Clipping the angel's wings: why the medicalization of love may still be worrying
This is a critique of Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu's argument in support of a possible future neuromodulation of love and love-related relationships. I argue that, contrary to what is suggested by Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu, we do have good reason to be concerned about that possibility as wel...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 2015-07, Vol.24 (3), p.361-365 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 365 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 361 |
| container_title | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Hauskeller, Michael |
| description | This is a critique of Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu's argument in support of a possible future neuromodulation of love and love-related relationships. I argue that, contrary to what is suggested by Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu, we do have good reason to be concerned about that possibility as well as about the medicalization of love that its pursuit would bring about. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S096318011400067X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687641800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1687641800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7bbc558968d24012995461893639e56cebbe3c3b6c97345f2b863d0d21d149c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAFyQJQ5wCXhtx4m5oYo_qRJI9MAtih2nTeUmIU6owtPj0MIBTivNfjPaHYROgVwBgej6lUjBICYAnBAiorc9NAYuZECBR_toPKyDYT9CR86tPEMpgUM0ooKEUgoYo5epLeq6KBe4XRqclgtjLxzeeMHd4M2y_5bXJit0aovPtC2qElc5ttWHl9Meu7awFiuDN1XT9N52jA7y1DpzspsTNL-_m08fg9nzw9P0dhZoGkMbRErpMIyliDPKCVApQy4glkwwaUKhjVKGaaaElhHjYU5VLFhGMgoZcKnZBF1uY-umeu-Ma5N14bSxNi1N1bkERBwJ7n8nHj3_g66qrin9cQMl_AlCgKdgS-mmcq4xeVI3xTpt-gRIMrSd_Gvbe852yZ3yHf06fuplXwl3eBU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1686968661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clipping the angel's wings: why the medicalization of love may still be worrying</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Hauskeller, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Hauskeller, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>This is a critique of Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu's argument in support of a possible future neuromodulation of love and love-related relationships. I argue that, contrary to what is suggested by Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu, we do have good reason to be concerned about that possibility as well as about the medicalization of love that its pursuit would bring about.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S096318011400067X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26059961</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Bioethics ; Biomedical Enhancement - ethics ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Love ; Medicalization - ethics ; Metaphor ; Morals ; Neurochemistry ; Personal Autonomy ; Philosophy, Medical</subject><ispartof>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 2015-07, Vol.24 (3), p.361-365</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7bbc558968d24012995461893639e56cebbe3c3b6c97345f2b863d0d21d149c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,27866,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26059961$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hauskeller, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Clipping the angel's wings: why the medicalization of love may still be worrying</title><title>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</title><addtitle>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</addtitle><description>This is a critique of Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu's argument in support of a possible future neuromodulation of love and love-related relationships. I argue that, contrary to what is suggested by Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu, we do have good reason to be concerned about that possibility as well as about the medicalization of love that its pursuit would bring about.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Enhancement - ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Love</subject><subject>Medicalization - ethics</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><subject>Morals</subject><subject>Neurochemistry</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Philosophy, Medical</subject><issn>0963-1801</issn><issn>1469-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAFyQJQ5wCXhtx4m5oYo_qRJI9MAtih2nTeUmIU6owtPj0MIBTivNfjPaHYROgVwBgej6lUjBICYAnBAiorc9NAYuZECBR_toPKyDYT9CR86tPEMpgUM0ooKEUgoYo5epLeq6KBe4XRqclgtjLxzeeMHd4M2y_5bXJit0aovPtC2qElc5ttWHl9Meu7awFiuDN1XT9N52jA7y1DpzspsTNL-_m08fg9nzw9P0dhZoGkMbRErpMIyliDPKCVApQy4glkwwaUKhjVKGaaaElhHjYU5VLFhGMgoZcKnZBF1uY-umeu-Ma5N14bSxNi1N1bkERBwJ7n8nHj3_g66qrin9cQMl_AlCgKdgS-mmcq4xeVI3xTpt-gRIMrSd_Gvbe852yZ3yHf06fuplXwl3eBU</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Hauskeller, Michael</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Clipping the angel's wings: why the medicalization of love may still be worrying</title><author>Hauskeller, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7bbc558968d24012995461893639e56cebbe3c3b6c97345f2b863d0d21d149c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Enhancement - ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Love</topic><topic>Medicalization - ethics</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><topic>Morals</topic><topic>Neurochemistry</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Philosophy, Medical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauskeller, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauskeller, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clipping the angel's wings: why the medicalization of love may still be worrying</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>365</epage><pages>361-365</pages><issn>0963-1801</issn><eissn>1469-2147</eissn><abstract>This is a critique of Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu's argument in support of a possible future neuromodulation of love and love-related relationships. I argue that, contrary to what is suggested by Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu, we do have good reason to be concerned about that possibility as well as about the medicalization of love that its pursuit would bring about.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>26059961</pmid><doi>10.1017/S096318011400067X</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0963-1801 |
| ispartof | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 2015-07, Vol.24 (3), p.361-365 |
| issn | 0963-1801 1469-2147 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687641800 |
| source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Anxiety Bioethics Biomedical Enhancement - ethics Humans Interpersonal Relations Love Medicalization - ethics Metaphor Morals Neurochemistry Personal Autonomy Philosophy, Medical |
| title | Clipping the angel's wings: why the medicalization of love may still be worrying |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A51%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clipping%20the%20angel's%20wings:%20why%20the%20medicalization%20of%20love%20may%20still%20be%20worrying&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20quarterly%20of%20healthcare%20ethics&rft.au=Hauskeller,%20Michael&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=365&rft.pages=361-365&rft.issn=0963-1801&rft.eissn=1469-2147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S096318011400067X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1687641800%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1686968661&rft_id=info:pmid/26059961&rfr_iscdi=true |