Religious Barriers to Measles Vaccination

In 2014, the United States has experienced an increase in measles activity, the most since the elimination of the virus in 2000. The measles infection occurs in unvaccinated individuals. Communities and individuals choose to not vaccinate for a number of reasons, primarily citing religious and philo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of community health 2015-06, Vol.40 (3), p.597-604
Hauptverfasser: Wombwell, Eric, Fangman, Mary T., Yoder, Alannah K., Spero, David L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 604
container_issue 3
container_start_page 597
container_title Journal of community health
container_volume 40
creator Wombwell, Eric
Fangman, Mary T.
Yoder, Alannah K.
Spero, David L.
description In 2014, the United States has experienced an increase in measles activity, the most since the elimination of the virus in 2000. The measles infection occurs in unvaccinated individuals. Communities and individuals choose to not vaccinate for a number of reasons, primarily citing religious and philosophical motives. Objections based upon religion most often center on the use of aborted human fetus tissue used in the rubella component of the combined vaccine products, and animal derived gelatins used in vaccine production. Objections among religious communities may also not be faith based, rather in some cases concerns related to lack of safety and efficacy of the vaccination result in refusal.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10900-014-9956-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687669146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48716069</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48716069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-37d220661af22a9bfd72055a91816854b935824bcd1e390aaa6d3ff82ed91bad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwAxhAlVhgCNz5Mx6h4ksqQkLAajmJU6VKk2KnA_8eVykVYkBMHu553_M9hBwjXCKAugoIGiAB5InWQia4Q4YoFEuYRNglQwDNE4FcDMhBCHMAQFBynwyoYJFDPiQXL66uZlW7CuMb633lfBh37fjJ2VC7MH63eV41tqva5pDslbYO7mjzjsjb3e3r5CGZPt8_Tq6nSc4VdAlTBaUgJdqSUquzslAUhLAaU5Sp4JlmIqU8ywt0TIO1VhasLFPqCo2ZLdiInPe9S99-rFzozKIKuatr27j4TRNblJQaufwPCjQqYiqiZ7_QebvyTTwkUkorlWoKkcKeyn0bgnelWfpqYf2nQTBr5aZXbqJys1ZuMGZON82rbOGKbeLbcQRoD4Q4ambO_1j9R-tJH5qHrvXbUp4qlCA1-wKGG5I3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1679778920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Religious Barriers to Measles Vaccination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Wombwell, Eric ; Fangman, Mary T. ; Yoder, Alannah K. ; Spero, David L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wombwell, Eric ; Fangman, Mary T. ; Yoder, Alannah K. ; Spero, David L.</creatorcontrib><description>In 2014, the United States has experienced an increase in measles activity, the most since the elimination of the virus in 2000. The measles infection occurs in unvaccinated individuals. Communities and individuals choose to not vaccinate for a number of reasons, primarily citing religious and philosophical motives. Objections based upon religion most often center on the use of aborted human fetus tissue used in the rubella component of the combined vaccine products, and animal derived gelatins used in vaccine production. Objections among religious communities may also not be faith based, rather in some cases concerns related to lack of safety and efficacy of the vaccination result in refusal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10900-014-9956-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25315714</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMHBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology ; Community Relations ; Ethics ; Fetal Research - ethics ; Health behavior ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Humans ; Measles ; Measles Vaccine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Pharmacy ; Preventive Medicine ; Proteins ; Public health ; Religion ; REVIEW ; United States ; Vaccination - ethics ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Journal of community health, 2015-06, Vol.40 (3), p.597-604</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-37d220661af22a9bfd72055a91816854b935824bcd1e390aaa6d3ff82ed91bad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-37d220661af22a9bfd72055a91816854b935824bcd1e390aaa6d3ff82ed91bad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48716069$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48716069$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wombwell, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fangman, Mary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoder, Alannah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spero, David L.</creatorcontrib><title>Religious Barriers to Measles Vaccination</title><title>Journal of community health</title><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><description>In 2014, the United States has experienced an increase in measles activity, the most since the elimination of the virus in 2000. The measles infection occurs in unvaccinated individuals. Communities and individuals choose to not vaccinate for a number of reasons, primarily citing religious and philosophical motives. Objections based upon religion most often center on the use of aborted human fetus tissue used in the rubella component of the combined vaccine products, and animal derived gelatins used in vaccine production. Objections among religious communities may also not be faith based, rather in some cases concerns related to lack of safety and efficacy of the vaccination result in refusal.</description><subject>Community and Environmental Psychology</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Fetal Research - ethics</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Measles</subject><subject>Measles Vaccine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Preventive Medicine</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>REVIEW</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vaccination - ethics</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0094-5145</issn><issn>1573-3610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwAxhAlVhgCNz5Mx6h4ksqQkLAajmJU6VKk2KnA_8eVykVYkBMHu553_M9hBwjXCKAugoIGiAB5InWQia4Q4YoFEuYRNglQwDNE4FcDMhBCHMAQFBynwyoYJFDPiQXL66uZlW7CuMb633lfBh37fjJ2VC7MH63eV41tqva5pDslbYO7mjzjsjb3e3r5CGZPt8_Tq6nSc4VdAlTBaUgJdqSUquzslAUhLAaU5Sp4JlmIqU8ywt0TIO1VhasLFPqCo2ZLdiInPe9S99-rFzozKIKuatr27j4TRNblJQaufwPCjQqYiqiZ7_QebvyTTwkUkorlWoKkcKeyn0bgnelWfpqYf2nQTBr5aZXbqJys1ZuMGZON82rbOGKbeLbcQRoD4Q4ambO_1j9R-tJH5qHrvXbUp4qlCA1-wKGG5I3</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Wombwell, Eric</creator><creator>Fangman, Mary T.</creator><creator>Yoder, Alannah K.</creator><creator>Spero, David L.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Religious Barriers to Measles Vaccination</title><author>Wombwell, Eric ; Fangman, Mary T. ; Yoder, Alannah K. ; Spero, David L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-37d220661af22a9bfd72055a91816854b935824bcd1e390aaa6d3ff82ed91bad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Community and Environmental Psychology</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Fetal Research - ethics</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Measles</topic><topic>Measles Vaccine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Preventive Medicine</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>REVIEW</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vaccination - ethics</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wombwell, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fangman, Mary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoder, Alannah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spero, David L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wombwell, Eric</au><au>Fangman, Mary T.</au><au>Yoder, Alannah K.</au><au>Spero, David L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Religious Barriers to Measles Vaccination</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle><stitle>J Community Health</stitle><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>604</epage><pages>597-604</pages><issn>0094-5145</issn><eissn>1573-3610</eissn><coden>JCMHBR</coden><abstract>In 2014, the United States has experienced an increase in measles activity, the most since the elimination of the virus in 2000. The measles infection occurs in unvaccinated individuals. Communities and individuals choose to not vaccinate for a number of reasons, primarily citing religious and philosophical motives. Objections based upon religion most often center on the use of aborted human fetus tissue used in the rubella component of the combined vaccine products, and animal derived gelatins used in vaccine production. Objections among religious communities may also not be faith based, rather in some cases concerns related to lack of safety and efficacy of the vaccination result in refusal.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>25315714</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10900-014-9956-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-5145
ispartof Journal of community health, 2015-06, Vol.40 (3), p.597-604
issn 0094-5145
1573-3610
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687669146
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Education Source
subjects Community and Environmental Psychology
Community Relations
Ethics
Fetal Research - ethics
Health behavior
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Humans
Measles
Measles Vaccine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Pharmacy
Preventive Medicine
Proteins
Public health
Religion
REVIEW
United States
Vaccination - ethics
Vaccines
title Religious Barriers to Measles Vaccination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A08%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Religious%20Barriers%20to%20Measles%20Vaccination&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20health&rft.au=Wombwell,%20Eric&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=604&rft.pages=597-604&rft.issn=0094-5145&rft.eissn=1573-3610&rft.coden=JCMHBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10900-014-9956-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48716069%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1679778920&rft_id=info:pmid/25315714&rft_jstor_id=48716069&rfr_iscdi=true