Impact of Intestinal Rehabilitation Program and Its Innovative Therapies on the Outcome of Intestinal Transplant Candidates

ABSTRACT Objectives: The outcome of children with intestinal failure has improved during the past decade following the introduction of novel therapies by dedicated intestinal rehabilitation programs (IRP). The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of IRP on the outcome of intestinal tran...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition 2015-07, Vol.61 (1), p.18-23
Hauptverfasser: Avitzur, Yaron, Wang, Jenny Y., Silva, Nicole T., Burghardt, Karolina M., DeAngelis, Maria, Grant, David, Ng, Vicky L., Jones, Nicola, Wales, Paul W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition
container_volume 61
creator Avitzur, Yaron
Wang, Jenny Y.
Silva, Nicole T.
Burghardt, Karolina M.
DeAngelis, Maria
Grant, David
Ng, Vicky L.
Jones, Nicola
Wales, Paul W.
description ABSTRACT Objectives: The outcome of children with intestinal failure has improved during the past decade following the introduction of novel therapies by dedicated intestinal rehabilitation programs (IRP). The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of IRP on the outcome of intestinal transplant (IT) candidates and the transplant waiting list. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of children assessed for IT (n = 84) during a 10‐year period. Comparisons were made among the following 3 time periods: before the establishment of our center's IRP (1999–2002; n = 33), early IRP (2003–2005; n = 18), and late IRP (2006–2009; n = 33). The following endpoints were used: patient outcome following IT assessment (not listed, listed and removed from the list, received transplant, died while on the list), patient characteristics at IT assessment, and patient status at the end of the study. Results: The late‐IRP era was associated with an increase in patients who were not listed (42% vs 28% at other periods, P = NS) and patients who were removed from the IT waiting list because of clinical improvement (P < 0.0005), and a decrease in those who died before transplant (15% vs >60% at other periods, P < 0.0005). The cause of death shifted from traditional causes such as liver failure or sepsis to other comorbid conditions (P < 0.005). Improved liver function at listing was also observed during late IRP (P < 0.005). Conclusions: Treatment by IRP, coupled with recent advances in the medical management of intestinal failure, is associated with improved survival and outcome of patients waiting for IT, and may lead to overall reduction in the number of IT in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000735
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691595683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1691595683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-87d9c154fced2bec9409a9f14c718b561112a0b0c78e0b475e251829f1f9a05c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFv1DAUhK0K1C4t_6BCPnJJaztxEh84wKotWxW6qpaz5TgvjcGJU9tpVfHn8WoXhHoBX2zpfTNvPAidUnJGiajOv6yvzsjfp8r5AVpQnpdZURP6Ci0Iq6qMUVoeoTchfN8yBSeH6IjxklLCxAL9XA2T0hG7Dq_GCCGaUVl8B71qjDVRReNGvPbu3qsBq7HFqxgSObrHNHoEvOnBq8lAwImLPeDbOWo3wAvDjVdjmKwaI14mF9OqNDpBrztlA7zd38fo2-XFZvk5u7m9Wi0_3mSaM8azumqFprzoNLSsAS0KIpToaKErWjfbn1CmSEN0VQNpiooD47RmieiEIlznx-j9znfy7mFOkeRgggab4oCbg6SloFzwss4TWuxQ7V0IHjo5eTMo_ywpkdvaZapdvqw9yd7tN8zNAO0f0e-eE1DvgCdnI_jww85P4GUPysb-X94f9lJj4fm_8sjr9df802V6EpL_AhzmoPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691595683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Intestinal Rehabilitation Program and Its Innovative Therapies on the Outcome of Intestinal Transplant Candidates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Avitzur, Yaron ; Wang, Jenny Y. ; Silva, Nicole T. ; Burghardt, Karolina M. ; DeAngelis, Maria ; Grant, David ; Ng, Vicky L. ; Jones, Nicola ; Wales, Paul W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Avitzur, Yaron ; Wang, Jenny Y. ; Silva, Nicole T. ; Burghardt, Karolina M. ; DeAngelis, Maria ; Grant, David ; Ng, Vicky L. ; Jones, Nicola ; Wales, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objectives: The outcome of children with intestinal failure has improved during the past decade following the introduction of novel therapies by dedicated intestinal rehabilitation programs (IRP). The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of IRP on the outcome of intestinal transplant (IT) candidates and the transplant waiting list. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of children assessed for IT (n = 84) during a 10‐year period. Comparisons were made among the following 3 time periods: before the establishment of our center's IRP (1999–2002; n = 33), early IRP (2003–2005; n = 18), and late IRP (2006–2009; n = 33). The following endpoints were used: patient outcome following IT assessment (not listed, listed and removed from the list, received transplant, died while on the list), patient characteristics at IT assessment, and patient status at the end of the study. Results: The late‐IRP era was associated with an increase in patients who were not listed (42% vs 28% at other periods, P = NS) and patients who were removed from the IT waiting list because of clinical improvement (P &lt; 0.0005), and a decrease in those who died before transplant (15% vs &gt;60% at other periods, P &lt; 0.0005). The cause of death shifted from traditional causes such as liver failure or sepsis to other comorbid conditions (P &lt; 0.005). Improved liver function at listing was also observed during late IRP (P &lt; 0.005). Conclusions: Treatment by IRP, coupled with recent advances in the medical management of intestinal failure, is associated with improved survival and outcome of patients waiting for IT, and may lead to overall reduction in the number of IT in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-2116</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000735</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25611029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Intestinal Diseases - surgery ; Intestinal Diseases - therapy ; intestinal failure ; intestinal rehabilitation ; intestinal transplantation ; Intestines - pathology ; Intestines - surgery ; Male ; Organ Transplantation ; program ; Retrospective Studies ; Therapies, Investigational ; therapy ; Waiting Lists</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2015-07, Vol.61 (1), p.18-23</ispartof><rights>2015 by European Society for European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition</rights><rights>2015 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-87d9c154fced2bec9409a9f14c718b561112a0b0c78e0b475e251829f1f9a05c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-87d9c154fced2bec9409a9f14c718b561112a0b0c78e0b475e251829f1f9a05c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1097%2FMPG.0000000000000735$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1097%2FMPG.0000000000000735$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25611029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Avitzur, Yaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jenny Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Nicole T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burghardt, Karolina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeAngelis, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Vicky L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Intestinal Rehabilitation Program and Its Innovative Therapies on the Outcome of Intestinal Transplant Candidates</title><title>Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objectives: The outcome of children with intestinal failure has improved during the past decade following the introduction of novel therapies by dedicated intestinal rehabilitation programs (IRP). The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of IRP on the outcome of intestinal transplant (IT) candidates and the transplant waiting list. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of children assessed for IT (n = 84) during a 10‐year period. Comparisons were made among the following 3 time periods: before the establishment of our center's IRP (1999–2002; n = 33), early IRP (2003–2005; n = 18), and late IRP (2006–2009; n = 33). The following endpoints were used: patient outcome following IT assessment (not listed, listed and removed from the list, received transplant, died while on the list), patient characteristics at IT assessment, and patient status at the end of the study. Results: The late‐IRP era was associated with an increase in patients who were not listed (42% vs 28% at other periods, P = NS) and patients who were removed from the IT waiting list because of clinical improvement (P &lt; 0.0005), and a decrease in those who died before transplant (15% vs &gt;60% at other periods, P &lt; 0.0005). The cause of death shifted from traditional causes such as liver failure or sepsis to other comorbid conditions (P &lt; 0.005). Improved liver function at listing was also observed during late IRP (P &lt; 0.005). Conclusions: Treatment by IRP, coupled with recent advances in the medical management of intestinal failure, is associated with improved survival and outcome of patients waiting for IT, and may lead to overall reduction in the number of IT in the future.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Intestinal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Intestinal Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>intestinal failure</subject><subject>intestinal rehabilitation</subject><subject>intestinal transplantation</subject><subject>Intestines - pathology</subject><subject>Intestines - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Organ Transplantation</subject><subject>program</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Therapies, Investigational</subject><subject>therapy</subject><subject>Waiting Lists</subject><issn>0277-2116</issn><issn>1536-4801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFv1DAUhK0K1C4t_6BCPnJJaztxEh84wKotWxW6qpaz5TgvjcGJU9tpVfHn8WoXhHoBX2zpfTNvPAidUnJGiajOv6yvzsjfp8r5AVpQnpdZURP6Ci0Iq6qMUVoeoTchfN8yBSeH6IjxklLCxAL9XA2T0hG7Dq_GCCGaUVl8B71qjDVRReNGvPbu3qsBq7HFqxgSObrHNHoEvOnBq8lAwImLPeDbOWo3wAvDjVdjmKwaI14mF9OqNDpBrztlA7zd38fo2-XFZvk5u7m9Wi0_3mSaM8azumqFprzoNLSsAS0KIpToaKErWjfbn1CmSEN0VQNpiooD47RmieiEIlznx-j9znfy7mFOkeRgggab4oCbg6SloFzwss4TWuxQ7V0IHjo5eTMo_ywpkdvaZapdvqw9yd7tN8zNAO0f0e-eE1DvgCdnI_jww85P4GUPysb-X94f9lJj4fm_8sjr9df802V6EpL_AhzmoPA</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Avitzur, Yaron</creator><creator>Wang, Jenny Y.</creator><creator>Silva, Nicole T.</creator><creator>Burghardt, Karolina M.</creator><creator>DeAngelis, Maria</creator><creator>Grant, David</creator><creator>Ng, Vicky L.</creator><creator>Jones, Nicola</creator><creator>Wales, Paul W.</creator><general>by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Impact of Intestinal Rehabilitation Program and Its Innovative Therapies on the Outcome of Intestinal Transplant Candidates</title><author>Avitzur, Yaron ; Wang, Jenny Y. ; Silva, Nicole T. ; Burghardt, Karolina M. ; DeAngelis, Maria ; Grant, David ; Ng, Vicky L. ; Jones, Nicola ; Wales, Paul W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5225-87d9c154fced2bec9409a9f14c718b561112a0b0c78e0b475e251829f1f9a05c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Intestinal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Intestinal Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>intestinal failure</topic><topic>intestinal rehabilitation</topic><topic>intestinal transplantation</topic><topic>Intestines - pathology</topic><topic>Intestines - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Organ Transplantation</topic><topic>program</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Therapies, Investigational</topic><topic>therapy</topic><topic>Waiting Lists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Avitzur, Yaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jenny Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Nicole T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burghardt, Karolina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeAngelis, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Vicky L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Avitzur, Yaron</au><au>Wang, Jenny Y.</au><au>Silva, Nicole T.</au><au>Burghardt, Karolina M.</au><au>DeAngelis, Maria</au><au>Grant, David</au><au>Ng, Vicky L.</au><au>Jones, Nicola</au><au>Wales, Paul W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Intestinal Rehabilitation Program and Its Innovative Therapies on the Outcome of Intestinal Transplant Candidates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>18-23</pages><issn>0277-2116</issn><eissn>1536-4801</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objectives: The outcome of children with intestinal failure has improved during the past decade following the introduction of novel therapies by dedicated intestinal rehabilitation programs (IRP). The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of IRP on the outcome of intestinal transplant (IT) candidates and the transplant waiting list. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of children assessed for IT (n = 84) during a 10‐year period. Comparisons were made among the following 3 time periods: before the establishment of our center's IRP (1999–2002; n = 33), early IRP (2003–2005; n = 18), and late IRP (2006–2009; n = 33). The following endpoints were used: patient outcome following IT assessment (not listed, listed and removed from the list, received transplant, died while on the list), patient characteristics at IT assessment, and patient status at the end of the study. Results: The late‐IRP era was associated with an increase in patients who were not listed (42% vs 28% at other periods, P = NS) and patients who were removed from the IT waiting list because of clinical improvement (P &lt; 0.0005), and a decrease in those who died before transplant (15% vs &gt;60% at other periods, P &lt; 0.0005). The cause of death shifted from traditional causes such as liver failure or sepsis to other comorbid conditions (P &lt; 0.005). Improved liver function at listing was also observed during late IRP (P &lt; 0.005). Conclusions: Treatment by IRP, coupled with recent advances in the medical management of intestinal failure, is associated with improved survival and outcome of patients waiting for IT, and may lead to overall reduction in the number of IT in the future.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology</pub><pmid>25611029</pmid><doi>10.1097/MPG.0000000000000735</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-2116
ispartof Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2015-07, Vol.61 (1), p.18-23
issn 0277-2116
1536-4801
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691595683
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Infant
Intestinal Diseases - surgery
Intestinal Diseases - therapy
intestinal failure
intestinal rehabilitation
intestinal transplantation
Intestines - pathology
Intestines - surgery
Male
Organ Transplantation
program
Retrospective Studies
Therapies, Investigational
therapy
Waiting Lists
title Impact of Intestinal Rehabilitation Program and Its Innovative Therapies on the Outcome of Intestinal Transplant Candidates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A54%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Intestinal%20Rehabilitation%20Program%20and%20Its%20Innovative%20Therapies%20on%20the%20Outcome%20of%20Intestinal%20Transplant%20Candidates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20gastroenterology%20and%20nutrition&rft.au=Avitzur,%20Yaron&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=18-23&rft.issn=0277-2116&rft.eissn=1536-4801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000735&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1691595683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691595683&rft_id=info:pmid/25611029&rfr_iscdi=true