Reliability and validity of the Dutch-translated Body Image Scale
Purpose Lacking a comprehensible and widely applicable Dutch test to assess body image changes in cancer patients, we validated Hopwood's Body Image Scale (BIS) for the Dutch language. Methods The BIS consists of 10 items scored 0-3. Total scores range from 0 (minimum body image-related distres...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Quality of life research 2015-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1629-1633 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1633 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1629 |
| container_title | Quality of life research |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | van Verschuer, V. M. T. Vrijland, W. W. Mares-Engelberts, I. Klem, T. M. A. L. |
| description | Purpose Lacking a comprehensible and widely applicable Dutch test to assess body image changes in cancer patients, we validated Hopwood's Body Image Scale (BIS) for the Dutch language. Methods The BIS consists of 10 items scored 0-3. Total scores range from 0 (minimum body image-related distress) to 30 (maximum distress). After forward and backward translation of the BIS, we evaluated its psychometric characteristics in breast cancer patients. We assessed feasibility by missing answer rates and positive response prevalence (score ≥1) per item (criterion ≥30 %), testretest reliability with a 2-week interval, internal consistence using Cronbach's α and discriminant ability by comparing body image after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy. Results Psychometric evaluation of 108 BCT and 101 mastectomy patients showed high feasibility (0.2 % missing answers), high positive response prevalence of ≥30 % in 9/10 items and high internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90). Test-retest reliability and correlation were high with 5.78 (test) versus 5.75 (retest; P = 0.86) and Spearman's ρ = 0.92 (P < 0.01). Discriminant ability was good with BIS scores of 4.56 after BCT versus 7.19 after mastectomy (P < 0.01). All results were comparable to the results of the original BIS. Conclusion The Dutch-translated BIS showed excellent psychometric results very similar to the original BIS. Its concise and simple design further supports wide application in clinical practice. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11136-014-0907-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691599156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44849457</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44849457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-943c52b0dbecaeffc7c4195a4567ad23f55d81d212a9a7874ea5a09074fb45d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMozjj6A1woBTduonm2zdK3giD4WIfbJJ3p0Gk1aYX592bsOIgLAyGE-52Te08QOqTkjBKSnQdKKU8xoQITRTJMt9CYyoxjlgq1jcZEpQwrLvgI7YUwJ4TkirBdNGIyrpynY3Tx7OoKiqquumUCjU0-oa7s6tKWSTdzyXXfmRnuPDShhs7Z5LK1y-RhAVOXvBio3T7aKaEO7mB9TtDb7c3r1T1-fLp7uLp4xEZy0mEluJGsILZwBlxZmswIqiQImWZgGS-ltDm1jDJQkOWZcCBhNZUoCyGt4hN0Ovi--_ajd6HTiyoYV9fQuLYPmqaKShV3GtGTP-i87X0Tu_umuEqVYJGiA2V8G4J3pX731QL8UlOiV_nqIV8d89WrTjSNmuO1c18snN0ofgKNABuAEEvN1PlfT__jejSI5qFr_cZUiFwoEf_zC-YzjVs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691396942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and validity of the Dutch-translated Body Image Scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>van Verschuer, V. M. T. ; Vrijland, W. W. ; Mares-Engelberts, I. ; Klem, T. M. A. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Verschuer, V. M. T. ; Vrijland, W. W. ; Mares-Engelberts, I. ; Klem, T. M. A. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Lacking a comprehensible and widely applicable Dutch test to assess body image changes in cancer patients, we validated Hopwood's Body Image Scale (BIS) for the Dutch language. Methods The BIS consists of 10 items scored 0-3. Total scores range from 0 (minimum body image-related distress) to 30 (maximum distress). After forward and backward translation of the BIS, we evaluated its psychometric characteristics in breast cancer patients. We assessed feasibility by missing answer rates and positive response prevalence (score ≥1) per item (criterion ≥30 %), testretest reliability with a 2-week interval, internal consistence using Cronbach's α and discriminant ability by comparing body image after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy. Results Psychometric evaluation of 108 BCT and 101 mastectomy patients showed high feasibility (0.2 % missing answers), high positive response prevalence of ≥30 % in 9/10 items and high internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90). Test-retest reliability and correlation were high with 5.78 (test) versus 5.75 (retest; P = 0.86) and Spearman's ρ = 0.92 (P < 0.01). Discriminant ability was good with BIS scores of 4.56 after BCT versus 7.19 after mastectomy (P < 0.01). All results were comparable to the results of the original BIS. Conclusion The Dutch-translated BIS showed excellent psychometric results very similar to the original BIS. Its concise and simple design further supports wide application in clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0907-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25555836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body composition ; Body image ; Body Image - psychology ; Breast cancer ; Brief Communication ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Data collection ; Denmark ; Dutch language ; Female ; Humans ; INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT ; Language ; Mastectomy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Psychometrics ; Public Health ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Response rates ; Self image ; Sociology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translating ; Translations ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2015-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1629-1633</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing 2015</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-943c52b0dbecaeffc7c4195a4567ad23f55d81d212a9a7874ea5a09074fb45d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-943c52b0dbecaeffc7c4195a4567ad23f55d81d212a9a7874ea5a09074fb45d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44849457$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44849457$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25555836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Verschuer, V. M. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrijland, W. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mares-Engelberts, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klem, T. M. A. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and validity of the Dutch-translated Body Image Scale</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose Lacking a comprehensible and widely applicable Dutch test to assess body image changes in cancer patients, we validated Hopwood's Body Image Scale (BIS) for the Dutch language. Methods The BIS consists of 10 items scored 0-3. Total scores range from 0 (minimum body image-related distress) to 30 (maximum distress). After forward and backward translation of the BIS, we evaluated its psychometric characteristics in breast cancer patients. We assessed feasibility by missing answer rates and positive response prevalence (score ≥1) per item (criterion ≥30 %), testretest reliability with a 2-week interval, internal consistence using Cronbach's α and discriminant ability by comparing body image after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy. Results Psychometric evaluation of 108 BCT and 101 mastectomy patients showed high feasibility (0.2 % missing answers), high positive response prevalence of ≥30 % in 9/10 items and high internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90). Test-retest reliability and correlation were high with 5.78 (test) versus 5.75 (retest; P = 0.86) and Spearman's ρ = 0.92 (P < 0.01). Discriminant ability was good with BIS scores of 4.56 after BCT versus 7.19 after mastectomy (P < 0.01). All results were comparable to the results of the original BIS. Conclusion The Dutch-translated BIS showed excellent psychometric results very similar to the original BIS. Its concise and simple design further supports wide application in clinical practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Body image</subject><subject>Body Image - psychology</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Brief Communication</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Self image</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translating</subject><subject>Translations</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMozjj6A1woBTduonm2zdK3giD4WIfbJJ3p0Gk1aYX592bsOIgLAyGE-52Te08QOqTkjBKSnQdKKU8xoQITRTJMt9CYyoxjlgq1jcZEpQwrLvgI7YUwJ4TkirBdNGIyrpynY3Tx7OoKiqquumUCjU0-oa7s6tKWSTdzyXXfmRnuPDShhs7Z5LK1y-RhAVOXvBio3T7aKaEO7mB9TtDb7c3r1T1-fLp7uLp4xEZy0mEluJGsILZwBlxZmswIqiQImWZgGS-ltDm1jDJQkOWZcCBhNZUoCyGt4hN0Ovi--_ajd6HTiyoYV9fQuLYPmqaKShV3GtGTP-i87X0Tu_umuEqVYJGiA2V8G4J3pX731QL8UlOiV_nqIV8d89WrTjSNmuO1c18snN0ofgKNABuAEEvN1PlfT__jejSI5qFr_cZUiFwoEf_zC-YzjVs</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>van Verschuer, V. M. T.</creator><creator>Vrijland, W. W.</creator><creator>Mares-Engelberts, I.</creator><creator>Klem, T. M. A. L.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Reliability and validity of the Dutch-translated Body Image Scale</title><author>van Verschuer, V. M. T. ; Vrijland, W. W. ; Mares-Engelberts, I. ; Klem, T. M. A. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-943c52b0dbecaeffc7c4195a4567ad23f55d81d212a9a7874ea5a09074fb45d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Body image</topic><topic>Body Image - psychology</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Brief Communication</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Self image</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translating</topic><topic>Translations</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Verschuer, V. M. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrijland, W. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mares-Engelberts, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klem, T. M. A. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Verschuer, V. M. T.</au><au>Vrijland, W. W.</au><au>Mares-Engelberts, I.</au><au>Klem, T. M. A. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and validity of the Dutch-translated Body Image Scale</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1629</spage><epage>1633</epage><pages>1629-1633</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose Lacking a comprehensible and widely applicable Dutch test to assess body image changes in cancer patients, we validated Hopwood's Body Image Scale (BIS) for the Dutch language. Methods The BIS consists of 10 items scored 0-3. Total scores range from 0 (minimum body image-related distress) to 30 (maximum distress). After forward and backward translation of the BIS, we evaluated its psychometric characteristics in breast cancer patients. We assessed feasibility by missing answer rates and positive response prevalence (score ≥1) per item (criterion ≥30 %), testretest reliability with a 2-week interval, internal consistence using Cronbach's α and discriminant ability by comparing body image after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy. Results Psychometric evaluation of 108 BCT and 101 mastectomy patients showed high feasibility (0.2 % missing answers), high positive response prevalence of ≥30 % in 9/10 items and high internal consistency (α ≥ 0.90). Test-retest reliability and correlation were high with 5.78 (test) versus 5.75 (retest; P = 0.86) and Spearman's ρ = 0.92 (P < 0.01). Discriminant ability was good with BIS scores of 4.56 after BCT versus 7.19 after mastectomy (P < 0.01). All results were comparable to the results of the original BIS. Conclusion The Dutch-translated BIS showed excellent psychometric results very similar to the original BIS. Its concise and simple design further supports wide application in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>25555836</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-014-0907-1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0962-9343 |
| ispartof | Quality of life research, 2015-07, Vol.24 (7), p.1629-1633 |
| issn | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691599156 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Body composition Body image Body Image - psychology Breast cancer Brief Communication Cancer Cancer therapies Data collection Denmark Dutch language Female Humans INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT Language Mastectomy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Patients Psychometrics Public Health Quality of Life Quality of Life Research Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Response rates Self image Sociology Surveys and Questionnaires Translating Translations Validity |
| title | Reliability and validity of the Dutch-translated Body Image Scale |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T05%3A04%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20the%20Dutch-translated%20Body%20Image%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=van%20Verschuer,%20V.%20M.%20T.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1629&rft.epage=1633&rft.pages=1629-1633&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-014-0907-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44849457%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691396942&rft_id=info:pmid/25555836&rft_jstor_id=44849457&rfr_iscdi=true |