Asia’s maritime order and New Zealand’s response
As th e powers jostle in a more competitive Asia-Pacific region, it may seem counter-intuitive to call for a clearer New Zealand position on the South China Sea disputes. But even as regional tensions grow, Wellington can stick up for its principles without joining a chorus of China criticism. Under...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | New Zealand international review 2014-09, Vol.39 (5), p.2-6 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 6 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 2 |
| container_title | New Zealand international review |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Ayson, Robert |
| description | As th e powers jostle in a more competitive Asia-Pacific region, it may seem counter-intuitive to call for a clearer New Zealand position on the South China Sea disputes. But even as regional tensions grow, Wellington can stick up for its principles without joining a chorus of China criticism. Under the Key government, New Zealand’s alignment with the United States is becoming more pronounced through a series of small but cumulatively important steps. This makes it even more important for New Zealand’s policy to be staked out clearly, including in written form accessible to the public discussion. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692284812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.600755442941492</informt_id><jstor_id>48551481</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48551481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j2302-5f4b740af037d282e48090e2f4a8145e36df6a014f7e63af84de6cc66639c3953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtKxEAQhoMoOI4eQQi4cROofqZ7OQy-YNCNgrhpepKKdkjSY3cGHyuv4fU8ie2M4NZVFdRXf_1VtZNNKGVQCM30bjYBQqAAKul-dhBjCwCCUTnJ-Cw6-_XxGfPeBje6HnMfagy5Her8Gl_yB7RdyjdIwLjyQ8TDbK-xXcSj3zjN7s7PbueXxeLm4mo-WxRtmkwL0fBlycE2wMqaKopcgQakDbeKcIFM1o20QHhTomS2UbxGWVVSSqYrpgWbZqdb3VXwz2uMo-ldrLBLhtCvoyFSU6q4IvSfKJQE_oES0EppIhN6skWHbng3bqjxNUWtk_1SSyaBKlYm6n5Lhd6NpvJdh9Xo0qFaO0YT0YbqKTU3flP34dHU3hm7TKPAMEbkX1EClEJwTjUnXP-sdbyVbuPog1kFl970ZrgSgqS92TeiTZNb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1610988916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asia’s maritime order and New Zealand’s response</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Ayson, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Ayson, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>As th e powers jostle in a more competitive Asia-Pacific region, it may seem counter-intuitive to call for a clearer New Zealand position on the South China Sea disputes. But even as regional tensions grow, Wellington can stick up for its principles without joining a chorus of China criticism. Under the Key government, New Zealand’s alignment with the United States is becoming more pronounced through a series of small but cumulatively important steps. This makes it even more important for New Zealand’s policy to be staked out clearly, including in written form accessible to the public discussion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0110-0262</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2230-5939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2230-5939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand Institute of International Affairs</publisher><subject>Asia ; Balance of power ; Boundary disputes ; China ; China (People's Republic) ; Criticism ; Disputes ; Geopolitics ; International relations ; International security ; Maritime law ; New Zealand ; Pacific settlement of international disputes ; Peoples Republic of China ; Regionalism ; Security measures ; South China sea ; Strategic studies ; Territorial waters ; Threat ; United States ; United States of America ; World order</subject><ispartof>New Zealand international review, 2014-09, Vol.39 (5), p.2-6</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48551481$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48551481$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27842,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://natlib-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?query=any,contains,998147963602837&tab=innz&search_scope=INNZ&vid=NLNZ&offset=0$$DView this record in NLNZ$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ayson, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Asia’s maritime order and New Zealand’s response</title><title>New Zealand international review</title><description>As th e powers jostle in a more competitive Asia-Pacific region, it may seem counter-intuitive to call for a clearer New Zealand position on the South China Sea disputes. But even as regional tensions grow, Wellington can stick up for its principles without joining a chorus of China criticism. Under the Key government, New Zealand’s alignment with the United States is becoming more pronounced through a series of small but cumulatively important steps. This makes it even more important for New Zealand’s policy to be staked out clearly, including in written form accessible to the public discussion.</description><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Balance of power</subject><subject>Boundary disputes</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>China (People's Republic)</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>International security</subject><subject>Maritime law</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Pacific settlement of international disputes</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Regionalism</subject><subject>Security measures</subject><subject>South China sea</subject><subject>Strategic studies</subject><subject>Territorial waters</subject><subject>Threat</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>World order</subject><issn>0110-0262</issn><issn>2230-5939</issn><issn>2230-5939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtKxEAQhoMoOI4eQQi4cROofqZ7OQy-YNCNgrhpepKKdkjSY3cGHyuv4fU8ie2M4NZVFdRXf_1VtZNNKGVQCM30bjYBQqAAKul-dhBjCwCCUTnJ-Cw6-_XxGfPeBje6HnMfagy5Her8Gl_yB7RdyjdIwLjyQ8TDbK-xXcSj3zjN7s7PbueXxeLm4mo-WxRtmkwL0fBlycE2wMqaKopcgQakDbeKcIFM1o20QHhTomS2UbxGWVVSSqYrpgWbZqdb3VXwz2uMo-ldrLBLhtCvoyFSU6q4IvSfKJQE_oES0EppIhN6skWHbng3bqjxNUWtk_1SSyaBKlYm6n5Lhd6NpvJdh9Xo0qFaO0YT0YbqKTU3flP34dHU3hm7TKPAMEbkX1EClEJwTjUnXP-sdbyVbuPog1kFl970ZrgSgqS92TeiTZNb</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Ayson, Robert</creator><general>New Zealand Institute of International Affairs</general><scope>DUNLO</scope><scope>GOM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Asia’s maritime order and New Zealand’s response</title><author>Ayson, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j2302-5f4b740af037d282e48090e2f4a8145e36df6a014f7e63af84de6cc66639c3953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Balance of power</topic><topic>Boundary disputes</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>China (People's Republic)</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>International security</topic><topic>Maritime law</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Pacific settlement of international disputes</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Regionalism</topic><topic>Security measures</topic><topic>South China sea</topic><topic>Strategic studies</topic><topic>Territorial waters</topic><topic>Threat</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>World order</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ayson, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Index New Zealand (A&I)</collection><collection>Index New Zealand</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>New Zealand international review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ayson, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asia’s maritime order and New Zealand’s response</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand international review</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>2-6</pages><issn>0110-0262</issn><issn>2230-5939</issn><eissn>2230-5939</eissn><abstract>As th e powers jostle in a more competitive Asia-Pacific region, it may seem counter-intuitive to call for a clearer New Zealand position on the South China Sea disputes. But even as regional tensions grow, Wellington can stick up for its principles without joining a chorus of China criticism. Under the Key government, New Zealand’s alignment with the United States is becoming more pronounced through a series of small but cumulatively important steps. This makes it even more important for New Zealand’s policy to be staked out clearly, including in written form accessible to the public discussion.</abstract><pub>New Zealand Institute of International Affairs</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0110-0262 |
| ispartof | New Zealand international review, 2014-09, Vol.39 (5), p.2-6 |
| issn | 0110-0262 2230-5939 2230-5939 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692284812 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| subjects | Asia Balance of power Boundary disputes China China (People's Republic) Criticism Disputes Geopolitics International relations International security Maritime law New Zealand Pacific settlement of international disputes Peoples Republic of China Regionalism Security measures South China sea Strategic studies Territorial waters Threat United States United States of America World order |
| title | Asia’s maritime order and New Zealand’s response |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asia%E2%80%99s%20maritime%20order%20and%20New%20Zealand%E2%80%99s%20response&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20international%20review&rft.au=Ayson,%20Robert&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=2-6&rft.issn=0110-0262&rft.eissn=2230-5939&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48551481%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1610988916&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.600755442941492&rft_jstor_id=48551481&rfr_iscdi=true |