Novel hybrid drilling protocol: evaluation for the implant healing - thermal changes, crestal bone loss, and bone-to-implant contact
Objectives To evaluate a new hybrid drilling protocol, by the analysis of thermal changes in vitro, and their effects in the crestal bone loss and bone‐to‐implant contact in vivo. Materials and Methods Temperature changes during simulated osteotomies with a hybrid drilling technique (biologic plus s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2015-07, Vol.26 (7), p.753-760 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 760 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 753 |
container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Calvo-Guirado, José Luis Delgado-Peña, Jorge Maté-Sánchez, Jose E. Mareque Bueno, Javier Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio Romanos, Georgios E. |
description | Objectives
To evaluate a new hybrid drilling protocol, by the analysis of thermal changes in vitro, and their effects in the crestal bone loss and bone‐to‐implant contact in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Temperature changes during simulated osteotomies with a hybrid drilling technique (biologic plus simplified) (test) versus an incremental drilling technique (control) were investigated. One hundred and twenty random osteotomies were performed (60 by group) in pig ribs up to 3.75‐mm‐diameter drill to a depth of 10 mm. Thermal changes and time were recorded by paired thermocouples. In a parallel experiment, bilateral mandibular premolars P2, P3, P4, and first molar M1 were extracted from six dogs. After 2‐month healing, implant sites were randomly prepared using either of the drilling techniques. Forty eight implants of 3.75 mm diameter and 10 mm length were inserted. The dogs were euthanized at 30 and 90 days, and crestal bone loss (CBL) and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) were evaluated.
Results
The control group showed maximum temperatures of 35.3°C ± 1.8°C, ΔT of 10.4°C, and a mean time of 100 s/procedure; meanwhile, the test group showed maximum temperatures of 36.7°C ± 1.2°C, ΔT of 8.1°C, and a mean time of 240 s/procedure. After 30 days, CBL values for both groups (test: 1.168 ± 0.194 mm; control: 1.181 ± 0.113 mm) and BIC values (test: 43 ± 2.8%; control: 45 ± 1.3%) were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). After 90 days, CBL (test: 1.173 ± 0.187 mm; control: 1.205 ± 0.122 mm) and BIC (test: 64 ± 3.3%; control: 64 ± 2.4%) values were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). The BIC values were increased at 90 days in both groups compared with the 30‐day period (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.12341 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687641670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1687641670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-a4241b5673e4225f9a2229701785404c25f3f52d60fd28999d79b64d85691e913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9vFCEYxonR2LV68AsYEi-aSAsMfwZvZqOrcVOj0XgkDMN0qcywAlPdux9cutvtwUQuhCe_98nz8gDwlOAzUs-5DemM0IaRe2BBBMYIc0zugwVWmCNJBDkBj3K-whgL1aqH4IQyjqngbAH-XMRrF-Bm1yXfwz75EPx0CbcplmhjeA3dtQmzKT5OcIgJlo2DftwGMxW4cWYPoxs1jSZAuzHTpcuvoE0ulyp0cXIwxFwlM_X7JyoRHR1snIqx5TF4MJiQ3ZPb-xR8e_f26_I9Wn9afVi-WSPbKEKQYZSRjgvZOEYpH5ShlCqJiWw5w8xWqRk47QUeetoqpXqpOsH6lgtFnCLNKXhx8K3r_ZxrQj36bF2oWVycsyailYIRIXFFn_-DXsU5TTWdbjDnrVQN4ZV6eaBsqjsmN-ht8qNJO02wvqlG12r0vprKPrt1nLvR9XfksYsKnB-AXz643f-d9HL95WiJDhM-F_f7bsKkH7p-kuT6-8Wqxv28bunHlabNX2FPpac</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055879315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel hybrid drilling protocol: evaluation for the implant healing - thermal changes, crestal bone loss, and bone-to-implant contact</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis ; Delgado-Peña, Jorge ; Maté-Sánchez, Jose E. ; Mareque Bueno, Javier ; Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio ; Romanos, Georgios E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis ; Delgado-Peña, Jorge ; Maté-Sánchez, Jose E. ; Mareque Bueno, Javier ; Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio ; Romanos, Georgios E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate a new hybrid drilling protocol, by the analysis of thermal changes in vitro, and their effects in the crestal bone loss and bone‐to‐implant contact in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Temperature changes during simulated osteotomies with a hybrid drilling technique (biologic plus simplified) (test) versus an incremental drilling technique (control) were investigated. One hundred and twenty random osteotomies were performed (60 by group) in pig ribs up to 3.75‐mm‐diameter drill to a depth of 10 mm. Thermal changes and time were recorded by paired thermocouples. In a parallel experiment, bilateral mandibular premolars P2, P3, P4, and first molar M1 were extracted from six dogs. After 2‐month healing, implant sites were randomly prepared using either of the drilling techniques. Forty eight implants of 3.75 mm diameter and 10 mm length were inserted. The dogs were euthanized at 30 and 90 days, and crestal bone loss (CBL) and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) were evaluated.
Results
The control group showed maximum temperatures of 35.3°C ± 1.8°C, ΔT of 10.4°C, and a mean time of 100 s/procedure; meanwhile, the test group showed maximum temperatures of 36.7°C ± 1.2°C, ΔT of 8.1°C, and a mean time of 240 s/procedure. After 30 days, CBL values for both groups (test: 1.168 ± 0.194 mm; control: 1.181 ± 0.113 mm) and BIC values (test: 43 ± 2.8%; control: 45 ± 1.3%) were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). After 90 days, CBL (test: 1.173 ± 0.187 mm; control: 1.205 ± 0.122 mm) and BIC (test: 64 ± 3.3%; control: 64 ± 2.4%) values were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). The BIC values were increased at 90 days in both groups compared with the 30‐day period (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, the new hybrid protocol for the preparation of the implant bed without irrigation, increase the temperature similarly to the incremental conventional protocol, and requires twice the time for the completion of the drilling procedure in vitro. Crestal bone loss and bone‐to‐implant contact in the hybrid drilling protocol are comparable with the conventional drilling protocol and do not affect the osseointegration process in vivo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.12341</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24502654</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alveolar Process - surgery ; animal studies ; Animals ; Bicuspid ; biologic drilling ; Bone healing ; Bone loss ; bone-to-implant contact ; crestal bone loss ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dental Implants ; Dentistry ; Dogs ; Drilling ; Healing ; histomorphometry ; Implants, Experimental ; In vivo methods and tests ; incremental drilling ; Mandible - surgery ; Osseointegration ; Osseointegration - physiology ; Osteotomy - methods ; Premolars ; Ribs - surgery ; Swine ; Temperature ; Temperature requirements ; Thermocouples ; Transplants & implants ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2015-07, Vol.26 (7), p.753-760</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-a4241b5673e4225f9a2229701785404c25f3f52d60fd28999d79b64d85691e913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-a4241b5673e4225f9a2229701785404c25f3f52d60fd28999d79b64d85691e913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.12341$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.12341$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24502654$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Peña, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maté-Sánchez, Jose E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mareque Bueno, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanos, Georgios E.</creatorcontrib><title>Novel hybrid drilling protocol: evaluation for the implant healing - thermal changes, crestal bone loss, and bone-to-implant contact</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate a new hybrid drilling protocol, by the analysis of thermal changes in vitro, and their effects in the crestal bone loss and bone‐to‐implant contact in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Temperature changes during simulated osteotomies with a hybrid drilling technique (biologic plus simplified) (test) versus an incremental drilling technique (control) were investigated. One hundred and twenty random osteotomies were performed (60 by group) in pig ribs up to 3.75‐mm‐diameter drill to a depth of 10 mm. Thermal changes and time were recorded by paired thermocouples. In a parallel experiment, bilateral mandibular premolars P2, P3, P4, and first molar M1 were extracted from six dogs. After 2‐month healing, implant sites were randomly prepared using either of the drilling techniques. Forty eight implants of 3.75 mm diameter and 10 mm length were inserted. The dogs were euthanized at 30 and 90 days, and crestal bone loss (CBL) and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) were evaluated.
Results
The control group showed maximum temperatures of 35.3°C ± 1.8°C, ΔT of 10.4°C, and a mean time of 100 s/procedure; meanwhile, the test group showed maximum temperatures of 36.7°C ± 1.2°C, ΔT of 8.1°C, and a mean time of 240 s/procedure. After 30 days, CBL values for both groups (test: 1.168 ± 0.194 mm; control: 1.181 ± 0.113 mm) and BIC values (test: 43 ± 2.8%; control: 45 ± 1.3%) were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). After 90 days, CBL (test: 1.173 ± 0.187 mm; control: 1.205 ± 0.122 mm) and BIC (test: 64 ± 3.3%; control: 64 ± 2.4%) values were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). The BIC values were increased at 90 days in both groups compared with the 30‐day period (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, the new hybrid protocol for the preparation of the implant bed without irrigation, increase the temperature similarly to the incremental conventional protocol, and requires twice the time for the completion of the drilling procedure in vitro. Crestal bone loss and bone‐to‐implant contact in the hybrid drilling protocol are comparable with the conventional drilling protocol and do not affect the osseointegration process in vivo.</description><subject>Alveolar Process - surgery</subject><subject>animal studies</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bicuspid</subject><subject>biologic drilling</subject><subject>Bone healing</subject><subject>Bone loss</subject><subject>bone-to-implant contact</subject><subject>crestal bone loss</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Healing</subject><subject>histomorphometry</subject><subject>Implants, Experimental</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>incremental drilling</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Osseointegration - physiology</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Premolars</subject><subject>Ribs - surgery</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature requirements</subject><subject>Thermocouples</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9vFCEYxonR2LV68AsYEi-aSAsMfwZvZqOrcVOj0XgkDMN0qcywAlPdux9cutvtwUQuhCe_98nz8gDwlOAzUs-5DemM0IaRe2BBBMYIc0zugwVWmCNJBDkBj3K-whgL1aqH4IQyjqngbAH-XMRrF-Bm1yXfwz75EPx0CbcplmhjeA3dtQmzKT5OcIgJlo2DftwGMxW4cWYPoxs1jSZAuzHTpcuvoE0ulyp0cXIwxFwlM_X7JyoRHR1snIqx5TF4MJiQ3ZPb-xR8e_f26_I9Wn9afVi-WSPbKEKQYZSRjgvZOEYpH5ShlCqJiWw5w8xWqRk47QUeetoqpXqpOsH6lgtFnCLNKXhx8K3r_ZxrQj36bF2oWVycsyailYIRIXFFn_-DXsU5TTWdbjDnrVQN4ZV6eaBsqjsmN-ht8qNJO02wvqlG12r0vprKPrt1nLvR9XfksYsKnB-AXz643f-d9HL95WiJDhM-F_f7bsKkH7p-kuT6-8Wqxv28bunHlabNX2FPpac</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</creator><creator>Delgado-Peña, Jorge</creator><creator>Maté-Sánchez, Jose E.</creator><creator>Mareque Bueno, Javier</creator><creator>Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio</creator><creator>Romanos, Georgios E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Novel hybrid drilling protocol: evaluation for the implant healing - thermal changes, crestal bone loss, and bone-to-implant contact</title><author>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis ; Delgado-Peña, Jorge ; Maté-Sánchez, Jose E. ; Mareque Bueno, Javier ; Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio ; Romanos, Georgios E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3911-a4241b5673e4225f9a2229701785404c25f3f52d60fd28999d79b64d85691e913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alveolar Process - surgery</topic><topic>animal studies</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bicuspid</topic><topic>biologic drilling</topic><topic>Bone healing</topic><topic>Bone loss</topic><topic>bone-to-implant contact</topic><topic>crestal bone loss</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Healing</topic><topic>histomorphometry</topic><topic>Implants, Experimental</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>incremental drilling</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Osseointegration - physiology</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Premolars</topic><topic>Ribs - surgery</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature requirements</topic><topic>Thermocouples</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Peña, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maté-Sánchez, Jose E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mareque Bueno, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanos, Georgios E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calvo-Guirado, José Luis</au><au>Delgado-Peña, Jorge</au><au>Maté-Sánchez, Jose E.</au><au>Mareque Bueno, Javier</au><au>Delgado-Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio</au><au>Romanos, Georgios E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel hybrid drilling protocol: evaluation for the implant healing - thermal changes, crestal bone loss, and bone-to-implant contact</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>753</spage><epage>760</epage><pages>753-760</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate a new hybrid drilling protocol, by the analysis of thermal changes in vitro, and their effects in the crestal bone loss and bone‐to‐implant contact in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Temperature changes during simulated osteotomies with a hybrid drilling technique (biologic plus simplified) (test) versus an incremental drilling technique (control) were investigated. One hundred and twenty random osteotomies were performed (60 by group) in pig ribs up to 3.75‐mm‐diameter drill to a depth of 10 mm. Thermal changes and time were recorded by paired thermocouples. In a parallel experiment, bilateral mandibular premolars P2, P3, P4, and first molar M1 were extracted from six dogs. After 2‐month healing, implant sites were randomly prepared using either of the drilling techniques. Forty eight implants of 3.75 mm diameter and 10 mm length were inserted. The dogs were euthanized at 30 and 90 days, and crestal bone loss (CBL) and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) were evaluated.
Results
The control group showed maximum temperatures of 35.3°C ± 1.8°C, ΔT of 10.4°C, and a mean time of 100 s/procedure; meanwhile, the test group showed maximum temperatures of 36.7°C ± 1.2°C, ΔT of 8.1°C, and a mean time of 240 s/procedure. After 30 days, CBL values for both groups (test: 1.168 ± 0.194 mm; control: 1.181 ± 0.113 mm) and BIC values (test: 43 ± 2.8%; control: 45 ± 1.3%) were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). After 90 days, CBL (test: 1.173 ± 0.187 mm; control: 1.205 ± 0.122 mm) and BIC (test: 64 ± 3.3%; control: 64 ± 2.4%) values were similar, without significant differences (P > 0.05). The BIC values were increased at 90 days in both groups compared with the 30‐day period (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Within the limitations of this study, the new hybrid protocol for the preparation of the implant bed without irrigation, increase the temperature similarly to the incremental conventional protocol, and requires twice the time for the completion of the drilling procedure in vitro. Crestal bone loss and bone‐to‐implant contact in the hybrid drilling protocol are comparable with the conventional drilling protocol and do not affect the osseointegration process in vivo.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24502654</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.12341</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2015-07, Vol.26 (7), p.753-760 |
issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1687641670 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Alveolar Process - surgery animal studies Animals Bicuspid biologic drilling Bone healing Bone loss bone-to-implant contact crestal bone loss Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods Dental Implants Dentistry Dogs Drilling Healing histomorphometry Implants, Experimental In vivo methods and tests incremental drilling Mandible - surgery Osseointegration Osseointegration - physiology Osteotomy - methods Premolars Ribs - surgery Swine Temperature Temperature requirements Thermocouples Transplants & implants Wound Healing - physiology |
title | Novel hybrid drilling protocol: evaluation for the implant healing - thermal changes, crestal bone loss, and bone-to-implant contact |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A28%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20hybrid%20drilling%20protocol:%20evaluation%20for%20the%20implant%20healing%20-%20thermal%20changes,%20crestal%20bone%20loss,%20and%20bone-to-implant%20contact&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Calvo-Guirado,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Luis&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=753&rft.epage=760&rft.pages=753-760&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.12341&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1687641670%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055879315&rft_id=info:pmid/24502654&rfr_iscdi=true |