Urologic Disorders in Living Renal Donors and Outcomes of Their Recipients

Abstract Background There is an expanding gap between the number of patients listed for kidney transplantation and the number of kidney transplantations performed annually. The use of sensitive imaging methods results in increased discovery of many urologic asymptomatic problems, such as urolithiase...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2015-06, Vol.47 (5), p.1306-1308
Hauptverfasser: Tonyali, S, Erdem, Y, Yilmaz, S.R, Erkan, I, Aki, F.T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1308
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1306
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 47
creator Tonyali, S
Erdem, Y
Yilmaz, S.R
Erkan, I
Aki, F.T
description Abstract Background There is an expanding gap between the number of patients listed for kidney transplantation and the number of kidney transplantations performed annually. The use of sensitive imaging methods results in increased discovery of many urologic asymptomatic problems, such as urolithiases, renal cysts, and solid renal masses. This result has brought the question of whether all donors with these urologic disorders should be rejected for donation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed donor and recipient records of all living kidney transplantations performed from 2004 to 2014. Results Among 251 living-related donor kidney transplantations, 51 donors (20.3%) had urologic disorders. Mean donor age was significantly higher in donors with urologic disorders than in the standard donor group (50 y vs 41 y). The identified disorders were 32 renal cysts, 8 urolithiases, 3 renal tumors, 6 adrenal adenomas, and 2 microscopic hematurias. After nephrectomy, the graft kidneys with cysts were inspected carefully and all of the cortical-peripheral cysts were decorticated. Renal tumors were excised in 3 renal units. Transplantations had proceeded after the confirmation of low malignancy potentials of the lesions with safe surgical margins. Two out of 8 patients had undergone stone removal with ex vivo ureteroscopy and 1 by means of pyelotomy incision because of calix neck stenosis. None of those donors and recipients developed clinically significant renal stone disease with a mean follow-up of 28 months. Neither donors nor recipients of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria patients developed any problem with a mean 28 months' follow-up period. Conclusions Asymptomatic urologic problems are very common. The significance of these asymptomatic pathologies is unclear. Our results suggest that in a selected group, at least some of these candidates can be accepted for donation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.068
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691015381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134515003930</els_id><sourcerecordid>1691015381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-ef7e9dd1b24434badb42d0172cb0446684408e7dc173b6f0017fe04f8c86db7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVpabZJ_kIwPfVid_Rh2ZtDIWSTfrCw0G7OQpbGiTZeaSPZgfz7aNkEQk49DTPzzgzzvIR8pVBRoPL7phqj9mkXg0G0FQNaVyAqkO0HMqNtw0smGf9IZgCClpSL-oh8SWkDOWeCfyZHTMKcN1DPyJ-bGIZw60yxcClEizEVzhdL9-j8bfEXvR6KRfAhl7W3xWoaTdhiKkJfrO_QxSwxbufQj-mEfOr1kPD0JR6Tm-ur9eWvcrn6-fvyYlkaweuxxL7BubW0Y0Jw0WnbCWaBNsx0IISUrRDQYmMNbXgne8itHkH0rWml7RrNj8m3w94M4GHCNKqtSwaHQXsMU1JUzjOmmrc0S88PUhNDShF7tYtuq-OToqD2LNVGvWWp9iwVCJVZ5uGzlztTt82919FXeFmwOAgwf_voMKpkMgmD1kU0o7LB_d-dH-_WmMF5Z_Rwj0-YNmGK2YX8l0pMgfq3d3VvKq0B-JwDfwbITKDe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691015381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urologic Disorders in Living Renal Donors and Outcomes of Their Recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tonyali, S ; Erdem, Y ; Yilmaz, S.R ; Erkan, I ; Aki, F.T</creator><creatorcontrib>Tonyali, S ; Erdem, Y ; Yilmaz, S.R ; Erkan, I ; Aki, F.T</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background There is an expanding gap between the number of patients listed for kidney transplantation and the number of kidney transplantations performed annually. The use of sensitive imaging methods results in increased discovery of many urologic asymptomatic problems, such as urolithiases, renal cysts, and solid renal masses. This result has brought the question of whether all donors with these urologic disorders should be rejected for donation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed donor and recipient records of all living kidney transplantations performed from 2004 to 2014. Results Among 251 living-related donor kidney transplantations, 51 donors (20.3%) had urologic disorders. Mean donor age was significantly higher in donors with urologic disorders than in the standard donor group (50 y vs 41 y). The identified disorders were 32 renal cysts, 8 urolithiases, 3 renal tumors, 6 adrenal adenomas, and 2 microscopic hematurias. After nephrectomy, the graft kidneys with cysts were inspected carefully and all of the cortical-peripheral cysts were decorticated. Renal tumors were excised in 3 renal units. Transplantations had proceeded after the confirmation of low malignancy potentials of the lesions with safe surgical margins. Two out of 8 patients had undergone stone removal with ex vivo ureteroscopy and 1 by means of pyelotomy incision because of calix neck stenosis. None of those donors and recipients developed clinically significant renal stone disease with a mean follow-up of 28 months. Neither donors nor recipients of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria patients developed any problem with a mean 28 months' follow-up period. Conclusions Asymptomatic urologic problems are very common. The significance of these asymptomatic pathologies is unclear. Our results suggest that in a selected group, at least some of these candidates can be accepted for donation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.068</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26093705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Donor Selection - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation ; Living Donors - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Urologic Diseases - epidemiology ; Urologic Diseases - pathology</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2015-06, Vol.47 (5), p.1306-1308</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-ef7e9dd1b24434badb42d0172cb0446684408e7dc173b6f0017fe04f8c86db7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-ef7e9dd1b24434badb42d0172cb0446684408e7dc173b6f0017fe04f8c86db7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.068$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26093705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tonyali, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkan, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aki, F.T</creatorcontrib><title>Urologic Disorders in Living Renal Donors and Outcomes of Their Recipients</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Background There is an expanding gap between the number of patients listed for kidney transplantation and the number of kidney transplantations performed annually. The use of sensitive imaging methods results in increased discovery of many urologic asymptomatic problems, such as urolithiases, renal cysts, and solid renal masses. This result has brought the question of whether all donors with these urologic disorders should be rejected for donation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed donor and recipient records of all living kidney transplantations performed from 2004 to 2014. Results Among 251 living-related donor kidney transplantations, 51 donors (20.3%) had urologic disorders. Mean donor age was significantly higher in donors with urologic disorders than in the standard donor group (50 y vs 41 y). The identified disorders were 32 renal cysts, 8 urolithiases, 3 renal tumors, 6 adrenal adenomas, and 2 microscopic hematurias. After nephrectomy, the graft kidneys with cysts were inspected carefully and all of the cortical-peripheral cysts were decorticated. Renal tumors were excised in 3 renal units. Transplantations had proceeded after the confirmation of low malignancy potentials of the lesions with safe surgical margins. Two out of 8 patients had undergone stone removal with ex vivo ureteroscopy and 1 by means of pyelotomy incision because of calix neck stenosis. None of those donors and recipients developed clinically significant renal stone disease with a mean follow-up of 28 months. Neither donors nor recipients of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria patients developed any problem with a mean 28 months' follow-up period. Conclusions Asymptomatic urologic problems are very common. The significance of these asymptomatic pathologies is unclear. Our results suggest that in a selected group, at least some of these candidates can be accepted for donation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Donor Selection - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Living Donors - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urologic Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urologic Diseases - pathology</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVpabZJ_kIwPfVid_Rh2ZtDIWSTfrCw0G7OQpbGiTZeaSPZgfz7aNkEQk49DTPzzgzzvIR8pVBRoPL7phqj9mkXg0G0FQNaVyAqkO0HMqNtw0smGf9IZgCClpSL-oh8SWkDOWeCfyZHTMKcN1DPyJ-bGIZw60yxcClEizEVzhdL9-j8bfEXvR6KRfAhl7W3xWoaTdhiKkJfrO_QxSwxbufQj-mEfOr1kPD0JR6Tm-ur9eWvcrn6-fvyYlkaweuxxL7BubW0Y0Jw0WnbCWaBNsx0IISUrRDQYmMNbXgne8itHkH0rWml7RrNj8m3w94M4GHCNKqtSwaHQXsMU1JUzjOmmrc0S88PUhNDShF7tYtuq-OToqD2LNVGvWWp9iwVCJVZ5uGzlztTt82919FXeFmwOAgwf_voMKpkMgmD1kU0o7LB_d-dH-_WmMF5Z_Rwj0-YNmGK2YX8l0pMgfq3d3VvKq0B-JwDfwbITKDe</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Tonyali, S</creator><creator>Erdem, Y</creator><creator>Yilmaz, S.R</creator><creator>Erkan, I</creator><creator>Aki, F.T</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Urologic Disorders in Living Renal Donors and Outcomes of Their Recipients</title><author>Tonyali, S ; Erdem, Y ; Yilmaz, S.R ; Erkan, I ; Aki, F.T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-ef7e9dd1b24434badb42d0172cb0446684408e7dc173b6f0017fe04f8c86db7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Donor Selection - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Living Donors - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urologic Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urologic Diseases - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tonyali, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erkan, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aki, F.T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tonyali, S</au><au>Erdem, Y</au><au>Yilmaz, S.R</au><au>Erkan, I</au><au>Aki, F.T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urologic Disorders in Living Renal Donors and Outcomes of Their Recipients</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1306</spage><epage>1308</epage><pages>1306-1308</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background There is an expanding gap between the number of patients listed for kidney transplantation and the number of kidney transplantations performed annually. The use of sensitive imaging methods results in increased discovery of many urologic asymptomatic problems, such as urolithiases, renal cysts, and solid renal masses. This result has brought the question of whether all donors with these urologic disorders should be rejected for donation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed donor and recipient records of all living kidney transplantations performed from 2004 to 2014. Results Among 251 living-related donor kidney transplantations, 51 donors (20.3%) had urologic disorders. Mean donor age was significantly higher in donors with urologic disorders than in the standard donor group (50 y vs 41 y). The identified disorders were 32 renal cysts, 8 urolithiases, 3 renal tumors, 6 adrenal adenomas, and 2 microscopic hematurias. After nephrectomy, the graft kidneys with cysts were inspected carefully and all of the cortical-peripheral cysts were decorticated. Renal tumors were excised in 3 renal units. Transplantations had proceeded after the confirmation of low malignancy potentials of the lesions with safe surgical margins. Two out of 8 patients had undergone stone removal with ex vivo ureteroscopy and 1 by means of pyelotomy incision because of calix neck stenosis. None of those donors and recipients developed clinically significant renal stone disease with a mean follow-up of 28 months. Neither donors nor recipients of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria patients developed any problem with a mean 28 months' follow-up period. Conclusions Asymptomatic urologic problems are very common. The significance of these asymptomatic pathologies is unclear. Our results suggest that in a selected group, at least some of these candidates can be accepted for donation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26093705</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.068</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2015-06, Vol.47 (5), p.1306-1308
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1691015381
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Donor Selection - statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Kidney Transplantation
Living Donors - statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrectomy
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Urologic Diseases - epidemiology
Urologic Diseases - pathology
title Urologic Disorders in Living Renal Donors and Outcomes of Their Recipients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A12%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urologic%20Disorders%20in%20Living%20Renal%20Donors%20and%20Outcomes%20of%20Their%20Recipients&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Tonyali,%20S&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1306&rft.epage=1308&rft.pages=1306-1308&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1691015381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691015381&rft_id=info:pmid/26093705&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0041134515003930&rfr_iscdi=true