Monoclonal antibody conjugated magnetic nanoparticles could target MUC-1-positive cells in vitro but not in vivo

MUC1 antigen is recognized as a high‐molecular‐weight glycoprotein that is unexpectedly over‐expressed in human breast and other carcinomas. In contrast, C595 a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the protein core of the human urinary epithelial machine, is commonly expressed in breast carcinomas. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contrast media and molecular imaging 2015-05, Vol.10 (3), p.225-236
Hauptverfasser: Shanehsazzadeh, Saeed, Gruettner, Cordula, Lahooti, Afsaneh, Mahmoudi, Morteza, Allen, Barry J., Ghavami, Mahdi, Daha, Fariba Johari, Oghabian, Mohammad Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 236
container_issue 3
container_start_page 225
container_title Contrast media and molecular imaging
container_volume 10
creator Shanehsazzadeh, Saeed
Gruettner, Cordula
Lahooti, Afsaneh
Mahmoudi, Morteza
Allen, Barry J.
Ghavami, Mahdi
Daha, Fariba Johari
Oghabian, Mohammad Ali
description MUC1 antigen is recognized as a high‐molecular‐weight glycoprotein that is unexpectedly over‐expressed in human breast and other carcinomas. In contrast, C595 a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the protein core of the human urinary epithelial machine, is commonly expressed in breast carcinomas. The aim of this study was to conjugate ultra‐small super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (USPIO) with C595 mAb, in order to detect in vivo MUC1 expression. A dual contrast agent (the C595 antibody‐conjugated USPIO labeled with 99mTc) was prepared for targeted imaging and therapy of anti‐MUC1‐expressing cancers. The C595 antibody‐conjugated USPIO had good stability and reactivity in the presence of blood plasma at 37 °C. No significant differences were observed in immunoreactivity results between conjugated and nonconjugated nanoparticles. The T1 and T2 measurements show >79 and 29% increments (for 0.02 mg/ml iron concentrations) in T1 and T2 values for USPIO‐C595 in comparison with USPIO, respectively. The nanoprobes showed the interesting targeting capability of finding the MUC1‐positive cell line in vitro. However, we found disappointing in vivo results (i.e. very low accumulation of nanoprobes in the targeted site while >80% of the injected dose per gram was taken up by the liver and spleen), not only due to the coverage of targeting site by protein corona but also because of absorption of opsonin‐based proteins at the surface of nanoprobes. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. We obtained very promising in vitro results, but we found the in vivo results disappointing not only owing to the coverage of targeting site by protein corona but also because of absorption of opsonin‐based proteins at the surface of nanoprobes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cmmi.1627
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1689311948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3714621091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3917-4de61a76ece613ba614741a7eb26aa72a5e106775face0e1714b3806974dccc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EoqVw4AWQJS5wSGvHjh0f0QraSt3lQuFoOc7syktiB9tZ2LcnIcsekDjNaPTNp9H8CL2m5JoSUt7YvnfXVJTyCbqkVVUVnFH59NwTdYFepLQnhHOm2HN0UVaslHVZXqJhHXywXfCmw8Zn14T2iG3w-3FnMrS4NzsP2VnsjQ-DiVPbQZqIsWtxNnEHGa8fVwUthpBcdgfAFrouYefxweUYcDNm7ENeBofwEj3bmi7Bq1O9Qo-fPn5Z3RUPn2_vVx8eCssUlQVvQVAjBdipssYIyiWfBtCUwhhZmgooEVJWW2OBAJWUN6wmQkneWmsVu0LvFu8Qw48RUta9S_NpxkMYk6aiVoxSxesJffsPug9jnD7yh5KKK8lm4fuFsjGkFGGrh-h6E4-aEj3HoOcY9BzDxL45Gcemh_ZM_v37BNwswE_XwfH_Jr1ar-9PymLZcCnDr_OGid-1kExW-tvmVt8RsdnUUuqv7DcHeaFu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687949739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monoclonal antibody conjugated magnetic nanoparticles could target MUC-1-positive cells in vitro but not in vivo</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shanehsazzadeh, Saeed ; Gruettner, Cordula ; Lahooti, Afsaneh ; Mahmoudi, Morteza ; Allen, Barry J. ; Ghavami, Mahdi ; Daha, Fariba Johari ; Oghabian, Mohammad Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Shanehsazzadeh, Saeed ; Gruettner, Cordula ; Lahooti, Afsaneh ; Mahmoudi, Morteza ; Allen, Barry J. ; Ghavami, Mahdi ; Daha, Fariba Johari ; Oghabian, Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><description>MUC1 antigen is recognized as a high‐molecular‐weight glycoprotein that is unexpectedly over‐expressed in human breast and other carcinomas. In contrast, C595 a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the protein core of the human urinary epithelial machine, is commonly expressed in breast carcinomas. The aim of this study was to conjugate ultra‐small super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (USPIO) with C595 mAb, in order to detect in vivo MUC1 expression. A dual contrast agent (the C595 antibody‐conjugated USPIO labeled with 99mTc) was prepared for targeted imaging and therapy of anti‐MUC1‐expressing cancers. The C595 antibody‐conjugated USPIO had good stability and reactivity in the presence of blood plasma at 37 °C. No significant differences were observed in immunoreactivity results between conjugated and nonconjugated nanoparticles. The T1 and T2 measurements show &gt;79 and 29% increments (for 0.02 mg/ml iron concentrations) in T1 and T2 values for USPIO‐C595 in comparison with USPIO, respectively. The nanoprobes showed the interesting targeting capability of finding the MUC1‐positive cell line in vitro. However, we found disappointing in vivo results (i.e. very low accumulation of nanoprobes in the targeted site while &gt;80% of the injected dose per gram was taken up by the liver and spleen), not only due to the coverage of targeting site by protein corona but also because of absorption of opsonin‐based proteins at the surface of nanoprobes. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. We obtained very promising in vitro results, but we found the in vivo results disappointing not only owing to the coverage of targeting site by protein corona but also because of absorption of opsonin‐based proteins at the surface of nanoprobes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-4309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-4317</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.1627</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25327822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology ; Antigens, Neoplasm - immunology ; biodistribution ; Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis ; Biomarkers, Tumor - immunology ; breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; C595 antibody ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Contrast Media - pharmacology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Female ; Ferric Compounds - chemistry ; Humans ; Liver - metabolism ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry ; MCF-7 Cells ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mucin-1 - immunology ; nanoparticles ; protein corona ; Spleen - metabolism ; Technetium - chemistry ; USPIO</subject><ispartof>Contrast media and molecular imaging, 2015-05, Vol.10 (3), p.225-236</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3917-4de61a76ece613ba614741a7eb26aa72a5e106775face0e1714b3806974dccc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3917-4de61a76ece613ba614741a7eb26aa72a5e106775face0e1714b3806974dccc93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25327822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shanehsazzadeh, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruettner, Cordula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahooti, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoudi, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Barry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghavami, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daha, Fariba Johari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oghabian, Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Monoclonal antibody conjugated magnetic nanoparticles could target MUC-1-positive cells in vitro but not in vivo</title><title>Contrast media and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Contrast Media Mol. Imaging</addtitle><description>MUC1 antigen is recognized as a high‐molecular‐weight glycoprotein that is unexpectedly over‐expressed in human breast and other carcinomas. In contrast, C595 a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the protein core of the human urinary epithelial machine, is commonly expressed in breast carcinomas. The aim of this study was to conjugate ultra‐small super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (USPIO) with C595 mAb, in order to detect in vivo MUC1 expression. A dual contrast agent (the C595 antibody‐conjugated USPIO labeled with 99mTc) was prepared for targeted imaging and therapy of anti‐MUC1‐expressing cancers. The C595 antibody‐conjugated USPIO had good stability and reactivity in the presence of blood plasma at 37 °C. No significant differences were observed in immunoreactivity results between conjugated and nonconjugated nanoparticles. The T1 and T2 measurements show &gt;79 and 29% increments (for 0.02 mg/ml iron concentrations) in T1 and T2 values for USPIO‐C595 in comparison with USPIO, respectively. The nanoprobes showed the interesting targeting capability of finding the MUC1‐positive cell line in vitro. However, we found disappointing in vivo results (i.e. very low accumulation of nanoprobes in the targeted site while &gt;80% of the injected dose per gram was taken up by the liver and spleen), not only due to the coverage of targeting site by protein corona but also because of absorption of opsonin‐based proteins at the surface of nanoprobes. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. We obtained very promising in vitro results, but we found the in vivo results disappointing not only owing to the coverage of targeting site by protein corona but also because of absorption of opsonin‐based proteins at the surface of nanoprobes.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology</subject><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - immunology</subject><subject>biodistribution</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - immunology</subject><subject>breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>C595 antibody</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Contrast Media - pharmacology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ferric Compounds - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver - metabolism</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry</subject><subject>MCF-7 Cells</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Mucin-1 - immunology</subject><subject>nanoparticles</subject><subject>protein corona</subject><subject>Spleen - metabolism</subject><subject>Technetium - chemistry</subject><subject>USPIO</subject><issn>1555-4309</issn><issn>1555-4317</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EoqVw4AWQJS5wSGvHjh0f0QraSt3lQuFoOc7syktiB9tZ2LcnIcsekDjNaPTNp9H8CL2m5JoSUt7YvnfXVJTyCbqkVVUVnFH59NwTdYFepLQnhHOm2HN0UVaslHVZXqJhHXywXfCmw8Zn14T2iG3w-3FnMrS4NzsP2VnsjQ-DiVPbQZqIsWtxNnEHGa8fVwUthpBcdgfAFrouYefxweUYcDNm7ENeBofwEj3bmi7Bq1O9Qo-fPn5Z3RUPn2_vVx8eCssUlQVvQVAjBdipssYIyiWfBtCUwhhZmgooEVJWW2OBAJWUN6wmQkneWmsVu0LvFu8Qw48RUta9S_NpxkMYk6aiVoxSxesJffsPug9jnD7yh5KKK8lm4fuFsjGkFGGrh-h6E4-aEj3HoOcY9BzDxL45Gcemh_ZM_v37BNwswE_XwfH_Jr1ar-9PymLZcCnDr_OGid-1kExW-tvmVt8RsdnUUuqv7DcHeaFu</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Shanehsazzadeh, Saeed</creator><creator>Gruettner, Cordula</creator><creator>Lahooti, Afsaneh</creator><creator>Mahmoudi, Morteza</creator><creator>Allen, Barry J.</creator><creator>Ghavami, Mahdi</creator><creator>Daha, Fariba Johari</creator><creator>Oghabian, Mohammad Ali</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Monoclonal antibody conjugated magnetic nanoparticles could target MUC-1-positive cells in vitro but not in vivo</title><author>Shanehsazzadeh, Saeed ; Gruettner, Cordula ; Lahooti, Afsaneh ; Mahmoudi, Morteza ; Allen, Barry J. ; Ghavami, Mahdi ; Daha, Fariba Johari ; Oghabian, Mohammad Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3917-4de61a76ece613ba614741a7eb26aa72a5e106775face0e1714b3806974dccc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology</topic><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - immunology</topic><topic>biodistribution</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - immunology</topic><topic>breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>C595 antibody</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Contrast Media - pharmacology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ferric Compounds - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver - metabolism</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry</topic><topic>MCF-7 Cells</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Mucin-1 - immunology</topic><topic>nanoparticles</topic><topic>protein corona</topic><topic>Spleen - metabolism</topic><topic>Technetium - chemistry</topic><topic>USPIO</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shanehsazzadeh, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruettner, Cordula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahooti, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoudi, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Barry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghavami, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daha, Fariba Johari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oghabian, Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contrast media and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shanehsazzadeh, Saeed</au><au>Gruettner, Cordula</au><au>Lahooti, Afsaneh</au><au>Mahmoudi, Morteza</au><au>Allen, Barry J.</au><au>Ghavami, Mahdi</au><au>Daha, Fariba Johari</au><au>Oghabian, Mohammad Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monoclonal antibody conjugated magnetic nanoparticles could target MUC-1-positive cells in vitro but not in vivo</atitle><jtitle>Contrast media and molecular imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Contrast Media Mol. Imaging</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>225-236</pages><issn>1555-4309</issn><eissn>1555-4317</eissn><abstract>MUC1 antigen is recognized as a high‐molecular‐weight glycoprotein that is unexpectedly over‐expressed in human breast and other carcinomas. In contrast, C595 a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the protein core of the human urinary epithelial machine, is commonly expressed in breast carcinomas. The aim of this study was to conjugate ultra‐small super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (USPIO) with C595 mAb, in order to detect in vivo MUC1 expression. A dual contrast agent (the C595 antibody‐conjugated USPIO labeled with 99mTc) was prepared for targeted imaging and therapy of anti‐MUC1‐expressing cancers. The C595 antibody‐conjugated USPIO had good stability and reactivity in the presence of blood plasma at 37 °C. No significant differences were observed in immunoreactivity results between conjugated and nonconjugated nanoparticles. The T1 and T2 measurements show &gt;79 and 29% increments (for 0.02 mg/ml iron concentrations) in T1 and T2 values for USPIO‐C595 in comparison with USPIO, respectively. The nanoprobes showed the interesting targeting capability of finding the MUC1‐positive cell line in vitro. However, we found disappointing in vivo results (i.e. very low accumulation of nanoprobes in the targeted site while &gt;80% of the injected dose per gram was taken up by the liver and spleen), not only due to the coverage of targeting site by protein corona but also because of absorption of opsonin‐based proteins at the surface of nanoprobes. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. We obtained very promising in vitro results, but we found the in vivo results disappointing not only owing to the coverage of targeting site by protein corona but also because of absorption of opsonin‐based proteins at the surface of nanoprobes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25327822</pmid><doi>10.1002/cmmi.1627</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1555-4309
ispartof Contrast media and molecular imaging, 2015-05, Vol.10 (3), p.225-236
issn 1555-4309
1555-4317
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1689311948
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology
Antigens, Neoplasm - immunology
biodistribution
Biomarkers, Tumor - biosynthesis
Biomarkers, Tumor - immunology
breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
C595 antibody
Cell Line, Tumor
Contrast Media - pharmacology
Disease Models, Animal
Female
Ferric Compounds - chemistry
Humans
Liver - metabolism
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Magnetite Nanoparticles - chemistry
MCF-7 Cells
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Mucin-1 - immunology
nanoparticles
protein corona
Spleen - metabolism
Technetium - chemistry
USPIO
title Monoclonal antibody conjugated magnetic nanoparticles could target MUC-1-positive cells in vitro but not in vivo
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A29%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monoclonal%20antibody%20conjugated%20magnetic%20nanoparticles%20could%20target%20MUC-1-positive%20cells%20in%20vitro%20but%20not%20in%20vivo&rft.jtitle=Contrast%20media%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Shanehsazzadeh,%20Saeed&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=225-236&rft.issn=1555-4309&rft.eissn=1555-4317&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cmmi.1627&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3714621091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687949739&rft_id=info:pmid/25327822&rfr_iscdi=true