On the notion of pre-request
In early work within Conversation Analysis, utterances within a request sequence which inquire regarding some of the preconditions of granting the request (such as having the item or having the ability to perform the action) are analyzed as pre-requests. Levinson, in an extended discussion of the or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Discourse studies 2015-02, Vol.17 (1), p.41-63 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 63 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Discourse studies |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Fox, Barbara |
description | In early work within Conversation Analysis, utterances within a request sequence which inquire regarding some of the preconditions of granting the request (such as having the item or having the ability to perform the action) are analyzed as pre-requests. Levinson, in an extended discussion of the organization of pre-requests and request sequences, treats utterances such as 'do you have X?', 'can I have X?' or 'can you X for me?' as inquiring about preconditions that could prevent the recipient from granting the request. By checking on preconditions, the requester works to avoid producing a request which will be declined, which is a dispreferred action. In other words, pre-requests, like other pre-sequences, function to project that another action will be produced if a favorable response is given; if not, that projected action may not be produced. In this view, then, they work to maintain the preference organization. This study uses requesting in service encounters to re-examine the evidence for an analysis of such utterances as pre-requests and finds that alternative analyses are more suited in these requesting activities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1461445614557762 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692279202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24815076</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1461445614557762</sage_id><sourcerecordid>24815076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7e91d531b56d1da373e80a7b54b120440d6842624a23e9360826965c1baf7aba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1Pw0AMhk8IJEphZwApI0vA9n1mRBUFpEpdYD5dkgu0anPlLhn496SkYmBALLZlP-9r2YxdItwian2HQqEQcghSaq3oiE32rVyDgeNDvZ-fsrOU1gBIhVATdrVss-7dZ23oVqHNQpPtos-j_-h96s7ZSeM2yV8c8pS9zh9eZk_5Yvn4PLtf5JXgssu1L7CWHEupaqwd19wbcLqUokQCIaBWRpAi4Yj7giswpAolKyxdo13p-JTdjL67GL4X2-0qVX6zca0PfbKoCiJdENA_UGFAk0AzoDCiVQwpRd_YXVxtXfy0CHb_M_v7Z4MkHyXJvXm7Dn1sh7v_4q9Hfp26EH_8SRiUoBX_AmQ_cSU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1648072418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the notion of pre-request</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Fox, Barbara</creator><creatorcontrib>Fox, Barbara</creatorcontrib><description>In early work within Conversation Analysis, utterances within a request sequence which inquire regarding some of the preconditions of granting the request (such as having the item or having the ability to perform the action) are analyzed as pre-requests. Levinson, in an extended discussion of the organization of pre-requests and request sequences, treats utterances such as 'do you have X?', 'can I have X?' or 'can you X for me?' as inquiring about preconditions that could prevent the recipient from granting the request. By checking on preconditions, the requester works to avoid producing a request which will be declined, which is a dispreferred action. In other words, pre-requests, like other pre-sequences, function to project that another action will be produced if a favorable response is given; if not, that projected action may not be produced. In this view, then, they work to maintain the preference organization. This study uses requesting in service encounters to re-examine the evidence for an analysis of such utterances as pre-requests and finds that alternative analyses are more suited in these requesting activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1461445614557762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ability ; Actionalism ; Analysis ; Conversation ; Organizations ; Public services</subject><ispartof>Discourse studies, 2015-02, Vol.17 (1), p.41-63</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 SAGE Publications Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7e91d531b56d1da373e80a7b54b120440d6842624a23e9360826965c1baf7aba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7e91d531b56d1da373e80a7b54b120440d6842624a23e9360826965c1baf7aba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24815076$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24815076$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fox, Barbara</creatorcontrib><title>On the notion of pre-request</title><title>Discourse studies</title><description>In early work within Conversation Analysis, utterances within a request sequence which inquire regarding some of the preconditions of granting the request (such as having the item or having the ability to perform the action) are analyzed as pre-requests. Levinson, in an extended discussion of the organization of pre-requests and request sequences, treats utterances such as 'do you have X?', 'can I have X?' or 'can you X for me?' as inquiring about preconditions that could prevent the recipient from granting the request. By checking on preconditions, the requester works to avoid producing a request which will be declined, which is a dispreferred action. In other words, pre-requests, like other pre-sequences, function to project that another action will be produced if a favorable response is given; if not, that projected action may not be produced. In this view, then, they work to maintain the preference organization. This study uses requesting in service encounters to re-examine the evidence for an analysis of such utterances as pre-requests and finds that alternative analyses are more suited in these requesting activities.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Actionalism</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Public services</subject><issn>1461-4456</issn><issn>1461-7080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1Pw0AMhk8IJEphZwApI0vA9n1mRBUFpEpdYD5dkgu0anPlLhn496SkYmBALLZlP-9r2YxdItwian2HQqEQcghSaq3oiE32rVyDgeNDvZ-fsrOU1gBIhVATdrVss-7dZ23oVqHNQpPtos-j_-h96s7ZSeM2yV8c8pS9zh9eZk_5Yvn4PLtf5JXgssu1L7CWHEupaqwd19wbcLqUokQCIaBWRpAi4Yj7giswpAolKyxdo13p-JTdjL67GL4X2-0qVX6zca0PfbKoCiJdENA_UGFAk0AzoDCiVQwpRd_YXVxtXfy0CHb_M_v7Z4MkHyXJvXm7Dn1sh7v_4q9Hfp26EH_8SRiUoBX_AmQ_cSU</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Fox, Barbara</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>On the notion of pre-request</title><author>Fox, Barbara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7e91d531b56d1da373e80a7b54b120440d6842624a23e9360826965c1baf7aba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Actionalism</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Public services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fox, Barbara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Discourse studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fox, Barbara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the notion of pre-request</atitle><jtitle>Discourse studies</jtitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>41-63</pages><issn>1461-4456</issn><eissn>1461-7080</eissn><abstract>In early work within Conversation Analysis, utterances within a request sequence which inquire regarding some of the preconditions of granting the request (such as having the item or having the ability to perform the action) are analyzed as pre-requests. Levinson, in an extended discussion of the organization of pre-requests and request sequences, treats utterances such as 'do you have X?', 'can I have X?' or 'can you X for me?' as inquiring about preconditions that could prevent the recipient from granting the request. By checking on preconditions, the requester works to avoid producing a request which will be declined, which is a dispreferred action. In other words, pre-requests, like other pre-sequences, function to project that another action will be produced if a favorable response is given; if not, that projected action may not be produced. In this view, then, they work to maintain the preference organization. This study uses requesting in service encounters to re-examine the evidence for an analysis of such utterances as pre-requests and finds that alternative analyses are more suited in these requesting activities.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1461445614557762</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-4456 |
ispartof | Discourse studies, 2015-02, Vol.17 (1), p.41-63 |
issn | 1461-4456 1461-7080 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1692279202 |
source | SAGE Complete; JSTOR |
subjects | Ability Actionalism Analysis Conversation Organizations Public services |
title | On the notion of pre-request |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T20%3A02%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20notion%20of%20pre-request&rft.jtitle=Discourse%20studies&rft.au=Fox,%20Barbara&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=41-63&rft.issn=1461-4456&rft.eissn=1461-7080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1461445614557762&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24815076%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1648072418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24815076&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1461445614557762&rfr_iscdi=true |