Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges
Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care. Medicare aims to apply alternati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2015-06, Vol.372 (24), p.2281-2283 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2283 |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 2281 |
container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
container_volume | 372 |
creator | Khullar, Dhruv Chokshi, Dave A Kocher, Robert Reddy, Ashok Basu, Karna Conway, Patrick H Rajkumar, Rahul |
description | Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care.
Medicare aims to apply alternative payment models to 50% of its fee-for-service payments by the end of 2018 — an important shift toward value-based health care.
1
The success of national payment reform, however, will depend on engaging clinicians in making better decisions in managing individual and population health. Many physician behaviors are well explained by “rational” economic models (e.g., fee-for-service reimbursement tends to promote well-compensated procedures), and revising incentives may drive changes in decision making, shifting our focus from volume to value. Provider organizations embracing alternative payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new . . . |
doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJMp1502312 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687999123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3713077531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-b626ede6ce8438f781c2c89012c82eccf78e27e3d20ab66bce797b643769b9bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0LtOwzAUBmALgaAUNmYUCQYGAr7VjkeIyqUq0AHmyHFOaarELnGD1I2H4Al5EkxbEEKcwUeyPv06-hE6IPiM4J44v-8P7makhykjdAN1SI-xmHMsNlEHY5rEXCq2g3a9n-IwhKtttEMFFiRhvIMGlzDRr6VrdBX1jbOuLo2PtC2i0WThS1NqG6WunoH1el46G328vUejJjAPS5ZOdFWBfQa_h7bGuvKwv95d9HTVf0xv4uHD9W16MYwNJ3we54IKKEAYSDhLxjIhhppEYRJeCsaEH6ASWEGxzoXIDUglc8GZFCpX-Zh10ckqd9a4lxb8PAvHGKgqbcG1PiMikUopQlmgR3_o1LWNDdctlcSCKhnU6UqZxnnfwDibNWWtm0VGcPbVcfa748AP16FtXkPxg79LDeB4BeraZxam9f85n_atgYs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687706297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Khullar, Dhruv ; Chokshi, Dave A ; Kocher, Robert ; Reddy, Ashok ; Basu, Karna ; Conway, Patrick H ; Rajkumar, Rahul</creator><creatorcontrib>Khullar, Dhruv ; Chokshi, Dave A ; Kocher, Robert ; Reddy, Ashok ; Basu, Karna ; Conway, Patrick H ; Rajkumar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><description>Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care.
Medicare aims to apply alternative payment models to 50% of its fee-for-service payments by the end of 2018 — an important shift toward value-based health care.
1
The success of national payment reform, however, will depend on engaging clinicians in making better decisions in managing individual and population health. Many physician behaviors are well explained by “rational” economic models (e.g., fee-for-service reimbursement tends to promote well-compensated procedures), and revising incentives may drive changes in decision making, shifting our focus from volume to value. Provider organizations embracing alternative payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1502312</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26061834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Brand names ; Clinical decision making ; Cognitive ability ; Computerized physician order entry ; Decision making ; Economics ; Economics, Behavioral ; Fee-for-Service Plans - economics ; Generic drugs ; Humans ; Incentives ; Medicare - economics ; Physicians - economics ; Physicians - psychology ; Reimbursement Mechanisms ; Reimbursement, Incentive ; United States</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2015-06, Vol.372 (24), p.2281-2283</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-b626ede6ce8438f781c2c89012c82eccf78e27e3d20ab66bce797b643769b9bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-b626ede6ce8438f781c2c89012c82eccf78e27e3d20ab66bce797b643769b9bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1502312$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1502312$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2746,2747,26080,27901,27902,52357,54039</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khullar, Dhruv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chokshi, Dave A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocher, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Karna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Patrick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajkumar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care.
Medicare aims to apply alternative payment models to 50% of its fee-for-service payments by the end of 2018 — an important shift toward value-based health care.
1
The success of national payment reform, however, will depend on engaging clinicians in making better decisions in managing individual and population health. Many physician behaviors are well explained by “rational” economic models (e.g., fee-for-service reimbursement tends to promote well-compensated procedures), and revising incentives may drive changes in decision making, shifting our focus from volume to value. Provider organizations embracing alternative payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new . . .</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Brand names</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Computerized physician order entry</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics, Behavioral</subject><subject>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</subject><subject>Generic drugs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Medicare - economics</subject><subject>Physicians - economics</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Reimbursement Mechanisms</subject><subject>Reimbursement, Incentive</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0LtOwzAUBmALgaAUNmYUCQYGAr7VjkeIyqUq0AHmyHFOaarELnGD1I2H4Al5EkxbEEKcwUeyPv06-hE6IPiM4J44v-8P7makhykjdAN1SI-xmHMsNlEHY5rEXCq2g3a9n-IwhKtttEMFFiRhvIMGlzDRr6VrdBX1jbOuLo2PtC2i0WThS1NqG6WunoH1el46G328vUejJjAPS5ZOdFWBfQa_h7bGuvKwv95d9HTVf0xv4uHD9W16MYwNJ3we54IKKEAYSDhLxjIhhppEYRJeCsaEH6ASWEGxzoXIDUglc8GZFCpX-Zh10ckqd9a4lxb8PAvHGKgqbcG1PiMikUopQlmgR3_o1LWNDdctlcSCKhnU6UqZxnnfwDibNWWtm0VGcPbVcfa748AP16FtXkPxg79LDeB4BeraZxam9f85n_atgYs</recordid><startdate>20150611</startdate><enddate>20150611</enddate><creator>Khullar, Dhruv</creator><creator>Chokshi, Dave A</creator><creator>Kocher, Robert</creator><creator>Reddy, Ashok</creator><creator>Basu, Karna</creator><creator>Conway, Patrick H</creator><creator>Rajkumar, Rahul</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150611</creationdate><title>Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges</title><author>Khullar, Dhruv ; Chokshi, Dave A ; Kocher, Robert ; Reddy, Ashok ; Basu, Karna ; Conway, Patrick H ; Rajkumar, Rahul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-b626ede6ce8438f781c2c89012c82eccf78e27e3d20ab66bce797b643769b9bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Brand names</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Computerized physician order entry</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics, Behavioral</topic><topic>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</topic><topic>Generic drugs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Medicare - economics</topic><topic>Physicians - economics</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Reimbursement Mechanisms</topic><topic>Reimbursement, Incentive</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khullar, Dhruv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chokshi, Dave A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocher, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Karna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Patrick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajkumar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khullar, Dhruv</au><au>Chokshi, Dave A</au><au>Kocher, Robert</au><au>Reddy, Ashok</au><au>Basu, Karna</au><au>Conway, Patrick H</au><au>Rajkumar, Rahul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2015-06-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>372</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>2281</spage><epage>2283</epage><pages>2281-2283</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care.
Medicare aims to apply alternative payment models to 50% of its fee-for-service payments by the end of 2018 — an important shift toward value-based health care.
1
The success of national payment reform, however, will depend on engaging clinicians in making better decisions in managing individual and population health. Many physician behaviors are well explained by “rational” economic models (e.g., fee-for-service reimbursement tends to promote well-compensated procedures), and revising incentives may drive changes in decision making, shifting our focus from volume to value. Provider organizations embracing alternative payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>26061834</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMp1502312</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 2015-06, Vol.372 (24), p.2281-2283 |
issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687999123 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; New England Journal of Medicine |
subjects | Behavior Brand names Clinical decision making Cognitive ability Computerized physician order entry Decision making Economics Economics, Behavioral Fee-for-Service Plans - economics Generic drugs Humans Incentives Medicare - economics Physicians - economics Physicians - psychology Reimbursement Mechanisms Reimbursement, Incentive United States |
title | Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A57%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20Economics%20and%20Physician%20Compensation%20%E2%80%94%20Promise%20and%20Challenges&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Khullar,%20Dhruv&rft.date=2015-06-11&rft.volume=372&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=2281&rft.epage=2283&rft.pages=2281-2283&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMp1502312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3713077531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687706297&rft_id=info:pmid/26061834&rfr_iscdi=true |