541796015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Review of “Wandering” Instruments for People With Dementia Who Get Lost</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>White, Eleanor Bantry ; Montgomery, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>White, Eleanor Bantry ; Montgomery, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives:
This study is the first review to be conducted to evaluate measures of wandering behavior for identifying people with dementia at risk of getting lost.
Method:
Drawing upon systematic review search strategies, the relevant literature was reviewed for wandering instruments using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The psychometric properties of these were evaluated with reference to establishing the risk of getting lost.
Results:
The search yielded 34 instruments. Of these, one wandering-specific measure and four measures of behavioral change in dementia met inclusion criteria. The ability of these to confidently evaluate the risk of getting lost remains uncertain.
Conclusion:
Further research is required to more fully evaluate the psychometric properties of the retrieved instruments. This process is made complex by difficulties in defining wandering and getting lost and methodologically, by the absence of a criterion reference. Methodological developments are required to enhance assessment-focused reviews in the psychosocial intervention field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049731513514116</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSWPEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>At Risk Persons ; Behavior ; Behavior Change ; Behavior Problems ; Dementia ; Diagnostic Tests ; Evaluation Methods ; Followup Studies ; Health ; Intervention ; Literature Reviews ; Longitudinal Studies ; Missing persons ; Nurses ; Outcomes of Treatment ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Risk ; Risk Assessment ; Safety ; Screening Tests ; Senility ; Social work ; Systematic review ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity</subject><ispartof>Research on social work practice, 2014-07, Vol.24 (4), p.400-413</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Jul 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ca16c4dfd1ca4879500ebf68e2666566eb1b444bf2f3585053172ebdbb32eb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ca16c4dfd1ca4879500ebf68e2666566eb1b444bf2f3585053172ebdbb32eb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049731513514116$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049731513514116$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1031997$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, Eleanor Bantry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>A Review of “Wandering” Instruments for People With Dementia Who Get Lost</title><title>Research on social work practice</title><description>Objectives:
This study is the first review to be conducted to evaluate measures of wandering behavior for identifying people with dementia at risk of getting lost.
Method:
Drawing upon systematic review search strategies, the relevant literature was reviewed for wandering instruments using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The psychometric properties of these were evaluated with reference to establishing the risk of getting lost.
Results:
The search yielded 34 instruments. Of these, one wandering-specific measure and four measures of behavioral change in dementia met inclusion criteria. The ability of these to confidently evaluate the risk of getting lost remains uncertain.
Conclusion:
Further research is required to more fully evaluate the psychometric properties of the retrieved instruments. This process is made complex by difficulties in defining wandering and getting lost and methodologically, by the absence of a criterion reference. Methodological developments are required to enhance assessment-focused reviews in the psychosocial intervention field.</description><subject>At Risk Persons</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Change</subject><subject>Behavior Problems</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Followup Studies</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Missing persons</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Outcomes of Treatment</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Senility</subject><subject>Social work</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><issn>1049-7315</issn><issn>1552-7581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFb3boQBN26iczKXJMtSa61UFCl0GXI5aVPSTJ1JFXd9EH25PolTIiIFV-dw_u_cfkLOgV0DBMENMBEFHCRwCQJAHZAOSOl7gQzh0OVO9nb6MTmxdsEYcF9FHfLYoy_4VuI71QXdbj6nSZ2jKevZdvNFR7VtzHqJdWNpoQ19Rr2qkE7LZk5vcVcvEzqdazrEho61bU7JUZFUFs9-YpdM7gaT_r03fhqO-r2xl3ElGi9LQGUiL3LIEhEGkWQM00KF6CulpFKYQiqESAu_4DKUTHIIfEzzNOUuhLxLrtqxK6Nf12ibeFnaDKsqqVGvbQwq8v3Qfc8cermHLvTa1O64GKSAIFIMpKNYS2VGW2uwiFemXCbmIwYW7-yN9-11LRdti3Mr-8UHD8A4RA7tEq_VbTLDP0v_m_cNod2C3Q</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>White, Eleanor Bantry</creator><creator>Montgomery, Paul</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>A Review of “Wandering” Instruments for People With Dementia Who Get Lost</title><author>White, Eleanor Bantry ; Montgomery, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ca16c4dfd1ca4879500ebf68e2666566eb1b444bf2f3585053172ebdbb32eb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>At Risk Persons</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Change</topic><topic>Behavior Problems</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Followup Studies</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Missing persons</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Outcomes of Treatment</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Senility</topic><topic>Social work</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, Eleanor Bantry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montgomery, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, Eleanor Bantry</au><au>Montgomery, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1031997</ericid><atitle>A Review of “Wandering” Instruments for People With Dementia Who Get Lost</atitle><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>400</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>400-413</pages><issn>1049-7315</issn><eissn>1552-7581</eissn><coden>RSWPEW</coden><abstract>Objectives:
This study is the first review to be conducted to evaluate measures of wandering behavior for identifying people with dementia at risk of getting lost.
Method:
Drawing upon systematic review search strategies, the relevant literature was reviewed for wandering instruments using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The psychometric properties of these were evaluated with reference to establishing the risk of getting lost.
Results:
The search yielded 34 instruments. Of these, one wandering-specific measure and four measures of behavioral change in dementia met inclusion criteria. The ability of these to confidently evaluate the risk of getting lost remains uncertain.
Conclusion:
Further research is required to more fully evaluate the psychometric properties of the retrieved instruments. This process is made complex by difficulties in defining wandering and getting lost and methodologically, by the absence of a criterion reference. Methodological developments are required to enhance assessment-focused reviews in the psychosocial intervention field.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1049731513514116</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1049-7315 |
| ispartof | Research on social work practice, 2014-07, Vol.24 (4), p.400-413 |
| issn | 1049-7315 1552-7581 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692285520 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | At Risk Persons Behavior Behavior Change Behavior Problems Dementia Diagnostic Tests Evaluation Methods Followup Studies Health Intervention Literature Reviews Longitudinal Studies Missing persons Nurses Outcomes of Treatment Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Risk Risk Assessment Safety Screening Tests Senility Social work Systematic review Test Reliability Test Validity |
| title | A Review of “Wandering” Instruments for People With Dementia Who Get Lost |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T08%3A20%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Review%20of%20%E2%80%9CWandering%E2%80%9D%20Instruments%20for%20People%20With%20Dementia%20Who%20Get%20Lost&rft.jtitle=Research%20on%20social%20work%20practice&rft.au=White,%20Eleanor%20Bantry&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=400&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=400-413&rft.issn=1049-7315&rft.eissn=1552-7581&rft.coden=RSWPEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049731513514116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3357687651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1541796015&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1031997&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049731513514116&rfr_iscdi=true |