Fatigue symptoms and workplace related factors of long-term care workers employed in facilities

Objectives: “Regular visiting/on-demand response type long-term care” has recently been established. This will lead to a decrease in the burden on the family, but an increase in the burden of the care personnel who provide this kind of long-term care. The objectives of this study were to clarify the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SANGYO EISEIGAKU ZASSHI 2015, Vol.57(3), pp.77-84
Hauptverfasser: Kawamura, Sachiyo, Yamada, Kazuko, Morioka, Ikuharu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 3
container_start_page 77
container_title SANGYO EISEIGAKU ZASSHI
container_volume 57
creator Kawamura, Sachiyo
Yamada, Kazuko
Morioka, Ikuharu
description Objectives: “Regular visiting/on-demand response type long-term care” has recently been established. This will lead to a decrease in the burden on the family, but an increase in the burden of the care personnel who provide this kind of long-term care. The objectives of this study were to clarify the fatigue symptoms of long-term care workers in facilities that provide this kind of long-term care, and examine the related factors in the workplace. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted with 96 workers engaged in long-term care in facilities. The questionnaire was composed of cumulative fatigue symptoms index, work situation, supports in the workplace, and the attributes. The subjects were divided into two groups: those who had night shift between PM 6 to AM 8 with or without day shift (night shift group), and those who had only day shift (day shift group). The relationships between the fatigue symptom levels and work situation etc. were compared between the two groups. Results: The night shift group consisted of 47 workers, whose mean age was 42.3 years and whose mean working experience was 6.0 years. The median number of persons they had visited in the previous month was 9. The day shift group consisted of 49 workers, whose mean age was 44.6 years and whose mean working experience was 5.9 years. The median number of persons they visited in the previous month was 9.5. Age and sex distributions showed no difference between the two groups. There was no difference in the work situations and the supports in the workplace, except for working time and the details of care the subjects were providing. The fatigue symptom levels were high in both groups, but in the night shift group the level of physical disorders was higher than in the day shift group. Satisfaction with work, education and training for mental health and consideration for traffic safety when making home visits were negatively related to fatigue symptom levels in both groups. Learning care during the previous year, and the ease of receiving paid holiday were not related to the fatigue symptom levels in the night shift group. This was different in the day shift group. Conclusions: Measures of fatigue symptoms should be performed for both groups. It is desirable that supports, additional to that given in the workplace to the day shift group, be given to the night shift group, and its efficacy be researched.
doi_str_mv 10.1539/sangyoeisei.B14015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1689308856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1689308856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-96eb26a66e041e2229efdc92230b35db09c876ee5ceeb8b48b93e9c931c26ead3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkLtOwzAUhi0Eoqj0BRhQRpYUX-okHqGiFKkSC0hsluOcFIMTB9sV6tuTNqWC5Vx0vvMNP0JXBE8JZ-I2qHa9dWACmOk9mWHCT9AFYTORcsbeTvczSXFO-QhNQjAlxkUuRL-foxHlBe8l5ALJhYpmvYEkbJsuuiYkqq2Sb-c_O6s0JB6silAltdLR-ZC4OrGuXacRfJNo5WHPQn-BprNu26Om3dHGmmggXKKzWtkAk0Mfo9fFw8t8ma6eH5_md6tUM5rzVGRQ0kxlGeAZAUqpgLrSglKGS8arEgtd5BkA1wBlUc6KUjAQWjCiaQaqYmN0M3g77742EKJsTNBgrWrBbYIkWSEYLgqe9SgdUO1dCB5q2XnTKL-VBMtdtvJPtnLItn-6Pvg3ZQPV8eU3yR5YDsBHiGoNR0D5aLSFf06eS7Yrg_uI6HflJbTsB5wnlMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1689308856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fatigue symptoms and workplace related factors of long-term care workers employed in facilities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>J-STAGE</source><creator>Kawamura, Sachiyo ; Yamada, Kazuko ; Morioka, Ikuharu</creator><creatorcontrib>Kawamura, Sachiyo ; Yamada, Kazuko ; Morioka, Ikuharu</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: “Regular visiting/on-demand response type long-term care” has recently been established. This will lead to a decrease in the burden on the family, but an increase in the burden of the care personnel who provide this kind of long-term care. The objectives of this study were to clarify the fatigue symptoms of long-term care workers in facilities that provide this kind of long-term care, and examine the related factors in the workplace. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted with 96 workers engaged in long-term care in facilities. The questionnaire was composed of cumulative fatigue symptoms index, work situation, supports in the workplace, and the attributes. The subjects were divided into two groups: those who had night shift between PM 6 to AM 8 with or without day shift (night shift group), and those who had only day shift (day shift group). The relationships between the fatigue symptom levels and work situation etc. were compared between the two groups. Results: The night shift group consisted of 47 workers, whose mean age was 42.3 years and whose mean working experience was 6.0 years. The median number of persons they had visited in the previous month was 9. The day shift group consisted of 49 workers, whose mean age was 44.6 years and whose mean working experience was 5.9 years. The median number of persons they visited in the previous month was 9.5. Age and sex distributions showed no difference between the two groups. There was no difference in the work situations and the supports in the workplace, except for working time and the details of care the subjects were providing. The fatigue symptom levels were high in both groups, but in the night shift group the level of physical disorders was higher than in the day shift group. Satisfaction with work, education and training for mental health and consideration for traffic safety when making home visits were negatively related to fatigue symptom levels in both groups. Learning care during the previous year, and the ease of receiving paid holiday were not related to the fatigue symptom levels in the night shift group. This was different in the day shift group. Conclusions: Measures of fatigue symptoms should be performed for both groups. It is desirable that supports, additional to that given in the workplace to the day shift group, be given to the night shift group, and its efficacy be researched.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-0725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-533X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.B14015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25855391</identifier><language>eng ; jpn</language><publisher>Japan: Japan Society for Occupational Health</publisher><subject>Adult ; Care workers ; Caregivers - psychology ; Fatigue - physiopathology ; Fatigue - psychology ; Fatigue symptoms ; Female ; Humans ; Job Satisfaction ; Long-Term Care ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Night shift ; Occupational Diseases - physiopathology ; Occupational Diseases - psychology ; Occupational Health ; Personnel Staffing and Scheduling ; Regular visiting ; Residential Facilities ; Social Support ; Support in workplace ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Work Schedule Tolerance - physiology ; Work Schedule Tolerance - psychology ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>SANGYO EISEIGAKU ZASSHI, 2015, Vol.57(3), pp.77-84</ispartof><rights>2015 by the Japan Society for Occupational Health</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-96eb26a66e041e2229efdc92230b35db09c876ee5ceeb8b48b93e9c931c26ead3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-96eb26a66e041e2229efdc92230b35db09c876ee5ceeb8b48b93e9c931c26ead3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1877,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25855391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kawamura, Sachiyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kazuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morioka, Ikuharu</creatorcontrib><title>Fatigue symptoms and workplace related factors of long-term care workers employed in facilities</title><title>SANGYO EISEIGAKU ZASSHI</title><addtitle>SanEiShi</addtitle><description>Objectives: “Regular visiting/on-demand response type long-term care” has recently been established. This will lead to a decrease in the burden on the family, but an increase in the burden of the care personnel who provide this kind of long-term care. The objectives of this study were to clarify the fatigue symptoms of long-term care workers in facilities that provide this kind of long-term care, and examine the related factors in the workplace. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted with 96 workers engaged in long-term care in facilities. The questionnaire was composed of cumulative fatigue symptoms index, work situation, supports in the workplace, and the attributes. The subjects were divided into two groups: those who had night shift between PM 6 to AM 8 with or without day shift (night shift group), and those who had only day shift (day shift group). The relationships between the fatigue symptom levels and work situation etc. were compared between the two groups. Results: The night shift group consisted of 47 workers, whose mean age was 42.3 years and whose mean working experience was 6.0 years. The median number of persons they had visited in the previous month was 9. The day shift group consisted of 49 workers, whose mean age was 44.6 years and whose mean working experience was 5.9 years. The median number of persons they visited in the previous month was 9.5. Age and sex distributions showed no difference between the two groups. There was no difference in the work situations and the supports in the workplace, except for working time and the details of care the subjects were providing. The fatigue symptom levels were high in both groups, but in the night shift group the level of physical disorders was higher than in the day shift group. Satisfaction with work, education and training for mental health and consideration for traffic safety when making home visits were negatively related to fatigue symptom levels in both groups. Learning care during the previous year, and the ease of receiving paid holiday were not related to the fatigue symptom levels in the night shift group. This was different in the day shift group. Conclusions: Measures of fatigue symptoms should be performed for both groups. It is desirable that supports, additional to that given in the workplace to the day shift group, be given to the night shift group, and its efficacy be researched.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Care workers</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>Fatigue - physiopathology</subject><subject>Fatigue - psychology</subject><subject>Fatigue symptoms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Long-Term Care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Night shift</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - psychology</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</subject><subject>Regular visiting</subject><subject>Residential Facilities</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Support in workplace</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Work Schedule Tolerance - physiology</subject><subject>Work Schedule Tolerance - psychology</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1341-0725</issn><issn>1349-533X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkLtOwzAUhi0Eoqj0BRhQRpYUX-okHqGiFKkSC0hsluOcFIMTB9sV6tuTNqWC5Vx0vvMNP0JXBE8JZ-I2qHa9dWACmOk9mWHCT9AFYTORcsbeTvczSXFO-QhNQjAlxkUuRL-foxHlBe8l5ALJhYpmvYEkbJsuuiYkqq2Sb-c_O6s0JB6silAltdLR-ZC4OrGuXacRfJNo5WHPQn-BprNu26Om3dHGmmggXKKzWtkAk0Mfo9fFw8t8ma6eH5_md6tUM5rzVGRQ0kxlGeAZAUqpgLrSglKGS8arEgtd5BkA1wBlUc6KUjAQWjCiaQaqYmN0M3g77742EKJsTNBgrWrBbYIkWSEYLgqe9SgdUO1dCB5q2XnTKL-VBMtdtvJPtnLItn-6Pvg3ZQPV8eU3yR5YDsBHiGoNR0D5aLSFf06eS7Yrg_uI6HflJbTsB5wnlMk</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Kawamura, Sachiyo</creator><creator>Yamada, Kazuko</creator><creator>Morioka, Ikuharu</creator><general>Japan Society for Occupational Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Fatigue symptoms and workplace related factors of long-term care workers employed in facilities</title><author>Kawamura, Sachiyo ; Yamada, Kazuko ; Morioka, Ikuharu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3275-96eb26a66e041e2229efdc92230b35db09c876ee5ceeb8b48b93e9c931c26ead3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; jpn</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Care workers</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>Fatigue - physiopathology</topic><topic>Fatigue - psychology</topic><topic>Fatigue symptoms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Long-Term Care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Night shift</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - psychology</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Personnel Staffing and Scheduling</topic><topic>Regular visiting</topic><topic>Residential Facilities</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Support in workplace</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Work Schedule Tolerance - physiology</topic><topic>Work Schedule Tolerance - psychology</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kawamura, Sachiyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kazuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morioka, Ikuharu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>SANGYO EISEIGAKU ZASSHI</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kawamura, Sachiyo</au><au>Yamada, Kazuko</au><au>Morioka, Ikuharu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fatigue symptoms and workplace related factors of long-term care workers employed in facilities</atitle><jtitle>SANGYO EISEIGAKU ZASSHI</jtitle><addtitle>SanEiShi</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>77-84</pages><issn>1341-0725</issn><eissn>1349-533X</eissn><abstract>Objectives: “Regular visiting/on-demand response type long-term care” has recently been established. This will lead to a decrease in the burden on the family, but an increase in the burden of the care personnel who provide this kind of long-term care. The objectives of this study were to clarify the fatigue symptoms of long-term care workers in facilities that provide this kind of long-term care, and examine the related factors in the workplace. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted with 96 workers engaged in long-term care in facilities. The questionnaire was composed of cumulative fatigue symptoms index, work situation, supports in the workplace, and the attributes. The subjects were divided into two groups: those who had night shift between PM 6 to AM 8 with or without day shift (night shift group), and those who had only day shift (day shift group). The relationships between the fatigue symptom levels and work situation etc. were compared between the two groups. Results: The night shift group consisted of 47 workers, whose mean age was 42.3 years and whose mean working experience was 6.0 years. The median number of persons they had visited in the previous month was 9. The day shift group consisted of 49 workers, whose mean age was 44.6 years and whose mean working experience was 5.9 years. The median number of persons they visited in the previous month was 9.5. Age and sex distributions showed no difference between the two groups. There was no difference in the work situations and the supports in the workplace, except for working time and the details of care the subjects were providing. The fatigue symptom levels were high in both groups, but in the night shift group the level of physical disorders was higher than in the day shift group. Satisfaction with work, education and training for mental health and consideration for traffic safety when making home visits were negatively related to fatigue symptom levels in both groups. Learning care during the previous year, and the ease of receiving paid holiday were not related to the fatigue symptom levels in the night shift group. This was different in the day shift group. Conclusions: Measures of fatigue symptoms should be performed for both groups. It is desirable that supports, additional to that given in the workplace to the day shift group, be given to the night shift group, and its efficacy be researched.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Japan Society for Occupational Health</pub><pmid>25855391</pmid><doi>10.1539/sangyoeisei.B14015</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-0725
ispartof SANGYO EISEIGAKU ZASSHI, 2015, Vol.57(3), pp.77-84
issn 1341-0725
1349-533X
language eng ; jpn
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1689308856
source MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library; J-STAGE
subjects Adult
Care workers
Caregivers - psychology
Fatigue - physiopathology
Fatigue - psychology
Fatigue symptoms
Female
Humans
Job Satisfaction
Long-Term Care
Male
Middle Aged
Night shift
Occupational Diseases - physiopathology
Occupational Diseases - psychology
Occupational Health
Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
Regular visiting
Residential Facilities
Social Support
Support in workplace
Surveys and Questionnaires
Work Schedule Tolerance - physiology
Work Schedule Tolerance - psychology
Workplace
title Fatigue symptoms and workplace related factors of long-term care workers employed in facilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A07%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fatigue%20symptoms%20and%20workplace%20related%20factors%20of%20long-term%20care%20workers%20employed%20in%20facilities&rft.jtitle=SANGYO%20EISEIGAKU%20ZASSHI&rft.au=Kawamura,%20Sachiyo&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=77-84&rft.issn=1341-0725&rft.eissn=1349-533X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1539/sangyoeisei.B14015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1689308856%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1689308856&rft_id=info:pmid/25855391&rfr_iscdi=true