Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges

Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care. Medicare aims to apply alternati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2015-06, Vol.372 (24), p.2281-2283
Hauptverfasser: Khullar, Dhruv, Chokshi, Dave A, Kocher, Robert, Reddy, Ashok, Basu, Karna, Conway, Patrick H, Rajkumar, Rahul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2283
container_issue 24
container_start_page 2281
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 372
creator Khullar, Dhruv
Chokshi, Dave A
Kocher, Robert
Reddy, Ashok
Basu, Karna
Conway, Patrick H
Rajkumar, Rahul
description Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care. Medicare aims to apply alternative payment models to 50% of its fee-for-service payments by the end of 2018 — an important shift toward value-based health care. 1 The success of national payment reform, however, will depend on engaging clinicians in making better decisions in managing individual and population health. Many physician behaviors are well explained by “rational” economic models (e.g., fee-for-service reimbursement tends to promote well-compensated procedures), and revising incentives may drive changes in decision making, shifting our focus from volume to value. Provider organizations embracing alternative payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new . . .
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJMp1502312
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687999123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3713077531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-b626ede6ce8438f781c2c89012c82eccf78e27e3d20ab66bce797b643769b9bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0LtOwzAUBmALgaAUNmYUCQYGAr7VjkeIyqUq0AHmyHFOaarELnGD1I2H4Al5EkxbEEKcwUeyPv06-hE6IPiM4J44v-8P7makhykjdAN1SI-xmHMsNlEHY5rEXCq2g3a9n-IwhKtttEMFFiRhvIMGlzDRr6VrdBX1jbOuLo2PtC2i0WThS1NqG6WunoH1el46G328vUejJjAPS5ZOdFWBfQa_h7bGuvKwv95d9HTVf0xv4uHD9W16MYwNJ3we54IKKEAYSDhLxjIhhppEYRJeCsaEH6ASWEGxzoXIDUglc8GZFCpX-Zh10ckqd9a4lxb8PAvHGKgqbcG1PiMikUopQlmgR3_o1LWNDdctlcSCKhnU6UqZxnnfwDibNWWtm0VGcPbVcfa748AP16FtXkPxg79LDeB4BeraZxam9f85n_atgYs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687706297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Khullar, Dhruv ; Chokshi, Dave A ; Kocher, Robert ; Reddy, Ashok ; Basu, Karna ; Conway, Patrick H ; Rajkumar, Rahul</creator><creatorcontrib>Khullar, Dhruv ; Chokshi, Dave A ; Kocher, Robert ; Reddy, Ashok ; Basu, Karna ; Conway, Patrick H ; Rajkumar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><description>Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care. Medicare aims to apply alternative payment models to 50% of its fee-for-service payments by the end of 2018 — an important shift toward value-based health care. 1 The success of national payment reform, however, will depend on engaging clinicians in making better decisions in managing individual and population health. Many physician behaviors are well explained by “rational” economic models (e.g., fee-for-service reimbursement tends to promote well-compensated procedures), and revising incentives may drive changes in decision making, shifting our focus from volume to value. Provider organizations embracing alternative payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1502312</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26061834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Brand names ; Clinical decision making ; Cognitive ability ; Computerized physician order entry ; Decision making ; Economics ; Economics, Behavioral ; Fee-for-Service Plans - economics ; Generic drugs ; Humans ; Incentives ; Medicare - economics ; Physicians - economics ; Physicians - psychology ; Reimbursement Mechanisms ; Reimbursement, Incentive ; United States</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2015-06, Vol.372 (24), p.2281-2283</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-b626ede6ce8438f781c2c89012c82eccf78e27e3d20ab66bce797b643769b9bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-b626ede6ce8438f781c2c89012c82eccf78e27e3d20ab66bce797b643769b9bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1502312$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1502312$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2746,2747,26080,27901,27902,52357,54039</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khullar, Dhruv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chokshi, Dave A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocher, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Karna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Patrick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajkumar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care. Medicare aims to apply alternative payment models to 50% of its fee-for-service payments by the end of 2018 — an important shift toward value-based health care. 1 The success of national payment reform, however, will depend on engaging clinicians in making better decisions in managing individual and population health. Many physician behaviors are well explained by “rational” economic models (e.g., fee-for-service reimbursement tends to promote well-compensated procedures), and revising incentives may drive changes in decision making, shifting our focus from volume to value. Provider organizations embracing alternative payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new . . .</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Brand names</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Computerized physician order entry</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics, Behavioral</subject><subject>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</subject><subject>Generic drugs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Medicare - economics</subject><subject>Physicians - economics</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Reimbursement Mechanisms</subject><subject>Reimbursement, Incentive</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0LtOwzAUBmALgaAUNmYUCQYGAr7VjkeIyqUq0AHmyHFOaarELnGD1I2H4Al5EkxbEEKcwUeyPv06-hE6IPiM4J44v-8P7makhykjdAN1SI-xmHMsNlEHY5rEXCq2g3a9n-IwhKtttEMFFiRhvIMGlzDRr6VrdBX1jbOuLo2PtC2i0WThS1NqG6WunoH1el46G328vUejJjAPS5ZOdFWBfQa_h7bGuvKwv95d9HTVf0xv4uHD9W16MYwNJ3we54IKKEAYSDhLxjIhhppEYRJeCsaEH6ASWEGxzoXIDUglc8GZFCpX-Zh10ckqd9a4lxb8PAvHGKgqbcG1PiMikUopQlmgR3_o1LWNDdctlcSCKhnU6UqZxnnfwDibNWWtm0VGcPbVcfa748AP16FtXkPxg79LDeB4BeraZxam9f85n_atgYs</recordid><startdate>20150611</startdate><enddate>20150611</enddate><creator>Khullar, Dhruv</creator><creator>Chokshi, Dave A</creator><creator>Kocher, Robert</creator><creator>Reddy, Ashok</creator><creator>Basu, Karna</creator><creator>Conway, Patrick H</creator><creator>Rajkumar, Rahul</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150611</creationdate><title>Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges</title><author>Khullar, Dhruv ; Chokshi, Dave A ; Kocher, Robert ; Reddy, Ashok ; Basu, Karna ; Conway, Patrick H ; Rajkumar, Rahul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-b626ede6ce8438f781c2c89012c82eccf78e27e3d20ab66bce797b643769b9bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Brand names</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Computerized physician order entry</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics, Behavioral</topic><topic>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</topic><topic>Generic drugs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Medicare - economics</topic><topic>Physicians - economics</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Reimbursement Mechanisms</topic><topic>Reimbursement, Incentive</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khullar, Dhruv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chokshi, Dave A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocher, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Ashok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basu, Karna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Patrick H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajkumar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khullar, Dhruv</au><au>Chokshi, Dave A</au><au>Kocher, Robert</au><au>Reddy, Ashok</au><au>Basu, Karna</au><au>Conway, Patrick H</au><au>Rajkumar, Rahul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2015-06-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>372</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>2281</spage><epage>2283</epage><pages>2281-2283</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>Health care organizations embracing new payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new incentives. By creating more favorable decision-making environments, we can take advantage of cognitive biases to encourage high-value care. Medicare aims to apply alternative payment models to 50% of its fee-for-service payments by the end of 2018 — an important shift toward value-based health care. 1 The success of national payment reform, however, will depend on engaging clinicians in making better decisions in managing individual and population health. Many physician behaviors are well explained by “rational” economic models (e.g., fee-for-service reimbursement tends to promote well-compensated procedures), and revising incentives may drive changes in decision making, shifting our focus from volume to value. Provider organizations embracing alternative payment models may find that applying behavioral economics can boost the effect of new . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>26061834</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMp1502312</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 2015-06, Vol.372 (24), p.2281-2283
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687999123
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; New England Journal of Medicine
subjects Behavior
Brand names
Clinical decision making
Cognitive ability
Computerized physician order entry
Decision making
Economics
Economics, Behavioral
Fee-for-Service Plans - economics
Generic drugs
Humans
Incentives
Medicare - economics
Physicians - economics
Physicians - psychology
Reimbursement Mechanisms
Reimbursement, Incentive
United States
title Behavioral Economics and Physician Compensation — Promise and Challenges
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A57%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20Economics%20and%20Physician%20Compensation%20%E2%80%94%20Promise%20and%20Challenges&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Khullar,%20Dhruv&rft.date=2015-06-11&rft.volume=372&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=2281&rft.epage=2283&rft.pages=2281-2283&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMp1502312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3713077531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687706297&rft_id=info:pmid/26061834&rfr_iscdi=true