Comparison Between Neck and Shoulder Stiffness Determined by Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography and a Muscle Hardness Meter
Abstract The goals of this study were to compare neck and shoulder stiffness values determined by shear wave ultrasound elastography with those obtained with a muscle hardness meter and to verify the correspondence between objective and subjective stiffness in the neck and shoulder. Twenty-four youn...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2015-08, Vol.41 (8), p.2266-2271 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2271 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 2266 |
| container_title | Ultrasound in medicine & biology |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Akagi, Ryota Kusama, Saki |
| description | Abstract The goals of this study were to compare neck and shoulder stiffness values determined by shear wave ultrasound elastography with those obtained with a muscle hardness meter and to verify the correspondence between objective and subjective stiffness in the neck and shoulder. Twenty-four young men and women participated in the study. Their neck and shoulder stiffness was determined at six sites. Before the start of the measurements, patients rated their present subjective symptoms of neck and shoulder stiffness on a 6-point verbal scale. At all measurement sites, the correlation coefficients between the values of muscle hardness indices determined by the muscle hardness meter and shear wave ultrasound elastography were not significant. Furthermore, individuals' subjective neck and shoulder stiffness did not correspond to their objective symptoms. These results suggest that the use of shear wave ultrasound elastography is essential to more precisely assess neck and shoulder stiffness. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1688000175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0301562915002720</els_id><sourcerecordid>1688000175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-6eefe911c0fd792579112b6816be9764a7db9f62ca1ba03d593af1394328af523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhS0EokvhLyCLE5ekthPHMQckui1tpRYOSwU3y7En1NskXuykaNU_X2e3VIgTp7E0770ZfxqE3lGSU0Kro3U-dWPQsQfbOJ8zQnlOypwQ-gwtaC1kxiT98RwtSEFoxismD9CrGNeEEFEV4iU6YFyWJav5At0vfb_RwUU_4GMYfwMM-AuYW6wHi1c3fuosBLwaXdsOECM-gRFC7wawuNkmAeiAv-s7wNe7lfyUbKedjqP_GfTmZrvL0fhqiqYDfK6D3cVczTGv0YtWdxHePNZDdP359NvyPLv8enax_HSZGS7omFUALUhKDWmtkIyL9GZNVdOqASmqUgvbyLZiRtNGk8JyWeiWFrIsWK1bzopD9H6fuwn-1wRxVL2LBrpOD-CnqGhV14kNFTxJP-ylJvgYA7RqE1yvw1ZRomb4aq3-hq9m-IqUKtmT-e3jnKlJ7SfrH9pJcLIXQPrtnYOgonEwGLAugBmV9e7_5nz8J8Z0bnBGd7ewhbj2UxgST0VVZIqo1XwG8xVQTggTjBQPSNGy-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1688000175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison Between Neck and Shoulder Stiffness Determined by Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography and a Muscle Hardness Meter</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Akagi, Ryota ; Kusama, Saki</creator><creatorcontrib>Akagi, Ryota ; Kusama, Saki</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The goals of this study were to compare neck and shoulder stiffness values determined by shear wave ultrasound elastography with those obtained with a muscle hardness meter and to verify the correspondence between objective and subjective stiffness in the neck and shoulder. Twenty-four young men and women participated in the study. Their neck and shoulder stiffness was determined at six sites. Before the start of the measurements, patients rated their present subjective symptoms of neck and shoulder stiffness on a 6-point verbal scale. At all measurement sites, the correlation coefficients between the values of muscle hardness indices determined by the muscle hardness meter and shear wave ultrasound elastography were not significant. Furthermore, individuals' subjective neck and shoulder stiffness did not correspond to their objective symptoms. These results suggest that the use of shear wave ultrasound elastography is essential to more precisely assess neck and shoulder stiffness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25944285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Elastic Modulus - physiology ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Female ; Hardness - physiology ; Hardness Tests - instrumentation ; Hardness Tests - methods ; Humans ; Levator scapulae muscle ; Male ; Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Neck - physiopathology ; Physical Examination - instrumentation ; Physical Examination - methods ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Shear modulus ; Shoulder - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder - physiopathology ; Splenius capitis muscle ; Trapezius muscle ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2015-08, Vol.41 (8), p.2266-2271</ispartof><rights>World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology</rights><rights>2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-6eefe911c0fd792579112b6816be9764a7db9f62ca1ba03d593af1394328af523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-6eefe911c0fd792579112b6816be9764a7db9f62ca1ba03d593af1394328af523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25944285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akagi, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusama, Saki</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison Between Neck and Shoulder Stiffness Determined by Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography and a Muscle Hardness Meter</title><title>Ultrasound in medicine & biology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract The goals of this study were to compare neck and shoulder stiffness values determined by shear wave ultrasound elastography with those obtained with a muscle hardness meter and to verify the correspondence between objective and subjective stiffness in the neck and shoulder. Twenty-four young men and women participated in the study. Their neck and shoulder stiffness was determined at six sites. Before the start of the measurements, patients rated their present subjective symptoms of neck and shoulder stiffness on a 6-point verbal scale. At all measurement sites, the correlation coefficients between the values of muscle hardness indices determined by the muscle hardness meter and shear wave ultrasound elastography were not significant. Furthermore, individuals' subjective neck and shoulder stiffness did not correspond to their objective symptoms. These results suggest that the use of shear wave ultrasound elastography is essential to more precisely assess neck and shoulder stiffness.</description><subject>Elastic Modulus - physiology</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hardness - physiology</subject><subject>Hardness Tests - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hardness Tests - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Levator scapulae muscle</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neck - physiopathology</subject><subject>Physical Examination - instrumentation</subject><subject>Physical Examination - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Shear modulus</subject><subject>Shoulder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder - physiopathology</subject><subject>Splenius capitis muscle</subject><subject>Trapezius muscle</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0301-5629</issn><issn>1879-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhS0EokvhLyCLE5ekthPHMQckui1tpRYOSwU3y7En1NskXuykaNU_X2e3VIgTp7E0770ZfxqE3lGSU0Kro3U-dWPQsQfbOJ8zQnlOypwQ-gwtaC1kxiT98RwtSEFoxismD9CrGNeEEFEV4iU6YFyWJav5At0vfb_RwUU_4GMYfwMM-AuYW6wHi1c3fuosBLwaXdsOECM-gRFC7wawuNkmAeiAv-s7wNe7lfyUbKedjqP_GfTmZrvL0fhqiqYDfK6D3cVczTGv0YtWdxHePNZDdP359NvyPLv8enax_HSZGS7omFUALUhKDWmtkIyL9GZNVdOqASmqUgvbyLZiRtNGk8JyWeiWFrIsWK1bzopD9H6fuwn-1wRxVL2LBrpOD-CnqGhV14kNFTxJP-ylJvgYA7RqE1yvw1ZRomb4aq3-hq9m-IqUKtmT-e3jnKlJ7SfrH9pJcLIXQPrtnYOgonEwGLAugBmV9e7_5nz8J8Z0bnBGd7ewhbj2UxgST0VVZIqo1XwG8xVQTggTjBQPSNGy-w</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Akagi, Ryota</creator><creator>Kusama, Saki</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Comparison Between Neck and Shoulder Stiffness Determined by Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography and a Muscle Hardness Meter</title><author>Akagi, Ryota ; Kusama, Saki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c571t-6eefe911c0fd792579112b6816be9764a7db9f62ca1ba03d593af1394328af523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Elastic Modulus - physiology</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hardness - physiology</topic><topic>Hardness Tests - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hardness Tests - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Levator scapulae muscle</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neck - physiopathology</topic><topic>Physical Examination - instrumentation</topic><topic>Physical Examination - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Shear modulus</topic><topic>Shoulder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder - physiopathology</topic><topic>Splenius capitis muscle</topic><topic>Trapezius muscle</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akagi, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusama, Saki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine & biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akagi, Ryota</au><au>Kusama, Saki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison Between Neck and Shoulder Stiffness Determined by Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography and a Muscle Hardness Meter</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine & biology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2266</spage><epage>2271</epage><pages>2266-2271</pages><issn>0301-5629</issn><eissn>1879-291X</eissn><abstract>Abstract The goals of this study were to compare neck and shoulder stiffness values determined by shear wave ultrasound elastography with those obtained with a muscle hardness meter and to verify the correspondence between objective and subjective stiffness in the neck and shoulder. Twenty-four young men and women participated in the study. Their neck and shoulder stiffness was determined at six sites. Before the start of the measurements, patients rated their present subjective symptoms of neck and shoulder stiffness on a 6-point verbal scale. At all measurement sites, the correlation coefficients between the values of muscle hardness indices determined by the muscle hardness meter and shear wave ultrasound elastography were not significant. Furthermore, individuals' subjective neck and shoulder stiffness did not correspond to their objective symptoms. These results suggest that the use of shear wave ultrasound elastography is essential to more precisely assess neck and shoulder stiffness.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25944285</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-5629 |
| ispartof | Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2015-08, Vol.41 (8), p.2266-2271 |
| issn | 0301-5629 1879-291X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1688000175 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Elastic Modulus - physiology Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods Female Hardness - physiology Hardness Tests - instrumentation Hardness Tests - methods Humans Levator scapulae muscle Male Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Neck - diagnostic imaging Neck - physiopathology Physical Examination - instrumentation Physical Examination - methods Radiology Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Shear modulus Shoulder - diagnostic imaging Shoulder - physiopathology Splenius capitis muscle Trapezius muscle Young Adult |
| title | Comparison Between Neck and Shoulder Stiffness Determined by Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography and a Muscle Hardness Meter |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T16%3A05%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20Between%20Neck%20and%20Shoulder%20Stiffness%20Determined%20by%20Shear%20Wave%20Ultrasound%20Elastography%20and%20a%20Muscle%20Hardness%20Meter&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Akagi,%20Ryota&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2266&rft.epage=2271&rft.pages=2266-2271&rft.issn=0301-5629&rft.eissn=1879-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1688000175%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1688000175&rft_id=info:pmid/25944285&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0301562915002720&rfr_iscdi=true |