Shark bycatch in the experimental tuna longline fishery in Lakshadweep Sea, India
Summary Bycatch from the experimental longline operations in the Lakshadweep Sea were studied. The experiments were conducted on converted Pablo boats, originally used for pole and line fishing operations, to capture skipjack tuna in the Lakshadweep Islands. The overall bycatch rate was very high, w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied ichthyology 2015-04, Vol.31 (2), p.301-307 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 307 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 301 |
container_title | Journal of applied ichthyology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Kumar, K. V. Aneesh Pravin, P. Meenakumari, B. Khanolkar, P. S. Baiju, M. V. |
description | Summary
Bycatch from the experimental longline operations in the Lakshadweep Sea were studied. The experiments were conducted on converted Pablo boats, originally used for pole and line fishing operations, to capture skipjack tuna in the Lakshadweep Islands. The overall bycatch rate was very high, with a mean hooking rate of 8.05/1000 hooks compared to the targeted tuna catch (1.75/1000 hooks). Bycatch contributed 82.4% of the catch in comparison to the tuna (17.6%) Thunnus albacares, in the longline operations. Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformes) with 89.9% was the dominant shark species followed by C. amblyrhynchos, Galeocerdo cuvier, Alopias pelagicus, Negapriion acutedens and Sphyrna lewinii with 4.7, 2.7, 1.4, 0.7 and 0.7%, respectively. Sharks contributed to 74.1% of the catch, followed by 15.7% sailfishes and 10.2% miscellaneous fishes. Higher bycatch rates were evident during evening hours compared to mornings, but the results were not significant statistically. Studies on the effects of depth on the overall fishing performance and species selectivity failed to establish any significant relationship at a depth range of 35–100 m. Soaking time had a significant effect on bycatch rates. The hooking rate of sharks declined with an increase in soaking time. Considering the high shark bycatch in the fishery, an accurate monitoring of the longline fish catches in the Lakshadweep waters is an important step towards ensuring the sustainability of other populations, especially sharks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jai.12682 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687682871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1687682871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4732-9f25c79eec18e4102151d69d89294eb0bbf90681d7fc2f3a7ab3274a6df1c3163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtP4zAUhS3ESJTHYv6BJTYgEfC1EzteoopHUSlCzGiWluPcEJeQlDhV6b_HpcMskOZuzuY7R1cfIT-BnUO8i7n158BlznfICFKhE5ZyuUtGDFSW5DLTe2Q_hDljLFdajsjjU237F1qsnR1cTX1Lhxopvi-w96_YDrahw7K1tOna58a3SCsfauzXG3JqX0JtyxXigj6hPaOTtvT2kPyobBPw6G8ekN_XV7_Gt8n04WYyvpwmLlWCJ7rimVMa0UGOKTAOGZRSl7nmOsWCFUWlmcyhVJXjlbDKFoKr1MqyAidAigNyst1d9N3bEsNgXn1w2DS2xW4ZDMhcRQ-5gogef0Pn3bJv43eRkiAYaLUZPN1Sru9C6LEyi-jA9msDzGzkmijXfMqN7MWWXfkG1_8Hzd3l5KuRbBs-DPj-rxHlG6mEysyf2Y2ZKRiz2f2jkeIDTXOIxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661301976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shark bycatch in the experimental tuna longline fishery in Lakshadweep Sea, India</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kumar, K. V. Aneesh ; Pravin, P. ; Meenakumari, B. ; Khanolkar, P. S. ; Baiju, M. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, K. V. Aneesh ; Pravin, P. ; Meenakumari, B. ; Khanolkar, P. S. ; Baiju, M. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Bycatch from the experimental longline operations in the Lakshadweep Sea were studied. The experiments were conducted on converted Pablo boats, originally used for pole and line fishing operations, to capture skipjack tuna in the Lakshadweep Islands. The overall bycatch rate was very high, with a mean hooking rate of 8.05/1000 hooks compared to the targeted tuna catch (1.75/1000 hooks). Bycatch contributed 82.4% of the catch in comparison to the tuna (17.6%) Thunnus albacares, in the longline operations. Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformes) with 89.9% was the dominant shark species followed by C. amblyrhynchos, Galeocerdo cuvier, Alopias pelagicus, Negapriion acutedens and Sphyrna lewinii with 4.7, 2.7, 1.4, 0.7 and 0.7%, respectively. Sharks contributed to 74.1% of the catch, followed by 15.7% sailfishes and 10.2% miscellaneous fishes. Higher bycatch rates were evident during evening hours compared to mornings, but the results were not significant statistically. Studies on the effects of depth on the overall fishing performance and species selectivity failed to establish any significant relationship at a depth range of 35–100 m. Soaking time had a significant effect on bycatch rates. The hooking rate of sharks declined with an increase in soaking time. Considering the high shark bycatch in the fishery, an accurate monitoring of the longline fish catches in the Lakshadweep waters is an important step towards ensuring the sustainability of other populations, especially sharks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0175-8659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jai.12682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Marine</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied ichthyology, 2015-04, Vol.31 (2), p.301-307</ispartof><rights>2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4732-9f25c79eec18e4102151d69d89294eb0bbf90681d7fc2f3a7ab3274a6df1c3163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4732-9f25c79eec18e4102151d69d89294eb0bbf90681d7fc2f3a7ab3274a6df1c3163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjai.12682$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjai.12682$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, K. V. Aneesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pravin, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meenakumari, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanolkar, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baiju, M. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Shark bycatch in the experimental tuna longline fishery in Lakshadweep Sea, India</title><title>Journal of applied ichthyology</title><addtitle>J. Appl. Ichthyol</addtitle><description>Summary
Bycatch from the experimental longline operations in the Lakshadweep Sea were studied. The experiments were conducted on converted Pablo boats, originally used for pole and line fishing operations, to capture skipjack tuna in the Lakshadweep Islands. The overall bycatch rate was very high, with a mean hooking rate of 8.05/1000 hooks compared to the targeted tuna catch (1.75/1000 hooks). Bycatch contributed 82.4% of the catch in comparison to the tuna (17.6%) Thunnus albacares, in the longline operations. Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformes) with 89.9% was the dominant shark species followed by C. amblyrhynchos, Galeocerdo cuvier, Alopias pelagicus, Negapriion acutedens and Sphyrna lewinii with 4.7, 2.7, 1.4, 0.7 and 0.7%, respectively. Sharks contributed to 74.1% of the catch, followed by 15.7% sailfishes and 10.2% miscellaneous fishes. Higher bycatch rates were evident during evening hours compared to mornings, but the results were not significant statistically. Studies on the effects of depth on the overall fishing performance and species selectivity failed to establish any significant relationship at a depth range of 35–100 m. Soaking time had a significant effect on bycatch rates. The hooking rate of sharks declined with an increase in soaking time. Considering the high shark bycatch in the fishery, an accurate monitoring of the longline fish catches in the Lakshadweep waters is an important step towards ensuring the sustainability of other populations, especially sharks.</description><subject>Marine</subject><issn>0175-8659</issn><issn>1439-0426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtP4zAUhS3ESJTHYv6BJTYgEfC1EzteoopHUSlCzGiWluPcEJeQlDhV6b_HpcMskOZuzuY7R1cfIT-BnUO8i7n158BlznfICFKhE5ZyuUtGDFSW5DLTe2Q_hDljLFdajsjjU237F1qsnR1cTX1Lhxopvi-w96_YDrahw7K1tOna58a3SCsfauzXG3JqX0JtyxXigj6hPaOTtvT2kPyobBPw6G8ekN_XV7_Gt8n04WYyvpwmLlWCJ7rimVMa0UGOKTAOGZRSl7nmOsWCFUWlmcyhVJXjlbDKFoKr1MqyAidAigNyst1d9N3bEsNgXn1w2DS2xW4ZDMhcRQ-5gogef0Pn3bJv43eRkiAYaLUZPN1Sru9C6LEyi-jA9msDzGzkmijXfMqN7MWWXfkG1_8Hzd3l5KuRbBs-DPj-rxHlG6mEysyf2Y2ZKRiz2f2jkeIDTXOIxg</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Kumar, K. V. Aneesh</creator><creator>Pravin, P.</creator><creator>Meenakumari, B.</creator><creator>Khanolkar, P. S.</creator><creator>Baiju, M. V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Shark bycatch in the experimental tuna longline fishery in Lakshadweep Sea, India</title><author>Kumar, K. V. Aneesh ; Pravin, P. ; Meenakumari, B. ; Khanolkar, P. S. ; Baiju, M. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4732-9f25c79eec18e4102151d69d89294eb0bbf90681d7fc2f3a7ab3274a6df1c3163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Marine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, K. V. Aneesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pravin, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meenakumari, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanolkar, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baiju, M. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied ichthyology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, K. V. Aneesh</au><au>Pravin, P.</au><au>Meenakumari, B.</au><au>Khanolkar, P. S.</au><au>Baiju, M. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shark bycatch in the experimental tuna longline fishery in Lakshadweep Sea, India</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied ichthyology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Appl. Ichthyol</addtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>301-307</pages><issn>0175-8659</issn><eissn>1439-0426</eissn><abstract>Summary
Bycatch from the experimental longline operations in the Lakshadweep Sea were studied. The experiments were conducted on converted Pablo boats, originally used for pole and line fishing operations, to capture skipjack tuna in the Lakshadweep Islands. The overall bycatch rate was very high, with a mean hooking rate of 8.05/1000 hooks compared to the targeted tuna catch (1.75/1000 hooks). Bycatch contributed 82.4% of the catch in comparison to the tuna (17.6%) Thunnus albacares, in the longline operations. Silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformes) with 89.9% was the dominant shark species followed by C. amblyrhynchos, Galeocerdo cuvier, Alopias pelagicus, Negapriion acutedens and Sphyrna lewinii with 4.7, 2.7, 1.4, 0.7 and 0.7%, respectively. Sharks contributed to 74.1% of the catch, followed by 15.7% sailfishes and 10.2% miscellaneous fishes. Higher bycatch rates were evident during evening hours compared to mornings, but the results were not significant statistically. Studies on the effects of depth on the overall fishing performance and species selectivity failed to establish any significant relationship at a depth range of 35–100 m. Soaking time had a significant effect on bycatch rates. The hooking rate of sharks declined with an increase in soaking time. Considering the high shark bycatch in the fishery, an accurate monitoring of the longline fish catches in the Lakshadweep waters is an important step towards ensuring the sustainability of other populations, especially sharks.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jai.12682</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0175-8659 |
ispartof | Journal of applied ichthyology, 2015-04, Vol.31 (2), p.301-307 |
issn | 0175-8659 1439-0426 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687682871 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Marine |
title | Shark bycatch in the experimental tuna longline fishery in Lakshadweep Sea, India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T12%3A18%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shark%20bycatch%20in%20the%20experimental%20tuna%20longline%20fishery%20in%20Lakshadweep%20Sea,%20India&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20ichthyology&rft.au=Kumar,%20K.%20V.%20Aneesh&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=301-307&rft.issn=0175-8659&rft.eissn=1439-0426&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jai.12682&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1687682871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661301976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |